SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

77%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900TE

5,342 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM: A Desktop Workstation-Class Analysis

This pairing combines a 35-watt, 24-core Raptor Lake desktop processor with an entry-level Ampere graphics card, resulting in a desktop build that ranks at the 59th percentile overall. The CPU, Intel Core i9-13900TE, sits at the 60th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, holds the 57th percentile among all GPUs. The data shows a system designed for multi-threaded productivity, moderate gaming, and energy-conscious operation, though its performance ceiling is defined by the GPU rather than the processor.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3050 OEM cannot sustain high-refresh 1080p gaming at ultra settings. Its PassMark G3D score of 11857 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (deltaPct 0.2%) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (deltaPct -0.6%), both of which are entry-to-midrange cards. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can handle esports titles at lower settings, but the data does not support expectations of 144 Hz or higher output in demanding titles. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2607 is adequate for frame pacing, but the GPU is the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide exceptional headroom for encoding and streaming workloads. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18472 indicates the processor can handle simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcasting without bottlenecking. The GPU's 72 tensor cores and 18 RT cores offer hardware-accelerated encoding, but the GPU's overall compute performance (PassMark GPU compute score of 5779) is modest, making CPU-based streaming the more robust option.

Video editing: Multi-core performance is the cornerstone of video editing, and this CPU delivers. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7758 and R15 multi-core score of 1861 show a processor that is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900KF and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in average benchmark scores. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 126.4 GTexel/s texture rate can handle 1080p editing timelines and effects, but 4K multi-layer editing will stress the GPU's 128-bit memory bus.

3D rendering: The CPU dominates rendering workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18472, combined with 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache per core, makes it a strong candidate for CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar applications. The GPU's FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS is sufficient for basic GPU-accelerated rendering, but the RTX 3050 OEM's 18 RT cores will lag behind faster ray-tracing cards when rendering complex scenes.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis benefit from the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2607 ensures responsive IDE performance, while the multi-core score allows for parallel builds. The GPU's OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 support GPU-accelerated compute tasks, though the 8 GB VRAM limits the size of datasets that can be processed on the GPU.

Student and office work: The 35-watt TDP makes this an energy-efficient choice for prolonged academic or office sessions. The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, and the GPU's 973 PassMark G2D score indicates solid 2D performance for document editing and web browsing. The dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support ensures adequate bandwidth for multitasking.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 5342, placing it at the 60th percentile of all CPUs. This score is 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i9-10900KF (avgScore 5316) and the AMD EPYC 7281 (avgScore 5315), 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (avgScore 5306), and 0.8% higher than the Intel Core i9-9900X (avgScore 5301). The GPU's average benchmark score is 15199, placing it at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. This score is 0.2% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (avgScore 15171), 0.5% lower than the AMD Radeon 680M (avgScore 15270) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (avgScore 15283), and 0.6% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (avgScore 15290).

The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its nearest rivals by less than 1% across the board, while the GPU is statistically tied with several competitors. The CPU's Cinebench scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads: R15 multi-core 1861, R20 multi-core 7758, and R23 multi-core 18472. Single-core scores are respectable but not class-leading: R15 single-core 262, R20 single-core 1094, and R23 single-core 2607. The GPU's PassMark scores show strong DirectX 9 performance (137) and weaker DirectX 12 performance (58), indicating that older APIs run relatively better than modern ones.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900TE is a Raptor Lake-S processor built on Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It features 24 cores and 32 threads, a base clock of 1000.00 MHz, and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support, a feature not commonly found in consumer desktop CPUs.

The 35-watt TDP is unusually low for a 24-core processor, indicating aggressive power limiting. The benchmark results suggest this power limit caps sustained multi-core performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18472 is strong but not exceptional for a 24-core chip; higher-TDP Raptor Lake processors would score higher. The single-core score of 2607 reflects the 5.00 GHz boost clock, which is competitive for gaming and lightly threaded applications.

The processor's percentile rank of 60 places it in the upper-middle tier of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include older high-core-count processors like the Intel Core i9-10900KF and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, indicating that the 13900TE trades clock speed for core count. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache is substantial and helps with memory-intensive workloads. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output, useful for troubleshooting or low-power scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory choice. The CPU provides Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes (CPU only), enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades. The 35-watt TDP means the CPU places minimal load on the power supply, allowing headroom for a more powerful GPU. The suggested PSU for the current GPU is 300 W, which is modest for a desktop build.

A sensible next upgrade would be a graphics card with higher performance. The current GPU's average benchmark score of 15199 is only 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 7600, indicating that a moderate GPU upgrade would yield significant performance gains. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads would not bottleneck a faster GPU in most workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 interface ensures that a future GPU upgrade will have ample bandwidth, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The platform's ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation use cases, allowing error-checking in memory-intensive applications. The dual-channel memory bus limits memory bandwidth compared to high-end workstation platforms, but the 36 MB L3 cache mitigates this in many workloads. The socket 1700 platform is mature, with a wide range of motherboards available, though the processor's 35-watt TDP means it can be paired with more modest VRM designs.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance compared to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900TE has an average benchmark score of 5342, which is 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i9-10900KF (5316) and AMD EPYC 7281 (5315), 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X (5306), and 0.8% higher than the Intel Core i9-9900X (5301).

Q: How does the GPU compare to the AMD Radeon RX 7600?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has an average benchmark score of 15199, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15171). This indicates near-identical performance in the benchmark data.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900TE supports ECC memory, which is a feature more commonly found in workstation-class processors.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and how does it affect performance?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 watts, which is very low for a 24-core processor. This power limit likely caps sustained multi-core performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18472.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The GPU has 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). Its PassMark DirectX 12 score is 58, indicating modest ray tracing performance.

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this build?

A: The combined percentile rank is 59, placing this desktop build in the upper-middle tier of all builds in the database.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is based on the GA106 chip, built on Samsung's 8 nm process with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It features 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The GPU has 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The boost clock is 1755 MHz with a base clock of 1515 MHz.

The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with a pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.087 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern APIs.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that performs best in older APIs. The PassMark DirectX 9 score of 137 is the highest among the DirectX tests, while DirectX 10 (61), DirectX 11 (86), and DirectX 12 (58) are lower. The PassMark G3D score of 11857 and GPU compute score of 5779 indicate solid but not exceptional performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 show strong compute capabilities relative to the GPU's gaming performance.

The GPU's percentile rank of 57 places it just above the median. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.2% higher), AMD Radeon 680M (-0.5%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (-0.5%), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (-0.6%). This clustering suggests the RTX 3050 OEM is at the boundary between entry-level and midrange performance.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the GPU as the primary bottleneck in gaming workloads. The CPU's 60th percentile rank and multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 18472) far exceed the GPU's 57th percentile and PassMark G3D score of 11857. In CPU-bound tasks like rendering or compilation, the GPU's compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute 5779) may become secondary, but in gaming, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit frame rates.

The FPS scaling evidence, though not measured for this exact combination, can be inferred from benchmark scores. The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2607 suggests it can feed frames at high rates, but the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 58 and G3D score of 11857 indicate it will cap frame rates at moderate levels. The CPU is unlikely to bottleneck the GPU in any workload; the reverse is true for gaming.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-core performance (Cinebench R20 multi-core 7758) will drive rendering and compilation, while the GPU's compute scores (OpenCL 60740) can accelerate specific tasks. The 35-watt CPU TDP means the system is power-efficient, but the GPU's 130 W TDP dominates the power draw. The suggested PSU of 300 W provides sufficient headroom for both components.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900TE, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor with a 35-watt TDP, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, an 8 GB Ampere GPU with a 130-watt TDP. The combined percentile rank is 59, placing this system in the upper-middle tier of all desktop builds.

The CPU is the standout component, offering workstation-class multi-threading in a power-efficient package. The GPU is entry-level, performing within 1% of several rivals including the AMD Radeon RX 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060. This pairing is best described as a productivity-first system with moderate gaming capabilities. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with ECC memory support, make it suitable for professional workloads, while the GPU provides adequate graphics performance for less demanding games and GPU-accelerated tasks.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p with medium-to-high settings will find the GPU adequate, though the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and ray tracing performance. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-core scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core 18472) and the GPU's compute capabilities (OpenCL 60740). Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 cores and 32 threads, while the single-core score of 2607 ensures responsive tooling.

Students and office workers seeking a quiet, energy-efficient system will find the 35-watt CPU TDP appealing, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display option. Small business workstations running multi-threaded applications like spreadsheet analysis or database processing will leverage the CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and ECC memory support. The GPU's PassMark G2D score of 973 indicates solid 2D performance for office tasks, while the 57th percentile ranking ensures compatibility with standard business software.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 and DirectX 12 score of 58 suggest 1080p gaming at medium settings in most modern titles, with lower settings required for ray tracing enabled games. The 8 GB VRAM will accommodate high-resolution textures at 1080p, but the 128-bit memory bus may cause performance drops in memory-intensive scenes.

The CPU's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2607 indicates it will not limit frame rates in most games, but the GPU's 57th percentile ranking means 144 Hz gaming is unlikely in demanding titles. Esports games and older titles will run smoothly at high frame rates. The GPU's DirectX 9 score of 137 suggests strong performance in legacy games, while DirectX 11 (86) and DirectX 12 (58) scores indicate diminishing performance with newer APIs. Estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra settings would likely fall below 60 FPS in AAA titles, with competitive settings required for higher refresh rates.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900TE + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900TE

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds