SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900TE + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

77%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900TE

5,342 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 sits in the 69th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23,877. This places it in a competitive mid-to-upper tier, roughly on par with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER (which trails by 1.2%) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (which leads by 0.8%). The data indicates a GPU that delivers solid 1440p-class performance with enough headroom for demanding titles, though it does not reach the top echelon of current flagship cards.

Memory configuration is a standout feature. The card carries 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s. That memory capacity is substantial for modern rendering workloads, particularly for high-resolution textures or AI-assisted content creation where VRAM limits are often the first bottleneck. The 256-bit bus width ensures the memory subsystem keeps pace with the compute units, and the 20.1 Gbps effective memory speed is a high figure for GDDR6-class parts. For 4K texture packs or large scene geometry in rendering software, 16 GB provides meaningful headroom.

Clock behavior shows a base of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. The gap between base and boost is wide, which suggests aggressive power management — the card runs cool and quiet at idle or light load, then ramps significantly under sustained workloads. The game clock is the more realistic sustained figure during actual gaming sessions, while the boost clock represents peak single-core or short-burst performance. For rendering tasks that hold the GPU at full load for extended periods, expect sustained clocks closer to the game clock than the boost figure.

The underlying architecture is RDNA 4.0 on a 4 nm TSMC process, with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. That transistor density of 151.0M per mm² is high, reflecting the efficiency gains of the 4 nm node. The chip, codenamed Navi 48, packs 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster output units. Peak pixel rate is 322.6 GPixel/s and texture rate is 564.5 GTexel/s, both of which are strong figures for a mid-to-upper tier card. FP32 compute is rated at 36.13 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 36.13 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), meaning no half-rate penalty for FP16 workloads — relevant for machine learning inference or certain rendering effects.

Ray tracing hardware is present in the form of 56 RT cores. The RX 9070 does not list tensor cores, so AI-accelerated features rely on the compute units rather than dedicated tensor hardware. This matters for workloads like DLSS-style upscaling or AI denoising, where NVIDIA parts with tensor cores may have an advantage. However, the 1:1 FP16 throughput partially compensates for the lack of dedicated tensor hardware in compute-heavy tasks. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering the full modern API stack for gaming and professional rendering.

Benchmark scores reveal the performance character. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 indicates strong DirectX 12 rasterization performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 131,539 shows excellent general-purpose compute. The Vulkan score of 58,705 is notably lower than OpenCL, suggesting the driver stack favors OpenCL for compute workloads. Passmark scores are mixed: G3D at 25,381 is solid, but the DirectX 12 score of 74 and DirectX 10 score of 141 are surprisingly low — these likely reflect specific driver or benchmark quirks rather than real-world DX12 weaknesses, given the Steel Nomad score. The G2D score of 1,280 indicates modest 2D desktop performance, which is rarely a bottleneck in practice.

For rendering, the combination of 16 GB VRAM, 644.6 GB/s bandwidth, and 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 means the RX 9070 can handle complex scenes with large texture sets and moderate ray tracing workloads. The 56 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the overall RT throughput is not class-leading. Real-time rendering engines like Unreal or Unity will benefit from the high texture rate and pixel rate, while offline renderers using GPU compute (like Blender Cycles or Octane) will leverage the strong OpenCL performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Radeon RX 9070, and where does it rank?

A: The RX 9070 has an average benchmark score of 23,877, placing it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. It performs within 1.2% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER and within 0.8% of the AMD Radeon RX 6800S.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900TE compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The i9-13900TE has an average benchmark score of 5,342, placing it in the 60th percentile of all CPUs. It is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900KF and the AMD EPYC 7281, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900X.

Q: What memory capacity and bandwidth does the RX 9070 offer?

A: The RX 9070 features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s and an effective memory speed of 20.1 Gbps.

Q: Does the RX 9070 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 9070 includes 56 dedicated RT cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes DirectX Raytracing. Its ray tracing performance is moderate relative to its rasterization strength.

Q: What is the TDP of the i9-13900TE, and what PSU is suggested for the RX 9070?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900TE has a TDP of 35 watts. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 has a TDP of 220 watts, and AMD suggests a 550-watt power supply for systems using this GPU.

Q: What socket does the i9-13900TE use, and what memory does it support?

A: The i9-13900TE uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory. It also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RX 9070?

A: The launch MSRP of the AMD Radeon RX 9070 is 549 USD.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty. All FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

Given the RX 9070’s 69th percentile GPU ranking and its average benchmark score of 23,877, the card is positioned for strong 1440p gaming and capable 4K performance in less demanding titles. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for modern games at high resolutions, and the 644.6 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory bottlenecks in texture-heavy scenes. The 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 compute ensures solid rasterization throughput.

At 1080p, expect the RX 9070 to deliver very high frame rates in competitive titles and high settings in AAA games. The CPU pairing with the i9-13900TE will not be a limiting factor at this resolution, as the CPU’s 60th percentile ranking is sufficient to feed the GPU in most scenarios. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration provides ample headroom for game logic and physics.

At 1440p, the RX 9070 should hit high refresh rates in esports titles and 60+ FPS in most AAA games on ultra settings. The pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s support high-resolution rendering without fill-rate bottlenecks. The 56 RT cores enable ray tracing at playable frame rates, though enabling heavy RT effects may require dropping to high settings or using upscaling.

At 4K, performance will vary by title. Less demanding games or those with good scalability should run at 60 FPS on ultra, while more demanding AAA titles may require medium-to-high settings or upscaling to maintain smooth frame rates. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K textures, but the overall compute throughput is not at flagship level, so 4K ultra in the most demanding titles will be a stretch.

The i9-13900TE’s CPU performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,472 and single-core score of 2,607, is sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz provides strong single-thread performance for game engines that rely on a few fast cores, while the 32 threads handle background tasks and streaming without interfering with gameplay.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Intel Core i9-13900TE and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 is characterized by a significant asymmetry: the CPU sits in the 60th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 69th percentile. This means the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, and in most gaming workloads, the GPU will be the primary performance limiter.

Evidence from benchmark scores supports this. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,472 and single-core score of 2,607 indicate a processor that is adequate but not exceptional for its class. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 23,877 and its 69th percentile ranking show a graphics card that is solidly above average. In gaming, where the GPU typically handles the bulk of the rendering work, the RX 9070 will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions (1440p and above), while the CPU could become a co-limiter at 1080p with very high frame rates.

The CPU’s TDP of 35 watts is remarkably low for a 24-core part, suggesting it is a power-constrained variant of the i9-13900 series. This means the CPU may throttle under sustained all-core workloads, which could impact performance in CPU-heavy games or multitasking scenarios. However, for gaming, the single-core boost clock of 5.00 GHz is more relevant, and that is competitive.

In mixed workloads — gaming with streaming, content creation while gaming, or heavy multitasking — the CPU’s 32 threads provide substantial parallel capacity. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7,758 and R15 multi-core score of 1,861 indicate a CPU that can handle parallel tasks without becoming a severe bottleneck. The GPU will still be the primary constraint in rendering-heavy tasks, but the CPU will not be idle.

FPS scaling evidence is not available (no measured FPS data exists), but benchmark ratios suggest the pairing is balanced for 1440p gaming. The GPU’s 69th percentile and the CPU’s 60th percentile mean the system is GPU-bound in most scenarios, which is generally desirable for gaming — it means the GPU is fully utilized rather than waiting on the CPU. At 4K, the GPU will be even more dominant as the limiting factor, which is expected and acceptable.

The power balance is also worth noting. The CPU’s 35-watt TDP and the GPU’s 220-watt TDP mean the GPU dominates power consumption. A 550-watt PSU is suggested for the GPU, which leaves ample headroom for the low-power CPU and other components. This pairing is efficient from a power perspective, with the low-power CPU offsetting the GPU’s higher draw.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900TE is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Core 13th Gen series, built on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename) using Intel’s 10 nm process node. It uses Intel Socket 1700 and has a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 1000.00 MHz (1.00 GHz) and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz, representing a 5x multiplier between base and boost — an aggressive range that allows significant power savings at idle and high performance when needed.

The TDP of 35 watts is exceptionally low for a 24-core part, indicating this is a power-optimized or embedded-focused variant. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The L3 cache is substantial and helps with multi-threaded workloads that share data. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5, with ECC memory support — a feature typically found in workstation or server-oriented parts.

Benchmark results show a processor that performs adequately but not spectacularly for its core count. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,472 and single-core score of 2,607 place it in the 60th percentile of all CPUs. The R20 scores (multi-core 7,758, single-core 1,094) and R15 scores (multi-core 1,861, single-core 262) follow a similar pattern. The average benchmark score is 5,342.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the i9-13900TE is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i9-10900KF and the AMD EPYC 7281, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900X. These are all older or lower-tier parts, and the margins are small — indicating the i9-13900TE is not a major performance leap over previous generations despite its newer architecture and higher core count. The low TDP likely limits sustained all-core performance, keeping it in the same performance class as these older chips.

For real workloads, the i9-13900TE excels in multi-threaded tasks that can utilize its 24 cores and 32 threads. Content creation, software compilation, and scientific computing will benefit from the parallel capacity. The 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures strong single-threaded performance for applications that rely on a few fast cores. The ECC memory support makes it suitable for error-sensitive workloads like financial modeling or data processing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and hardware acceleration without requiring a discrete GPU, though the RX 9070 will handle all graphics duties in this build.

The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the GPU and NVMe storage. This is forward-looking and ensures the CPU does not bottleneck modern components. However, the 10 nm process node is not as advanced as the GPU’s 4 nm node, and the power constraint means the CPU cannot reach the sustained performance of higher-TDP variants in the same series.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need a balanced desktop system with a focus on GPU-accelerated work and moderate CPU demands. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 65 indicates an overall mid-to-upper tier system.

Gamers at 1440p will find the RX 9070 well-suited for high-refresh-rate play, with the i9-13900TE providing sufficient CPU throughput. The 16 GB VRAM ensures future-proofing for texture-heavy titles, and the 69th percentile GPU ranking means consistent performance above most rivals. Gamers at 4K will also benefit, though they may need to adjust settings in the most demanding titles.

Content creators — video editors, 3D artists, and graphic designers — will appreciate the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and strong OpenCL compute performance (Geekbench OpenCL score of 131,539). The CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads handle rendering, encoding, and multitasking well, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for long render sessions. The 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 compute is useful for GPU-accelerated effects and rendering.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s 32 threads for compilation and the PCIe Gen 5 support for fast storage and I/O. The low 35-watt TDP means the system runs cool and quiet, suitable for office or lab environments. The GPU’s Vulkan support (score of 58,705) is relevant for graphics programming and compute workloads.

Students and small business workstations will find this a capable system for general productivity, data analysis, and light-to-moderate content creation. The combination of a low-power CPU and a mid-to-upper-tier GPU provides a good balance of performance and efficiency. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for users who require data integrity.

The system is less suited for users who need extreme multi-threaded CPU performance (where higher-TDP parts would be better) or those who require top-tier GPU compute for machine learning training (where NVIDIA parts with tensor cores and higher FP32 throughput would be superior). However, for the target use cases of 1440p gaming, content creation, and general workstation tasks, this pairing is well-balanced.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from benchmark data shows a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peer group. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 achieves an average benchmark score of 23,877, placing it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Core i9-13900TE achieves an average benchmark score of 5,342, placing it in the 60th percentile of all CPUs. The combined percentile for the pairing is 65.

The GPU’s benchmark results are consistent with a mid-to-upper tier card. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 is a strong result for modern DX12 gaming. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 131,539 and Vulkan score of 58,705 show robust compute performance, with OpenCL significantly ahead of Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score of 25,381 and GPU compute score of 14,737 further confirm the compute capability. The Passmark DirectX scores (DX9: 343, DX10: 141, DX11: 281, DX12: 74) are anomalous and likely reflect driver or test artifacts rather than true performance, given the strong Steel Nomad DX12 result.

The CPU’s benchmark results show a processor that is adequate for its class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,472 and single-core score of 2,607 are respectable but not outstanding for a 24-core part. The R20 scores (7,758 multi-core, 1,094 single-core) and R15 scores (1,861 multi-core, 262 single-core) follow expected scaling. The i9-13900TE’s nearest rivals are all older parts, and the CPU edges them by 0.5% to 0.8% — a slim margin that indicates the low TDP limits its potential.

The combined picture is a system that performs above average overall (65th percentile) but does not excel in either CPU or GPU performance relative to the best available parts. The GPU carries the system in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, while the CPU provides adequate support without being a standout. This is a balanced mid-to-upper tier desktop system suitable for a wide range of tasks.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900TE, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake desktop processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 9070, a 16 GB RDNA 4.0 graphics card. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile of 65 places it in the mid-to-upper tier of systems.

The CPU is a power-optimized variant of the Core i9 series, with a 35-watt TDP that is unusually low for its core count. It uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with ECC. The GPU is a more conventional mid-to-upper tier card with a 220-watt TDP and a suggested 550-watt PSU. The system requires two 8-pin power connectors for the GPU and is a dual-slot card.

The tier from the percentiles indicates this is a system that will handle most modern games at 1440p with high settings and can manage 4K in less demanding titles. For productivity, the 24-core CPU and 16 GB GPU provide solid performance for content creation and multi-threaded workloads. The system is not a top-tier enthusiast build, but it is well above average and capable across most use cases.

The integrated UHD Graphics 770 in the CPU provides a fallback display output and hardware acceleration, though the RX 9070 will be used for all graphics-intensive tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 x16 interface for the GPU ensures no bandwidth bottleneck with the CPU’s 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900TE uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Intel Core processors. This means there is a potential upgrade path within the same socket for newer 13th or 14th generation parts, though the specific low-TDP variant is unique. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility, but users must choose one type at build time — the motherboard determines which is used. ECC memory support is a differentiator for workstation use.

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with older PCIe generations and forward-looking. The GPU has a 220-watt TDP and suggests a 550-watt power supply. The CPU’s 35-watt TDP means the total system power draw is dominated by the GPU, so the 550-watt suggestion provides ample headroom. The GPU uses two 8-pin power connectors, which are standard on most power supplies.

For a sensible next upgrade, the most impactful change would be a higher-TDP CPU in the same socket, such as a standard i9-13900 or i9-13900K variant, which would improve multi-threaded performance without requiring a motherboard change. However, the low-TDP i9-13900TE may be limited by the motherboard’s power delivery design, so users should verify compatibility. The GPU has less headroom for upgrade within the same platform — a higher-tier GPU would require a larger power supply and possibly a case with more clearance, but the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface would not bottleneck.

The memory bus is dual-channel, and the CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 would require a new motherboard, so users should choose the memory type carefully at build time. The L3 cache of 36 MB is shared and cannot be upgraded, but it is sufficient for most workloads. The PCIe Gen 5 support (16 lanes, CPU only) allows for fast NVMe storage and ensures the GPU has full bandwidth.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to first increase memory capacity or speed (within the chosen DDR4 or DDR5 standard), then consider a higher-TDP CPU in the same socket for improved multi-threaded performance, and finally a more powerful GPU with a larger PSU if gaming demands increase. The platform has moderate headroom for these upgrades without requiring a complete rebuild.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900TE + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900TE

AMD Radeon RX 9070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds