SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900T paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is an unusual but coherent proposition: a power-sipping 24-core desktop CPU sitting in the 92nd percentile of all processors, matched with an end-of-life Turing workstation GPU in the 67th percentile. The data shows a build whose combined percentile of 80 is carried almost entirely by the processor. This is a workstation-first combination, not a gaming rig, and every benchmark score in the fact pack supports that verdict.

CPU Analysis

The Core i9-13900T is a Raptor Lake-S chip built on Intel's 10 nm process, packing 24 cores and 32 threads into a package with a base power rating of just 35 W. That low-power envelope makes its benchmark results genuinely striking. In Cinebench R23 multi-core it scores 36517, with a single-core score of 5155 — figures that place it alongside the highest-tier desktop chips in the database. The single-core result is the headline: a boost clock of 5.30 GHz on a part rated at 35 W means lightly threaded applications — CAD UI interaction, compiler single-thread passes, office software — behave as if this were a flagship unlocked chip.

The nearest-rivals list quantifies exactly that. The 13900T's average benchmark score of 61723 sits within a rounding error of the Core i9-13900K (61766 average, deltaPct -0.1), the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834, -0.2), the i9-13900KF (61841, -0.2), and the Xeon 636 (61360, +0.6). In other words, this 35 W part trades blows with Intel's unlocked enthusiast flagships of the same generation in aggregate performance. Against the full CPU population it stands at the 92nd percentile.

The detailed benchmark breakdown shows where the strength lies. PassMark multi-thread returns 43036, while integer math scores 157324, floating point math 108779, data compression 538254, and data encryption 34415. Random string sorting at 63358 and extended instructions at 29719 indicate solid throughput for data-processing workloads. The single-thread PassMark score of 4177 mirrors the Cinebench story: responsiveness is flagship-grade. The one modest figure is find-prime-numbers at 175, a sustained all-core AVX-style load where the power envelope inevitably constrains the chip relative to unlocked parts — yet even there the aggregate remains competitive. For real workloads, this means video encoding passes, 3D renders, code compilation, and virtualized environments all complete at near-flagship speed, with the caveat that the longest all-core runs will be governed by the 35 W design point rather than the 5.30 GHz boost ceiling. The locked multiplier (multiplierUnlocked is false) removes overclocking from the equation entirely.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform story is straightforward and forward-looking. The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, supports both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU-attached lanes. ECC memory support is present, which matters for workstation stability and is a natural fit for the Quadro card's professional orientation. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a display fallback should the discrete card ever fail or be removed.

Power provisioning is the most interesting aspect. The CPU's 35 W TDP plus the GPU's 230 W TDP makes the suggested 550 W PSU for the graphics card comfortably sufficient for the whole system — the processor adds almost nothing to the load budget. That leaves substantial headroom for a future GPU upgrade, and that is precisely where this build should go next: the Quadro RTX 5000 occupies the 67th percentile with an average score of 21629, while the CPU sits at the 92nd, so the graphics side is the obvious successor-in-waiting. NVIDIA's own lineage points the way — the card's listed successor is the Workstation Ampere generation. A sensible upgrade path keeps the 13900T and Socket 1700 board intact, moves to faster DDR5 if starting from DDR4, and replaces the end-of-life GPU. The card itself is dual-slot, 267 mm long and 111 mm tall, drawing power through one 6-pin and one 8-pin connector, so case and PSU compatibility for a same-class replacement is essentially guaranteed.

GPU Analysis

The Quadro RTX 5000 is a Turing-generation workstation card built on the TU104 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors across a 545 mm² die. It carries 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and a substantial 384 tensor cores. Clocks run from a 1620 MHz base to an 1815 MHz boost, with memory at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth — a healthy allocation for professional viewport work, mid-sized GPU rendering scenes, and moderate machine-learning inference batches.

Raw rates confirm a mid-tier professional part: 11.15 TFLOPS FP32, 22.30 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio, 116.2 GPixel/s pixel fill, and 348.5 GTexel/s texture fill. The benchmark scores align with that positioning. Geekbench OpenCL returns 78999 and Geekbench Vulkan 92309 — the Vulkan figure being notably higher, which reflects the API's lower driver overhead on this architecture. PassMark G3D lands at 15616 and GPU compute at 6525, placing the card in the 67th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 21629.

The rival list contextualizes the card bluntly: it performs within 1% of a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (21856, deltaPct -1), 1.2% ahead of an RTX A4000 Mobile (21379), 1.8% ahead of a Radeon HD 8970M (21237), and 2.3% ahead of a Radeon RX Vega M GL (21153). That is the honest picture for rendering: the RT cores and tensor cores provide hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration that gaming-derived rivals of similar score lack, but the raw throughput is roughly a decade-old mainstream gaming card's equal. For viewport work, CUDA-enabled renderer output at moderate scene sizes, and 16 GB VRAM-dependent tasks, it remains serviceable. For heavy modern rendering, it is the limiting component. The DirectX scores (195 for DX9, 140 for DX11, 113 for DX10, and 59 for DX12) also show a clear decline as APIs get newer — the card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6, but its DX12 throughput score of 59 is its weakest gaming-related result.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 80 summarizes the imbalance: a 92nd-percentile CPU yoked to a 67th-percentile GPU. In GPU-bound workloads — games at any resolution, real-time rendering, viewport-heavy 3D — the Quadro RTX 5000 sets the ceiling. In CPU-bound workloads — compilation, video encoding, simulation, office multitasking — the 13900T delivers near-flagship throughput and the GPU is largely a spectator.

The evidence is in the deltas. The CPU matches the i9-13900K to within 0.1% on average score; the GPU sits below a GTX 1060 6 GB by 1%. In any task that scales with both components, such as GPU rendering with CPU scene preparation, the processor finishes its share quickly and waits. Conversely, in tasks that are purely CPU-driven, the 35 W envelope barely registers: PassMark multi-thread at 43036 and Cinebench R23 multi-core at 36517 are the numbers that matter, and the GPU contributes nothing. The build is not balanced in the gaming sense. It is balanced in the workstation sense, where an over-provisioned CPU driving a modest professional GPU is a legitimate configuration for CAD, development, and entry rendering duties.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists in the fact pack for this exact combination — the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame-rate discussion below is therefore estimated from benchmark scores, not measured results, and should be treated as indicative only.

Working from the PassMark G3D score of 15616 and the 67th-percentile placement, gaming expectations cluster around the GTX 1060 6 GB comparison point: roughly one percent apart in average score. That tier historically translates into playable frame rates at 1080p in mainstream titles with settings reduced, and pressure at 1440p or with ultra presets in modern AAA titles. The DX12 score of 59 suggests newer API-heavy games will fare worse than the DX9/DX11 figures (195 and 140) imply for older titles. The 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth remove memory capacity from the equation — texture sets will fit — but the 11.15 TFLOPS of shading throughput and the modest DX12 result are the constraints. The CPU side is never the problem: 32 threads, a 4177 single-thread PassMark score, and 2497 in PassMark physics mean frame pacing and draw-call submission will be smooth. In short, the processor could feed a far faster GPU; the estimates simply reflect that it does not have one.

Who Should Build It

This combination suits users whose work is CPU-dominated with occasional GPU acceleration. Software developers are the clearest fit: a 36517 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, 43036 PassMark multi-thread, and near-parity with the i9-13900K make compilation, containerized builds, and virtualization fast, while ECC support adds platform reliability for long-lived development machines. Content creators doing video editing benefit similarly — the CPU handles encoding and timeline scrubbing, while the 16 GB of GPU VRAM aids timeline acceleration within the card's 67th-percentile limits. Entry-to-mid 3D and CAD professionals get certified-class display outputs (four DisplayPort 1.4a plus USB Type-C), RT and tensor cores for denoising and AI-assisted tooling, and enough bandwidth for moderate scene complexity. Students and small-business workstation users get flagship-tier responsiveness for office workloads at low power draw. High-refresh gamers and heavy GPU renderers should look elsewhere — the GPU's average score of 21629 and its GTX 1060-adjacent performance tier disqualify it for that audience. The launch MSRP context underlines the workstation positioning: $549 for the CPU and 2,299 USD launch MSRP for the GPU, the latter reflecting professional certification rather than gaming throughput.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. Not recommended. Estimated from scores rather than measured data, the card's 15616 G3D result and 67th percentile place it around GTX 1060 6 GB territory — adequate for older or lighter titles at 1080p, insufficient for modern AAA gaming at high refresh. The DX12 score of 59 is the strongest warning sign.

Streaming. Partially viable. The CPU is excellent — 24 cores, 32 threads, and a 5155 Cinebench R23 single-core score mean encoding and game logic can share the chip without contention, and the PassMark multi-thread score of 43036 confirms the headroom. The limit is game performance itself, not streaming overhead.

Video editing. A good fit. Near-flagship multi-core throughput (Cinebench R20 multi-core of 15337, R15 of 3680) accelerates export passes, and 16 GB of GPU VRAM with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports timeline effects within the card's compute envelope. Dual-channel DDR5 support keeps feed rates adequate.

3D rendering. Moderate. The 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores enable hardware ray tracing and AI denoising, and the 22.30 TFLOPS FP16 rate helps optimized renderers. But a 6525 PassMark GPU compute score and 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 cap scene throughput; the CPU will often be the faster render path given its near-13900K aggregate.

Software development. Ideal. The rival table shows parity with unlocked flagships at 0.1% delta, single-thread responsiveness at 4177, and integer math at 157324 — compilation, tests, and local server workloads all execute at top-tier speed. ECC support and a 35 W TDP suit always-on developer machines.

Student and office work. Overqualified, pleasantly so. Documents, browsing, and video calls barely register against a 92nd-percentile CPU, and the 5.30 GHz boost makes every interaction instant. Low power draw makes it a quiet, efficient daily machine.

FAQ

Q: How does the i9-13900T compare to the i9-13900K in performance?

A: Nearly identically. The 13900T averages 61723 versus the 13900K's 61766 — a deltaPct of just -0.1 — despite the 13900T's 35 W TDP and locked multiplier.

Q: Is this build good for gaming?

A: No measured FPS data exists for this pairing, and score-based estimates put the Quadro RTX 5000 within 1% of a GTX 1060 6 GB (average score 21629 vs 21856). Expect older games to run fine at 1080p and modern AAA titles to struggle; high-refresh gaming is out of scope.

Q: How much PSU headroom does the system have?

A: Plenty. The GPU's suggested PSU is 550 W while the card itself draws 230 W and the CPU just 35 W, leaving generous capacity for drives, peripherals, and a future GPU upgrade.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory and modern standards?

A: Yes. ECC is supported, the socket is Intel Socket 1700, memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 dual-channel, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes.

Q: Is the Quadro RTX 5000 still current?

A: No. Its production status is end-of-life; it launched in 2018 and its listed successor is the Workstation Ampere generation. It remains usable, sitting in the 67th GPU percentile, but it is the aging half of this pairing.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No. multiplierUnlocked is false, so performance is fixed by the 1100 MHz base and 5.30 GHz boost clocks.

Q: What do the RT and tensor cores actually enable here?

A: The 48 RT cores provide hardware ray-tring acceleration for supported renderers and viewport engines, while the 384 tensor cores drive AI features such as denoising, with 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth to back them.

Benchmark Performance

The complete score sheet, CPU side: Cinebench R15 multi-core 3680 and single-core 519; Cinebench R20 multi-core 15337 and single-core 2165; Cinebench R23 multi-core 36517 and single-core 5155. PassMark results: multi-thread 43036, single-thread 4177, physics 2497, integer math 157324, floating point math 108779, data compression 538254, data encryption 34415, extended instructions 29719, find-prime-numbers 175, and random string sorting 63358. Average benchmark score: 61723, at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with rivals clustered within a fraction of a percent — i9-13900K at -0.1, Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at -0.2, i9-13900KF at -0.2, and the Xeon 636 at +0.6.

GPU side: Geekbench OpenCL 78999, Geekbench Vulkan 92309, PassMark G3D 15616, GPU compute 6525, G2D 709, and DirectX scores of 195 (DX9), 140 (DX11), 113 (DX10), and 59 (DX12). Average benchmark score: 21629, at the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with the GTX 1060 6 GB at -1%, RTX A4000 Mobile at +1.2%, Radeon HD 8970M at +1.8%, and RX Vega M GL at +2.3%.

The combined picture is a system at the 80th percentile overall — a near-flagship CPU doing flagship work at 35 W, paired with a workstation GPU whose professional features (16 GB VRAM, RT and tensor cores, quad DisplayPort outputs, certified drivers implied by the Quadro line) outlive its gaming-class throughput. For CPU-heavy professional use, the scores say buy with confidence. For GPU-bound workloads, the scores say the graphics card is the next upgrade, and the platform — Socket 1700, Gen 5 lanes, DDR5, and a PSU with ample headroom — is ready to receive one.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds