SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13950HX paired with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a laptop build defined by an unusual asymmetry: a flagship-class mobile processor anchored to a mid-range mobile GPU. The data makes this divide plain. The CPU sits in the 88th percentile against all processors in the database — desktop chips included — while the GPU lands at the 67th percentile. Combined, the pairing ranks in the 78th percentile. That imbalance is not a flaw by default; it is the classic profile of a mobile workstation that can also game, and this page breaks down exactly where that strength pays off and where the graphics subsystem becomes the ceiling.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13950HX is the top tier of Intel's Raptor Lake-HX mobile lineup, and its specifications read like a desktop part pressed into a notebook chassis. Twenty-four cores and thirty-two threads, a 2.20 GHz base clock that boosts to 5.50 GHz, and a 55 W TDP on the Intel BGA 1964 package — this is silicon designed for sustained, heavily threaded work in portable form. The architecture is Raptor Lake, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm².

The cache hierarchy is generous. Each core carries 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2, with a shared 36 MB block of L3 serving the whole chip. That L3 pool is what keeps the many-core design fed during rendering and compilation workloads, and it is one of the reasons the chip's multi-threaded scores hold up so strongly.

And they do hold up. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 28681 points is a serious number for any processor, let alone a mobile one, and it is backed by 14462 in R20 and 4529 in R15. Single-thread performance is equally impressive for a laptop chip: 2096 points in Cinebench R23 single-core, 2041 in R20 single-core, and 297 in R15 single-core. The 3DMark CPU scaling profile tells the same story from a different angle — 1102 points single-threaded, rising to 2107 at two threads, 3957 at four, 6732 at eight, and 11926 at maximum threads. Notably, the jump from eight threads to maximum threads more than doubles throughput, which indicates the efficiency cores are not decoration; they contribute real, scalable capacity when software demands it.

Thread leveling matters for interpretation. The step from one thread to four threads in 3DMark is nearly linear, meaning lightly threaded applications — most games, most office software — get close to full single-core value from this chip. The curve then bends between four and eight threads before surging again at maximum threads, which is the hybrid architecture showing its shape: performance cores carry light loads, and the full 32-thread spread unlocks the heavy ones.

Against its nearest rivals in the database, the i9-13950HX sits in a statistical dead heat. Its average benchmark score of 44342 is within half a percent of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309, a 0.1% gap), the Intel Core i5-13600 (44240, 0.2% behind), the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466, 0.3% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573, 0.5% ahead). In practical terms, buyers choosing between these processors on raw average performance are choosing between equivalents; the differentiators are the specific benchmark curves and platform features, not the aggregate number.

For real workloads, the PassMark subtests sketch the practical picture. Integer math at 147091 and floating point at 105553 point to strong general compute. Data compression at 510258 and encryption at 30805 support file archiving and full-disk encryption duties without strain. Physics at 2668 and the multithread score of 41614 reinforce the rendering and simulation credentials. Even the obscure corners — 29779 on extended instructions and 57274 on string sorting — show no weak leg this chip stands on.

Two platform details deserve emphasis. First, ECC memory support is present, which is rare in consumer mobile silicon and meaningful for workstation-adjacent use. Second, the multiplier is unlocked, giving system integrators and enthusiasts headroom within thermal limits. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 handles display duties and nothing more ambitious — with an RTX 4060 Mobile alongside it, that is the correct division of labor.

Benchmark Performance

The headline numbers: the CPU averages 44342 across its benchmark suite (88th percentile versus all CPUs in the database), the GPU averages 22729 (67th percentile versus all GPUs), and the combination lands at the 78th percentile. Read as a verdict, the data says this laptop is an elite compute machine attached to a competent but unexceptional graphics card.

On the CPU side, the Cinebench and PassMark figures above place the i9-13950HX firmly in flagship mobile territory, trading blows with desktop-class rivals. On the GPU side, the RTX 4060 Mobile posts 17469 in PassMark G3D, 89420 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 89569 in Geekbench Vulkan — the latter two nearly identical, which suggests consistent compute performance across both major APIs rather than a driver-optimized outlier. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6816 and the modest DirectX sub-scores (216 for DirectX 9, 157 for DirectX 11, 107 for DirectX 10, 73 for DirectX 12) round out the picture; the low DirectX numbers reflect the test scaling rather than a DirectX 12 deficiency, as the API list confirms support for 12 Ultimate (12_2).

The rival comparison for the GPU is instructive. The RTX 4060 Mobile's average of 22729 sits within 1.3% of four very different cards: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895, 0.7% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (22549, 0.8% behind), the Intel Arc B580 (23021, 1.3% ahead), and even its own successor, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22435, 1.3% behind). That cluster tells two stories. First, the 4060 Mobile performs at the level of a previous-generation high-end desktop card. Second, the generational step to the 5060 Mobile was marginal at best by these averages — a relevant data point for anyone weighing whether the newer silicon justifies a platform change.

The combined 78th percentile quantifies the imbalance precisely. If both components were equal in class, the combined figure would sit near the CPU's 88th percentile. The eleven-point drag downward is the GPU's contribution — or rather, its limitation. This is a build where the processor waits on the graphics card far more often than the reverse.

Upgrade Path and Platform

As a BGA 1964 package, the CPU is soldered to the board; there is no socket swap in this laptop's future. The upgrade path therefore runs through memory, storage, and — in the sense of eventual machine replacement — the platform itself.

Memory support is flexible: DDR4 and DDR5 are both supported over a dual-channel bus. For a chip with this much multi-threaded throughput, DDR5 in dual-channel is the sensible pairing, since memory bandwidth becomes the gating factor when 32 threads contend for data. The ECC support adds a wrinkle for workstation buyers — it is a feature normally reserved for professional platforms and can matter for long-running scientific or financial workloads where silent bit errors are unacceptable.

PCIe connectivity is a strength: Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU alone. That is desktop-class expansion, translating into fast NVMe storage options and full-bandwidth links to the discrete GPU. The GPU itself connects over PCIe 4.0 x8 — fewer lanes than the CPU could supply, but a standard configuration for this GPU class and not a practical bottleneck for gaming workloads.

Power budgeting is straightforward in spec terms: 55 W for the CPU and 115 W for the GPU. The GPU is an integrated-package mobile part with no external power connectors — it draws everything from the laptop's internal power delivery, so the suggested PSU figure of null is expected for a laptop build class rather than a red flag. Within the chassis, the practical implication is that sustained combined loads will depend on the manufacturer's cooling implementation; the silicon itself specifies the headroom, and the thermal solution determines how much of it is usable.

A sensible next upgrade for this machine is therefore not the CPU or GPU — both are fixed — but memory saturation (dual-channel DDR5), additional Gen 5 NVMe storage using the CPU's 20 lanes, and eventually a full platform jump when the GPU's 67th-percentile performance becomes the limiting factor for the owner's actual workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck in this pairing is unambiguous, and the percentile data identifies it: the CPU at the 88th percentile outruns the GPU at the 67th by a wide margin. In any workload that scales with graphics throughput — gaming at higher settings and resolutions, GPU rendering, some simulation — the RTX 4060 Mobile is the ceiling, and the i9-13950HX will have idle threads waiting on frames.

The converse is equally true and more flattering to this configuration. In CPU-bound workloads — code compilation, video encoding, 3D rendering on the processor, physics simulation — the laptop performs like a top-tier machine with the GPU loafing. The PassMark physics score of 2668 and the 3DMark max-threads result of 11926 are the evidence: this processor can carry simulation-heavy and compilation-heavy tasks at near-desktop levels.

The 67th-percentile GPU is not weak in absolute terms. Matching the RTX 2080 and Radeon RX 7700 XT within a percentage point means it delivers previous-flagship performance. But paired against an 88th-percentile CPU, it is definitively the junior partner, and the combined 78th percentile confirms a CPU-forward balance. Buyers should want this configuration precisely when the processor's 28681 Cinebench R23 multi-core score matters more to them than pushing maximum graphics settings.

One note on measurement: this exact CPU-plus-GPU combination has no measured FPS data in the database. All frame-rate discussion below is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores rather than measured, and should be treated as informed projection, not recorded results.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With a GPU at the 67th percentile performing in the RTX 2080 / RX 7700 XT bracket, the expectation is high-refresh gameplay at 1080p and strong performance at 1440p, with some settings trade-offs at the ultra preset — especially in modern ray-traced titles, where the 24 RT cores can only do so much. The 88th-percentile CPU will never be the reason frames drop.

Streaming. This is a configuration that flatters streamers. The i9-13950HX's 32 threads absorb encoding and compositing overhead with room to spare — the 11926 max-threads 3DMark score is the relevant figure — while the GPU handles game rendering. A dual-PC streaming setup is unnecessary when the CPU has this much spare capacity.

Video editing. Excellent CPU-side story. The 28681 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 510258 data-compression result translate into fast timeline scrubbing, export throughput, and proxy handling. The caveat is the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM: heavy GPU-accelerated effects stacks and high-bitrate 4K multicam work will press against that ceiling.

3D rendering. Split verdict. CPU rendering is elite — Cinebench is a rendering benchmark, and the R23 multi-core score says the processor alone competes near desktop-flagship level. GPU rendering via the 89420 OpenCL and 89569 Vulkan Geekbench scores is respectable but mid-range, capped by the 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 rate and 8 GB VRAM.

Software development. Arguably the best-fit scenario. Compilation is thread-hungry, and the max-threads scaling curve plus the 41614 PassMark multithread score indicate fast build times on large codebases. Containers, local test environments, and background services all draw from the same deep thread pool without competing for GPU resources at all.

Student and office work. Overkill in the best way. Single-thread scores of 2096 (Cinebench R23) and 3899 (PassMark) mean every office application, browser tab pile, and video call runs without hesitation. The machine will outlast a typical degree program with performance to spare; the only cost of that headroom is in the laptop's weight class and battery demands inherent to a 55 W HX processor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-and-GPU combination in the database — the figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not recorded results.

Estimating from the GPU's 17469 PassMark G3D score and its statistical tie with the RTX 2080, the RTX 4060 Mobile targets high-refresh 1080p gaming and comfortable 1440p gaming. At 1080p with the ultra preset, esports and competitive titles should run at very high frame rates, and modern AAA titles should remain fluid, though the heaviest ray-traced scenes may need settings reduced given the 24 RT cores and 128-bit memory bus. At 1440p, mid-to-high settings rather than flat ultra are the realistic expectation for recent releases, with the 256 GB/s bandwidth becoming the operative constraint in texture-heavy scenes. At 4K, this GPU class is generally out of its comfort zone except for older or lighter titles.

The CPU side of the frame-rate equation is a non-issue. With single-thread performance in the 88th percentile overall and a 2668 physics score, frame pacing and simulation load will not introduce bottlenecks. Whatever frame rates this laptop achieves, the CPU allows the GPU to define them — the definition of a well-fed mid-range graphics configuration.

Who Should Build It

Since this is a laptop-class pairing (build class: laptop), "building" means choosing the right machine with this silicon inside it. The data points to three strong audiences.

First, developers and engineers: the 32-thread processor with 147091 integer math and 41614 multithread PassMark scores, ECC memory support, and Gen 5 storage lanes makes this a portable compilation and simulation workstation with essentially no CPU compromise. Second, hybrid creator-gamers: users who render or encode on the CPU during work hours and game at 1080p-to-1440p in the evening get a machine genuinely good at both, provided they accept mid-range GPU ceilings. Third, students and small-business professionals in technical fields — 3D design, data analysis, engineering coursework — who need desktop-class threaded performance in a portable chassis and will exploit the 36 MB L3 cache and DDR5 support for years.

The wrong buyer is the pure high-end gamer. Someone whose workload is exclusively maximum-settings AAA gaming would be paying for an 88th-percentile CPU that a 67th-percentile GPU cannot fully exploit; the nearest-rival data shows the GPU performing at RTX 2080 level, which is good but not flagship. This configuration's value — in performance terms, not monetary ones — is compute density, not graphics supremacy.

FAQ

Q: How does the i9-13950HX compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 44342 lands within half a percent of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 (44309, 0.1%), Intel Core i5-13600 (44240, 0.2%), Intel Core Ultra X9 388H (44466, 0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D (44573, 0.5%). The aggregate performance is effectively identical; differentiation comes from the individual benchmark curves and platform features.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 Mobile a meaningful step down from the RTX 5060 Mobile?

A: Not by the database averages. The 4060 Mobile scores 22729 versus 22435 for the RTX 5060 Mobile — a 1.3% edge to the older card. The two perform within noise of each other on these scores.

Q: Can this laptop handle video editing and 3D rendering?

A: Yes, with a CPU-forward bias. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 28681 places the processor near desktop-flagship rendering performance. GPU rendering is mid-range — Geekbench OpenCL 89420 and Vulkan 89569 — and the 8 GB of VRAM limits the heaviest GPU-accelerated projects.

Q: What memory should this system use?

A: The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus. DDR5 in dual-channel is the natural match for a 32-thread processor with a 36 MB shared L3 cache. ECC memory is supported, a notable workstation feature for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: Are there measured frame rates for this CPU-and-GPU combination?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS data for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate expectations on this page are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in games?

A: The GPU. The CPU sits at the 88th percentile versus all processors while the GPU sits at the 67th percentile versus all GPUs, pulling the combined ranking down to the 78th percentile. The processor will rarely limit gaming performance on this machine.

Q: Can the CPU be upgraded later?

A: No. The Intel BGA 1964 package is soldered to the board. Upgrade options are limited to memory and storage, where the CPU's 20 Gen 5 lanes provide substantial headroom.

GPU Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is an Ada Lovelace part built on TSMC's 5 nm process, using the AD107 chip with 18.9 billion transistors packed onto a 159 mm² die — a transistor density of 118.9 million per square millimeter. It is a compact, efficient design, which is exactly what a mobile GPU should be.

The hardware inventory: 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, 48 render output units, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores. Clocks run from a 1545 MHz base to an 1890 MHz boost, with memory at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The peak figures that follow from this configuration are 90.72 GPixel/s of pixel fill, 181.4 GTexel/s of texture fill, and 11.61 TFLOPS of FP32 — with FP16 running at the same rate (1:1), which matters for workloads that use half-precision.

Memory is the defining constraint and the defining advantage, depending on the workload. The 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus yields 256 GB/s of bandwidth. For 1080p and 1440p gaming, this is adequate. For texture-heavy ultra-settings gaming at higher resolutions, or GPU rendering of large scenes, the capacity and bandwidth both become limiting factors, and the benchmark record reflects that ceiling.

The ray-tracing and AI hardware deserves specific attention. The 24 third-generation RT cores handle ray-triangle intersection, and the 96 fourth-generation tensor cores drive DLSS-style upscaling and AI-accelerated features. For a mid-range mobile card, this tensor core count is the quiet headline: it is what allows the GPU to punch above its raw rasterization weight in supported titles and AI-assisted creative applications. The API support — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, OpenGL 4.6 — ensures full access to modern rendering feature sets.

In benchmark terms, the GPU averages 22729 across its suite, placing it at the 67th percentile. The near-identical Geekbench OpenCL (89420) and Vulkan (89569) results indicate consistent cross-API compute behavior, useful for OpenCL- and Vulkan-based rendering engines alike. The PassMark G3D score of 17469 anchors its gaming-class standing.

The verdict for rendering work: capable, consistent, and clearly mid-range. It sits in a statistical tie with the RTX 2080, RX 7700 XT, Arc B580, and RTX 5060 Mobile — a tightly packed cluster that defines the current mid-tier. In this laptop, it is the supporting act to a headline processor, and as long as expectations are set at 1080p-to-1440p gaming and moderate GPU compute, it plays its role without disappointment.