SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13905H + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13905H

40,313 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13905H paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S is an unusual combination in the database: a mobile Raptor Lake-H processor sitting alongside an RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU from the Strix Halo family. The data shows a build classified as a laptop configuration with a combined percentile of 88, placing it in the upper tier of all recorded systems. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing — the fact pack contains no measuredFps entries and dataIsMeasured is false — so every frame-rate statement below is an estimate derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct game measurement.

FAQ

Q: What CPU is in this build?

A: The Intel Core i9-13905H, a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-H mobile processor with a 2.60 base clock, a 5.40 boost clock, and a 45 W TDP. It sits at the 87th percentile versus all CPUs in the database with an average benchmark score of 40313.

Q: What GPU is paired with it?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S, an integrated RDNA 3.5 design built on the Strix Halo chip at TSMC's 4 nm node. It has 2048 shading units, 32 ray-tracing cores, a 2800 MHz boost clock, and a 55 W TDP, ranking at the 89th percentile versus all GPUs.

Q: How fast is the i9-13905H in Cinebench R23?

A: It scores 20034 in multi-core and 2020 in single-core. The single-core figure indicates strong per-thread responsiveness, while the multi-core score reflects the full 20-thread throughput of the hybrid core design.

Q: Which CPUs are its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Xeon 6369P (average score 40327, deltaPct 0), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40246, 0.2%), the Intel Xeon 6507P (40426, −0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (40431, −0.3%). All four sit within a fraction of a percent of its aggregate score.

Q: Does this configuration have measured game FPS data?

A: No. The fact pack contains no measuredFps entries for this pairing and dataIsMeasured is false. Any frame-rate discussion here is estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Q: What memory does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus. Because the Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory, the amount and speed of installed RAM directly determines GPU memory capacity and bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked?

A: No. The multiplierUnlocked field is false, so tuning is limited to whatever the laptop vendor exposes, as is typical for a BGA-packaged mobile part.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-13905H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, which means it is soldered directly to the motherboard and cannot be swapped or upgraded. That single fact defines the upgrade path: the CPU and GPU are fixed at purchase, and all future headroom must come from memory, storage, and the platform's connectivity. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and since the Radeon 8050S draws its video memory from system RAM, maximizing memory speed and capacity is the one genuinely performance-relevant upgrade available. Storage and peripherals can exploit PCIe Gen 5, though the CPU provides only 8 lanes of it directly.

Power headroom is defined by the two TDP figures: 45 W for the CPU and 55 W for the GPU, for a combined thermal envelope that a laptop chassis must manage as a whole. There is no suggestedPsu value because this is an integrated mobile design with no power connectors on the GPU side. A sensible next upgrade is therefore not a component swap but a whole-system move to a newer mobile platform; within this machine, adding faster dual-channel memory and additional RAM is the practical lever, since it feeds both the CPU and the shared-memory GPU simultaneously.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU posts 2857 multi-core and 246 single-core in Cinebench R15, 10605 multi-core and 1497 single-core in R20, and 20034 multi-core with 2020 single-core in R23. That progression shows a consistent profile: strong multi-core scaling across the 14 cores and 20 threads, paired with single-core numbers that keep latency-sensitive workloads competitive. The PassMark suite fills out the picture with a 29779 multithread score, a 3703 single-thread score, 101716 integer math, 73434 floating point math, 354330 data compression, 20464 encryption, 21297 extended instructions, 37460 string sorting, a 2054 physics score, and 122 in find-prime-numbers.

The 87th percentile placement against all CPUs means this chip outperforms roughly the large majority of the database, including desktop parts — a strong position for a 45 W mobile processor. Its average benchmark score of 40313 lands it within a rounding error of the Intel Xeon 6369P (40327, deltaPct 0), fractionally ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40246, 0.2%), and marginally behind the Intel Xeon 6507P (40426, −0.3%) and AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (40431, −0.3%). In other words, it performs like those chips, full stop.

On the GPU side, the Radeon 8050S records 65818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58398 in Geekbench Vulkan, averaging 62108 and landing at the 89th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals cluster tightly: the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61896 (0.3% behind this GPU), and the Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63693), RX 7600M (63775), and RX 9060 XT LP (63830) all 2.5–2.7% ahead. Combined, the system sits at the 88th percentile — a high-tier laptop configuration by any measure in this database.

Who Should Build It

Because the buildClass is laptop and both chips are soldered or integrated, this is a machine to buy, not build — and the measured numbers say it suits a demanding mobile professional. Content creators benefit most: the 20034 R23 multi-core score handles video exports and 3D renders on the road, while the 2020 single-core score keeps timeline scrubbing and application responsiveness sharp. Software developers get a 3703 single-thread PassMark score, which drives fast compile times, and the 29779 multithread result supports parallel builds, containerized environments, and local test suites.

Students and office users are covered with headroom to spare — the physics score of 2054 and encryption score of 20464 indicate effortless everyday responsiveness, and the integrated Iris Xe 96EU graphics can drive displays without engaging the heavier GPU. Small-business workstations doing data work benefit from the 354330 compression and 101716 integer math scores. Gamers are the one group needing tempered expectations: the 89th-percentile GPU is genuinely capable, but as an estimate-based judgement (no measured FPS data exists), the system is best framed as a high-refresh 1080p-class gaming machine rather than a 4K flagship.

CPU Analysis

The i9-13905H is a 14-core, 20-thread Raptor Lake-H processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a 257 mm² die. Its cache hierarchy — 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 — gives the hybrid architecture a deep pool for sustained multi-threaded work. The base clock of 2.60 and boost clock of 5.40 span a wide range, letting the chip sprint on single threads and spread out across all cores within its 45 W envelope.

The benchmark spread tells a coherent story about real workloads. The 2020 R23 single-core score and 3703 PassMark single-thread score mean any application limited by one fast thread — game logic, editor UI, script interpreters — runs near the top of the mobile class. The 20034 R23 multi-core score and 29779 PassMark multithread score show near-linear exploitation of the thread count in rendering and batch processing. The integer (101716) and floating-point (73434) math results favor general application and compute workloads alike, while the 354330 compression score is directly relevant to anyone working with large archives or build artifacts. Ranking at the 87th percentile against all CPUs — effectively tied with the Xeon 6369P and within half a percent of the Ryzen 9 7940H — this is desktop-adjacent performance from a mobile part.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: No measured FPS rows exist for this pairing, so figures are estimated from benchmark scores. The 89th-percentile GPU, sitting within a few percent of the RX 7600M and RX 9060 XT LP, points to strong ultra-settings 1080p play with high refresh targets, with 1440p plausible in lighter titles.

Streaming: The 20034 R23 multi-core score gives the CPU reserves to run an encoder and game logic simultaneously, while the 5.40 boost clock keeps the game thread responsive. The Vulkan score of 58398 suggests the GPU can carry the render load while CPU threads absorb the stream.

Video editing: Timeline responsiveness tracks single-core performance, and the 2020 R23 single-core score is strong; export throughput tracks multi-core, where 20034 plus the 354330 compression score indicate fast renders and proxy generation.

3D rendering: The 2857 R15, 10605 R20, and 20034 R23 multi-core scores scale cleanly across the 14 cores, and the GPU's 65818 OpenCL score supports GPU-accelerated viewport and render engines, rivaling the Radeon Pro W6600M — a workstation-class comparison.

Software development: A 3703 single-thread score drives fast interactive compilation, and the 29779 multithread result plus 21297 extended-instruction score handle parallel builds and virtualized environments. The 122 find-prime-numbers result is consistent with solid raw integer throughput.

Student and office work: The 2054 physics score and 20464 encryption score indicate snappy everyday use and fast disk encryption, with the 87th-percentile CPU leaving years of headroom over typical productivity demand.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon 8050S is an RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU on the Strix Halo chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process with a 308 mm² die. It carries 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render outputs, and 32 ray-tracing cores, with no tensor cores listed. Clocks run from a 1295 MHz base to a 2800 MHz boost, producing a pixel fill rate of 179.2 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s, and 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 — FP16 runs at the same rate on a 1:1 basis.

Its defining trait is shared memory: size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all "system shared/dependent," meaning GPU performance is coupled to installed system RAM rather than dedicated VRAM. There is no fixed capacity figure to cite — a rare design among upper-tier GPUs. The 65818 OpenCL score is the key number for rendering and compute contexts, and it lands within 0.3% of the Radeon Pro W6600M, a professional part, while trailing the Vega 56, RX 7600M, and RX 9060 XT LP by 2.5–2.7%. The 58398 Vulkan score is notably lower than the OpenCL figure, which suggests the API path matters for this design. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6 support means modern renderers, including ray-traced effects via its 32 RT cores, are available, and the PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface is present even though the part functions as an IGP with no power connectors.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing: a mobile Raptor Lake-H flagship CPU with an integrated RDNA 3.5 GPU, a combination unusual in the database because the two parts come from different platform generations and vendors. The tier is unambiguous — CPU at the 87th percentile, GPU at the 89th, and the system overall at the 88th combined percentile. That places the machine in the top eighth of the database, a high-performance mobile configuration whose CPU rivals Xeon workstation silicon and whose GPU trades blows with dedicated mobile and low-profile desktop cards. With a 45 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP, the total thermal budget is modest for this performance level, which is exactly what the 4 nm GPU node and 10 nm CPU process are buying.

Balance and Bottleneck

The percentiles are unusually well matched: 87 for the CPU, 89 for the GPU, 88 combined. Neither component dramatically overshadows the other, which is the signature of a balanced system. The GPU sits two percentile points above the CPU, suggesting that in the heaviest GPU-bound rendering loads, the CPU can feed the graphics side without becoming the limiter, while the CPU's strong single-core scores (2020 R23, 3703 PassMark single-thread) prevent a CPU bottleneck in game logic and draw-call-heavy scenes.

The real bottleneck in this design is structural, not componental: shared memory. Because GPU bandwidth is "system dependent," workloads that saturate video memory bandwidth — high-resolution textures, large render buffers — will be limited by system RAM rather than silicon. No measured FPS scaling data exists for this pairing to quantify that limit, so the judgement is qualitative: in CPU-bound scenarios the 5.40 boost clock and strong single-core results carry the system; in GPU-bound scenarios the 11.47 TFLOPS and 89th-percentile compute carry it; in memory-bound scenarios the shared-memory architecture is the ceiling.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS figures for this exact combination — the fact pack's measuredFps data is empty and dataIsMeasured is false — so everything here is an estimate extrapolated from the benchmark scores. The starting point is the GPU's 89th percentile ranking and its 62108 average score, which sits within 0.3% of the Radeon Pro W6600M and 2.5–2.7% behind the Radeon Pro Vega 56, RX 7600M, and RX 9060 XT LP. Systems in that performance neighborhood are typically comfortable at ultra settings at 1080p, including demanding modern titles, with headroom for high-refresh play in competitive and lighter games. At 1440p, the estimate is playable-to-smooth depending on title, though the shared-memory bandwidth becomes more relevant as resolution and texture load rise.

The CPU side supports rather than limits those estimates: a 3703 single-thread PassMark score and 2054 physics score indicate the processor will not be the frame-rate ceiling in most games. Ray-traced effects are available through the 32 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, though enabling them will cost frame rate, as it does for any GPU in this tier. The honest summary: the benchmark data places this firmly among capable mobile gaming machines, but per-game, per-resolution frame counts for this specific pairing remain unmeasured in the database.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13905H + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13905H

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds