SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop pairing that leans heavily on CPU muscle, pairing Intel’s top-tier mobile HX processor with a professional-grade Turing GPU. The data shows a system built for compute-heavy tasks rather than raw gaming frame rates, and the performance profile reflects that split clearly.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance here is distinctly CPU-forward. The Intel Core i9-13950HX sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile lands at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. That is a massive gap, and it means the processor will frequently be waiting on the graphics solution in graphics-bound workloads. The combined percentile for the pair is 69, which is pulled down by the GPU’s middling position.

Benchmark scaling on the CPU side tells the story of a chip that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores climb from 1,102 in single-thread to 8,903 at 16 threads, then to 11,926 at max threads. That is a roughly 10.8x improvement from single-thread to max-thread, which is strong scaling for a 24-core part. The Cinebench R23 results reinforce this: 2,096 single-core versus 28,681 multi-core, a 13.7x multiplier. This is a processor that wants many threads and rewards workloads that can use them.

The GPU, by contrast, has no benchmark scores in the data pack. Its 50th percentile placement is the only quantitative anchor, and it suggests a mid-pack mobile GPU. The FP32 throughput is listed at 9.400 TFLOPS, which is respectable for a Turing-generation part, but the architecture is dated. The GPU was released in 2019 and is now end-of-life, so its driver optimization and feature set are frozen in time.

For gaming, the bottleneck will almost always be the GPU. The CPU’s single-thread score of 2,096 in Cinebench R23 is more than sufficient to feed most games, but the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile’s mid-pack position means it will cap frame rates well before the CPU does. For productivity, the balance flips: the CPU’s 28,681 multi-core score will dominate rendering and compilation, while the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM provides memory headroom that the GPU’s compute throughput cannot fully exploit.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44,342, placing it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44,309 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i5-13600 scores 44,240 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44,466 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44,573 (0.5% higher). This puts the i9-13950HX in a dead heat with several strong desktop and mobile parts, which is remarkable for a 55W mobile processor.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data, so its performance must be inferred from its 50th percentile position and its specifications. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is generous for a laptop GPU. The 3072 shading units and 48 RT cores are Turing-era counts, and the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 figure is modest by modern standards.

The combined picture is a system that excels at CPU-bound tasks but is held back by the GPU in graphics-heavy scenarios. The CPU’s 88th percentile means it competes with desktop-class processors, while the GPU’s 50th percentile places it in the middle of the laptop GPU pack. For a workstation laptop, this makes sense: the CPU does the heavy lifting for rendering and simulation, while the GPU handles professional visualization and CUDA-accelerated tasks with its 384 tensor cores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX codename. It uses Intel’s 10 nm process and has a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, and it is multiplier-unlocked, allowing for overclocking in supported laptops. The TDP is listed at 55W, which is low for a 24-core part but typical for the HX mobile series.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool helps with multi-threaded workloads that share data. The memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported — a key feature for workstation reliability. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is ahead of many desktop platforms of the same era.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that is exceptionally strong in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,681 is the standout number, placing it in desktop-tier territory. The R20 multi-core score of 14,462 and R15 multi-core score of 4,529 follow the same pattern. Single-thread scores are also solid: 2,096 in R23 and 2,041 in R20, which are competitive with desktop parts from the same generation.

The PassMark results show specialized strengths. Integer math scores 147,091, floating-point math scores 105,553, and extended instructions score 29,779. Data compression scores 510,258, which is exceptionally high and suggests strong AVX-512 or similar vector performance. Data encryption scores 30,805, and random string sorting scores 57,274. These numbers indicate a processor that is well-suited to scientific computing, financial modeling, and other integer-heavy workloads.

The 3DMark thread scaling is particularly telling. The jump from 8 threads (6,732) to 16 threads (8,903) shows good scaling, but the leap to max threads (11,926) is where the 24-core design shines. This is not a chip that tops out early; it keeps adding performance as more threads are utilized.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is for users who need CPU horsepower above all else and require professional GPU features rather than gaming performance. The 88th percentile CPU ranking makes it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, researchers running simulations, and content creators rendering 3D scenes. The 32 threads will chew through parallel workloads, and the 36 MB of L3 cache helps with data-heavy tasks.

The GPU’s 50th percentile and 16 GB of VRAM make it a fit for professionals who need to load large datasets into GPU memory for visualization or machine learning inference. The 384 tensor cores are Turing-generation, so they support older CUDA and TensorRT workflows. The 48 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, though the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits ray-traced performance.

Students in engineering or computer science programs would benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities for compilation and simulation, though the GPU is not ideal for modern gaming. Small business workstations that run CAD, financial analysis, or database workloads would find the CPU’s integer math score of 147,091 and data compression score of 510,258 valuable. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for mission-critical applications.

The 55W CPU TDP and 110W GPU TDP mean this is a power-hungry laptop, so it is not suited for users who prioritize battery life. It is a desktop replacement for professionals who need portable compute power.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 2,096 in Cinebench R23 is more than enough for high-refresh gaming, but the GPU’s 50th percentile position will limit frame rates. Expect 1080p gaming to be playable at medium settings, but 1440p and 4K will struggle. The 16 GB of VRAM helps with texture-heavy titles, but the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput caps overall performance.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming. The 3DMark max-thread score of 11,926 indicates strong parallel performance, so streaming overhead will be minimal. The GPU’s NVENC encoder is Turing-generation, which supports H.264 and HEVC encoding, but the lack of AV1 support is a limitation for modern streaming workflows.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core scores shine here. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,681 will handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export efficiently. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is beneficial for effects-heavy timelines, though the 50th percentile GPU position means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on newer parts.

3D rendering: This is where the CPU dominates. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 14,462 and R15 score of 4,529 are strong for CPU-based rendering engines like V-Ray or Blender’s Cycles. The GPU can assist with CUDA-accelerated rendering, but its 9.400 TFLOPS is modest compared to modern workstation GPUs.

Software development: The PassMark integer math score of 147,091 and data compression score of 510,258 are excellent for code compilation and database operations. The 32 threads will parallelize build processes effectively, and the 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for large projects.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,899 in PassMark single-thread is more than adequate for office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU is overkill for this use case, but the 16 GB of VRAM provides future-proofing for any GPU-accelerated applications. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data integrity in academic research.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as an approximation rather than a definitive result.

Based on the CPU’s 88th percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile, the estimated gaming performance is as follows. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is roughly half of what a modern mid-range laptop GPU offers, so expect frame rates in the 30-50 FPS range for AAA titles. Esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant may hit 60-90 FPS, but the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is not optimized for gaming drivers.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM help with high-resolution textures, but the compute throughput is insufficient for smooth frame rates. Expect 25-40 FPS in demanding titles, with lower settings required to maintain playability. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern games, even at medium settings.

The CPU will not be the bottleneck in any of these scenarios. The single-thread score of 2,096 in Cinebench R23 is sufficient to drive frame rates well above what the GPU can deliver. The 36 MB of L3 cache and high boost clock of 5.50 GHz ensure that the CPU can feed the GPU efficiently.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; it is fixed to the motherboard. The memory support covers DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, so users can upgrade RAM up to the motherboard’s capacity. ECC memory is supported, which is unusual for a consumer platform.

The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for NVMe storage and external GPU enclosures. The GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is a generation behind the CPU’s capability. This does not significantly impact gaming performance, but it could limit bandwidth for GPU-accelerated compute tasks.

The GPU has a TDP of 110W and is an IGP (integrated GPU) in terms of slot width, meaning it is soldered to the motherboard. The suggested PSU is listed as null, which is expected for a laptop where the power supply is proprietary. The CPU TDP is 55W, and combined with the GPU’s 110W, this system requires a substantial power brick.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing the RAM to the maximum supported capacity, particularly if the system ships with a smaller configuration. The DDR5 support allows for high-bandwidth memory, which complements the CPU’s 36 MB L3 cache. For storage, the Gen 5 PCIe lanes support the fastest NVMe drives available, so adding a Gen 5 SSD would maximize I/O performance.

The GPU is end-of-life, so there is no upgrade path for the graphics solution in this laptop. Users who need more GPU performance would need to consider an external GPU enclosure over the PCIe Gen 5 connection, though the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface on the GPU itself limits the benefit.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13950HX with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 55W TDP, and the GPU is a Turing-generation professional mobile solution with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 110W TDP. The combined percentile is 69, reflecting a system that is strong on the CPU side but average on the GPU side.

The CPU’s 88th percentile places it among the top mobile processors, competitive with desktop parts like the Intel Core i5-13600 and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D, both within 0.5% in average benchmark score. The GPU’s 50th percentile places it in the middle of the GPU pack, which is a significant mismatch for gaming but acceptable for professional workloads that rely more on VRAM capacity than raw compute.

This is a workstation-oriented laptop for users who prioritize CPU performance and need professional GPU features like ECC memory support and 16 GB of VRAM. It is not a gaming laptop, despite the high-end CPU. The data shows a system that will excel in rendering, compilation, and data processing, but will lag in graphics-intensive applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s benchmark percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Intel Core i9-13950HX is at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. This means it outperforms 88% of processors in the database, placing it in the top tier for multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44,342. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44,309 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i5-13600 scores 44,240 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44,466 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44,573 (0.5% higher).

Q: What is the GPU’s benchmark percentile?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. It has no benchmark scores in the data pack, so this percentile is based on its specifications and historical performance.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory. The memory support is listed as DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory explicitly supported.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and how does it affect performance?

A: The boost clock is 5.50 GHz, which is high for a mobile processor. This contributes to the single-thread score of 2,096 in Cinebench R23, which is competitive with desktop parts.

Q: Is this a good gaming laptop?

A: No. The GPU’s 50th percentile position and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will limit gaming performance. The CPU is more than capable, but the GPU will bottleneck in most games.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, achieved through 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. This is generous for a laptop GPU and helps with high-resolution textures.