SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i9-13900T with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 represents a study in contrasts: a 35-watt, efficiency-focused desktop CPU from Intel’s Raptor Lake generation, coupled with a professional-grade, 150-watt mobile-derived GPU built on Ada Lovelace. The data shows a system that is neither a pure workstation nor a typical gaming rig, but rather a hybrid whose behavior is dictated by the massive disparity in power envelopes and architectural goals between its two primary components. This analysis examines the benchmark data to understand where this combination excels, where it struggles, and who would find it useful.

Balance and Bottleneck

The term "bottleneck" is often misused, but in this configuration, the data suggests a clear delineation of workload responsibilities. The CPU, despite its 24 cores and 32 threads, is constrained by a base clock of just 1100 MHz and a 35-watt TDP, yet it can boost to 5.30 GHz. This creates a dual personality: in short, lightly threaded bursts, it performs like a flagship desktop processor, but under sustained all-core loads, the power limit forces it to throttle back significantly. Conversely, the GPU, with its 150-watt TDP and 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, is a mobile-class component that does not have the same thermal or power headroom as a desktop card but is engineered for consistent performance within its envelope.

Benchmark results indicate that the CPU's single-threaded capabilities are its strongest asset relative to its power draw. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5155 is exceptionally high, placing it within striking distance of far more power-hungry desktop parts. However, the multi-core score of 36517, while respectable, reveals the cost of the 35-watt limit; the gap between its single-core and multi-core scaling is not as large as one would expect from a 24-core part, suggesting that sustained all-core workloads are limited by power delivery. The PassMark data reinforces this: the single-thread score of 4177 is a top-tier result, while the multithread score of 43036 is solid but not dominant, indicating that the CPU cannot maintain peak clocks across all cores indefinitely.

The GPU's bottleneck profile is different. With an FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada is a capable rendering engine. However, its lower boost clock of 1680 MHz and reliance on GDDR6 memory (not GDDR6X) mean that its performance is more uniform across workloads than the CPU's. The data implies that in gaming scenarios, the CPU will usually be the limiting factor at lower resolutions where high frame rates demand strong single-thread performance, while the GPU will become the bottleneck at higher resolutions where the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth are more critical. In productivity tasks like video editing or 3D rendering, the bottleneck shifts depending on the specific stage: the CPU handles timeline and physics, while the GPU accelerates effects and final render output.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 61723, which places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. This is a remarkable achievement for a 35-watt part. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900K, scores 61766, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the 13900T is virtually identical in average performance despite having a significantly lower TDP. This suggests that the 13900T is not a "cut down" chip as much as it is a power-limited version of a flagship, retaining most of the performance when the workload allows for boost clocks. The data shows a 0.6% advantage over the Intel Xeon 636, further cementing its position in the upper echelon of desktop processors.

Specific CPU benchmarks show a mixed picture. The PassMark data compression score of 538254 is exceptionally high, indicating strong integer and memory subsystem performance. The floating-point math score of 108779 and integer math score of 157324 are also robust, suggesting the CPU handles scientific and financial computations well when power limits allow. However, the find prime numbers score of 175 is notably low, which is a benchmark known to be sensitive to sustained multi-core frequency; this is the clearest evidence of the TDP constraint. The extended instructions score of 29719 shows that AVX-512 and similar workloads are supported but not optimized for sustained throughput.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, and its percentileVsAllGpus is 50, indicating it sits at the median of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 0, meaning no direct comparisons are available. However, its specifications—16 GB of GDDR6 memory, 9728 shading units, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores—suggest it is a very high-end mobile or embedded part, likely competing with desktop mid-range cards. The combined percentile of the system is 71, indicating that as a whole, this build outperforms roughly 71% of all possible configurations in the database, a solid but not spectacular result given the CPU's high standing.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data suggests this is a complex scenario. The CPU's single-core score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread of 4177 are sufficient for high frame rates in most esports titles. However, the GPU's median percentile (50) and lack of measured FPS data indicate that it may struggle to maintain 144Hz or higher in demanding AAA titles at 1440p or 4K. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 32.69 TFLOPS are competitive, but the 1680 MHz boost clock is low for a high-end part, suggesting that sustained gaming performance will be good, not great.

Streaming: The presence of 304 tensor cores on the GPU enables hardware-accelerated encoding and decoding, which offloads the streaming workload from the CPU. This is a significant advantage. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads can handle the game logic and encoding, but the 35-watt TDP might cause frame drops in CPU-intensive games if the stream encoding also uses CPU resources. The data indicates that using the GPU's NVENC would be the recommended approach to avoid this bottleneck.

Video Editing: This is a strong suit. The CPU's high single-thread score (5155) ensures smooth timeline scrubbing and effects previews, while the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for 4K and even 8K video layers and effects. The PassMark data compression score of 538254 also suggests fast file I/O and video codec handling. The system's combined percentile of 71 supports the notion that it is a capable video editing machine.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 is solid for CPU-based rendering, but the GPU is the star here. With 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 76 RT cores, the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada should accelerate ray-traced renders significantly. However, the 150-watt TDP and 1680 MHz boost clock might limit sustained render times, potentially making it slower than a desktop RTX 4070 or 4080 over long periods. The data shows it is a capable but not top-tier rendering solution.

Software Development: The CPU excels here. The PassMark multithread score of 43036 and integer math score of 157324 indicate fast compilation times and parallel build processes. The single-thread score of 4177 is also excellent for IDE responsiveness and code analysis. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large codebases. The 35-watt TDP is a benefit in this scenario, as it allows for a quieter, cooler workstation that can handle heavy compilation without thermal throttling.

Student and Office Work: This is overkill but effective. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches and spreadsheet calculations. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM is unused in this scenario, but the integrated UHD Graphics 770 on the CPU could handle basic display output, allowing the RTX 5000 to be used for compute tasks if needed. The low TDP of the CPU (35 watts) is ideal for a small form factor or energy-conscious build.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900T a good CPU for gaming?

A: Yes, for single-threaded gaming performance. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5155 and PassMark single-thread score of 4177 are near the top of the database, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. However, its 35-watt TDP may limit sustained all-core performance in games that use more than 8 threads, potentially causing frame dips.

Q: How does the i9-13900T compare to the i9-13900K?

A: The average benchmark score of the 13900T is 61723, which is only 0.1% lower than the 13900K's score of 61766. This shows that the T-series chip performs nearly identically on average, despite having a much lower 35-watt TDP, likely due to similar boost clocks of 5.30 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and size?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and AI workloads?

A: Yes. The GPU has 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 tensor cores for AI acceleration. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, all of which include ray tracing and machine learning extensions.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The system has a combined percentile of 71, meaning it outperforms 71% of all configurations in the database. This is driven primarily by the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and socket type?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900T has a TDP of 35 watts and uses the Intel Socket 1700. It is a desktop processor from the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this build?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores and specifications.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for a specific niche: the professional or prosumer who needs top-tier CPU performance in a power-constrained environment. The data shows the CPU is in the 92nd percentile, making it suitable for software developers compiling large codebases, financial analysts running complex models, or engineers using CAD tools that are heavily single-threaded. The PassMark multithread score of 43036 also supports use in video editing and 3D rendering, where the combination of the CPU's 24 cores and the GPU's 9728 shading units can accelerate workflows.

For gamers, this build is a compromise. The CPU's high single-thread score (5155 in Cinebench R23) is excellent for esports and older titles, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests that at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings, it will be the limiting factor. It is a better fit for gamers who prioritize CPU-heavy simulations or strategy games that are not graphically demanding. The 16 GB of VRAM is a plus for texture-heavy mods, but the 150-watt TDP of the GPU implies it is not a high-end desktop card.

For students and small business workstations, this is a high-end option that offers future-proofing. The CPU's 35-watt TDP allows for a compact, quiet build that does not require massive cooling, while the GPU can be used for CUDA-accelerated tasks in data science or machine learning courses. The 36 MB of L3 cache and 32 threads make it a multitasking powerhouse, handling virtual machines and data analysis simultaneously.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel memory bus. The CPU supports ECC memory, which is a critical feature for workstation reliability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the GPU has ample bandwidth, but the platform is not the latest generation; a user looking to upgrade to a newer CPU would need to change the motherboard.

The CPU's TDP is 35 watts, which is remarkably low for a 24-core part. This means the power delivery system on the motherboard does not need to be top-tier, and a modest air cooler would suffice. The GPU's TDP is 150 watts, and the suggested PSU is not listed in the FACT PACK. However, given the combined TDP of 185 watts, a 500-600 watt PSU would be more than sufficient, leaving headroom for drives and peripherals.

A sensible next upgrade would be to add more memory, as the CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, and the system's performance in data compression (538254 in PassMark) suggests memory bandwidth is a key factor. Alternatively, upgrading the GPU to a higher-percentile desktop part would balance the system, since the current GPU sits at the 50th percentile, while the CPU is at the 92nd. This would require a larger PSU and possibly a new case if the current one is compact.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 1100 MHz, which is extremely low, and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, which is the same as the flagship 13900K. This 4.2 GHz delta between base and boost is the defining feature of the chip: it is designed to idle at very low power and then burst to high frequencies for short periods. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache is generous and helps mitigate the lower base clock.

The benchmark scores confirm this behavior. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5155 is a top-tier result, matching or exceeding many desktop CPUs with much higher TDPs. The multi-core score of 36517, while lower than the 13900K's likely score, is still respectable, but the PassMark find prime numbers score of 175 is a clear outlier, indicating that sustained all-core workloads cause the CPU to drop below its boost clock. The PassMark single-thread score of 4177 aligns with the Cinebench result, showing that the architecture is highly efficient at low power.

The 35-watt TDP makes this CPU unique. It is a desktop chip that can be cooled by a low-profile cooler, enabling small form factor builds that do not sacrifice single-thread performance. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback display output, though it is not suitable for gaming. The CPU's memory support for DDR4 and DDR5, along with ECC, makes it flexible for both consumer and workstation builds. The launch MSRP is $549, but this is a minor detail compared to its performance per watt.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a 35-watt, 24-core flagship CPU with a 150-watt, mobile-derived professional GPU. The combined percentile of 71 indicates it is a mid-to-high-tier system, but the disparity between the CPU's 92nd percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile is striking. This is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a CPU-centric workstation with a capable but not dominant GPU.

The build class is desktop, and the form factor is likely to be a small or compact desktop, given the GPU's "IGP" slot width and lack of power connectors, which are typical of embedded or MXM modules. The GPU is listed as "NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2," suggesting it is a dual-GPU configuration or a special embedded variant, though the specifications provided are for a single GPU unit. The system is likely intended for professional applications such as CAD, simulation, or AI development, where the CPU's single-thread performance and the GPU's tensor cores are more important than raw gaming frame rates.

The data shows that this is a system for users who understand that not all workloads scale with GPU power. The CPU's high single-thread and decent multi-thread scores, combined with the GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, make it a versatile tool for content creation. However, it is not a high-end gaming machine, and users expecting that should look elsewhere.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is built on the AD103 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It features 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. The GPU operates at a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz. It has 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 tensor cores for AI workloads, supporting a wide range of APIs including DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Memory is a key strength: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, yielding 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is ample for 4K textures, large datasets, and multi-layer video editing. The FP32 compute throughput is 32.69 TFLOPS, which is competitive with desktop mid-range cards. The pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s are also solid, indicating that the GPU can handle high-resolution rendering and complex shaders.

However, the GPU's percentileVsAllGpus is 50, meaning it is exactly average. This is surprising given the specifications, but it may be due to the "Embedded" nature of the card, which likely has lower clock speeds than a desktop variant with the same chip. The boost clock of 1680 MHz is conservative, and the 150-watt TDP limits how high it can go. This means that while the GPU has the theoretical compute capability to compete with high-end desktop cards, its sustained performance may be lower. The lack of benchmark scores in the FACT PACK makes direct comparison impossible, but the specifications suggest a capable, professional-grade GPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and specifications. The CPU's single-thread score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 and 4177 in PassMark indicates it can feed high frame rates in CPU-bound games. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS and 16 GB of VRAM suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p and 1440p with high settings.

At 1080p, the system should excel in esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, where the CPU's single-thread performance is the primary driver, potentially achieving 200+ FPS. In AAA titles at 1080p, the GPU will be the limiter, but should still manage 60-100 FPS on ultra settings, given its 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and 9728 shaders. At 1440p, the GPU's load increases, and frame rates will likely drop to 50-80 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain 60 FPS in most AAA games, as its 1680 MHz boost clock and 150-watt TDP are not designed for sustained high-resolution rendering.

The CPU's 35-watt TDP could also cause frame drops in games that use more than 8 threads, as the CPU will throttle under sustained load. However, for most games, the boost clock of 5.30 GHz will be maintained for short bursts, keeping frame times consistent. The 76 RT cores will enable ray tracing at playable frame rates, but likely requiring DLSS or reduced settings to hit 60 FPS at 1440p. Overall, the data suggests this is a 1080p gaming system for high-refresh, or a 1440p system for 60 FPS gaming with settings adjustments, but not a 4K gaming powerhouse.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds