SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + AMD Radeon 890M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

90 Score

Top 10% Ranking

90 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 10% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13980HX

50,398 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 890M

9,210 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# The i9-13980HX and Radeon 890M: A Study in Asymmetry

This pairing combines Intel's top-tier 13th Gen mobile processor with AMD's latest integrated graphics, creating a system where the CPU is a class leader while the GPU sits near the middle of the pack. The Core i9-13980HX posts an average benchmark score of 50,398, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the Radeon 890M manages an average score of 9,210, landing in the 45th percentile of all GPUs. This is a laptop configuration built around compute muscle first, with graphics as a secondary consideration. The data shows a clear hierarchy: the processor can handle virtually any workload thrown at it, while the integrated GPU is best suited for lighter tasks and older or less demanding titles.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. The chip itself, codenamed Strix Point, contains 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 145.9M per mm². The GPU operates with a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, with memory bandwidth classified as "System Dependent" since it shares system memory. The memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," meaning performance will vary based on the laptop's RAM configuration.

The 890M packs 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. It includes 16 ray tracing cores, though the absence of dedicated tensor cores means AI acceleration relies on standard compute paths. The pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 185.6 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 5.939 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. Power draw is rated at 15 W TDP, and the slot width is listed as IGP with no power connectors required.

Benchmark results for the 890M show a mixed picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 590. Geekbench OpenCL yields 37,254, while Geekbench Vulkan reaches 40,808. Passmark results are more granular: DirectX 9 scores 97, DirectX 10 scores 33, DirectX 11 scores 73, and DirectX 12 scores 37. The G2D score is 979, while G3D reaches 8,076. GPU compute scores 4,157. The GPU's average benchmark score of 9,210 places it at the 45th percentile of all GPUs, meaning it sits almost exactly in the middle of the performance distribution.

When compared to its nearest rivals, the 890M is remarkably close to older discrete and integrated solutions. It trails the AMD Radeon Vega 8 by 0.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 by 0.7%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 by 0.9%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M by 1%. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the 890M performs at a level comparable to a mid-range GPU from roughly a decade ago. For rendering workloads, the 16 ray tracing cores are present but modest; the absence of tensor cores means no dedicated AI acceleration, and the 5.939 TFLOPS FP32 figure suggests moderate compute capability. The DirectX 12 score of 37 in Passmark is notably low, suggesting that modern API-heavy workloads may struggle.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The 890M's 45th percentile GPU ranking and its near-parity with the GTX 960 and GTX 850M indicate that high-refresh gaming is not realistic for demanding titles. The GPU's single-digit DirectX 12 Passmark score of 37 further confirms that modern APIs will be a bottleneck. Expect playable framerates only in esports or older games at lower settings, and even then, high refresh rates are unlikely given the GPU's mid-pack standing.

Streaming: The CPU is the star here. The i9-13980HX's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Passmark multithread score of 46,409 and data compression score of 588,306, provide ample headroom for encoding, overlays, and chat applications simultaneously. The 55 W TDP is modest for a chip with this much compute, making sustained streaming sessions feasible. However, the GPU's limited encode capabilities may offload more work to the CPU, which is well-equipped to handle it.

Video editing: The i9-13980HX delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30,273 and a single-core score of 2,110, indicating strong performance for both timeline scrubbing and export rendering. The 890M's 8,076 G3D score provides basic acceleration for effects and previews, but the GPU will not accelerate heavy 4K or 8K workflows. The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 166,455 and floating-point math score of 118,645 suggest that software-based encoding and effect processing will be the primary path, and the CPU is well-suited for that role.

3D rendering: Cinebench R20 multicore at 16,187 and R15 multicore at 4,717 show a CPU that can chew through rendering tasks. The Passmark extended instructions score of 33,868 indicates solid SIMD performance for render engines that leverage AVX. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the 890M's 5.939 TFLOPS and 4,157 GPU compute score are underwhelming; expect CPU-based rendering to be substantially faster than GPU-based paths for most applications.

Software development: The i9-13980HX's 90th percentile CPU ranking and 50,398 average score make it a high-end choice for compilation. The Passmark data encryption score of 35,332 and random string sorting score of 66,125 are relevant for build tools, hashing, and data processing. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 further aid in reducing compile times for large codebases.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for most student workloads, but the 890M's 979 G2D score ensures responsive 2D desktop rendering and office applications. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,145 in 3DMark and 4,252 in Passmark means everyday tasks are handled instantly. The 45th percentile GPU is sufficient for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, though the laptop's overall cost is likely far higher than needed for these tasks.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13980HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX codename, and built on Intel's 10 nm process. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen series and is manufactured by Intel with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.20 GHz, boosting up to 5.60 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. The chip uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU-only lanes. Integrated graphics are handled by UHD Graphics 770. The TDP is rated at 55 W, and the launch MSRP was $668.

Benchmark scores paint a picture of a dominant mobile CPU. In 3DMark tests, the chip scores 1,145 in single-thread, 2,207 in 2-thread, 4,177 in 4-thread, 7,290 in 8-thread, 9,440 in 16-thread, and 12,601 in max-thread tests. Cinebench results are equally strong: R15 multicore at 4,717 and single-core at 304.5, R20 multicore at 16,187 and single-core at 2,285, and R23 multicore at 30,273 and single-core at 2,110. Passmark results include a multithread score of 46,409, single-thread of 4,252, physics at 2,575, data compression at 588,306, data encryption at 35,332, extended instructions at 33,868, find prime numbers at 191, floating-point math at 118,645, integer math at 166,455, and random string sorting at 66,125.

The CPU's 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 50,398, places it in the upper echelon of processors. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 with an average score of 50,448 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT at 50,718 (0.6% higher), the Intel Core i7-13850HX at 50,761 (0.7% higher), and the Intel Core 9 273PE at 49,845 (1.1% lower). These deltas are all within about one percent, indicating that the i9-13980HX trades blows with the best available alternatives. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 30,273 is particularly telling — it shows sustained multi-threaded performance that rivals many desktop processors. Real workloads benefit from the combination of high single-thread performance (2,110 in R23 single-core) for responsive interactive tasks and massive multi-thread throughput for rendering, compilation, and scientific computing.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This configuration targets users who need extreme CPU performance but can accept modest graphics. Gamers at 1080p will find the 890M's 45th percentile GPU ranking limiting; the near-parity with the GTX 960 suggests that only older or low-demand titles will run smoothly at that resolution, and even then, settings will need to be reduced. Content creators working with video or 3D will benefit from the i9-13980HX's 30,273 Cinebench R23 multicore score, which accelerates rendering and export times, but they must rely on CPU-based workflows rather than GPU acceleration, given the 890M's 4,157 GPU compute score. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 166,455 integer math score and 36 MB of L3 cache, which speed up build processes. Students in engineering or computer science programs may find the CPU overkill, but the 890M's 979 G2D score ensures smooth document and browser use. Small business workstations handling data analysis, virtualization, or heavy spreadsheet work will benefit from the CPU's 46,409 Passmark multithread score and 588,306 data compression score, though the GPU adds little for such tasks beyond basic display output.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 50,398, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This is a standout result, with nearest rivals all within 1.1%: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50,448 (-0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50,718 (-0.6%), the Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50,761 (-0.7%), and the Intel Core 9 273PE scores 49,845 (+1.1%). The GPU's average benchmark score is 9,210, placing it in the 45th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Vega 8 at 9,221 (-0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 at 9,273 (-0.7%), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 at 9,294 (-0.9%), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M at 9,302 (-1%). The combined percentile for this pair is 68, reflecting the dominant CPU dragging the overall figure up despite the mid-pack GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 590 for the GPU is modest, while the CPU's max-thread 3DMark score of 12,601 shows a stark contrast in compute capability. Together, the data indicates a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but will be GPU-limited in any graphically demanding scenario.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of Intel Core i9-13980HX and AMD Radeon 890M. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than actual game testing. The GPU's average benchmark score of 9,210 and its position at the 45th percentile of all GPUs suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, this system will not deliver high frame rates in modern titles. The near-parity with the GTX 960 (0.7% lower score) and GTX 850M (1% lower score) implies performance comparable to those older discrete GPUs. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, the CPU's 4,252 Passmark single-thread score and the GPU's 8,076 G3D score might allow 60+ FPS at 1080p with reduced settings. For AAA games released in the last few years, the DirectX 12 Passmark score of 37 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 590 indicate that ultra settings will likely produce framerates below 30 FPS. At 1440p or 4K, the 890M will be severely constrained, and the 32 ROPS and 185.6 GTexel/s texture rate are insufficient for high-resolution textures and effects. The CPU will not be a limiting factor in gaming — its 90th percentile standing ensures it can feed frames quickly — but the GPU's 45th percentile ranking will cap performance. Users should expect to play at 720p or 1080p with low-to-medium settings for acceptable frame rates in most modern games.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The CPU and GPU are drastically mismatched in performance. The i9-13980HX sits at the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the 890M sits at the 45th percentile of all GPUs. In gaming, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The 890M's average benchmark score of 9,210 is roughly one-fifth of the CPU's 50,398 average score, and the GPU's DirectX 12 Passmark score of 37 versus the CPU's max-thread 3DMark score of 12,601 illustrates the gap. FPS scaling in games will be limited entirely by the GPU; the CPU has ample headroom to process game logic, physics, and draw calls, but the GPU's 5.939 TFLOPS and 32 ROPS will constrain frame rates. In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or data compilation, the GPU is barely involved, and the CPU's 30,273 Cinebench R23 multicore score shines. The 890M's 15 W TDP and system-shared memory further compound the imbalance, as the GPU competes with the CPU for memory bandwidth. For productivity tasks that leverage the CPU's 46,409 Passmark multithread score, the system is well-balanced. For any GPU-accelerated task, the 890M's 45th percentile ranking will be the limiting factor, reducing overall system performance to roughly that of a mid-range laptop from several generations ago.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-13980HX is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 50,398.

Q: How does the Radeon 890M compare to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960?

A: The 890M has an average benchmark score of 9,210, which is 0.7% lower than the GTX 960's 9,273, placing them at nearly identical performance levels.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The Radeon 890M uses system-shared memory, with the size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared," and bandwidth classified as "System Dependent."

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and the CPU has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The i9-13980HX scores 30,273 in Cinebench R23 multicore, with a single-core score of 2,110.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 68, reflecting the CPU's high standing and the GPU's mid-pack position.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this system in games?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13980HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a laptop-specific mount, meaning the CPU is soldered and cannot be upgraded. The GPU is an integrated part of the AMD Strix Point chip, so it also cannot be upgraded. The system supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available, allowing for a potential memory upgrade to improve system-shared GPU bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, so there is headroom for high-speed NVMe storage. The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and the GPU's TDP is 15 W, totaling 70 W for the core components; the suggested PSU is not listed, so power supply headroom cannot be quantified. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system RAM capacity and speed, as the GPU's performance is "System Dependent" on memory bandwidth. However, since both the CPU and GPU are fixed, the only meaningful hardware changes are memory and storage. Users seeking better gaming performance would need to consider an entirely different laptop with a discrete GPU, as this configuration's 45th percentile GPU ranking will remain the limiting factor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + AMD Radeon 890M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13980HX

AMD Radeon 890M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds