SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

26,331 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900T paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is a desktop combination that places in the 82nd percentile of all tracked CPU+GPU pairings, built around a 24-core Raptor Lake processor engineered for low power draw and a Blackwell 2.0 graphics card that sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. It is an unusual match — a top-tier-count CPU tuned for efficiency rather than peak clocks, joined to a mid-tier GPU with modern ray tracing and GDDR7 memory. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database; all frame-rate discussion below is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores, not directly measured. What follows is a component-by-component analysis of what the numbers say this build can do.

FAQ

Q: What CPU is in this build?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900T, a 13th-generation Raptor Lake-S desktop processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, a 1100 MHz base clock, and a boost clock of up to 5.3 GHz. It is an Active part from Intel's 10 nm process, launched at $549 MSRP.

Q: What GPU is in this build?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, a Blackwell 2.0 architecture card built on TSMC's 5 nm process with the GB206 chip. It carries 3840 shading units, 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, and 448 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: How fast is the CPU in benchmarks?

A: It posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 and a single-core score of 5155, ranking in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 61723 lands within a fraction of a percent of the Core i9-13900K, which scores 61766 — a delta of just -0.1%.

Q: How fast is the GPU in benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5060 posts a PassMark G3D score of 20891, a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3628, and ranks in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its average score of 26331 sits within 0.3% of the Radeon 860M and the GeForce MX550 by the database's cross-metric ranking.

Q: Can this build run games at high frame rates?

A: Estimated from the benchmark scores — no measured FPS data exists for this pairing — the GPU's 72nd-percentile standing suggests strong 1080p performance in modern titles at ultra settings, with 1440p playable in most games. The 8 GB VRAM buffer is the main constraint at higher resolutions with maximum textures.

Q: What power supply does this build need?

A: The RTX 5060 carries a 145 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 300 W, and the CPU adds only 35 W of TDP. A modest PSU comfortably covers the total draw of both components.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No. The i9-13900T has a locked multiplier, so tuning headroom on the CPU side is essentially absent.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture begins with the raw numbers. On the CPU side, the i9-13900T scores 519 single-core and 3680 multi-core in Cinebench R15, 2165 single-core and 15337 multi-core in Cinebench R20, and 5155 single-core and 36517 multi-core in Cinebench R23. PassMark results reinforce the same profile: 4177 single-thread, 43036 multithread, 157324 integer math, 108779 floating point math, 538254 data compression, 34415 data encryption, 63358 random string sorting, 29719 extended instructions, and 2497 physics. The CPU's average benchmark score across all tests is 61723, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs in the database.

That percentile is the headline. A 92nd-percentile CPU is, by definition, faster than roughly nine in ten processors tracked — the profile of a workstation-class part, not a mid-range one. The rivalry data confirms it: the i9-13900T scores within -0.1% of the Core i9-13900K (61766), -0.2% of the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834), and -0.2% of the i9-13900KF (61841), while beating the Xeon 636 by 0.6%. In other words, despite its efficiency-focused 35 W TDP designation, the aggregate benchmark data shows it trading blows with unlocked flagship silicon.

The GPU tells a different story. The RTX 5060 scores 3628 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 20891 in PassMark G3D, 112787 in Geekbench OpenCL, 113321 in Geekbench Vulkan, and 10899 in PassMark GPU Compute. Its auxiliary PassMark DirectX scores run 225 for DX9, 200 for DX11, 77 for DX12, and 127 for DX10, with a 2D score of 1154. The average benchmark score of 26331 puts it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs — a solid mid-tier placement. Its nearest rivals by the database's composite metric are the Radeon 860M at 26401 (-0.3%), the GeForce MX550 at 26421 (-0.3%), the Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary at 26553 (-0.8%), and the Radeon RX 6750 XT at 26011 (+1.2%).

The combined percentile of 82 reflects exactly what those two numbers imply: a build dragged upward by an exceptional CPU and held to a mid-upper tier by a competent but unexceptional GPU. It is a top-decile processor attached to a third-quartile graphics card.

CPU Analysis

The i9-13900T's specifications read like flagship hardware. Twenty-four cores and thirty-two threads on the Raptor Lake-S architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. Cache is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. The clock structure is where the "T" suffix shows — a 1100 MHz base clock is conservative, but the 5.3 GHz boost clock is fully flagship-grade. What this means in practice, per the benchmark data, is that the chip sprints like a premium part when thermal and power budgets allow, and idles at a fraction of the draw of its unlocked siblings.

The single-core numbers prove the sprint. A Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5155, alongside a PassMark single-thread score of 4177, indicates snappy per-thread responsiveness — the metric that governs UI latency, game logic, and lightly threaded applications. The multi-core scores tell the parallel story: 36517 in R23 multi-core and 43036 in PassMark multithread. The ratio between those single- and multi-core figures shows a chip with substantial scaling headroom across its 32 threads, which is exactly what render farms, compilation jobs, and batch encoding want.

The specialized PassMark subtests map cleanly onto real workloads. Data compression at 538254 and encryption at 34415 indicate strong file-archiving and cryptographic throughput. Integer math at 157324 and floating point at 108779 cover general-purpose computation and scientific workloads respectively. Random string sorting at 63358 reflects text-processing and database-adjacent performance, and extended instructions at 29719 show capable SIMD throughput. The physics score of 2497 is the figure most relevant to gaming, where CPU-side simulation load is the classic bottleneck source — a healthy score here supports the GPU's work rather than starving it.

ECC memory support is a notable differentiator: for workstation duty where data integrity matters, the platform can be configured conservatively. The locked multiplier means buyers should treat the 61723 average score as the ceiling, not a starting point.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With a 92nd-percentile CPU and 72nd-percentile GPU, this build is estimated — no measured FPS data exists — to deliver high-refresh 1080p gaming in competitive titles and smooth 1440p play in most modern games. The CPU physics score of 2497 and single-thread strength mean frame pacing will rarely be processor-limited; the GPU is the pacing component.

Streaming. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration is ideal for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The 43036 PassMark multithread score leaves ample headroom for x264 encoding threads to run alongside a game without cannibalizing the cores the game needs. The GPU's 120 tensor cores and NVENC-class hardware (implied by the Blackwell 2.0 architecture's compute scores of 112787 OpenCL and 113321 Vulkan) provide an encoder offload path as well.

Video editing. The 36517 Cinebench R23 multi-core score handles timeline scrubbing, proxies, and export rendering comfortably. The RTX 5060's 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 and 10899 GPU Compute score accelerate effects and color work, though 8 GB of VRAM will limit heavy 4K multicam projects with layered effects.

3D rendering. CPU rendering is a genuine strength — the i9-13900T trades blows with the i9-13900K at -0.1% delta, meaning Blender CPU renders complete at flagship pace. GPU-path rendering benefits from 30 RT cores and the 3628 Steel Nomad score, but the 72nd-percentile GPU places GPU-render throughput firmly in mid-tier territory.

Software development. Compilation is the classic many-core workload, and 32 threads with 36 MB of shared L3 cache make large builds fast. The 5155 single-core R23 score keeps single-file iteration and IDE responsiveness sharp. The 538254 compression score also accelerates container image packaging and artifact bundling.

Student and office work. Frankly, this CPU is overkill for documents and browsing — but the 35 W TDP means it does that work while drawing very little power, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a display fallback if the discrete card is ever removed. Responsiveness will be excellent in every routine task.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5060 is defined by modern memory technology wrapped around a mid-sized compute engine. The 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus delivers 448 GB/s of bandwidth — the effective 28 Gbps memory clock at 1750 MHz base is what lets a narrow bus punch above its width. The GB206 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process, packs 21,900 million transistors into 181 mm², a density of 121 million transistors per square millimeter.

The compute engine comprises 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s, and 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 — with FP16 running at a 1:1 ratio for another 19.18 TFLOPS. The fixed-function rasterization throughput indicated by the ROP and pixel-rate figures supports high frame rates at 1080p and workable rates at 1440p.

Ray tracing and AI hardware are where the architecture earns its keep: 30 RT cores handle BVH traversal, and 120 tensor cores drive the upscaling and frame-generation features of the GeForce 50 series. In rendering terms, this means path-traced lighting in supported engines and accelerated AI-assisted workflows, with the Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 112787 and 113321 confirming capable general compute throughput.

The benchmark interpretation is straightforward. A Steel Nomad score of 3628 and G3D score of 20891 place the card at the 72nd percentile — ahead of roughly seven in ten GPUs tracked. The rival set — Radeon 860M, MX550, RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, RX 6750 XT — all cluster within roughly a percent of its composite score, confirming the card occupies a tightly contested mid-tier band. The 8 GB VRAM allocation is the spec to watch: sufficient for 1080p ultra and generally fine at 1440p, but a ceiling for 4K texture packs and heavy rendering scenes.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform foundation is Intel Socket 1700, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel memory bus. That dual-generation memory support is a real advantage: a build can start on existing DDR4 and move to DDR5 without changing the CPU, and ECC support adds a workstation-grade integrity option. PCIe connectivity comes from the CPU at Gen 5 with 20 lanes — enough for the RTX 5060's PCIe 5.0 x8 interface with lanes to spare for a fast NVMe SSD and additional devices.

The power story is remarkably compact. The CPU's 35 W TDP plus the GPU's 145 W TDP total 180 W against the GPU's suggested 300 W PSU — the pairing has generous headroom. A capable air cooler is all the thermal management the CPU requires given its efficiency designation.

The sensible upgrade path is clear from the percentiles: the GPU is the component with room to grow. Moving from a 72nd-percentile GPU toward the 90th percentile would rebalance the build toward its 92nd-percentile CPU. The CPU itself, sitting -0.1% from the i9-13900K's average score, offers no meaningful in-socket upgrade — it is already at the top of what its silicon family delivers in aggregate benchmark terms.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data identifies the GPU as the limiting component for graphics workloads without ambiguity. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile; the GPU at the 72nd. That twenty-percentile gap means the processor will spend much of its capacity waiting on the graphics card in any GPU-bound scenario.

For CPU-bound workloads the situation inverts entirely. Rendering, compilation, compression, and encryption all run at flagship pace, with the 43036 multithread score and the -0.1% delta to the i9-13900K establishing that no meaningful processor bottleneck exists in those domains. The physics score of 2497 further indicates that game-engine simulation will not throttle frame delivery.

In gaming terms, the estimated frame scaling — again, no measured FPS rows exist for this pairing — favors higher frame rates at 1080p over higher resolutions at 4K, because the CPU has headroom the GPU cannot fully exploit at ultra settings, and the 8 GB VRAM buffer constrains texture-heavy 4K configurations. The build is CPU-rich by design; frame rates will track the RTX 5060's 72nd-percentile capability, not the i9's 92nd.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build, per the buildClass field, pairing Intel's efficiency-flagship 13th-generation i9 with NVIDIA's mid-tier 50-series card. The combined percentile of 82 places it in the top fifth of all tracked pairings — a strong overall position driven almost entirely by the processor. The character of the machine follows directly: it is a compute-first build with a modern, capable, but not dominant graphics card, engineered around low CPU power draw without the benchmark cost usually associated with that trade, as evidenced by the 61723 average score against the i9-13900K's 61766.

Who Should Build It

The ideal owner has CPU-heavy priorities. Software developers, 3D artists who render on the CPU, data analysts working with compression and encryption pipelines, and streamers who need parallel encoding capacity will extract full value from the 92nd-percentile processor and its 24 cores. Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh or 1440p ultra — with expectations set by the 72nd-percentile GPU — will find the pairing well matched, particularly in CPU-demanding titles where simulation load is high. Students and small businesses building workstations benefit from ECC support and the modest 35 W CPU TDP for always-on machines. Content creators doing 1080p and moderate 1440p video work fit the profile; those doing 4K-heavy GPU rendering or maximum-texture gaming at 4K will bump against the 8 GB VRAM ceiling.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the pair has no FPS-based ranking. All frame-rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as such.

At 1080p ultra settings, the RTX 5060's 72nd-percentile standing, 3628 Steel Nomad score, and 20891 G3D score point to high frame rates in esports and competitive titles and smooth ultra-settings play in modern AAA releases, with the i9-13900T's physics and single-thread scores ensuring the CPU will not be the frame limiter. At 1440p, estimated performance remains strong in most titles, though demanding games may require selective settings reduction. At 4K, the 8 GB GDDR7 buffer and the card's mid-tier percentile placement make ultra-settings gaming an expectation to manage rather than assume; the 448 GB/s bandwidth helps, but the composite benchmark data does not support flagship 4K throughput. Ray-traced lighting is viable thanks to the 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, with tensor-driven upscaling extending playable settings upward from the raster baseline the scores imply.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds