SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-13900T pairs with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 in a desktop build that combines a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 4 GB entry-level Ampere GPU. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 18th percentile among all GPUs, producing a combined percentile of 55. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process from Intel. Its base clock is 1100.00 MHz, which rises to 5.30 GHz at boost, and it carries a 35 W TDP that makes it an unusually power-efficient flagship part. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support spans DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory enabled, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU itself. Integrated graphics come via UHD Graphics 770.

Benchmark results position this CPU near the top of the desktop stack. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 36517 reflects strong sustained multi-threaded performance, while the single-core score of 5155 indicates excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded tasks. Cinebench R20 scores of 15337 multicore and 2165 single-core reinforce the same picture, and Cinebench R15 scores of 3680 multicore and 519 single-core show consistency across generations of the test. The average benchmark score of 61723 places it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 92% of processors in the database.

PassMark results add workload-specific detail. The multithread score of 43036 and single-thread score of 4177 confirm balanced strength, while integer math at 157324 and floating-point math at 108779 show strong arithmetic throughput. Data compression at 538254 and data encryption at 34415 indicate solid performance in storage and security-related tasks. Extended instructions score 29719, random string sorting hits 63358, and find prime numbers returns 175. Physics simulation scores 2497. Compared to nearest rivals, the i9-13900T trails the Intel Core i9-13900K by only 0.1% in average score, sits 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, and is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-13900KF, while leading the Intel Xeon 636 by 0.6%. These deltas are negligible, meaning the 35 W T variant effectively matches flagship unlocked parts in aggregate benchmark performance despite its drastically lower power envelope.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform defines the upgrade path. This socket supports the Core 13th Gen series, and the CPU’s Raptor Lake architecture is the final generation on this socket, so future CPU upgrades are limited to other LGA 1700 parts rather than next-generation architectures. Memory flexibility is a strength: DDR4 and DDR5 are both supported, letting users choose between older, widely available modules or newer higher-bandwidth options, with dual-channel configuration standard. ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation-style use cases.

PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage, though the RTX 4010 itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is fully compatible and does not bottleneck the connection. The GPU’s suggested PSU is 250 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 35 W, so the combined power draw is modest; a 250 W power supply recommendation indicates that most standard desktop PSUs will have headroom. The GPU requires no power connectors and is a single-slot design, which simplifies installation. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU, since the CPU’s 92nd percentile performance vastly exceeds the GPU’s 18th percentile, leaving significant room for a more powerful graphics card without changing the platform.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s performance is elite, with an average benchmark score of 61723 and a 92nd percentile rank. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 36517 and single-core score of 5155 place it among the fastest desktop processors available. The GPU, in contrast, delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893, ranking at the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This places the RTX 4010 near the bottom of the performance distribution, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (0.5% higher score), NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (0.6% higher), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (0.7% higher), and NVIDIA Quadro P600 (1% higher). The deltas are small, but the percentile gap between CPU and GPU is enormous — 92 versus 18 — which drives the combined percentile down to 55. This indicates that the CPU is the dominant component in terms of raw capability, while the GPU significantly limits overall system performance in graphics-bound tasks.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU can handle the most demanding multi-threaded workloads — Cinebench R23 multicore at 36517 suggests rendering, compilation, and simulation tasks will run exceptionally well — but the GPU’s 2893 Steel Nomad score caps 3D performance at levels far below what the CPU could feed. For non-graphics workloads such as data compression (538254 in PassMark) or integer math (157324), the system performs at a high tier. For gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 4010 becomes the limiting factor.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive rather than GPU-intensive. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 36517 indicating fast build times. Students and academic researchers running simulations or data analysis in Python or MATLAB will see strong performance in integer math (157324) and floating-point math (108779). Small business workstations handling spreadsheets, databases, or virtualization can leverage the 92nd percentile CPU performance and ECC memory support for data integrity.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering, such as video encoding with x264 or x265, will find the multicore scores compelling, but GPU-accelerated effects or 3D rendering will be constrained by the RTX 4010’s 18th percentile standing. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with low graphical settings may achieve playable frame rates, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture quality and resolution scaling. The system is best suited for users who need massive CPU throughput for professional or academic work and only occasional, light GPU use — the integrated UHD Graphics 770 could even serve as a fallback for basic display output, though the discrete GPU is present.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck is unambiguous: the GPU limits graphics performance while the CPU has substantial headroom. The CPU’s 92nd percentile versus the GPU’s 18th percentile means that in any workload that stresses the GPU — gaming, 3D rendering, GPU-accelerated video encoding — the RTX 4010 will be the constraining factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 is comparable to low-end GPUs, and the nearest rivals are all within 1% in score, so there is no hidden strength to exploit. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 61723 versus the GPU’s 2893 reflects a 21.3x difference in raw benchmark output, though these scores are not directly comparable across different test suites.

In CPU-bound workloads, the balance flips. Data compression at 538254, encryption at 34415, and multithread at 43036 all indicate that the CPU can sustain heavy parallel loads without issue. The 35 W TDP means thermal throttling is unlikely, and the boost clock of 5.30 GHz ensures single-threaded tasks run at high speed. For gaming, the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor at typical resolutions; the GPU will cap frame rates well before the CPU’s single-core score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 becomes relevant. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is sufficient for its bandwidth needs, so no platform-level bottleneck exists there. The practical outcome is that users should expect GPU-bound performance in any 3D application, while CPU-heavy productivity tasks will run at near-flagship levels.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4010’s 18th percentile GPU score and 4 GB VRAM make high-refresh gaming at 1080p possible only with low settings and older titles. Estimated frame rates in modern AAA games would likely fall below 60 FPS at 1080p ultra, and the 96.00 GB/s bandwidth may cause texture pop-in. The CPU’s single-core score of 5155 ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU is the ceiling.

Streaming: CPU-based streaming with x264 encoding will perform excellently given the 24 cores and 36517 Cinebench R23 multicore score, allowing simultaneous game capture and encoding without impacting CPU performance. However, the GPU’s low score means the game itself will struggle to maintain high frame rates, so streaming quality is limited by the game’s playability, not the encoder.

Video editing: Timeline editing and CPU-based effects will be fast, with PassMark multithread at 43036 and data compression at 538254 supporting quick scrubbing and export. GPU-accelerated effects, such as Lumetri or noise reduction in Premiere Pro, will be slow or require reduced preview resolution due to the RTX 4010’s low compute throughput.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in Blender Cycles or similar will be strong, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 36517 indicating fast ray tracing on CPU. GPU rendering with CUDA will be severely limited by the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 4 GB VRAM, which may not fit larger scenes.

Software development: Compilation and testing benefit from 24 cores and 32 threads, with integer math at 157324 and extended instructions at 29719 suggesting strong code generation and execution. The 92nd percentile CPU rank means build servers or local dev machines will outperform most systems.

Student and office work: Office applications, web browsing, and document editing are trivial for this CPU, and the 35 W TDP means low power draw and quiet operation. The GPU’s 18th percentile is irrelevant for these tasks, and the system will feel extremely responsive due to the 5155 single-core Cinebench R23 score.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-threaded performance relative to its closest rival?

A: The i9-13900T scores 36517 in Cinebench R23 multicore, and its average benchmark score of 61723 is only 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900K, which scores 61766.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and does it matter?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. This is a limiting factor for modern games at high textures and for GPU rendering, as larger scenes may exceed 4 GB.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, which is useful for workstation builds where data integrity in memory is critical.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 55, reflecting the CPU’s 92nd percentile and the GPU’s 18th percentile, with the low GPU score dragging the overall rank down.

Q: Is the CPU’s power draw low enough for a small form factor build?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP, and the GPU has a 50 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 250 W, so the total system draw is modest, and the GPU is single-slot with no power connectors.

Q: What PCIe version does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 4010 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and the bandwidth is sufficient for the GPU’s 96.00 GB/s memory bandwidth.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB?

A: The RTX 4010 scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 0.5% lower than the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB’s score of 2907, meaning performance is nearly identical in this specific test.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900T with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 35 W TDP and a 92nd percentile rank, representing top-tier multi-threaded performance. The GPU is an Ampere-based entry-level card with 4 GB VRAM, an 18th percentile rank, and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893. The combined percentile of 55 places the system in the mid-range overall, but the distribution is heavily skewed: the CPU is among the best in the database, while the GPU is among the worst. This is a workstation-oriented CPU with a display adapter attached, rather than a balanced gaming or graphics system.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 uses the GA107 chip on an 8 nm Samsung process, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². It belongs to the GeForce 40-series but is architecturally Ampere, not Ada Lovelace, which is notable for a 40-series part. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. Base clock is 1417 MHz, boost clock is 1762 MHz, and memory runs at 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective speed. There are 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output pipelines. Ray tracing is handled by 6 RT cores, and tensor performance comes from 24 tensor cores. Pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s, texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU’s TDP is 50 W, it is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 250 W. Display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893 places the GPU at the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very low rank, indicating that the RTX 4010 performs far below the median GPU in the database. Its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its score — the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907, RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2910, RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB at 2913, and Quadro P600 at 2923 — which suggests that in this specific benchmark, the RTX 4010 is effectively tied with cards that are marketed at very different tiers. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus are the primary limitations for rendering: texture-heavy scenes will exceed memory capacity, and the 96.00 GB/s bandwidth restricts data throughput. For compute workloads, the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 is modest, and the 6 RT cores provide ray tracing capability but at low performance levels.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893, combined with its 18th percentile rank, indicates that gaming performance will be at the entry level. At 1080p with ultra settings, modern AAA titles would likely run at 30-45 FPS, with esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant potentially exceeding 60 FPS due to their low demands. At 1440p, ultra settings would push the GPU to its limits, and 4 GB VRAM would cause texture streaming issues in many games. The CPU’s single-core score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 ensures no CPU bottleneck, so all frame rate limitations come from the GPU. The 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for high-refresh gaming at high settings, and the 6 RT cores are too few for meaningful ray-traced effects at playable frame rates. Users should expect 1080p gaming at medium-to-low settings for smooth frame rates, and the GPU’s 50 W TDP means it will run cool and quiet, but it is not a gaming-focused part.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds