SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation here is Intel's Raptor Lake-HX architecture, built on a 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. The processor uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a mobile-specific package, meaning the upgrade path is defined by the laptop chassis rather than a desktop motherboard ecosystem. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory support included—a feature that leans toward workstation reliability. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 20 CPU-only lanes, providing high bandwidth for NVMe storage and discrete GPUs, though this particular pairing relies on the integrated AMD Radeon 860M instead of a dGPU.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, while the iGPU is rated at a separate 15 W figure. The absence of a suggested PSU value in the data indicates that this is a self-contained mobile platform; the power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal design rather than an external PSU selection. For a user considering a sensible next upgrade, the data points are limited: the CPU is generation-locked to the BGA 1964 socket, so a CPU swap is not feasible. The realistic upgrade path involves moving to a different laptop entirely, possibly with a newer Intel or AMD platform. The integrated graphics' memory bandwidth is "System Dependent," meaning that upgrading the laptop's RAM—from DDR4 to DDR5, or to higher-speed modules—could directly improve iGPU performance. The GPU's bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for the iGPU's bandwidth needs, but the shared memory architecture means that faster system memory translates to better graphics throughput.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture places this pairing at the 80th percentile overall, indicating a strong upper-midrange configuration. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44342, which sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU's average benchmark score is 26401, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination—the data is entirely estimated from benchmark scores, and this will be the only explicit note on that matter. All subsequent FPS references are projections derived from the synthetic test results.

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Core i9-13950HX is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, which scores 44309, a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Core i5-13600 scores 44240, a 0.2% delta. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44466, a -0.3% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44573, a -0.5% delta. The differences are within a single percentage point, meaning the i9-13950HX is at the center of a tight performance cluster. The GPU's nearest rivals show a similar clustering: the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 scores 26421, a -0.1% delta; the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 scores 26331, a 0.3% delta; the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary scores 26553, a -0.6% delta; and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 scores 26683, a -1.1% delta. The Radeon 860M's score of 26401 is within 1.1% of all these parts, which is notable given the range of product classes involved—from entry-level mobile GPUs to desktop cards.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that punches well above its class while the GPU holds its own in the midrange. For gaming, the CPU is unlikely to be the bottleneck in most scenarios, but the iGPU's relative weakness compared to the CPU's strength suggests that graphics-intensive tasks will be limited by the Radeon 860M. The CPU's multi-threaded scores—like the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 28681—indicate strong content-creation potential, while the GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 suggests capable 1080p gaming at medium settings.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. The core configuration is not explicitly broken down in the data, but the 24-core count with 32 threads implies a hybrid arrangement of performance and efficiency cores, typical of this generation. The base clock is 2.20 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.50 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The 3DMark single-thread score is 1102, while the 2-thread score is 2107, showing near-perfect scaling. The 4-thread score is 3957, the 8-thread score is 6732, and the 16-thread score is 8903. The max-threads score is 11926, which shows that scaling continues but at a diminishing rate—the jump from 8 to 16 threads is 32%, while the jump from 16 to max threads is 34%. This is consistent with a hybrid architecture where efficiency cores contribute to multi-threaded throughput but with lower per-thread performance than the performance cores.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R15 multicore score is 4529, while the single-core score is 297. The R20 multicore score is 14462, and the single-core score is 2041. The R23 multicore score is 28681, and the single-core score is 2096. The ratio of multicore to single-core in R23 is roughly 13.7x, which is strong for a mobile chip. PassMark results show a multithread score of 41614, a single-thread score of 3899, and a physics score of 2668. Data compression scores are 510258, data encryption is 30805, and extended instructions score is 29779. Floating point math hits 105553, integer math hits 147091, and prime number finding is 203. Random string sorting scores 57274.

In real-world terms, the data shows a processor that can handle heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease. The PassMark multithread score of 41614 places it in the top 12% of all CPUs, and the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28681 is competitive with many desktop parts. Single-threaded performance, with a PassMark single-thread score of 3899, ensures responsive day-to-day use and solid gaming performance, where per-core speed matters. The 88th percentile ranking confirms that this is a high-end mobile CPU, and the near-tie with the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and Intel Core i5-13600—both within 0.2%—shows that it is at the top of its class for mobile processors.

Who Should Build It

The benchmark data points to several distinct user profiles. Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh-rate play will find the CPU's single-threaded performance—a PassMark single-thread score of 3899 and a 3DMark 2-thread score of 2107—sufficient to drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. However, the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking suggests that graphics settings will need to be adjusted to medium or high, rather than ultra, to maintain smooth frame rates. The combined 80th percentile indicates a system that can handle esports titles and older AAA games at high settings, but newer, more demanding titles will require compromises.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit most from this CPU. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28681 and the PassMark multithread score of 41614 are strong indicators of performance in rendering and compilation tasks. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration provides ample parallelism for multi-threaded applications. The GPU's OpenCL score of 22759 and Vulkan score of 30043 also support GPU-accelerated rendering, though the iGPU is not in the same league as dedicated workstation GPUs.

Students and small business users building a portable workstation will appreciate the balance of CPU power and integrated graphics. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking ensures that even demanding productivity applications run smoothly, while the GPU's 72nd percentile handles light graphics work and media consumption. The ECC memory support adds a layer of reliability for data-intensive work. For developers, the high multithreaded performance means faster build times and smoother virtual machine operation. The data does not support high-resolution gaming—the GPU's pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s suggest it is best suited to 1080p, not 1440p or 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of all laptop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385?

A: The Intel Core i9-13950HX scores 44342 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385's 44309. This is a statistical tie.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark score relative to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M scores 26401, which is 0.1% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce MX550's 26421. The two are effectively identical in raw benchmark performance.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13950HX supports ECC memory, which is indicated in the CPU specifications.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.50 GHz, while the base clock is 2.20 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS data points for this exact CPU and GPU pairing. All performance estimates are derived from benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The chip is codenamed Krackan Point and belongs to the Navi III IGP generation, specifically the Strix Point Mobile variant. The GPU has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output pipelines. It includes 8 ray tracing cores, though tensor cores are not listed. The base clock is 600 MHz, and the boost clock is 3000 MHz. The memory configuration is entirely system-shared, with the bus width and bandwidth both listed as "System Dependent." This means the GPU's memory performance is tied directly to the laptop's system RAM, with no dedicated VRAM.

The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 3.072 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The GPU's TDP is 15 W, which is remarkably low for the performance it delivers. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, and display outputs are "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the laptop's design dictates the available ports. The API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

In benchmark terms, the Geekbench OpenCL score is 22759, and the Geekbench Vulkan score is 30043. The average benchmark score is 26401, placing it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are telling: the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 is 0.1% faster, indicating parity with a dedicated entry-level laptop GPU. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is 0.3% faster—a surprising result given the massive difference in class, but it reflects the benchmark average rather than real-world gaming performance. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary is 0.6% faster, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 is 1.1% faster. This clustering means the Radeon 860M performs at a level comparable to a range of dedicated GPUs, both old and new, at least in synthetic benchmarks.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 3.072 TFLOPS is modest, but the 8 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for DirectX 12 Ultimate titles. The Vulkan score of 30043 suggests that Vulkan-based games and applications run well. The lack of dedicated VRAM means that texture-heavy workloads will be limited by system memory bandwidth, which is "System Dependent." The GPU's 15 W TDP makes it highly efficient, but that efficiency comes at the cost of raw performance, placing it firmly in the midrange for integrated graphics.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-threaded strength—a 3DMark single-thread score of 1102 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3899—supports high frame rates in esports titles. The GPU's 72nd percentile ranking means 1080p at high refresh is achievable in less demanding games, but AAA titles will likely run at medium settings to maintain playable frame rates. The combined 80th percentile suggests a system that can hit 60+ FPS in most competitive shooters.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28681 indicates that x264 encoding at 1080p60 is feasible without a dedicated capture card. The GPU's Vulkan score of 30043 can assist with GPU-accelerated encoding, though the iGPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest for this task.

Video Editing: The PassMark multithread score of 41614 and the data compression score of 510258 show strong performance in codec-heavy workloads. Timeline scrubbing and export times will be quick, especially with the CPU's 36 MB of L3 cache. The GPU's OpenCL score of 22759 provides acceleration for effects and transitions in editing software.

3D Rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 28681 is a clear indicator of CPU rendering capability. For GPU rendering, the Radeon 860M's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8 ray tracing cores can handle simple scenes, but complex renders will be slow. The CPU is the primary workhorse here, and the GPU should be viewed as supplementary.

Software Development: The 24-core, 32-thread configuration excels at parallel compilation. The PassMark integer math score of 147091 and extended instructions score of 29779 suggest strong performance in code compilation and scientific computing. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 88th percentile ranking ensures snappy performance in productivity suites, web browsing, and multitasking. The GPU handles 4K video playback and light photo editing with ease. The 15 W GPU TDP and 55 W CPU TDP contribute to a balanced thermal profile that suits a portable workstation.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (as indicated by the buildClass field) pairing Intel's Core i9-13950HX processor with AMD's Radeon 860M integrated graphics. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-HX part with a 5.50 GHz boost clock, 36 MB of L3 cache, and a 55 W TDP. The GPU is an RDNA 3.5-based integrated solution with 512 shading units, 8 ray tracing cores, and a 3000 MHz boost clock, drawing just 15 W. The combined percentile is 80, which places this configuration in the upper-midrange tier of laptop systems.

The CPU is the clear star of this pairing, sitting at the 88th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 44342. The GPU is more modest, at the 72nd percentile with an average score of 26401. This asymmetry defines the build's character: it is a CPU-first system with adequate graphics capability for mainstream use, but not for high-end gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU's nearest rivals—the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, Intel Core i5-13600, Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, and AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D—are all within 0.5% of its average score, indicating that the i9-13950HX is at the peak of its performance class. The GPU's rivals, which include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and RTX 5060, show that the Radeon 860M punches at the level of entry-level dedicated GPUs.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between CPU and GPU is lopsided, and the data makes this clear. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 72nd percentile means that in most workloads, the CPU will outpace the GPU by a significant margin. For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, the system will perform at a level near the 88th percentile, limited only by the CPU's 55 W TDP and thermal constraints. For GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high settings, 3D rendering, or machine learning inference, the Radeon 860M will be the limiting factor, capping performance at the 72nd percentile.

The benchmark score deltas provide further evidence. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.5%, meaning the CPU is not a differentiator in its class—it is at parity with its closest competitors. The GPU's nearest rivals span a wider range of product types, from the MX550 to the RTX 5060, yet all are within 1.1% of the Radeon 860M's score. This suggests that the GPU's performance is tightly clustered with a broad set of GPUs, and its relative weakness is not a single-point deficiency but a general characteristic of its class.

The FPS scaling, estimated from the benchmark scores, shows that the CPU's single-threaded performance (3DMark 2-thread score of 2107) is sufficient to drive high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will cap frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios. In esports titles at 1080p, the CPU can push 144+ FPS, but the GPU may hold that back to 60-90 FPS depending on settings. In AAA titles, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, and the CPU's power will go largely unused. Conversely, in productivity tasks, the GPU is idle, and the CPU delivers the vast majority of the performance. The 80th combined percentile reflects this imbalance: a system that is better than 80% of laptops overall, but where the CPU is better than 88% and the GPU is better than only 72%.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13950HX

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds