SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13950HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a high-end mobile combination built for laptops, and the benchmark data places it in rare territory: a combined percentile of 85 across tracked CPU+GPU pairings, with the CPU sitting at the 88th percentile of all CPUs and the GPU at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. This is a flagship-class Raptor Lake-HX processor mated to an Ada Lovelace GPU, and the numbers show a machine aimed squarely at demanding gaming and heavy content creation workloads that normally sit on desktop desks. One important caveat up front: the FACT PACK for this exact pairing contains no measured FPS rows — dataIsMeasured is false — so every frame-rate figure in this analysis is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores rather than measured in-game results.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4080 Mobile is built on TSMC's 5 nm process and uses the AD104 chip, part of NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture. The silicon is dense: 35,800 million transistors packed into a 294 mm² die, which works out to a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². That density is what allows a mobile part to carry 7424 shading units, 232 texture mapping units, 80 render output units, 58 RT cores, and 232 tensor cores on a power budget the laptop chassis can actually sustain.

The memory subsystem is the first thing to scrutinize. You get 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus running at 2250 MHz — 18 Gbps effective — which produces 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For rendering and modern gaming at high resolutions, that capacity is comfortable: 12 GB is enough to hold large textures and scene data without spilling into system memory in most current titles at ultra settings. The 192-bit bus is narrower than full-fat flagship designs, so the bandwidth figure matters more than raw clock speed when scenes get texture-heavy, but 432.0 GB/s keeps the shader array fed in practice.

Clocks run from a 1290 MHz base to a 1665 MHz boost. Compute throughput lands at 24.72 TFLOPS FP32, with FP16 at the same 24.72 TFLOPS thanks to a 1:1 ratio. Rasterization rates are a pixel rate of 133.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s — figures that translate directly into high-refresh gameplay at 1440p and playable ultra-settings performance at 4K. The 58 third-generation RT cores and 232 tensor cores are the Ada Lovelace story for rendering: ray-traced lighting in games, GPU-accelerated OptiX-style viewport rendering, and AI-assisted upscaling and denoising all lean on this hardware. For 3D artists, the tensor cores also accelerate AI tools in content-creation suites.

The benchmark scores put this in context. Geekbench OpenCL comes in at 159575 and Vulkan at 145807 — these are compute-focused numbers that reflect the GPU's rendering and GPU-compute muscle. PassMark G3D, the general graphics score, is 24926, and PassMark GPU Compute is 11191. Against its nearest rivals by average score, the RTX 4080 Mobile sits within a fraction of a percent of the GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (-0.6 deltaPct in that rival's favor), effectively tied with the GeForce MX570's average score profile at -0.4, and 1.3 percent ahead of both the desktop GeForce RTX 4070 and the Tesla P4. In other words, the data indicates this mobile GPU trades blows with parts well outside its class bracket — a desktop RTX 4070 being the notable scalp — which is a strong result for a 110 W TDP part.

Upgrade Path and Platform

This is a laptop platform, so the upgrade path looks very different from a desktop build — and in one respect, it doesn't exist at all. The CPU is soldered to an Intel BGA 1964 socket. There is no CPU swap, ever. The same applies to the GPU: the RTX 4080 Mobile is an integrated mobile part with no power connectors and a bus interface of PCIe 4.0 x16, and the display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent." Neither chip is user-replaceable.

What you can plan around is the platform itself. The i9-13950HX supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, so the specific laptop model determines which generation you get — DDR5 is the forward-looking choice when shopping. ECC memory support is listed as true, which is unusual for consumer mobile silicon and relevant to anyone running long unattended compute jobs where memory errors matter. The CPU also provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the CPU's multiplier is unlocked, meaning system integrators and enthusiast firmware can push clocks beyond stock where thermals allow.

Power is the real constraint on any sensible next step. The CPU carries a 55 W TDP and the GPU a 110 W TDP, and the GPU's suggestedPsu field is null — expected for a laptop where the chassis handles power delivery. Neither component is something you upgrade by buying a bigger supply; you manage them with cooling and firmware power limits. The realistic "next upgrade" for this platform is a whole-machine move: the GPU's listed successor is the GeForce 50 Mobile generation, and the CPU's rivals list already includes next-generation parts like the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385. When performance starts to feel limiting, the path is a new laptop, not a new part. For a desktop builder reading this because the scores look tempting, the lesson is the reverse: this pairing shows what laptop silicon can now do, but a desktop platform with a socketed CPU remains the only configuration with a genuine component upgrade path.

CPU Analysis

The i9-13950HX is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX processor on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die. It boosts to 5.50 GHz from a 2.20 GHz base — that boost clock is the headline, because it means lightly-threaded applications run at desktop-flagship speeds, not compromised mobile speeds.

The cache layout tells the hybrid-architecture story: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3. Integrated UHD Graphics 770 handles display duties when the discrete GPU is idle, which helps battery life on a platform this powerful.

The benchmark spread shows a CPU that is strong everywhere, not just in multi-core. The 3DMark CPU scaling series makes the point: 1102 single-thread, 2107 at two threads, 3957 at four, 6732 at eight, 8903 at sixteen, and 11926 at max threads. Scaling from one to eight threads is nearly linear, and the jump from sixteen threads (8903) to all thirty-two threads (11926) still shows meaningful gains — a sign that heavily parallel workloads keep finding headroom rather than hitting a ceiling. In real terms, that max-threads score means video encodes, code compiles, and 3D renders that spawn many threads all finish materially faster than on a typical laptop chip.

Cinebench confirms it: R23 multi-core at 28681 with single-core at 2096, R20 multi-core at 14462 with single-core at 2041, and R15 multi-core at 4529 with single-core at 297. A single-core score north of 2000 in R23 is desktop-class responsiveness for everyday applications, while the multi-core result sits in workstation territory. PassMark fills in the workload picture: 41614 multi-thread, 3899 single-thread, integer math at 147091, floating point at 105553, data compression at 510258, encryption at 30805, extended instructions at 29779, physics at 2668, prime finding at 203, and string sorting at 57274. The compression and encryption numbers in particular indicate fast file archiving and disk-crypt operations.

The 88th percentile against all CPUs is the summary stat, and the rivals list shows how contested that neighborhood is: the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 is within 0.1 percent, the Intel Core i5-13600 within 0.2 percent, and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D are 0.3 and 0.5 percent ahead respectively. This is a statistical dead heat with those parts on average score — but the composition differs, since a 24-core HX flagship wins the heavily-threaded cases while a 7500X3D-type part may take gaming leads elsewhere. The launch MSRP was $590.

Who Should Build It

Because this is a laptop-class pairing — buildClass is "laptop" — the audience is buyers choosing a machine, not builders picking parts off a shelf.

Competitive and high-refresh gamers are the first group. With the GPU posting a PassMark G3D of 24926 and CPU single-thread performance at the 88th-percentile level, this pairing targets 1440p ultra-settings gaming at high frame rates, with 4K ultra play viable where the title's demands allow. The CPU's 11926 max-thread 3DMark score means simulation-heavy and physics-driven games won't starve the GPU for draw calls.

Content creators are the second group, and arguably the primary one. A 28681 Cinebench R23 multi-core score plus a GPU with 232 tensor cores and 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput is a portable video-editing and 3D-rendering station: timeline scrubbing, exports, and viewport rendering all have hardware backing on both chips. The 12 GB of GDDR6 is sufficient for mid-size scenes and standard editing resolutions.

Developers and engineers form the third group. The 24-core/32-thread configuration with strong PassMark integer and compression scores makes local compile cycles, container workloads, and dataset wrangling fast, and ECC memory support adds a reliability margin for long-running jobs. Students in technical programs get a single machine that games well and runs engineering software without compromise. Small businesses needing a mobile workstation for CAD, visualization, or field rendering will find the combined 85th percentile places this above the overwhelming majority of tracked systems.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU upgradeable? A: No. The Intel Core i9-13950HX uses an Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is soldered. The GPU is likewise integrated into the laptop platform with no power connectors.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 Mobile have? A: 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 18 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals? A: Its average benchmark score of 44342 puts it within half a percent of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (0.1 deltaPct), Intel Core i5-13600 (0.2), Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (-0.3), and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (-0.5).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory? A: Yes, ECC support is listed as true — useful for stability-critical, long-running workloads.

Q: What memory types does the platform support? A: Both DDR4 and DDR5, in a dual-channel configuration. The specific type depends on the laptop model.

Q: Are the gaming frame rates on this page measured? A: No. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination; dataIsMeasured is false and all frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 4070? A: By average score, the RTX 4080 Mobile leads the desktop GeForce RTX 4070 by 1.3 percent (deltaPct 1.3 in the 4080 Mobile's favor).

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries — so the following is estimated strictly from the benchmark scores, and should be treated as such.

The estimate method is straightforward: a PassMark G3D score of 24926, Geekbench Vulkan at 145807, and a 118-GFLOPS-class FP32 figure of 24.72 TFLOPS place this GPU at the 81st percentile of all GPUs, roughly on par with the average score of the GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (-0.6 deltaPct) and ahead of the desktop RTX 4070 by 1.3 percent. GPUs in that bracket typically deliver ultra-settings 1440p gaming at comfortably high frame rates in current AAA titles, with 4K ultra play realistic where titles are not pathologically demanding. The PassMark DirectX results (286 for DX9, 244 for DX11, 96 for DX12, 157 for DX10) are relative indices rather than frame rates, but the DX12 index in particular shows the GPU holding up in the modern API used by most new releases.

On the CPU side, gaming frame rates at high refresh depend on single-thread and low-thread throughput, and here the data is unambiguous: a 3DMark single-thread score of 1102 and a 3957 four-thread score mean the processor can drive high-FPS 1440p and 1080p gaming without becoming the frame-time bottleneck in the CPU-limited scenarios esports titles create. DirectX 12 Ultimate support on the GPU means ray-traced effects and modern rendering features are available at the API level. Again: these are estimates from synthetic scores, not measurements of this pairing in games.

Benchmark Performance

The exact scores, by component:

CPU — Intel Core i9-13950HX: 3DMark single-thread 1102, 2-thread 2107, 4-thread 3957, 8-thread 6732, 16-thread 8903, max-threads 11926. Cinebench R15 multi 4529 / single 297; R20 multi 14462 / single 2041; R23 multi 28681 / single 2096. PassMark multi-thread 41614, single-thread 3899, integer math 147091, floating point 105553, physics 2668, data compression 510258, encryption 30805, extended instructions 29779, primes 203, string sorting 57274. Average score 44342, 88th percentile versus all CPUs.

GPU — NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile: Geekbench OpenCL 159575, Geekbench Vulkan 145807, PassMark G3D 24926, GPU Compute 11191, G2D 929, DirectX 9/10/11/12 at 286/157/244/96. Average score 38135, 81st percentile versus all GPUs.

The combined picture is a pairing at the 85th percentile of all tracked builds. What that means in practice: both halves are individually upper-tier, and neither drags the other down. The CPU's 88th percentile slightly exceeds the GPU's 81st, which is the preferable orientation for a gaming-and-creation laptop — the processor is never the weak link, and the GPU always has system resources to consume.

Build Overview

This pairing is a flagship mobile configuration: Intel's 13th-generation Core i9 Raptor Lake-HX flagship CPU plus NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4080 Mobile, both released in early January 2023 (the CPU on the 3rd, the GPU on the 2nd). Build class is laptop — this is silicon you buy inside a finished machine, with a 55 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP that laptop cooling must handle.

By tier, the data places it unambiguously in the high-end bracket. A combined 85th percentile, an 88th-percentile CPU, and an 81st-percentile GPU describe a system faster than roughly five of every six tracked configurations across all classes — including desktops — despite being a portable platform. The CPU's rivals list mixing it with desktop and next-generation mobile parts, and the GPU's list containing the RTX 5080 Mobile as a near-statistical tie, reinforce that this is not merely "fast for a laptop"; it is fast, full stop.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance question has a clear answer in the data: the CPU outranks the GPU by seven percentile points (88 versus 81), making the GPU the limiting component in any GPU-bound workload. That is the correct configuration for a gaming laptop — you want the graphics subsystem saturated and the processor holding frame pacing steady, and the 3DMark scaling curve (1102 single-thread through 11926 max-threads) shows the CPU has throughput in reserve at every thread count games actually use.

In GPU-bound scenarios — ultra settings at 1440p and 4K — the RTX 4080 Mobile's 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth and 24.72 TFLOPS set the ceiling, and upgrading graphics settings costs frame rate linearly against that ceiling. In CPU-bound scenarios, chiefly high-refresh gaming at lower resolutions, the single-thread scores of 1102 (3DMark) and 2096 (Cinebench R23) indicate the processor holds up well past the point where lesser mobile chips falter. In production workloads the roles split cleanly: rendering and GPU compute are bound by the GPU's OpenCL score of 159575, while compilation, encoding, and compression scale across the 32 threads and land on the CPU's 41614 PassMark multi-thread result.

The one structural bottleneck is the platform, not the parts. BGA-socketed CPU, integrated mobile GPU, and chassis-defined power limits mean that when either component starts to feel limiting in a few years, there is no component-level relief — the balanced next move is a new machine built around the GPU's successor generation.