SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process node. This is a high-core-count part with a modest 35 W TDP, which immediately signals its positioning: it is designed to deliver substantial multi-threaded throughput within a constrained thermal envelope. The base clock of 1100 MHz is notably low, but the boost clock reaches 5.30 GHz, indicating significant headroom when workloads demand it. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache, combined with 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 80 KB of L1 per core, provides a substantial cache hierarchy for data-intensive tasks.

Benchmark results place this CPU at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, which is an elite standing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 is particularly telling — this is a score that rivals flagship desktop parts, yet it comes from a processor with a 35 W TDP. The single-core R23 score of 5155 demonstrates that this is not merely a multi-threaded workhorse; it also excels in lightly-threaded workloads. PassMark single-thread performance of 4177 confirms this trend, while the multi-thread score of 43036 shows exceptional scaling across the 24 cores.

Data compression results are striking: a PassMark data compression score of 538254 indicates massive parallel throughput for archiving and storage tasks. Integer math at 157324 and floating-point math at 108779 further underscore the CPU's computational breadth. The find prime numbers score of 175 is comparatively modest, but this is a niche benchmark. Physics simulation at 2497 suggests solid performance in physics-based workloads, while random string sorting at 63358 points to strong database and sorting operations.

The nearest rivals provide context for the i9-13900T's positioning. The Intel Core i9-13900K scores 61766 on average, a mere 0.1% higher, meaning the 13900T is virtually indistinguishable from the flagship K-series part in overall benchmark averages. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and i9-13900KF are also within 0.2% of the 13900T's average score of 61723. The Intel Xeon 636 trails by 0.6%. This is remarkable: a 35 W TDP processor matching the performance of parts with much higher power limits. The data implies that the 13900T's efficiency is exceptional, likely making it a superior choice for thermally constrained environments without sacrificing computational capability.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture for this CPU+GPU pairing is defined by the CPU's elite standing and the GPU's mid-range position. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this build is 77, indicating a system that is above average overall but with a clear disparity between the two components.

Focusing on the GPU, the Quadro RTX 4000 delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873. Geekbench OpenCL performance reaches 74540, and Vulkan performance is slightly higher at 78844. PassMark G3D scoring shows 15117, with G2D at 846. DirectX 12 performance in PassMark is notably low at 52, while DirectX 11 scores 128 and DirectX 9 reaches 205. GPU compute performance is 6176, which is respectable for a workstation card.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17789 places it in the 61st percentile. Its nearest rivals are close: the AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666 (0.7% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 17639 (0.9% higher), the AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588 (1.1% higher), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551 (1.4% higher). This clustering suggests that the Quadro RTX 4000 is competitive with a range of modern and older parts, but it is not a high-end performer by current standards.

The asymmetry is stark. In multi-core CPU benchmarks, the i9-13900T rivals the best consumer processors ever made, matching the 13900K within 0.1%. Meanwhile, the GPU is competing with integrated graphics solutions like the Radeon 780M and older discrete cards. This creates a system where the CPU is overqualified for the GPU's output, but the GPU is still capable of handling professional workstation tasks and moderate gaming. The data shows a pairing that prioritizes CPU-bound workloads while accommodating GPU-accelerated tasks at a more modest level.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The imbalance between the CPU and GPU is the defining characteristic of this build. With the CPU at the 92nd percentile and the GPU at the 61st percentile, the bottleneck analysis is straightforward: the GPU will be the limiting factor in most graphics-intensive scenarios. In gaming, this means CPU-bound scenarios will rarely occur; instead, frame rates will be constrained by what the Quadro RTX 4000 can render.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this. The CPU's single-thread score of 4177 in PassMark is high enough to drive modern game engines without issue. The R23 single-core score of 5155 further confirms strong per-core performance. In contrast, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 and its DirectX 12 score of 52 indicate that it will struggle with modern, graphics-heavy workloads that rely on DX12 features. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 is modest, suggesting that it can handle some modern titles at lower settings but will not excel at high-fidelity gaming.

For professional workloads, the bottleneck shifts. The CPU's massive multi-threaded performance — a 36517 R23 multi-core score — means that CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D scene processing will run exceptionally fast. The GPU's compute score of 6176, while not top-tier, is sufficient for GPU-accelerated rendering and scientific computing, but it will not match the throughput of higher-end workstation cards. In mixed workloads, the CPU will often finish its portion of a task and wait on the GPU, making the GPU the clear limiter in real-time graphics and rendering pipelines.

The FPS scaling picture is absent from measured data — no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, based on the benchmark scores, the CPU's percentile advantage over the GPU implies that resolution increases will disproportionately impact frame rates, as the GPU becomes saturated while the CPU remains underutilized. At lower resolutions, the GPU's limitations will cap FPS well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a high-refresh gaming build. The GPU's 61st percentile standing and low DirectX 12 score of 52 indicate that it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p in modern titles, let alone at 1440p or 4K. The CPU is more than capable — its single-thread performance is top-tier — but the GPU will bottleneck any attempt at 144 Hz or 240 Hz gaming.

Streaming: The CPU excels here. With 24 cores and 32 threads, the i9-13900T can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without breaking a sweat. The 36517 R23 multi-core score provides ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, and the GPU's NVENC capabilities (via its Turing architecture) offer an alternative hardware encoding path. Streaming at 1080p60 should be smooth, though the GPU's gaming limitations will still cap in-game FPS.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for the build. The CPU's multi-threaded power accelerates timeline rendering and export tasks, with PassMark integer math at 157324 indicating robust processing of video codecs. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate support for effects and color grading. The CPU will dominate export times, making this a viable system for 4K video editing.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here. R23 multi-core of 36517 means CPU-based rendering engines (like V-Ray or Blender's Cycles with CPU) will perform exceptionally well. The GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 36 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but its 61st percentile standing means GPU rendering will be slower than dedicated high-end render cards. Still, a hybrid CPU+GPU rendering workflow would leverage both components effectively.

Software development: Compilation is heavily multi-threaded, and the CPU's 43036 PassMark multi-thread score will dramatically reduce build times. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases, and the support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows flexible system configuration. The GPU is less relevant here, though its compute capabilities can assist with parallel workloads like unit testing or simulation.

Student and office work: This is massive overkill for typical student or office tasks. The CPU's 92nd percentile performance is far beyond what word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing require. The GPU's workstation-class drivers and 8 GB VRAM could be useful for engineering or design coursework, but for general productivity, this system is more powerful than necessary, which means it will handle everything with ease but at a premium cost.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS figures here are estimates derived from benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning frame expectations are qualitative estimates based on the relative performance of the CPU and GPU.

Based on the GPU's 61st percentile standing and its PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52, this system will deliver playable but not impressive gaming performance. At 1080p with ultra settings, expect frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range for moderately demanding titles from the GPU's era (around 2018-2020). Modern AAA games will likely require reduced settings to maintain 60 FPS. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 is low enough to suggest that newer, more demanding titles will push this card to its limits.

The CPU will not be the limiting factor in any gaming scenario. Its single-thread performance is strong enough to feed even high-end GPUs, meaning any FPS shortfall is directly attributable to the Quadro RTX 4000. At 1440p, expect a noticeable drop in frame rates relative to 1080p, as the GPU's 256-bit memory bus and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth become strained. At 4K, gaming will be marginal at best, with only older or less demanding titles achieving playable frame rates.

For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the GPU's raw throughput might still deliver high frame rates at lower settings, but the lack of measured data prevents precise estimates. The realistic assessment is that this is a workstation GPU with gaming as a secondary function, not a dedicated gaming card.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation-class GPU built on the Turing architecture, using the TU104 chip fabricated on TSMC's 12 nm process. It contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, with a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1005 MHz and a boost clock of 1545 MHz, with memory running at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The compute configuration includes 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. Crucially, it has 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads. The FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance of 14.24 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 98.88 GPixel/s and texture rate is 222.5 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show that this GPU, while dated, still holds its own in certain areas. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 78844 is respectable, and the OpenCL score of 74540 indicates solid compute capability. However, the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 52 is a clear weakness — this card does not excel at modern graphics APIs. The G3D score of 15117 places it in the 61st percentile, which is mid-range.

For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for large scenes, but the 416.0 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate memory pressure. The RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, which is rare for a card of this age, but the overall compute throughput is modest by modern standards. The tensor cores provide AI acceleration, which could benefit machine learning inference tasks. The GPU's 160 W TDP and single-slot design make it a practical addition to a workstation, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The PCIe 3.0 x16 interface is older, which could limit bandwidth in some scenarios, but for most workloads this is not a bottleneck.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets professionals and power users who prioritize CPU-bound workloads over gaming performance. The i9-13900T's 92nd percentile CPU performance makes it ideal for video editors who export long timelines, software developers who compile large codebases, and 3D artists who rely on CPU-based rendering engines. The 36517 R23 multi-core score is a strong indicator of productivity in these fields.

For content creators working in video editing, the combination of the CPU's multi-threaded power and the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is viable for 4K workflows, though GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than on higher-end cards. The GPU's 36 RT cores could benefit 3D artists using ray-traced viewports, but the 61st percentile GPU performance means this is not a top-tier rendering workstation.

Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit from the CPU's compilation speed and the GPU's compute capabilities for simulations. Small business workstations handling database operations or data analysis would also see significant gains from the CPU's PassMark data compression score of 538254 and integer math score of 157324.

Gamers should look elsewhere unless they play undemanding or older titles. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 52 is a clear warning that modern gaming will be underwhelming. This is a professional's tool, not a gaming rig.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900T sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating elite-level performance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the i9-13900K?

A: The i9-13900K has an average benchmark score of 61766, which is only 0.1% higher than the 13900T's 61723, meaning they are effectively equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Quadro RTX 4000 has 36 RT cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing workloads.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 77, placing it above average among all systems.

Q: What is the GPU's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP for the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is 899 USD.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900T has a TDP of 35 watts, which is remarkably low for a 24-core processor.

# Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900T, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor with a 35 W TDP, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000, a Turing-based workstation GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU is a top-tier performer at the 92nd percentile, while the GPU occupies the 61st percentile. The combined percentile of 77 reflects a system that is strong overall but heavily skewed toward CPU performance.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 61723 places it within 0.2% of the i9-13900K, 13900KF, and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, making it one of the best-performing desktop processors available. The GPU's average score of 17789 is competitive with the RTX 4060 and Radeon 780M, but these are not high-end parts. This is a workstation-class build that prioritizes computational throughput over graphics fidelity.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, and ECC memory is supported, making this a viable platform for reliability-sensitive workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16 — a potential bottleneck for data transfer between the GPU and system, though the impact varies by workload.

The CPU's 35 W TDP and the GPU's 160 W TDP mean the total system power draw is modest, and the suggested PSU of 450 W provides ample headroom. The motherboard socket supports future 13th-gen and potentially 14th-gen Intel processors, though the exact compatibility depends on the specific board's BIOS. However, the GPU is end-of-life, with its production status listed as "End-of-life," and its successor is Workstation Ampere. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a newer workstation card to better balance the system, as the CPU has substantial headroom to drive more powerful graphics hardware. The CPU itself is near the top of its generation, so upgrading the CPU would yield minimal gains; the GPU is the clear bottleneck and the primary upgrade target.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds