SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

76%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13950HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

This pairing combines a 24-core Raptor Lake-HX flagship mobile processor with an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile GPU based on the Turing architecture. The CPU sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 44,342, while the GPU ranks in the 7th percentile with a score of 1,285 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The combined build percentile lands at 48, placing this laptop configuration squarely in the middle of the performance spectrum. The data shows a stark imbalance: a top-tier multi-core processor paired with a GPU that benchmarks near entry-level discrete graphics. This is not a gaming rig, nor is it a rendering workstation — it is a specialized mobile platform for specific professional workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is built on the TU106 chip using a 12 nm process at TSMC, with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 945 MHz and boosts to 1380 MHz. Memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed across a 192-bit bus, yielding 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 6 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is modest by modern standards, and the 192-bit bus width limits memory throughput for large datasets. The card has 1920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It includes 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, meaning it can accelerate ray-traced workloads and AI inference tasks, though its raw compute throughput is constrained by the older Turing architecture.

Pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s and texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 5.299 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 10.60 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. These numbers place the GPU far below current-generation mobile workstation parts. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,285 puts it in the 7th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (score 1,281, 0.3% slower), AMD Radeon R9 380 (score 1,293, 0.6% faster), NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 (score 1,267, 1.4% slower), and NVIDIA NVS 4200M (score 1,267, 1.4% slower). The data indicates this GPU performs at roughly the level of a decade-old entry-level desktop card, not a modern workstation GPU.

For rendering, the 30 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing, but the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput severely limits compute-heavy rendering tasks. The 6 GB VRAM will quickly fill with complex scenes, and the 336.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes a bottleneck for texture streaming. The 240 tensor cores can handle AI denoising and DLSS-style workloads, but their effectiveness is bounded by the overall GPU performance. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support means modern graphics features are available, but the hardware cannot deliver playable frame rates with those features enabled at high resolutions.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,285, sitting at the 7th percentile, indicates very low gaming throughput. Compared to the nearest rivals, the GPU performs within 1.4% of cards like the GT 610 and GT 520, which are not viable for modern gaming.

The CPU, by contrast, has strong single-thread performance with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,102 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,899. This would help maintain minimum frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will bottleneck almost all gaming workloads. At 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing would struggle to maintain 30 FPS in modern titles. Esports titles from several years ago might run acceptably at lower settings, but the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 88.32 GPixel/s pixel rate are simply too low for demanding games. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU would be overwhelmed, and the 6 GB VRAM could cause texture thrashing in memory-heavy games. The data suggests this is not a gaming laptop, and buyers should not expect playable frame rates in current AAA releases.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 48, placing it in the middle of all laptop configurations. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile while the GPU sits at the 7th percentile, creating a large performance gap.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i9-13950HX has an average benchmark score of 44,342. It is 0.1% faster than the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (score 44,309), 0.2% faster than the Intel Core i5-13600 (score 44,240), 0.3% slower than the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (score 44,466), and 0.5% slower than the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (score 44,573).

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile scores 1,285 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. It is 0.3% faster than the GeForce GT 610 (score 1,281), 0.6% slower than the Radeon R9 380 (score 1,293), 1.4% faster than the GeForce GT 520 (score 1,267), and 1.4% faster than the NVS 4200M (score 1,267).

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench?

A: The CPU scores 28,681 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 14,462 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 4,529 in Cinebench R15 multi-core. Single-core scores are 2,096 in R23, 2,041 in R20, and 297 in R15.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 336.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13950HX supports ECC memory. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the production status of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is marked as Active production status, released on 2023-01-03. The GPU is marked as End-of-life, released on 2019-05-26.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a severe imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 44,342 places it at the 88th percentile, while the GPU's score of 1,285 places it at the 7th percentile — a gap of 81 percentile points. In any workload that stresses both components, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 11,926 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,681 indicate exceptional multi-threaded throughput. The GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 88.32 GPixel/s pixel rate cannot keep pace.

The PassMark multi-thread score of 41,614 and data compression score of 510,258 show the CPU excels at CPU-bound tasks like compilation, data processing, and scientific computing. The GPU's nearest rivals, including the GT 610 and GT 520, are not modern gaming or rendering parts. In gaming, the GPU will bottleneck at any resolution above 720p with medium settings. In GPU-accelerated rendering, the 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit scene complexity. The CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU in most graphics workloads. Only CPU-only tasks like software encoding, code compilation, or database processing will fully utilize the processor's potential.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13950HX delivers an average benchmark score of 44,342 across all tests. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,681 and single-core score of 2,096 demonstrate strong performance. PassMark tests show 147,091 in integer math, 105,553 in floating point math, 41,614 in multi-thread, and 3,899 in single-thread. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 1,102 single-thread to 11,926 max-threads. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile of all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 at 44,309 (0.1% slower) and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44,466 (0.3% faster).

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile scores 1,285 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it at the 7th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 at 1,281 (0.3% slower) and the AMD Radeon R9 380 at 1,293 (0.6% faster). The combined build percentile is 48. The CPU's performance is competitive with modern desktop processors, while the GPU's performance is comparable to decade-old entry-level graphics cards. This creates a lopsided benchmark profile where the CPU carries nearly all the performance weight.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals who need extreme CPU throughput for multi-threaded workloads but do not require GPU acceleration. The 24-core, 32-thread processor with a 5.50 GHz boost clock excels at software development, code compilation, data analysis, and scientific computing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,681 and PassMark integer math score of 147,091 indicate strong performance for CPU-bound tasks. Developers working with large codebases, researchers running simulations, and analysts processing large datasets would benefit from the CPU performance.

The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and Turing architecture with 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores provide some acceleration for CUDA-based compute, but the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 limits heavy GPU workloads. Students in engineering or computer science fields might find the CPU power useful for coursework, but the GPU will not handle modern 3D modeling or video editing efficiently. Small business workstations that run database queries, financial models, or office software would see good CPU performance. However, anyone needing GPU rendering, video encoding, or modern gaming should look elsewhere. The 48th combined percentile reflects this split personality: a top-tier CPU held back by a bottom-tier GPU.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor from the Raptor Lake-HX family. It has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and boosts to 5.50 GHz. The 10 nm process from Intel produces a die size of 257 mm². Cache configuration includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB shared L3. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC support enabled. It uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket and is marked as an active production part with a launch MSRP of $590.

Benchmark scores show strong scaling across thread counts: 1,102 single-thread, 2,107 for 2 threads, 3,957 for 4 threads, 6,732 for 8 threads, 8,903 for 16 threads, and 11,926 for max threads. This indicates good multi-core efficiency. Cinebench R23 scores of 2,096 single-core and 28,681 multi-core place it among faster mobile processors. PassMark scores reinforce this: 3899 single-thread, 41,614 multi-thread, 510,258 data compression, 30,805 data encryption, 29,779 extended instructions, 147,091 integer math, and 105,553 floating point math. The 88th percentile ranking means it outperforms most CPUs in the database.

The architecture uses 24 cores with 32 threads, suggesting a mix of performance and efficiency cores typical of Raptor Lake design. The 36 MB shared L3 cache helps with multi-threaded workloads that share data. The 5.50 GHz boost clock is high for a mobile part and contributes to the strong single-thread performance. For real workloads, this CPU handles heavy compilation, video encoding (software), scientific simulation, and virtualization with ease. The PassMark physics score of 2,668 and find prime numbers score of 203 indicate solid computational throughput.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile platform — there is no socket upgrade path. The motherboard and CPU are integrated into the laptop chassis, so upgrading the CPU requires replacing the entire system. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with ECC capability. This allows for memory flexibility, though the laptop form factor limits user upgrades. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which supports modern NVMe SSDs and discrete GPUs.

The GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface and is an MXM module. This theoretically allows GPU replacement if the laptop has a user-accessible MXM slot, but the End-of-life production status and the age of the Turing architecture make finding a compatible upgrade difficult. The GPU has a TDP of 80 W and no power connectors, drawing power directly from the MXM slot. The CPU TDP is 55 W. The system's PSU requirements are not specified in the data, but the combined 135 W TDP for CPU and GPU suggests a moderate power supply for a laptop. A sensible next upgrade would be an entirely new system with a more balanced CPU-GPU pairing, as the current configuration's 7th percentile GPU cannot be meaningfully improved within this platform.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining an Intel Core i9-13950HX with an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile. The CPU is a 24-core Raptor Lake-HX part from the Core 13th Gen series, released in January 2023, with a 5.50 GHz boost clock and 36 MB L3 cache. The GPU is a Turing-architecture Quadro part from 2019, with 6 GB GDDR6 memory and a 192-bit bus. The combined percentile of 48 places this configuration in the middle of all laptop builds, but the distribution is heavily skewed: the CPU at the 88th percentile and the GPU at the 7th percentile.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 44,342 is competitive with desktop processors like the Intel Core i5-13600 (44,240, 0.2% slower) and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44,573, 0.5% faster). The GPU's score of 1,285 is within 1.4% of the GeForce GT 610 and GT 520, which are not modern parts. This pairing makes sense only for users who need extreme CPU compute power and can accept minimal GPU performance. It is not a gaming system, not a rendering workstation, and not a balanced productivity machine. It is a niche configuration for CPU-bound professional workloads where the GPU is secondary. The overall tier is "entry-level GPU with flagship CPU," and buyers should understand that the GPU will limit any graphics-intensive task.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13950HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds