SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13950HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile represent a specific configuration for laptops, pairing a top-tier 24-core processor with a mainstream 40-series graphics solution. This combination creates a distinct performance profile where the CPU’s capabilities significantly outpace the GPU, leading to a system that excels in processor-intensive tasks while offering solid, though not class-leading, graphics performance. The data indicates a clear hierarchy within this build, and the following analysis breaks down the implications of this pairing.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip, designated AD107, contains 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1455 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz. Memory is configured as 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 96-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. The memory clock is specified as 2000 MHz, which translates to 16 Gbps effective.

The core configuration includes 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. For specialized workloads, the GPU features 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 84.24 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 140.4 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 8.986 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, the latter operating at a 1:1 ratio.

Benchmark results for the GPU show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 and a Vulkan score of 75235. In Passmark tests, the GPU scores 14423 in G3D and 5947 in GPU compute. The average benchmark score is 19049, placing it in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. This percentile position indicates that the RTX 4050 Mobile performs better than a majority of GPUs in the database, but it is not a high-end part. The nearest rivals in performance are the AMD Radeon RX 6600 with an average score of 19036, the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 at 19030, the NVIDIA Tesla K20m at 19089, and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation at 18954. The deltaPct values are minimal, ranging from -0.2% to 0.5%, meaning these GPUs are statistically tied in performance. For rendering tasks, the 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and entry-level 1440p workloads, but the 96-bit bus width may limit performance in high-texture scenarios. The presence of 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, but the overall compute throughput of 8.986 TFLOPS suggests that heavy rendering workloads will be handled by the CPU rather than the GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Intel Core i9-13950HX and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor’s average benchmark score is 44342, placing it in the 88th percentile among all CPUs. In contrast, the GPU’s average benchmark score is 19049, placing it in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. This 25-percentile gap is substantial, and it indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in most graphics-bound workloads.

In gaming scenarios, the CPU’s high single-thread scores—such as 1102 in 3dmark single-thread and 3899 in Passmark single-thread—are more than sufficient to feed the GPU. The bottleneck will manifest at the GPU level, where the RTX 4050 Mobile’s 8.986 TFLOPS of compute will cap frame rates in modern titles. The GPU’s 63rd percentile position, compared to the CPU’s 88th, means that in a balanced workload, the GPU will saturate before the CPU reaches its limits. The Passmark multithread score of 41614 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28681 further emphasize that the CPU has substantial headroom. For non-graphics tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will play a supplementary role. The data suggests that this is a CPU-first build, where the GPU is chosen for mainstream gaming rather than high-end performance. The lack of measured FPS data for this combination prevents a direct scaling analysis, but the percentile disparity alone establishes that the GPU is the constraining component for frame rate output.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 4050 Mobile’s 63rd percentile standing and 8.986 TFLOPS of compute suggest that 1080p high-refresh gaming is achievable, but 1440p high-refresh will be challenging. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3899 in Passmark ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, but the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit texture quality in newer titles. Gamers targeting 144Hz at 1080p should expect playable frame rates, but esports titles will benefit more than AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28681, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Passmark data encryption score of 30805 and extended instructions score of 29779 indicate strong performance in compression and encoding tasks. The GPU’s NVENC capabilities, implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture, would offload encoding work, but the CPU alone can handle streaming without significant frame loss.

Video Editing: The i9-13950HX excels in this scenario. The Passmark multithread score of 41614 and floating-point math score of 105553 demonstrate strong performance in rendering timelines and applying effects. The GPU’s 80 tensor cores can accelerate AI-based features in editing software, but the 6 GB VRAM may be a constraint for large 4K projects. The combination is better suited for 1080p editing with occasional 4K work.

3D Rendering: This workload is dominated by the CPU. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 14462 and R15 multicore score of 4529 show that the processor can handle complex scenes. The GPU’s 20 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but its 8.986 TFLOPS compute is modest compared to the CPU’s 147091 integer math score. For final-frame rendering, the CPU will be the primary engine, while the GPU can assist with viewport previews.

Software Development: The CPU’s 88th percentile ranking makes it a strong choice for compilation and multitasking. The Passmark find prime numbers score of 203 and random string sorting score of 57274 indicate solid performance in algorithmic tasks. The 36 MB of L3 cache reduces latency in multi-threaded workflows. The GPU is largely irrelevant for this workload, but the overall system will handle IDE, build tools, and virtualization smoothly.

Student and Office Work: This build is overkill for this scenario, but it handles it effortlessly. The CPU’s 3dmark 2-thread score of 2107 ensures responsive application use, while the GPU’s 633 Passmark G2D score is adequate for 2D interfaces. The 55W TDP of the CPU suggests that battery life may be a concern, but for plugged-in office work, the performance is excessive yet sufficient.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 4050 Mobile sufficient for medium-to-high settings, but those seeking 1440p high-refresh gaming should look elsewhere given the GPU’s 63rd percentile rank. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s 88th percentile rank, with scores like 28681 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 105553 in Passmark floating-point math, though they must accept the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM limit. Software developers will appreciate the 24 cores and 32 threads for compilation, backed by a Passmark multithread score of 41614. Students and office workers will find the system vastly more powerful than needed, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 3899 ensures quick response in everyday tasks. Small business workstations requiring heavy data processing, evidenced by the Passmark data compression score of 510258, would suit this build. The GPU’s 20 RT cores make it a viable option for entry-level ray tracing, but the 192.0 GB/s bandwidth caps its effectiveness.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined percentile for this build is 76, reflecting a system that is above average overall but not at the top tier. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 44342, placing it in the 88th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 with an average score of 44309 and a deltaPct of 0.1%, the Intel Core i5-13600 at 44240 with a 0.2% delta, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H at 44466 with a -0.3% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D at 44573 with a -0.5% delta. These deltas are negligible, meaning the i9-13950HX is effectively tied with these processors. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19049, placing it in the 63rd percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6600 at 19036 (0.1% delta), the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 at 19030 (0.1% delta), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m at 19089 (-0.2% delta), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation at 18954 (0.5% delta). The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a high-end performer, matching or slightly exceeding several desktop and mobile processors, while the GPU is a mid-range part that aligns closely with older desktop GPUs. The 76th combined percentile indicates that this laptop will outperform most systems in CPU-bound tasks but will be average in GPU-bound tasks.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 14423 Passmark G3D score and 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, modern AAA titles would run in the 45-60 FPS range, while esports titles could exceed 100 FPS. The 6 GB VRAM may cause stuttering in titles with high texture requirements at 1080p ultra. At 1440p, the GPU’s 63rd percentile rank indicates that frame rates would drop to the 30-45 FPS range for demanding titles, making medium settings more appropriate. The CPU’s high single-thread scores, such as 2096 in Cinebench R23 single-core, ensure that the GPU is the limiting factor in all gaming scenarios. Ray tracing would be possible due to the 20 RT cores, but performance would be significantly impacted given the compute throughput. These figures are estimates derived from the GPU’s overall benchmark standing and should be treated as such.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX codename. It is manufactured on Intel’s 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 2.20 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.50 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported. The CPU is designed for the Intel BGA 1964 socket and has a TDP of 55W. It includes integrated UHD Graphics 770 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

Benchmark scores for the CPU are exceptional. The Cinebench R23 multicore score is 28681, and the single-core score is 2096. In 3dmark tests, the CPU scores 11926 in max threads and 8903 in 16 threads. The Passmark multithread score is 41614, with single-thread at 3899. The Passmark integer math score is 147091, and floating-point math is 105553. Data compression scores are 510258, and encryption is 30805. These numbers indicate that the CPU excels in multi-threaded workloads like video rendering, 3D modeling, and data processing. The single-thread scores are also strong, ensuring responsiveness in everyday tasks and gaming. The 36 MB of L3 cache reduces memory latency, and the 5.50 GHz boost clock provides high peak performance. The CPU’s 88th percentile rank places it among the top-tier processors in the database, with its nearest rivals being desktop processors like the Intel Core i5-13600 and mobile parts like the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385. The 0.1% to 0.5% deltaPct values mean these processors are indistinguishable in average score.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered mobile socket. This means the CPU is not upgradeable, and any future processor upgrade would require a new laptop. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, allowing for either type to be installed, though the specific motherboard will dictate which is used. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, providing high bandwidth for storage and external GPUs, though the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The GPU has a TDP of 50W, and the CPU has a TDP of 55W, but no suggested PSU is listed for the GPU, and the system is a laptop with a proprietary power supply.

The upgrade path is limited by the laptop form factor. The GPU is soldered and cannot be replaced, and the CPU is also fixed. The only sensible upgrades are memory and storage. Upgrading to faster DDR5 memory could improve memory bandwidth, but the dual-channel bus already provides adequate bandwidth. Adding a PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drive would take advantage of the CPU’s 20 lanes, improving load times and data throughput. The 36 MB of L3 cache is fixed, and the CPU’s 55W TDP suggests that cooling is a constraint, so overclocking is not recommended. For users seeking more GPU performance, this platform cannot be upgraded, and a new laptop would be required. The GPU’s 50W TDP and lack of power connectors indicate that it is a low-power part, which is typical for mobile configurations.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 76, indicating it outperforms 76% of all systems in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385?

A: The Intel Core i9-13950HX has an average benchmark score of 44342, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44309. The deltaPct is 0.1%, meaning the Intel part is marginally faster but statistically tied.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s, based on a 96-bit bus and 2000 MHz memory clock, which translates to 16 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13950HX supports ECC memory, according to the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the TDP of the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has a TDP of 50W.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU?

A: The Intel Core i9-13950HX has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: What are the shading units and RT cores on the GPU?

A: The GPU has 2560 shading units and 20 RT cores.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The pairing of the Intel Core i9-13950HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a high-CPU, mid-GPU configuration. The CPU’s 88th percentile rank makes it a top-tier processor, while the GPU’s 63rd percentile rank places it in the mid-range. The combined percentile of 76 reflects a system that is above average but not at the enthusiast level. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 44342 rivals desktop processors, and its 24 cores and 32 threads make it a powerhouse for productivity. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 19049 is comparable to older desktop GPUs, providing adequate 1080p gaming performance. This build is best suited for users who need substantial CPU power for creation, development, or data work, but who only require moderate GPU performance for gaming or light rendering. The 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are the GPU’s main limitations, and the 50W TDP indicates a power-efficient design. Overall, this is a workstation-class CPU paired with a mainstream gaming GPU, resulting in a system that is unbalanced but effective for specific workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13950HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds