SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900T + AMD Radeon RX 7700: A Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines a 24-core, 32-thread Intel Raptor Lake processor with a 16 GB Radeon RX 7700 GPU, creating a desktop build that sits at the 75th percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is a power-sipping variant of the flagship i9-13900 family, while the GPU targets the mid-range of the Radeon RX 7000 series. Benchmark data reveals a system with exceptional multi-threaded compute capability but more modest graphics throughput, making it a peculiar yet intriguing match for specific workloads. No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming performance figures discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RX 7700's PassMark G3D score of 20974 places it at the 58th percentile among all GPUs, which suggests it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming at high settings, but the data does not support consistent 4K high-refresh play. The GPU trails the RTX 3060 Ti by 1.7% in average benchmark score, indicating performance roughly on par with that previous-generation mid-range card. At 1080p, frame rates in the 100-144 Hz range are plausible for competitive titles, but the 58th percentile GPU score means the RX 7700 is not in the upper echelon needed for 240 Hz+ gaming at maximum settings.

Streaming: The i9-13900T's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 provides substantial headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcast. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with a multi-threaded score just 0.1% below the i9-13900K, meaning X264 encoding on the CPU is a viable option without compromising game performance. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU also offers Quick Sync capabilities, though its performance is not benchmarked in this data pack.

Video Editing: Multi-core rendering workloads will benefit enormously from the 24-core, 32-thread configuration. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15337 and R15 multi-core score of 3680 indicate that timeline rendering, effect processing, and export tasks will be CPU-bound in most cases. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory for 4K video scrubbing and color grading, though the GPU compute score of 10963 in PassMark suggests it is not a top-tier acceleration card for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 157324 and floating point math score of 108779 are exceptionally high, placing this build in a strong position for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or V-Ray. The GPU's 25.18 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 40 ray accelerators provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the 58th percentile GPU ranking means it will not compete with high-end rendering cards. For hybrid CPU+GPU rendering pipelines, this system would be CPU-limited in most production scenarios.

Software Development: The 32 threads and 36 MB of shared L3 cache make this an excellent compilation machine. The PassMark data compression score of 538254 and random string sorting score of 63358 indicate strong performance in data manipulation tasks common in build systems and database operations. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for long-running build agents where data integrity matters.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4177 in PassMark and 5155 in Cinebench R23 single-core ensure snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The 35 W TDP of the CPU means this system can run quietly and efficiently in a shared workspace, while the GPU's dual-slot design and 200 W TDP are moderate for a desktop. For document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing, this system is vastly over-provisioned, but the headroom means it will never feel sluggish.

FAQ

Q: How does the i9-13900T compare to the i9-13900K in CPU benchmarks?

A: The i9-13900T has an average benchmark score of 61723, which is just 0.1% below the i9-13900K's 61766. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the T-series scores 36517, which is effectively identical to the K-series given the sub-1% delta. The T variant achieves this with a 35 W TDP versus the K's higher power envelope.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The RX 7700 sits at the 58th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. This places it in the mid-range tier, roughly equivalent to the RTX 3060 Ti (which is 1.7% faster) and the RX 9060 (which is 1% faster). It is a capable 1080p and 1440p card but not a 4K flagship.

Q: Does the CPU support DDR5 memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through its dual-channel memory controller. The memory bus is dual-channel, which means two sticks of RAM are recommended for optimal bandwidth. ECC memory is also supported, which is unusual for a consumer desktop CPU.

Q: What is the combined system performance percentile?

A: The CPU+GPU combination ranks at the 75th percentile among all desktop builds in the database. This reflects the strong CPU (92nd percentile) paired with a more modest GPU (58th percentile), resulting in a system that is well above average overall but not at the top tier.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7700 have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. This is generous for the GPU's performance class and supports high-resolution textures in games and large dataset processing in compute workloads.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and core configuration?

A: The i9-13900T has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. It features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The architecture is Raptor Lake on Intel's 10 nm process.

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked for overclocking?

A: No, the multiplier is locked (multiplierUnlocked: false). This is typical for T-series low-power processors, which are designed for efficient operation at their stock clocks rather than enthusiast overclocking. The boost clock of 5.30 GHz is already quite aggressive for a 35 W TDP part.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a pronounced imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The i9-13900T ranks at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 7700 sits at just the 58th percentile among GPUs. This means in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck, limiting frame rates well before the CPU reaches its capacity. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 43036 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 are more than sufficient to feed any modern GPU, and the 0.1% delta to the i9-13900K shows that the T-series does not sacrifice meaningful performance despite its low power draw.

In CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU becomes the dominant component, and the GPU's mid-range performance may not accelerate those tasks as effectively as a higher-tier card would. The GPU's PassMark compute score of 10963 is respectable but not exceptional, meaning GPU-accelerated compute tasks will not be the system's strong suit. For gaming, the RX 7700's 58th percentile score suggests that at 1080p, the CPU could drive frame rates well beyond 144 Hz in many titles, but the GPU will cap performance at lower levels. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced.

The combined 75th percentile system ranking reflects this asymmetry: the CPU is pulling the system upward while the GPU holds it back from the top quartile. For productivity workloads, this is a well-balanced machine. For gaming, it is a CPU-heavy configuration that would benefit from a stronger GPU to fully utilize the i9-13900T's capabilities. The 35 W TDP of the CPU is noteworthy — it produces far less heat than a standard high-end CPU, which can be an advantage in compact or quiet PC builds, but the GPU's 200 W TDP and suggested 550 W PSU mean the system still requires a moderately powerful power supply.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p: The RX 7700's 58th percentile GPU score and 16 GB VRAM make it suitable for high-settings gaming at these resolutions. Users who prioritize high frame rates in esports titles at 1080p will find the CPU more than capable, but the GPU will be the limiting factor. For 1440p with ray tracing enabled, the 40 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, though performance will be modest given the card's overall tier.

Content Creators and Video Editors: The i9-13900T's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 is a strong asset for video encoding, rendering, and effects processing. The 16 GB GPU memory is useful for timeline scrubbing and multi-layer compositing. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long rendering jobs.

Software Developers and Data Analysts: With 32 threads and a PassMark data compression score of 538254, this system excels at code compilation, data processing, and running virtual machines. The 36 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in database workloads. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking ensures developers will rarely wait on compilation.

Students and Small Business Workstations: The 35 W CPU TDP makes this an energy-efficient choice for a workstation that runs all day. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is not needed. The system's overall 75th percentile ranking means it can handle any office productivity task with ease, while also supporting occasional rendering or simulation work.

Benchmark Performance

The i9-13900T achieves a 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61723. Its Cinebench suite results are impressive: R15 multi-core scores 3680 and single-core 519; R20 multi-core scores 15337 and single-core 2165; R23 multi-core scores 36517 and single-core 5155. PassMark tests show multi-thread performance of 43036, single-thread of 4177, integer math of 157324, floating point math of 108779, data compression of 538254, and data encryption of 34415. The CPU matches the i9-13900K within 0.1%, making it effectively identical in performance despite its lower power target.

The RX 7700 sits at the 58th percentile among GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 15852. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2865, and PassMark G3D is 20974. The GPU compute score of 10963 indicates moderate compute capability. The nearest rival is the R9 370X (0.1% slower), while the RX 9060 is 1% faster and the RTX 3060 Ti is 1.7% faster. This places the RX 7700 in a tightly contested mid-range segment where small margins separate competitors.

The combined picture is a system at the 75th percentile overall, driven primarily by the exceptional CPU performance. The GPU's 58th percentile ranking is the weaker link, but the pairing is still well above average. The delta between CPU and GPU percentiles (92 vs 58) is significant, indicating that the CPU is capable of much more than the GPU can deliver in graphics workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the Navi 32 chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. It features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, and 40 ray accelerators. The GPU has a base clock of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. Memory runs at 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) across a 256-bit bus, providing 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM.

The pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s are solid mid-range figures. FP32 compute is rated at 25.18 TFLOPS, which is competitive for the price tier. The 40 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the 58th percentile overall GPU score suggests that ray-traced workloads will not be a primary strength. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 96 and DirectX 11 score of 186 indicate moderate API performance, while the OpenCL score of 106028 in Geekbench shows reasonable compute capability.

The RX 7700's nearest rival, the RTX 3060 Ti, is 1.7% faster in average score, suggesting the RX 7700 is positioned between the previous generation's mid-range and upper-mid-range. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage over many competitors, enabling high-resolution texture packs and larger compute datasets. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it future-proof for upcoming game APIs. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, providing modern connectivity options.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a TDP of just 35 W. Cache configuration includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory as an option, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

The 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs is remarkable for a low-power T-series part. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 is nearly identical to the i9-13900K, which is a 125 W+ part. This suggests the T-series's 35 W TDP is not a significant performance limiter in short multi-threaded bursts, though sustained heavy loads may see the CPU throttle to maintain power limits. The single-core score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 is excellent, ensuring responsive performance in lightly-threaded applications.

PassMark results show a well-rounded profile: multi-thread 43036, single-thread 4177, integer math 157324, floating point math 108779, extended instructions 29719, data compression 538254, data encryption 34415, and random string sorting 63358. The physics score of 2497 and find prime numbers score of 175 are lower, indicating that not all workloads scale perfectly with the core count. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output and media acceleration, which is useful for troubleshooting or power-saving scenarios.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: desktop) pairing a 35 W T-series flagship CPU with a 200 W mid-range GPU. The combined system ranking is at the 75th percentile among all CPU+GPU pairs, driven largely by the CPU's 92nd percentile performance. The CPU is a locked multiplier part, meaning no manual overclocking, but its stock boost clock of 5.30 GHz is already high. The GPU is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width, requiring 2x 8-pin power connectors and a suggested 550 W PSU.

The i9-13900T's launch MSRP is $549. The overall tier is upper-mid-range, with the CPU providing flagship-level compute while the GPU delivers mid-range graphics. This is a system that will excel in productivity and compute workloads while providing solid, but not elite, gaming performance. The low CPU TDP allows for a quieter and more thermally efficient build, though the GPU's 200 W TDP means the system still generates meaningful heat. The combination is unusual — most builds pair a high-end CPU with a high-end GPU — but it makes sense for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks and play games at moderate resolutions.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The memory support includes ECC, which is beneficial for workstation use. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes is available from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16 — this is backward compatible and provides ample bandwidth for the RX 7700.

The suggested PSU of 550 W provides headroom for the 35 W CPU and 200 W GPU, but future upgrades to a more power-hungry GPU would require a larger PSU. The 2x 8-pin power connectors on the GPU suggest it draws near the 200 W TDP, and a higher-tier GPU might need 3x 8-pin or a 12VHPWR connector.

A sensible next upgrade would be a stronger GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom — it matches the i9-13900K within 0.1% and sits at the 92nd percentile. The RX 7700's 58th percentile ranking is the system's weakest point, and upgrading to a GPU in the 80th-90th percentile would better utilize the CPU's capabilities. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5, so future GPUs using that interface will be compatible. Memory can be upgraded to higher-speed DDR5 modules, though the current dual-channel support is standard. The CPU socket is likely at the end of its generation (Raptor Lake), so a future CPU upgrade may require a new motherboard.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. The following figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component. The RX 7700's PassMark G3D score of 20974 (58th percentile) suggests the following approximate performance:

1080p Ultra: Estimated 80-120 FPS in AAA titles, 144-200 FPS in esports titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 4177 ensures minimal bottleneck at this resolution, so the GPU is the primary limiter.
1440p Ultra: Estimated 60-90 FPS in AAA titles, 100-140 FPS in esports. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 624.1 GB/s bandwidth supports 1440p rendering well.
4K Ultra: Estimated 30-50 FPS in AAA titles, 60-80 FPS in lighter games. The GPU's 58th percentile ranking puts it below the threshold for comfortable 4K gaming at high settings.
Ray Tracing: With 40 RT cores, ray-traced performance will be modest. Expect a 30-50% performance hit compared to rasterized rendering, placing ray-traced 1080p at 50-70 FPS in supported titles.

These estimates are based on the GPU's relative position to the RTX 3060 Ti (1.7% faster) and RX 9060 (1% faster), as well as the CPU's strong single-thread performance. The CPU will not be a limiting factor at any resolution below 1080p, and even at 1080p, the GPU is the bottleneck in GPU-intensive scenes. For esports titles at 1080p with competitive settings (low-medium), frame rates could exceed 200 FPS, but this is an estimate from the benchmark data rather than a measured result.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

AMD Radeon RX 7700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds