SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13980HX

50,398 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13980HX + AMD Radeon 860M — Benchmark Database Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's top-tier 13th Gen mobile processor with AMD's latest integrated graphics solution, creating a laptop configuration that prioritizes CPU throughput while relying on an IGP for visual output. The Intel Core i9-13980HX sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD Radeon 860M reaches the 72nd percentile among GPUs, placing the combined system at the 81st percentile overall. The data indicates a CPU-dominant build where multi-threaded compute tasks will vastly outperform graphics-intensive workloads.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13980HX is a Raptor Lake-HX architecture processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, featuring a substantial 24 cores and 32 threads. This hybrid configuration pairs performance and efficiency cores to balance throughput with power consumption, operating at a base clock of 2.20 GHz and boosting up to 5.60 GHz. The die size measures 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a 36 MB shared L3 pool. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, includes ECC memory support, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark data reveals exceptional scaling from low to high thread counts. The 3DMark suite shows a single-thread score of 1145, doubling to 2207 at 2 threads, then jumping to 4177 at 4 threads and 7290 at 8 threads. The 16-thread result reaches 9440, and the max-thread score hits 12601, demonstrating strong multi-core efficiency. Cinebench results reinforce this pattern: R15 multicore scores 4717, R20 multicore reaches 16187, and R23 multicore climbs to 30273. Single-core Cinebench scores of 304.5 (R15), 2285 (R20), and 2110 (R23) indicate competitive per-thread performance for a mobile flagship.

The PassMark suite provides broader workload insights. Multithread performance scores 46409, while single-thread reaches 4252. Integer math completes at 166455, floating-point math at 118645, and extended instructions at 33868. Data compression scores 588306, data encryption 35332, and random string sorting 66125. Physics processing achieves 2575, and prime number finding scores 191.

The closest CPU rival is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 with an average score of 50448, representing a delta of -0.1% — essentially a statistical tie. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT scores 50718 (-0.6%), the Intel Core i7-13850HX scores 50761 (-0.7%), and the Intel Core 9 273PE scores 49845 (+1.1%). The i9-13980HX's average benchmark score of 50398 places it within 1% of all four nearest rivals, indicating that at this performance tier, differences are negligible. For real workloads, this means the chip delivers top-tier compile times, rendering throughput, and scientific computing capability, though users will not notice meaningful differences versus the competition.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 50398 places it in the 90th percentile of all processors, a position that reflects flagship-tier compute capability. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26401 places it in the 72nd percentile of all graphics cards, a mid-to-upper range result for integrated graphics. The combined system percentile of 81 indicates that the CPU is the primary performance driver, with the GPU contributing less to overall standing.

Geekbench results for the AMD Radeon 860M show an OpenCL score of 22759 and a Vulkan score of 30043. The Vulkan result being roughly 32% higher than OpenCL suggests the architecture responds well to modern, low-overhead graphics APIs. GPU nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 at 26421 (-0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 at 26331 (+0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary at 26553 (-0.6%), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 at 26683 (-1.1%). The 860M's average of 26401 sits within 1.1% of all these competitors, showing that despite being an IGP, it trades blows with entry-level discrete GPUs and even some older high-end cards.

The combined picture shows a system that computes at a 90th-percentile CPU level but renders at a 72nd-percentile GPU level. For productivity applications that rely on CPU throughput — compilation, data processing, spreadsheet manipulation, or scientific calculations — this build will feel exceptionally fast. For graphics work, the experience will match a modest discrete GPU from several generations ago. The data suggests the i9-13980HX can feed the Radeon 860M far more data than the IGP can process, creating a fundamental imbalance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 90th percentile versus the GPU's 72nd percentile creates a clear bottleneck scenario. The Radeon 860M, with its 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, cannot keep pace with the i9-13980HX's 32 threads. In any graphics-bound workload, the GPU will be the limiting factor. Benchmark results indicate the CPU can produce frames, physics calculations, or geometry data much faster than the GPU can rasterize or compute.

The GPU's pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s, combined with FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS, define its ceiling. The CPU, by contrast, can execute 46409 PassMark multithread operations and 166455 integer math operations. In gaming scenarios, frame generation will be constrained by the GPU's throughput, not the CPU's ability to feed it. In productivity scenarios, the CPU will dominate, with the GPU playing a minimal role.

FPS scaling evidence from the benchmark data is indirect but clear: the CPU's 3DMark max-thread score of 12601 versus the GPU's Vulkan score of 30043 suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU can maintain high frame pacing, but at higher resolutions where GPU load increases, the 860M will become the limiting factor. The combinedPercentile of 81, sitting between the CPU's 90 and GPU's 72, reflects this imbalance — the system is only as strong as its weakest link in graphics tasks, while in CPU tasks it performs near the top of the database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13980HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile package, meaning the CPU is soldered and not user-upgradable. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and peripherals. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 serves as a fallback display adapter, though the system will typically use the Radeon 860M for graphics output.

The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 15 W and draws power through the system rather than dedicated power connectors. The GPU's suggested PSU is null, indicating that no separate power supply recommendation is needed for this IGP. The Radeon 860M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which provides adequate bandwidth for an integrated solution. The GPU's memory is system-shared, with bandwidth dependent on the installed system memory configuration.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would focus on memory capacity and speed, since the GPU's performance scales with system memory bandwidth. Given the CPU's 90th percentile standing, upgrading the GPU would require moving to a discrete solution, but the BGA socket and laptop form factor limit such options. The practical upgrade path is to maximize RAM capacity and ensure dual-channel operation to feed both the 32-thread CPU and the memory-dependent IGP. The platform's DDR5 support offers a meaningful bandwidth advantage over DDR4 for both CPU and GPU workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with the chip codenamed Krackan Point. This is an integrated graphics processor from the Navi III IGP generation, targeting mobile platforms. The GPU operates at a base clock of 600 MHz and boosts to 3000 MHz, a wide dynamic range that allows it to idle efficiently and ramp up for demanding tasks.

Memory is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM, no fixed bus width, and bandwidth dependent on the host system's memory configuration. The GPU integrates 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units. For ray tracing, it includes 8 RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The FP32 throughput is rated at 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no dedicated half-precision acceleration.

Rendering performance, as measured by Geekbench, shows the OpenCL score of 22759 and Vulkan score of 30043. The Vulkan advantage suggests the architecture benefits from explicit command submission and multi-threaded CPU work, which pairs well with the i9-13980HX's 32 threads. The pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s define the rasterization ceiling. For rendering workloads, this GPU will handle 1080p-class workloads at modest settings, but the 72nd percentile ranking indicates it sits below most discrete gaming GPUs. The RT cores provide basic ray tracing capability, but with only 8 of them, ray-traced scenes will see significant performance impact.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined system sits at the 81st percentile among all builds in the database, reflecting the CPU's 90th percentile and GPU's 72nd percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13980HX compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i9-13980HX has an average benchmark score of 50398, which is 0.1% below the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (50448) and 0.6% below the AMD Ryzen 9 5900XT (50718), making them statistically equivalent.

Q: What is the GPU's closest competitor?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M's average score of 26401 is 0.1% below the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26421) and 0.3% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (26331).

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 860M includes 8 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling ray-traced effects, though performance will be limited by the modest RT core count.

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-13980HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available.

Q: What is the GPU's power consumption?

A: The Radeon 860M has a TDP of 15 W and requires no power connectors, drawing all power through the system.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU scores 12601 in 3DMark max-threads, 30273 in Cinebench R23 multicore, and 46409 in PassMark multithread, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as projections rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking and its Vulkan score of 30043, this system should handle esports titles and older games at 1080p with medium to high settings. The CPU's exceptional single-thread score of 4252 in PassMark and 1145 in 3DMark single-thread will prevent CPU-bound frame drops in most scenarios. However, the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 16 ROPs will limit performance in graphically intensive modern titles. At 1080p, users can expect playable frame rates in competitive shooters and lighter titles, while at 1440p or 4K, the system will struggle to maintain smooth gameplay in demanding games. The 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but enabling ray tracing will significantly reduce frame rates. The GPU's memory being system-shared means performance will vary based on the laptop's RAM configuration, with faster dual-channel memory improving results.

Build Overview

This pairing represents a laptop-class configuration where a flagship 13th Gen Intel processor is matched with AMD's current integrated graphics solution. The buildClass is laptop, confirming this is a mobile platform rather than a desktop setup. The Intel Core i9-13980HX provides 24 cores, 32 threads, and a 5.60 GHz boost clock, making it one of the most powerful mobile CPUs available, sitting at the 90th percentile of all processors. The AMD Radeon 860M, based on RDNA 3.5, delivers integrated graphics performance at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, a strong result for an IGP but far below discrete gaming graphics cards.

The combinedPercentile of 81 places this system in the upper tier of all builds, though the performance profile is heavily skewed toward CPU workloads. This is not a gaming laptop in the traditional sense; it is a mobile workstation or productivity laptop with competent graphics capability. The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 15 W TDP suggest a system that balances performance with portability. The overall tier is high-end for productivity and compute, mid-range for gaming, and entry-level for GPU-accelerated rendering.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need maximum CPU performance in a mobile form factor. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 32 threads and 30273 Cinebench R23 multicore score. Data scientists running numerical simulations will leverage the 166455 PassMark integer math score. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU capable of handling complex computations, while the GPU handles everyday display tasks and light graphics work.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will see strong CPU performance for encoding and physics simulation, though GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the 860M's 3.072 TFLOPS throughput. Small business users running virtual machines, database queries, or heavy spreadsheet analysis will appreciate the 588306 data compression score and 35332 data encryption score. Gamers at 1080p with modest settings will find the system acceptable for less demanding titles, but those seeking high-refresh or high-resolution gaming should look elsewhere. The system is best suited for professionals and power users who prioritize compute over graphics.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance of 1145 in 3DMark single-thread will maintain high frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking and 16 ROPs will cap frame rates well below high-refresh territory in most modern titles. Esports games at 1080p with competitive settings are the realistic ceiling here.

Streaming: The 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, but the GPU's modest performance means the system will struggle to run demanding games at high quality while streaming. CPU-based encoding using the i9-13980HX's strong 35332 data encryption score and 46409 multithread score is viable.

Video editing: The CPU's 30273 Cinebench R23 multicore score handles timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export encoding efficiently. The GPU's 22759 OpenCL score accelerates basic effects and previews, but complex GPU-accelerated effects will lag behind discrete GPU systems.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers will perform exceptionally well thanks to the 90th-percentile CPU. GPU-based renderers will be limited by the 860M's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance, making it suitable for low-poly or preview renders only.

Software development: The 32 threads and high single-thread score of 4252 in PassMark make compilation, testing, and local server operations fast and responsive. The 166455 integer math score accelerates build tools and static analysis.

Student and office work: The system handles document processing, spreadsheet analysis, and web-based applications with ease. The 588306 data compression score speeds file archiving, and the 118645 floating-point math score accelerates scientific computing assignments. The 15 W GPU TDP contributes to efficient battery operation for portable use.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13980HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13980HX

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds