SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900TE + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

82 Score

Top 18% Ranking

82 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 18% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

77%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900TE

5,342 Benchmark Score

Top 23% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-13900TE's position relative to other CPUs?

A: The i9-13900TE sits at the 60th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 5342. Its closest rival is the Intel Core i9-10900KF, which scores 5316, a mere 0.5% difference, indicating near-parity in overall processing performance.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT compare to its nearest competitors?

A: The RX 7900 XT holds the 55th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 13745. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is 1.5% ahead, while the AMD Radeon 660M trails by 0.5%, showing the 7900 XT is tightly clustered with mid-range performers despite its high-end positioning.

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the i9-13900TE, and what does that imply?

A: The i9-13900TE has 24 cores and 32 threads, a hybrid arrangement typical of Raptor Lake. This configuration supports heavy multi-threaded workloads like rendering and compilation, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18472 versus a single-core score of 2607.

Q: Does the RX 7900 XT support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 7900 XT includes 84 RT cores. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 suggest substantial ray-traced and rasterized rendering capability, though no measured gaming frames are available for this pairing.

Q: What memory types does the i9-13900TE support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation builds where data integrity is critical, though the platform's memory bandwidth is not specified in the data.

Q: Is the RX 7900 XT still in active production?

A: No, the RX 7900 XT is marked as "End-of-life" in production status, with a release date of November 2022. It has a successor in the Navi IV generation, but the card remains a relevant option based on its benchmark standing.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture for the Intel Core i9-13900TE and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT shows a system at the 58th percentile overall, indicating a balanced mid-to-upper tier desktop pairing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 5342 places it at the 60th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 13745 places it at the 55th percentile. The near-equal percentile positions suggest neither component dramatically overshadows the other, though the CPU holds a slight edge in relative standing.

Looking at raw CPU numbers, the i9-13900TE achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18472 and a single-core score of 2607. In Cinebench R20, it scores 7758 multi-core and 1094 single-core, while in R15 it reaches 1861 multi-core and 262 single-core. These scores indicate a CPU that excels in multi-threaded tasks, with the multi-core to single-core ratio roughly 7:1 in R23, highlighting its strength in parallel workloads. The 0.5% delta from the Intel Core i9-10900KF and AMD EPYC 7281 shows the i9-13900TE is statistically tied with those rivals, while it is 0.7% ahead of the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and 0.8% ahead of the Core i9-9900X.

For the GPU, the RX 7900 XT posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 12756, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068. In Passmark tests, it scores 29009 in G3D, 16828 in GPU compute, and lower legacy scores like 158 in DirectX 10, 340 in DirectX 11, 110 in DirectX 12, and 322 in DirectX 9. The G2D score of 1232 is modest, but the GPU compute figure of 16828 suggests strong non-graphics processing power. The 1.5% delta from the RX 9070 XT and the -0.5% delta from the Radeon 660M and RTX A2000 Mobile show the GPU is competitive but not dominant in its percentile band.

The combined percentile of 58 indicates that, when paired, this CPU and GPU deliver a cohesive experience that is slightly above average across all systems. The CPU's superior percentile relative to the GPU means the processor is less likely to be the limiting factor in most scenarios, but the GPU's 55th percentile still places it firmly in the capable range for 1440p and 4K gaming, as discussed later.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all FPS figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions, not direct measurements. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so treat these as qualitative expectations rather than empirical results.

The RX 7900 XT's Vulkan score of 71068 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 indicate strong DirectX 12 and Vulkan performance, which are the primary APIs for modern titles. The GPU's 20 GB of GDDR6 memory with 800 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for high-resolution textures, while the 84 RT cores support ray-traced effects. In rasterized workloads at 1440p, the GPU's 55th percentile suggests it can handle most titles at high settings, though the lack of measured FPS means exact frame rates are unknown. At 4K, the memory capacity and bandwidth become advantageous, but the GPU's mid-tier percentile implies that ultra settings may require scaling back for consistent 60 FPS.

The i9-13900TE's single-core score of 2607 in Cinebench R23 is adequate for feeding the GPU, but the CPU's 60th percentile is not top-tier, so in CPU-bound scenarios like competitive shooters at 1080p, frame rates may be limited. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration excels in background tasks, but gaming benefits more from single-core performance, where the CPU is only modestly above average. For high-refresh 1080p gaming, the pairing is likely sufficient for 100+ FPS in less demanding titles, but heavier games may see dips. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, which is favorable since the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources are well-suited for that resolution. At 4K, the GPU's 55th percentile suggests playable but not exceptional frame rates, with ultra settings requiring compromises.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in percentile terms, but the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. In multi-threaded tasks, the i9-13900TE's 18472 R23 multi-core score indicates the CPU is a strong performer, so the GPU's compute capabilities (16828 in Passmark GPU compute) might become the limiting factor in GPU-accelerated workloads. Conversely, in gaming, the GPU's 55th percentile versus the CPU's 60th percentile suggests the GPU is the more likely bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput dominates.

Evidence from the FPS scaling (estimated) supports this: at 1080p, the CPU's single-core score of 2607 becomes more critical, and the GPU may be underutilized, leading to CPU-bound scenarios. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 800 GB/s bandwidth and 20 GB VRAM are taxed, shifting the bottleneck to the GPU. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 is a DirectX 12 test that stresses the GPU, and its percentile rank of 55 indicates it is not a top-tier part, so in GPU-intensive games, the RX 7900 XT will limit performance before the CPU does.

In productivity, the balance tilts toward the CPU. The i9-13900TE's 32 threads and 24 cores give it a significant advantage in rendering and compilation, while the GPU's FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS is robust but not class-leading. For tasks like video encoding, the CPU's multi-core score suggests it can handle the workload, but the GPU's compute capabilities could accelerate certain filters. Overall, the system is balanced, but the GPU is the weaker link in gaming, and the CPU is the stronger link in multi-threaded productivity.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900TE is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, with a TDP of 35 watts, which is notably low for a 24-core part, indicating a power-efficient design. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

In benchmark terms, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18472 and a single-core score of 2607. The multi-core score places it at the 60th percentile, with the nearest rival being the Intel Core i9-10900KF at 5316 average score, a 0.5% difference. This near-parity suggests that despite the architectural advances of Raptor Lake, the 35-watt TDP limits sustained multi-core performance compared to higher-wattage parts. The single-core score of 2607 is respectable but not exceptional, indicating good but not class-leading per-thread performance.

The 10 nm process node, while not the most advanced, allows for the 24-core configuration within a 35-watt envelope. This makes the CPU suitable for thermally constrained environments, such as small-form-factor desktops or workstations where power density is a concern. The support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, along with ECC memory, broadens its applicability to both consumer and professional builds. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes provides high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe drives, though the integrated UHD Graphics 770 is present but not intended for gaming.

For real workloads, the 18472 R23 multi-core score translates to strong performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where the 32 threads can be fully utilized. The 2607 single-core score is adequate for general productivity and light gaming, but the CPU is not a top-tier gaming processor due to its lower clock speeds and modest single-core percentile. The 60th percentile overall means it outperforms a majority of CPUs, but it is not in the top quartile, so expect it to handle most tasks without issue, though it will not lead in CPU-intensive gaming benchmarks.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7900 XT's 55th percentile and the CPU's 60th percentile suggest that at 1080p, the CPU may limit frame rates in esports titles, but at 1440p, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, allowing for high settings. Estimated FPS would be adequate for 100+ Hz in less demanding games, but exact figures are unavailable.

Streaming: The i9-13900TE's 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with the 18472 R23 multi-core score indicating the CPU can handle simultaneous game and encode workloads. The GPU's 16828 compute score could also assist with hardware encoding, but the lack of NVENC means reliance on CPU or AMD's encoder.

Video editing: The 24-core, 32-thread CPU excels in timeline rendering and export, with the multi-core score of 18472 significantly outperforming single-threaded tasks. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth accelerate effects and color grading, but the 55th percentile GPU is not top-tier for GPU-accelerated rendering.

3D rendering: This pairing is well-suited for CPU-based rendering, as the i9-13900TE's multi-core score of 18472 is strong, and the GPU's 51.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance can handle GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles, though the 55th percentile suggests mid-range performance.

Software development: The 32 threads and 60th percentile CPU make compilation and multi-tasking efficient, while the GPU's compute score of 16828 supports parallel processing for testing. The ECC memory support and DDR5 compatibility enhance stability for long builds.

Student and office work: For document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the CPU's single-core score of 2607 is more than sufficient, and the GPU is overkill, but the low 35-watt TDP keeps power draw minimal, making this a quiet, efficient system for daily tasks.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need a balance of multi-threaded CPU performance and capable GPU compute, but it is not for those seeking top-tier gaming or rendering. Gamers at 1440p will benefit from the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 800 GB/s bandwidth, allowing high settings in most titles, but the 55th percentile means they should not expect 4K ultra at high frame rates. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will leverage the CPU's 32 threads, with the 18472 R23 multi-core score indicating solid export times, while the GPU's 51.48 TFLOPS accelerates render previews.

Software developers will find the 24 cores and 32 threads ideal for parallel builds, and the ECC memory support is a boon for server-like workloads. Students and office workers will find the system overpowered for basic tasks, but the low 35-watt TDP of the CPU makes it energy-efficient, and the GPU can be underutilized without issue. Small business workstations that run virtualization or data analysis will appreciate the 60th percentile CPU and the GPU's compute throughput, though the GPU's end-of-life status may be a consideration for long-term support.

The 58th combined percentile indicates this is a mid-tier system, so it suits users who need a jack-of-all-trades machine rather than a specialist. It is not ideal for competitive gamers seeking maximum frame rates at 1080p, nor for professionals requiring top-quartile GPU rendering. Instead, it fits those who split time between productivity and gaming at 1440p or 4K with reasonable settings.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900TE with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, representing a system at the 58th combined percentile. The CPU, a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake part with a 35-watt TDP, holds the 60th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, a Navi 31-based RDNA 3.0 card with 20 GB GDDR6, holds the 55th percentile among all GPUs. This places the system in the upper-mid tier of desktop performance, suitable for a wide range of tasks but not at the enthusiast extreme.

The CPU's low 35-watt TDP is a defining feature, allowing for efficient operation, while the GPU's 300-watt TDP balances the system's power profile. The pairing is coherent: the CPU provides robust multi-threaded performance, and the GPU offers substantial memory bandwidth and compute resources. However, neither component is top-tier, as evidenced by the percentiles, so the overall system is best described as a capable, well-rounded desktop rather than a flagship. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, which may affect availability, while the CPU remains active.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the Navi 31 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with a transistor count of 57,700 million and a die size of 529 mm². It has 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 raster operation units, along with 84 RT cores for hardware ray tracing. The GPU has a base clock of 1387 MHz, a boost clock of 2394 MHz, and a game clock of 2025 MHz, with memory running at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective). It features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

In benchmark terms, the GPU achieves a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5623, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068, and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 12756. Its Passmark G3D score is 29009, with a GPU compute score of 16828. These numbers place it at the 55th percentile, with the nearest rival being the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT at a 1.5% higher average score. The GPU's FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 103.0 TFLOPS (2:1) indicate strong compute capability for rendering and general-purpose tasks.

For rendering, the 20 GB VRAM is generous, preventing memory bottlenecks in high-resolution textures or complex scenes, while the 800 GB/s bandwidth ensures quick data transfer. The 84 RT cores support DirectX 12 Ultimate, enabling ray-traced effects, though the 55th percentile suggests the GPU is not a leader in RT performance. The pixel rate of 459.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 804.4 GTexel/s are solid, but the GPU's overall mid-tier standing means it will handle 1440p gaming well and 4K with compromises. The end-of-life status is a caveat, but the hardware remains relevant based on its benchmark scores.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900TE uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is compatible with 12th and 13th generation Core processors, but the CPU is already at the top of its generation with 24 cores. A meaningful CPU upgrade would require moving to a newer platform, as the 1700 socket is unlikely to support future generations beyond Raptor Lake. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support, allowing users to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the memory bandwidth is not specified in the data.

The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes (CPU only) provides high bandwidth for the GPU and NVMe storage, but the RX 7900 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so it will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. The CPU's 35-watt TDP means a modest cooling solution is sufficient, but the GPU's 300-watt TDP requires a more robust PSU, with the suggested PSU rated at 700 watts. The GPU requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, and its dual-slot design with a length of 276 mm (10.9 inches) should fit in most mid-tower cases.

For upgrades, the most sensible path is to replace the GPU, as the RX 7900 XT is end-of-life and the 55th percentile is the weaker link in gaming. A future GPU with a higher percentile would better utilize the CPU's 60th percentile standing. Alternatively, adding more RAM or faster DDR5 could improve memory-bound tasks, but the CPU's performance is already well-established. The platform's ECC support makes it viable for workstation use, and the 700-watt PSU headroom allows for a more power-hungry GPU in the future, though the CPU's 35-watt TDP means the PSU is primarily sized for the GPU. Overall, the upgrade path is limited by the socket's longevity, but the GPU is the primary candidate for replacement to boost the system's performance tier.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900TE + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900TE

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds