SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13950HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13950HX

44,342 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13950HX is the flagship mobile processor in Intel's 13th Gen Raptor Lake-HX lineup, built on a 10 nm Intel process with a die size of 257 mm². It features 24 cores and 32 threads, a combination of performance and efficiency cores designed for high-end laptops. The base clock is 2.20 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.50 GHz, allowing for substantial single-thread and multi-thread performance. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, a figure that is relatively high for a mobile part, but it is unlocked, enabling overclocking in systems with adequate cooling. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This large L3 cache is critical for gaming and productivity workloads, as it reduces memory latency and improves data throughput.

Benchmark results place the i9-13950HX in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. The average benchmark score is 44,342. Its closest rivals, according to the data, include the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, which scores 44,309 (a 0.1% delta), and the Intel Core i5-13600, which scores 44,240 (a 0.2% delta). The data shows a near-tie among these top-tier parts, meaning the i9-13950HX is competitive at the very top of the mobile CPU hierarchy. The 3DMark multi-thread score of 11,926 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,681 demonstrate exceptional performance for demanding tasks like video rendering and software compilation. In contrast, the single-thread score in Cinebench R23 is 2,096, which is strong but not class-leading, indicating that while the chip excels in parallel workloads, its single-core performance is merely very good rather than exceptional.

For real-world workloads, the PassMark scores are illustrative. The multi-thread score of 41,614 and integer math score of 147,091 show that the CPU can handle heavy computational tasks with ease. The floating-point math score of 105,553 further confirms its strength in scientific and engineering applications. The data encryption score of 30,805 and compression score of 510,258 suggest rapid file handling and secure data processing, making it suitable for enterprise-level tasks. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 8,903 indicates that even when not all cores are utilized, the processor maintains high throughput, which is beneficial for gaming and content creation where thread counts vary. The CPU's percentile ranking and benchmark scores establish it as a top-tier mobile processor, albeit one that trades battery life for raw performance.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13950HX uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable socket typically found in laptops. This means that the CPU itself is not a component that can be swapped out in a traditional desktop sense; the upgrade path is tied to the entire laptop chassis. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows system integrators to choose between the older, more affordable DDR4 standard or the faster DDR5 standard, though the benchmark data does not specify which memory type yields better results. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a feature usually associated with workstation-class machines, indicating that this processor can be used in professional environments where data integrity is paramount.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth interface for connecting to discrete GPUs and NVMe storage. This is a forward-looking feature, as PCIe Gen 5 offers double the bandwidth of Gen 4, ensuring that future storage and graphics cards will not be bottlenecked by the interface. The integrated graphics are the UHD Graphics 770, which are basic and not intended for gaming but can drive displays and handle light graphical tasks. The CPU's 55 W TDP is a baseline, but in a laptop, the actual power draw can be higher under boost loads, so the system's cooling solution and power delivery are critical. The suggested PSU is not listed in the data, but given the mobile form factor, the power is supplied by an external adapter, and the system's power headroom will depend on the laptop's design.

The platform's upgrade path is limited to what the laptop manufacturer allows. Since the CPU is soldered, the primary upgrades are memory, storage, and potentially the wireless card. The support for DDR4 and DDR5 means that a user cannot change memory type after purchase; they must buy the correct type from the start. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide headroom for future high-speed storage devices, making this platform suitable for a long service life. The unlocked multiplier is a notable feature for a mobile chip, but its practical use is constrained by thermal limits in a laptop chassis. Overall, the platform is designed for maximum performance in a mobile form factor, with the trade-off being limited upgradeability compared to a desktop system.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark performance of the Intel Core i9-13950HX is comprehensive, covering a wide range of tests from 3DMark and Cinebench to PassMark. The CPU's average benchmark score is 44,342, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. This is a high ranking, but the nearest rival data shows that it is not alone at the top. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 44,309, which is a 0.1% difference, making the i9-13950HX essentially tied with it. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H scores 44,466, which is 0.3% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D scores 44,573, which is 0.5% higher. These margins are within the noise of benchmark variance, so the i9-13950HX is statistically equivalent to its closest competitors. This is a crowded field at the top, and the choice between these CPUs should be based on other factors like platform features and price.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 28,681, which is a strong result for a mobile chip, and the single-core score of 2,096 is competitive. The PassMark multi-thread score of 41,614 and the 3DMark max threads score of 11,926 both indicate high sustained performance under load. The single-thread PassMark score is 3,899, which is lower than some desktop parts but expected for a mobile processor. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6,732 is notable, as it represents a workload that is common in gaming, where 8 cores are often the target. This score suggests that the CPU will not bottleneck a high-end GPU in most gaming scenarios.

The GPU in this pairing is the AMD Radeon 780M, an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture. Its average benchmark score is 17,588, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 560 with a score of 17,551 (0.2% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 with a score of 17,639 (-0.3% delta). This is a surprising comparison, as the RTX 4060 is a discrete desktop GPU, but the benchmark data shows that the Radeon 780M is within a fraction of a percent of it in the provided tests. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 480, and the Geekbench OpenCL score is 18,602, with a Vulkan score of 33,683. These scores indicate that the integrated GPU is capable of handling light gaming and general graphical tasks, but it is not a substitute for a high-end discrete GPU. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 75, reflecting that the CPU is much stronger than the GPU, creating an imbalance where the CPU is underutilized in graphics-heavy tasks.

Who Should Build It

This pairing of the Intel Core i9-13950HX and AMD Radeon 780M is unusual, as it combines a top-tier CPU with a mid-range integrated GPU. The target user is someone who prioritizes CPU performance above all else, such as a developer compiling code, a researcher running simulations, or a data analyst processing large datasets. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and high multi-thread scores make it ideal for workloads like software development, where compilation times are reduced by having 32 threads. The 36 MB L3 cache and high IPC also benefit database queries and scientific computing. For these users, the integrated GPU is sufficient because their work is not graphically intensive.

Content creators who work primarily with video encoding or 3D rendering will find the CPU's performance to be excellent, but the GPU will be a bottleneck for GPU-accelerated effects. The Radeon 780M's 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for basic rendering, but it will struggle with complex scenes. Students and small business users who need a powerful machine for multitasking and heavy productivity will benefit from the CPU's performance, but they will pay a premium for a processor that is more powerful than needed for typical office tasks. The laptop class of this build means it is a mobile workstation, and the lack of a discrete GPU suggests that the manufacturer targeted a niche audience of users who need raw CPU power on the go.

The 61st percentile ranking of the GPU means it is better than many integrated solutions but worse than most discrete ones. This build is not for gamers, as the Radeon 780M will not deliver high frame rates in modern titles at high settings. It is, however, a viable option for developers who need to test their software on a machine with a specific CPU architecture. The ECC memory support is a strong indicator that this is aimed at professionals who need reliable, error-free computation. Overall, the target user is a power user who values CPU throughput and is willing to forego gaming performance.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The chip, codenamed Phoenix, has a die size of 178 mm² and contains 25,390 million transistors. The GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operations units. It features 12 ray tracing cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting effects in supported games and applications. The boost clock is 2900 MHz, with a base clock of 800 MHz. The pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 139.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.909 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 8.909 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio, which is unusual and suggests a focus on compute rather than AI workloads.

The memory is system shared, meaning the GPU uses the same memory as the CPU. The bandwidth is system dependent, which means performance will vary based on the memory type and configuration. The GPU has a TDP of 15 W, which is very low, and it uses no power connectors, as it is an IGP. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for an integrated GPU. The display outputs are motherboard dependent, so the availability of ports varies by laptop design. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern graphics APIs.

The benchmark scores show that the Radeon 780M is a capable integrated GPU. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 33,683 is strong, indicating good performance in Vulkan-based games and applications. The OpenCL score of 18,602 is respectable for an IGP. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 is low, but this is a demanding test, and the GPU is not designed for high-end gaming. The nearest rival data shows it is within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in average score, which is a surprising result but likely reflects the specific benchmarks used. In rendering workloads, the 12 RT cores provide some hardware acceleration, but the 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the limiting factor for complex scenes. This GPU is suitable for light photo editing, video playback, and older games, but it will struggle with modern AAA titles at high settings.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination of the Intel Core i9-13950HX and AMD Radeon 780M. Therefore, all gaming performance figures are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and high single-thread scores suggest that it will not be a bottleneck in gaming, as most games rely on a few fast cores. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 6,732 is particularly relevant, as it represents a common gaming workload. This score indicates that the CPU can handle the game logic and physics calculations without issue.

The GPU, however, is the limiting factor. With an average benchmark score in the 61st percentile, the Radeon 780M is positioned as a mid-range integrated GPU. Based on the FP32 performance of 8.909 TFLOPS and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480, the expected performance in modern games at 1080p with ultra settings would be low, likely in the range of 20-30 FPS in demanding titles. In less demanding games like esports titles, the frame rates could be higher, potentially reaching 60 FPS or more at lower settings. The lack of dedicated VRAM means the GPU relies on system memory, which can cause stuttering if the memory bandwidth is insufficient.

The CPU's strong performance does not translate to gaming FPS because the GPU is the bottleneck. For example, in a game that is GPU-bound, the CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to render frames. The 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is roughly equivalent to a low-end discrete GPU from a few generations ago, so users should expect to play games at 720p or 1080p with low to medium settings to achieve playable frame rates. The 12 RT cores are a plus for games that support ray tracing, but the overall performance is too low to enable ray tracing at playable frame rates. In summary, this is not a gaming machine, and users who prioritize gaming should look for a system with a discrete GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not recommended. The Radeon 780M's 61st percentile ranking and low 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 indicate that it cannot drive high refresh rate displays in modern games. The CPU is capable of high frame rates, but the GPU will cap the output at low levels, making high-refresh gaming unrealistic.

Streaming: The CPU's 88th percentile ranking and strong multi-thread score of 41,614 in PassMark make it excellent for software encoding. The i9-13950HX can handle the encoding workload while maintaining game performance, but the GPU's low performance means the game will run poorly, making streaming a non-viable use case.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 28,681 suggests excellent performance in video editing software that uses the CPU for encoding and effects. The GPU can accelerate some effects, but the 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is not enough for heavy GPU-accelerated effects. This is a viable scenario for CPU-based editing workflows.

3D Rendering: The CPU's high multi-thread performance makes it suitable for CPU-based rendering, which is common in software like Blender. The GPU can assist with rendering, but its 12 RT cores and low TFLOPS mean that GPU rendering will be slow. This scenario is viable for CPU rendering, but not for GPU rendering.

Software Development: The CPU's 32 threads and high integer math score of 147,091 make it ideal for compiling code and running virtual machines. The GPU is irrelevant for this scenario, making it one of the best use cases for this pairing.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's performance is overkill for this scenario, but the system will handle all office tasks with ease. The GPU is sufficient for video playback and basic graphical tasks. The 55 W TDP may result in shorter battery life, but this is a minor concern for plugged-in work.

FAQ

Q: What is the process node of the Intel Core i9-13950HX?

A: The process node is 10 nm, manufactured by Intel.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 780M have its own dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the memory is system shared, and the bandwidth is system dependent.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The CPU is in the 88th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Is the CPU's multiplier unlocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is 5.50 GHz.

Q: Does the GPU support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What is the TDP of the AMD Radeon 780M?

A: The TDP is 15 W.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the CPU and GPU are severely imbalanced. The CPU's 88th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile ranking indicates that the CPU is the dominant component. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, and scientific calculations, the i9-13950HX will perform exceptionally well, with no bottleneck from the GPU. The PassMark multi-thread score of 41,614 and the integer math score of 147,091 confirm that the CPU is not the limiting factor in these tasks.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering, the Radeon 780M will be the bottleneck. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 6,732 is high enough to handle most game logic, but the GPU's low FP32 performance of 8.909 TFLOPS will cap the frame rate. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 is a clear indicator that the GPU is not suitable for demanding graphical tasks. The result is a system where the CPU will frequently be idle or underutilized because the GPU cannot keep up.

The combined percentile of 75 reflects this imbalance, as it is lower than the CPU's percentile but higher than the GPU's. In a balanced system, the CPU and GPU would be closer in percentile. This pairing makes sense for users who need maximum CPU performance and are willing to accept mediocre graphics. For gaming, the GPU will limit the experience, while for productivity, the CPU will shine. The bottleneck analysis shows that the GPU is the limiting factor in all graphics-related tasks, while the CPU is the limiting factor only in tasks that do not rely on the GPU.

Build Overview

This build is classified as a laptop, combining the Intel Core i9-13950HX CPU with the AMD Radeon 780M integrated GPU. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, ranking in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range integrated solution, ranking in the 61st percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 75, placing it in the upper quartile of all builds. This is a workstation-class laptop designed for users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics.

The i9-13950HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, making it one of the fastest mobile chips available. The Radeon 780M, with its 768 shading units and 12 RT cores, is a capable integrated GPU but is not designed for high-end gaming. The overall tier of this build is high, driven by the CPU's performance, but the GPU holds it back in graphics-intensive applications. This is a niche product for professionals who need raw processing power in a portable form factor and do not require a discrete GPU. The lack of measured FPS data means that gaming performance is estimated, but the benchmark scores clearly show that this is not a gaming laptop.