SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core i9-13900T's overall percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The processor sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, placing it in the top 8% of all processors. Its average benchmark score is 61,723, which lands within 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-13900K's average score of 61,766, indicating near-flagship compute performance despite its lower thermal design.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600 compare to its closest competitor, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?

A: The RX 7600's average benchmark score is 15,171, which is 0.2% lower than the RTX 3050 OEM's score of 15,199. This places the two GPUs in a statistical dead heat, with the RX 7600 ranking at the 57th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What are the Cinebench multi-core scores for the i9-13900T?

A: The i9-13900T scores 3,680 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, 15,337 in Cinebench R20 multi-core, and 36,517 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. These numbers reflect a 24-core, 32-thread configuration that delivers substantial parallel processing power for rendering workloads.

Q: What memory types does the i9-13900T support?

A: The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation and reliability-focused builds that require error-correcting memory.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The RX 7600 features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, which is a typical configuration for a mid-range desktop graphics card.

Q: Does the i9-13900T have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Intel UHD Graphics 770. This provides a display output capability without a discrete GPU, which can assist with troubleshooting and basic desktop use if the discrete graphics card is removed or fails.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combination of the Intel Core i9-13900T and AMD Radeon RX 7600 achieves a combined percentile of 75 among all desktop builds. This indicates a system that outperforms the majority of desktop configurations, though the CPU is notably stronger than the GPU in raw performance terms.

# Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data presents a clear picture of a system with an elite-level CPU paired with a mid-range GPU. The Intel Core i9-13900T delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,517 and a single-core score of 5,155, positioning it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. This multi-core result is 0.1% below the Intel Core i9-13900K's average score of 61,766, effectively matching the flagship K-series part in overall average benchmark score at 61,723 versus 61,766. The processor also demonstrates strong single-threaded capability with a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 2,165 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,177.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 operates in a different performance tier. Its average benchmark score of 15,171 places it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, with a Passmark G3D score of 16,634 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,310. The GPU's closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, scores 15,199, just 0.2% higher, while the AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics score 15,270, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600. This clustering of scores around 15,000 indicates that the RX 7600 is a solid mid-tier performer but does not approach the upper echelons of graphics performance.

The combined picture is one of imbalance: the CPU's 92nd percentile standing contrasts sharply with the GPU's 57th percentile position. The combined percentile of 75 reflects this gap, indicating that the system's overall performance is dragged down by the GPU relative to what the CPU alone can achieve. For compute-heavy tasks like Cinebench rendering, the system will perform at a level comparable to high-end desktop workstations; for gaming and graphics-intensive workloads, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern NVMe storage and expansion cards. The processor's 35 W TDP is remarkably low for a 24-core part, and the suggested PSU for the RX 7600 is 450 W, giving builders ample headroom for a compact power supply. The combination of a low-TDP CPU and a 165 W GPU means the total system power draw is modest, allowing for efficient cooling solutions and smaller form-factor builds.

A sensible next upgrade path would focus on the GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom for more powerful graphics cards. The i9-13900T's benchmark scores suggest it can drive much higher frame rates than the RX 7600 can produce, so moving to a higher-tier GPU would better utilize the CPU's 92nd percentile compute capability. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures compatibility with next-generation GPUs and storage devices. The dual memory support means builders can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5, though the CPU's memory bandwidth figures are not listed in the data.

For system builders considering this platform, the unlocked multiplier is not available on the i9-13900T, meaning overclocking is not supported. However, the processor's 5.30 GHz boost clock already delivers strong single-thread performance without manual tuning. The 257 mm² die size and 10 nm process node from Intel indicate a mature manufacturing process that balances performance with efficiency. The platform's ECC memory support adds a reliability dimension that is uncommon in consumer desktop processors, making it suitable for entry-level workstation builds where data integrity is a priority.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need exceptional multi-threaded compute performance but are satisfied with mid-range graphics capability. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit most from the i9-13900T's 24 cores and 32 threads, which deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,517. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of processors, making it suitable for professionals who rely on CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, data analysis, and scientific computing.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the RX 7600 adequate for most titles, though its 57th percentile ranking indicates it is not a high-end gaming GPU. The 8 GB VRAM capacity and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth support 1080p gaming with high settings, but users seeking 1440p or higher refresh rates may need to lower settings. The system is better suited for developers who need fast compilation times and parallel test execution, as the Passmark multi-thread score of 43,036 and integer math score of 157,324 indicate strong throughput for build processes.

Students and small business users will appreciate the processor's 35 W TDP, which allows for quiet and efficient operation in office environments. The ECC memory support is a differentiator for small business workstations handling financial data or database workloads where memory errors are unacceptable. The Passmark data compression score of 538,254 and data encryption score of 34,415 indicate strong performance for file archiving, backup processes, and secure communications. However, users primarily focused on gaming should note that the GPU will limit frame rates well below what the CPU can support, making this a compute-first rather than graphics-first build.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck in this system. The i9-13900T's 92nd percentile CPU ranking versus the RX 7600's 57th percentile GPU ranking creates a significant performance gap that manifests in graphics-limited workloads. In gaming scenarios, the RX 7600 will saturate its 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth before the CPU's processing power becomes a constraint. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 169.9 GPixel/s pixel rate are respectable for mid-range cards but will limit frame rates in modern titles.

The CPU, by contrast, has no such limitations. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,517 and Passmark multi-thread score of 43,036 indicate that it can handle heavily threaded workloads without breaking a sweat. The Passmark floating point math score of 108,779 and extended instructions score of 29,719 further demonstrate the CPU's capability for scientific and engineering computations. In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the GPU's performance is irrelevant, and the system will operate at the CPU's high performance level.

The bottleneck is workload-dependent. For productivity applications that rely on CPU processing, the system is well-balanced with the CPU providing near-flagship performance. For gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, the RX 7600 becomes the limiting factor, capping performance at roughly the 57th percentile level. The Passmark G2D score of 984 and DirectX 12 score of 58 suggest that the GPU handles 2D and DirectX 12 workloads modestly, while the DirectX 11 score of 172 and DirectX 9 score of 226 indicate better performance on older graphics APIs. Users should expect GPU-bound frame rates in most modern games, with the CPU rarely dropping below 90% utilization in compute-heavy scenarios.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RX 7600's 57th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM make it suitable for 1080p gaming at high refresh rates in esports titles, though demanding AAA games will likely stay below 144 FPS at high settings. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 5,155 in Cinebench R23 ensures minimal bottlenecking at lower resolutions, but the GPU's 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance in memory-intensive scenes.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, with a Passmark multi-thread score of 43,036 indicating smooth x264 encoding. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports hardware encoding as well, though the lack of measured FPS data means streaming performance is estimated from these compute scores.

Video editing: The i9-13900T delivers strong performance in rendering and export tasks, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,517 and Passmark data compression score of 538,254. The RX 7600's 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate acceleration for effects and timeline previews, though the GPU's 57th percentile ranking means it will not accelerate 4K timelines as quickly as higher-tier cards.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will excel, with the i9-13900T's 24 cores delivering near-flagship performance compared to the i9-13900K. GPU rendering will be limited by the RX 7600's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, which is mid-range; the 32 ray tracing cores and 2048 shading units provide moderate acceleration in supported renderers.

Software development: The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 157,324 and extended instructions score of 29,719 indicate fast compilation and test execution. The 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for high-speed NVMe storage, reducing build times further. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and basic GPU compute tasks in development workflows.

Student and office work: The 35 W CPU TDP enables quiet operation, while the ECC memory support adds reliability for spreadsheet and database work. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display option, and the Passmark single-thread score of 4,177 ensures responsive day-to-day application performance.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is a mid-range desktop GPU built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 2250 MHz memory clock with 18 Gbps effective speed. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz, providing a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,310 and a Passmark G3D score of 16,634. Its average benchmark score of 15,171 places it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 15,199 (0.2% higher) and the AMD Radeon 680M at 15,270 (0.7% higher).

The GPU's compute specifications include 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines. It achieves a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 performance both rated at 21.75 TFLOPS. The 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though the GPU's mid-range positioning means RT performance will be modest. The 6 nm process node from TSMC with 13,300 million transistors and a die size of 204 mm² results in a transistor density of 65.2M per mm².

For rendering workloads, the RX 7600's 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and light 1440p content creation, but may struggle with large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth supports moderate texture streaming, and the 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provides reasonable compute acceleration. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. Its dual-slot design with a 1x 8-pin power connector and 450 W suggested PSU make it easy to integrate into existing systems, and the 204 mm length fits in most mid-tower cases.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900T with the AMD Radeon RX 7600. The combination achieves a combined percentile of 75 among all desktop configurations, placing it above the majority of systems. The i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from Intel's Core 13th Gen series, built on the Raptor Lake architecture with a 10 nm process node from Intel. It features a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 35 W TDP that is exceptionally low for its core count. The RX 7600 is a mid-range GPU from AMD's Radeon RX 7000 series, built on RDNA 3.0 with a 6 nm TSMC process.

The system's overall tier is defined by the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 57th percentile ranking. This creates a build that excels at CPU-intensive tasks but is average-to-good for gaming. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,517 approaches the i9-13900K's performance, while the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 16,634 is typical for a mainstream graphics card. The combined percentile of 75 suggests a well-above-average desktop system, though not a top-tier gaming rig.

The build class is desktop, and the data indicates no measured FPS results exist for this exact combination. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, ECC memory, and PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $549, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 269 USD. The system is best characterized as a compute-focused workstation with modest gaming capability, suitable for professionals and enthusiasts who prioritize CPU performance over graphics.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, using the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process node. It features a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 35 W TDP that is remarkably low for a processor with this core count. The CPU has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, with a die size of 257 mm². It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory, including ECC memory, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The processor's benchmark scores demonstrate strong multi-threaded performance. It achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,517 and a single-core score of 5,155, with corresponding R20 scores of 15,337 and 2,165, and R15 scores of 3,680 and 519. The Passmark multi-thread score is 43,036, and the single-thread score is 4,177. Its average benchmark score of 61,723 places it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, just 0.1% below the Intel Core i9-13900K's average score of 61,766. This near-parity with the flagship K-series part indicates that the T-series low-power variant sacrifices minimal performance while significantly reducing power draw.

For real workloads, the i9-13900T excels at parallel computation. The Passmark data compression score of 538,254 and data encryption score of 34,415 indicate strong performance in file archiving and security applications. The integer math score of 157,324 and floating point math score of 108,779 demonstrate robust arithmetic throughput for scientific computing. The extended instructions score of 29,719 supports modern SIMD workloads, while the find prime numbers score of 175 and random string sorting score of 63,358 provide additional evidence of computational versatility. The CPU's 35 W TDP makes it an efficient choice for always-on workstations, and its ECC memory support adds a professional-grade reliability feature. The processor is not multiplier-unlocked, so overclocking is not possible, but the 5.30 GHz boost clock already provides high single-thread performance without manual tuning.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900T

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds