SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
77%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900TE

5,342 Benchmark Score
Top 23% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

56,083 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a desktop pairing built around a 24-core Intel Raptor Lake processor and a top-tier NVIDIA Blackwell GPU. The data in this analysis is derived entirely from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. All gaming performance discussions are therefore estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark results, not from direct in-game testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 5080 is the dominant force here, sitting at the 87th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 56,083. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 8,637 indicates substantial rasterization headroom, which translates to strong 1440p and 4K performance estimates. The CPU, while not a gaming specialist, holds its own with a 60th percentile ranking; the i9-13900TE’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2,607 is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking high frame rate scenarios in most titles.

Streaming and Content Creation: The combination of 32 threads and UHD Graphics 770 on the CPU provides a solid foundation for encoding and multitasking. The GPU’s 336 tensor cores and 84 RT cores offer dedicated hardware for AI-enhanced encoding and real-time effects. In streaming workloads, the CPU’s multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 18,472 suggests it can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously, while the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 36,565 indicates it can render frames without stuttering under load.

Video Editing: Editors will find the RTX 5080’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth well-suited for 4K timelines and effects-heavy projects. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 235,901 and Vulkan score of 255,450 point to strong compute acceleration for rendering and export tasks. The CPU’s multi-core performance, 24 cores and 32 threads, provides parallel processing for timeline scrubbing and background exports.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the i9-13900TE delivers a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7,758 and R15 multi-core score of 1,861. This places it in a competitive position, though its 60th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier render farm chip. The GPU, however, excels at GPU-accelerated rendering; its FP32 throughput of 56.28 TFLOPS and Passmark GPU Compute score of 21,789 make it a formidable choice for real-time viewport rendering and final frame output in engines that support CUDA.

Software Development: Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s 32 threads and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node delivers efficient multi-threaded throughput, as seen in the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,472. The platform’s support for ECC memory is a practical feature for development servers or workstations where data integrity is critical.

Student and Office Work: This pairing is severely overqualified for typical academic or office tasks. The CPU’s boost clock of 5.00 GHz ensures snappy responsiveness in single-threaded applications like spreadsheets and word processors. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU will handle any graphical interface with ease. For students, this is a workstation-class setup that will not struggle with any coursework, but the power draw and physical size may be excessive for a dorm room.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a GPU-heavy system where the graphics card is the clear performance leader. The RTX 5080 sits at the 87th GPU percentile, while the CPU rests at the 60th CPU percentile. This 27-point gap suggests that in gaming scenarios, the GPU will often be waiting on the CPU to feed it data, particularly at lower resolutions where frame rates are high. The CPU’s single-core score of 2,607 in Cinebench R23 is the limiting factor for maximum FPS in esports titles, while the GPU’s headroom is underutilized in those cases.

Conversely, in compute-heavy workloads like 3D rendering or video encoding, the balance shifts. The CPU’s multi-core score of 18,472 in Cinebench R23 is respectable but not exceptional for a 24-core part, indicating that it may throttle under sustained all-core loads due to its 35 W TDP. The GPU, with its 56.28 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, will dominate any GPU-accelerated task, leaving the CPU as a supporting player rather than a bottleneck.

The FPS scaling estimation from the benchmark scores suggests that at 4K resolution, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, which is typical for high-end graphics cards. At 1080p, the CPU becomes the limiting factor, as its single-core performance is modest relative to the GPU’s raw power. For a balanced experience, pairing this CPU with a slightly less powerful GPU might yield more consistent frame pacing, but the current setup will still deliver high frame rates in most titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900TE uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5 modules. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes, which is sufficient for a single modern GPU like the RTX 5080 that uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface.

The platform’s memory support for ECC is a notable feature for workstation builds, though the consumer-oriented socket may limit ECC availability on some motherboards. The 35 W TDP of the CPU is remarkably low for a 24-core part, meaning a modest air cooler or low-profile cooler is sufficient, which is unusual for an i9-class processor. This low TDP also means the CPU will not demand excessive power delivery from the motherboard, making it compatible with a wide range of Intel 600-series and 700-series boards.

The RTX 5080, with a 360 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 750 W, requires a substantial power supply. The 1x 16-pin power connector is modern but requires an adapter for older PSUs. A sensible next upgrade would be a newer generation CPU on a different socket, but given this platform’s maturity, the more practical path is to wait for a full platform overhaul. For now, the PCIe 5.0 support ensures the GPU is not bandwidth-limited, and the dual-channel memory is adequate for most workloads.

Build Overview

This build pairs a 24-core Intel Raptor Lake desktop CPU with a high-end NVIDIA GeForce 50-series GPU in a desktop-class configuration. The combined percentile ranking of 74 places this system above the majority of all possible CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU’s 60th percentile and the GPU’s 87th percentile create a system that is firmly in the upper mid-range to high-end performance tier, though the CPU is notably weaker than the GPU on a relative basis.

The i9-13900TE is a peculiar chip: it is a 24-core processor with a 35 W TDP, which is an energy-efficient variant of the standard i9-13900. Its benchmarks show it performs similarly to older high-end chips like the Intel Core i9-10900KF, which has an average score of 5,316 versus the i9-13900TE’s 5,342, a delta of 0.5%. This suggests the low TDP limits sustained performance, making it more akin to a laptop-class CPU in a desktop form factor.

The RTX 5080 is a genuine flagship-tier GPU. Its average benchmark score of 56,083 is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, though it trails the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by 2.2%. This places it in a competitive position with AMD’s best offerings, but not decisively ahead. The build as a whole is a high-performance desktop suitable for demanding workloads, but the CPU’s efficiency focus may leave performance on the table in CPU-bound scenarios.

FAQ

Q: Is this CPU-GPU pairing good for 4K gaming?

A: Yes, the RTX 5080’s 87th GPU percentile and 16 GB of GDDR7 memory provide ample headroom for 4K gaming, but the CPU’s 60th percentile may limit frame rates in CPU-intensive titles.

Q: What is the power consumption of this build?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, while the GPU has a 360 W TDP. A suggested PSU of 750 W is required to safely power this configuration.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked, meaning the i9-13900TE cannot be overclocked. Its base clock is 1000.00 MHz and boost clock is 5.00 GHz.

Q: Can I use DDR4 memory with this CPU?

A: Yes, the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in memory choice.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56,083, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Radeon 8060S and 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, but 2.2% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 has a launch MSRP of 999 USD.

Q: Is ECC memory supported?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900TE supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, packing 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. It features 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. The GPU’s memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s, which is exceptional for high-resolution textures and large datasets.

Clock speeds are set at a base of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2617 MHz, with memory running at 1875 MHz or 30 Gbps effective. The pixel rate is 293.1 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 879.3 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill rates for high-resolution rendering. The FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 matching at 56.28 TFLOPS due to a 1:1 ratio.

Ray tracing and AI capabilities are handled by 84 RT cores and 336 tensor cores, respectively. These enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-style features. In benchmark tests, the GPU scored 8,637 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 235,901 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 255,450 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its Passmark G3D score is 36,565, with a GPU Compute score of 21,789.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s high FP32 throughput and tensor core count make it well-suited for real-time ray tracing and AI denoising. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 4K texture sets, and the bandwidth ensures fast data transfer. However, the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 151 is notably low, which may indicate driver overhead or test-specific anomalies rather than real-world DX12 performance.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this pairing is a professional content creator or a high-end enthusiast gamer who prioritizes GPU performance above all else. Gamers playing at 4K resolution will see the most benefit, as the RTX 5080’s 87th percentile ranking ensures high frame rates in demanding titles. Those at 1440p will also find excellent performance, though the CPU may become a bottleneck in lighter esports games.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or AI workloads will leverage the GPU’s compute capabilities. The 16 GB VRAM and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are ideal for large video timelines and complex 3D scenes. The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide adequate support for background tasks, though its low TDP may limit sustained all-core performance.

Software developers and data scientists will appreciate the ECC memory support and the platform’s PCIe 5.0 connectivity. Students and office workers would find this build excessively powerful, but it would handle any academic software with ease. Small business workstations requiring reliable multi-threaded performance and GPU acceleration for tasks like CAD or data visualization would also benefit, provided the power draw is acceptable.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900TE is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. It has a base clock of 1000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, which is a wide frequency range that allows for efficient power management. The 35 W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core part, indicating a focus on energy efficiency over raw performance.

The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for workloads with high data locality. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC, and provides 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for GPU connectivity.

In benchmark tests, the CPU scored 1,861 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 262 in single-core. Its Cinebench R20 scores are 7,758 multi-core and 1,094 single-core. In Cinebench R23, it achieved 18,472 multi-core and 2,607 single-core. These scores position the CPU at the 60th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 5,342.

The nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-10900KF with a score of 5,316, a 0.5% delta, meaning the i9-13900TE is only marginally faster. This is surprising given the architectural differences, but it underscores the impact of the low TDP on sustained performance. The CPU is not unlocked, so overclocking is unavailable, which limits its potential for users seeking maximum single-thread performance.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 5,342, placing it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs. Its best result is in Cinebench R23 multi-core with 18,472 points, while its single-core score is 2,607. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 56,083, placing it at the 87th percentile among all GPUs. Its strongest result is in Geekbench Vulkan with 255,450 points, followed by Geekbench OpenCL with 235,901.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 74, which reflects a system that is above average overall but not at the extreme top end. The GPU’s high percentile is the primary driver of this combined score, while the CPU’s lower percentile drags it down slightly. In terms of raw scores, the GPU has an average score that is roughly 10.5 times higher than the CPU’s average, highlighting the GPU’s dominance in this pairing.

The data shows a system that excels in GPU-accelerated tasks but is merely adequate in CPU-bound tasks. The RTX 5080’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 8060S, trails by 0.6%, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE leads by 2.2%. This indicates the GPU is competitive with top AMD offerings but not the undisputed leader. The CPU’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900KF, is essentially tied with a 0.5% delta, showing that the i9-13900TE offers no significant performance advantage over older, higher-TDP chips.

For a builder, this means the system will shine in GPU-heavy workloads like gaming at high resolutions, 3D rendering, and video encoding. In CPU-heavy tasks like software compilation or multi-threaded rendering, it will perform at a level comparable to several-generation-old high-end CPUs, which may be a disappointment given the i9 branding. The combined picture is of a system that delivers excellent graphics performance with a CPU that is efficient but not class-leading.