SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900T + AMD Radeon RX 6600: A Desktop Pairing Analysis

This build pairs Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake-S flagship with a 35-watt TDP envelope against AMD's RDNA 2-based Radeon RX 6600, a combination that lands at the 78th percentile overall among desktop configurations. The CPU is a remarkable engineering exercise—a 24-thread processor that sips power—while the GPU is a mainstream 1080p-class part; together they create a system with a massive compute disparity that deserves scrutiny across workload types. The data reveals a processor that trades blows with the Core i9-13900K (within 0.1% average benchmark score) while drawing a fraction of the power, paired with a graphics card that sits at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is shared across the Core 13th Gen lineup and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This memory flexibility is a key advantage for upgrades: a builder can carry forward existing DDR4 modules or move to DDR5, depending on motherboard choice, without changing the CPU. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 per core are fed by that dual-channel memory bus, and the platform supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop part and hints at workstation-adjacent use cases.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, though the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x8, meaning the primary graphics slot runs at half the width of a typical x16 connection. The CPU's integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output and can handle basic desktop tasks if the discrete GPU is removed or fails. The socket is not forward-compatible with newer Intel generations, so a meaningful CPU upgrade would require a motherboard swap, but within Socket 1700, the i9-13900T is already near the top of the stack—only the 13900K and 13900KF rival it in average score, with deltas of -0.1% and -0.2% respectively.

The power supply requirement is modest: the GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, and the CPU's 35 W TDP means the total system draw is low enough that most quality power supplies will have ample headroom. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design measuring 190 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, so it fits in most mid-tower cases without issue. A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU—the platform's PCIe Gen 5 lanes and the CPU's compute headroom can feed a much faster card—or additional memory capacity, given the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking suggests it will not be the bottleneck in any near-term upgrade scenario.

FAQ

Q: Does this CPU support overclocking?

A: No, the Intel Core i9-13900T has the multiplier locked (multiplierUnlocked is false), so it cannot be overclocked via multiplier adjustments. The 35 W TDP and 1100 MHz base clock are fixed by design.

Q: What memory types are compatible with this build?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel regardless of which type is chosen, and the platform also supports ECC memory.

Q: How does the i9-13900T compare to the i9-13900K in benchmark scores?

A: The average benchmark score for the 13900T is 61723, while the 13900K scores 61766, a delta of -0.1%. In practical terms, the 13900T is essentially identical in average performance despite its drastically lower 35 W TDP.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and capacity?

A: The Radeon RX 6600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: The build class is desktop. Both the CPU (Intel Socket 1700) and GPU (dual-slot, 190 mm length) are designed for desktop systems, and the CPU's market segment is listed as Desktop.

Q: What is the production status of each component?

A: The CPU is listed as Active production, while the GPU is End-of-life. The GPU's successor is Navi III, and its predecessor is Navi.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon RX 6600 includes 28 ray accelerators (rtCores) and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU posts an average benchmark score of 61723, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i9-13900K scores 61766 (-0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61834 (-0.2%), the Intel Core i9-13900KF scores 61841 (-0.2%), and the Intel Xeon 636 scores 61360 (+0.6%). This means the 13900T is effectively performance-equivalent to the top desktop silicon from the same generation, despite its 35 W TDP, which is a striking result. In multi-core workloads, the Cinebench R23 score of 36517 is exceptionally high, while the single-core R23 score of 5155 is strong but not class-leading—the difference suggests the 1100 MHz base clock and power limit affect sustained single-core boost behavior less than they do multi-core all-core loads.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 19036, placing it at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, delta 0%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (19049, -0.1%), the NVIDIA Tesla K20m (19089, -0.3%), and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954, +0.4%). The RX 6600 is therefore a mid-pack performer, roughly matching a professional workstation GPU from a previous era and a modern mobile RTX 4050. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, which reflects the substantial gap between the CPU's high standing (92nd) and the GPU's mid-tier position (63rd). The combined picture is one of a CPU that can drive far more graphics horsepower than the RX 6600 provides, with the GPU acting as the performance ceiling in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need massive multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity but are satisfied with 1080p gaming or lighter GPU compute tasks. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with its 92nd percentile ranking, make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running PassMark data compression (score 538254) and encryption (score 34415) workloads, or researchers running floating-point math (score 108779) and integer math (score 157324) simulations. Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit from the CPU's compile speed and the GPU's ability to handle moderate rendering tasks, though the 8 GB VRAM may limit larger 3D scenes.

Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database servers, or batch processing would find the CPU's thread count and ECC memory support compelling, while the GPU's 63rd percentile is sufficient for office productivity, spreadsheets, and 2D design. Gamers at 1080p resolution will find the pairing viable for most titles, but those targeting 1440p or 4K would need a stronger GPU to match the CPU's potential. The build is less suited for AI researchers or deep learning practitioners who need higher GPU compute throughput—the RX 6600's PassMark GPU compute score of 6554 is modest, and its FP32 performance of 8.928 TFLOPS is far below what a high-end data center GPU would offer.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 1100 MHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 35 W TDP that is remarkably low for a 24-core part—this is the defining characteristic of the T-series, designed for thermally constrained systems. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC capability, and provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that punches far above its power class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 is within striking distance of the 13900K's average, and the Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 15337 confirms strong all-core throughput. Single-core performance is also solid, with R23 single-core at 5155 and R20 single-core at 2165, indicating that the 5.30 GHz boost clock is effectively sustained for lightly threaded tasks. PassMark multi-thread score of 43036 and single-thread score of 4177 reinforce this pattern. The data compression score of 538254 is particularly high, suggesting excellent memory subsystem performance, while the find prime numbers score of 175 is lower, indicating that the power limit may throttle certain integer-heavy workloads that stress all cores simultaneously.

For real workloads, this CPU excels in scenarios that benefit from many threads: video encoding, 3D rendering, code compilation, and scientific computation. The 35 W TDP means it can sustain high clock speeds in short bursts but may reduce all-core frequencies under prolonged heavy load, which is a trade-off for its low power draw. The architecture's hybrid design—performance and efficiency cores—is not explicitly detailed in the core configuration, but the 24-core/32-thread count suggests a mix that balances throughput and power efficiency.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries—so all frame rate discussion here is estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 and PassMark G3D score of 15096 indicate that the RX 6600 is a solid 1080p performer, but its 63rd percentile ranking means it will struggle at higher resolutions or with ultra settings in demanding titles. The CPU's 92nd percentile and strong single-core scores (R23 single-core 5155, PassMark single-thread 4177) ensure that it will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p, where frame rates are more likely GPU-limited.

Estimated frame rates for 1080p ultra settings would likely fall in the 60-100 FPS range for most modern titles, based on the GPU's relative standing against the RTX 4050 Mobile (delta -0.1%) and its DirectX 12 support. At 1440p, frame rates would drop significantly, likely into the 40-70 FPS range depending on the game, and at 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth would become limiting factors, with many titles falling below 60 FPS. The GPU's 28 ray accelerators provide some ray tracing capability, but the low RT throughput relative to higher-end cards suggests that enabling ray tracing at 1080p would be feasible only with reduced settings or upscaling. These are estimates based on benchmark scores, not measured results, and actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a heavily CPU-favored build, with the processor at the 92nd percentile and the GPU at the 63rd percentile—a 29-percentage-point gap. In gaming workloads, the RX 6600 will be the limiting factor in virtually all scenarios, as the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread 4177) is more than sufficient to feed the GPU's 8.928 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput. The FPS scaling evidence from the GPU's benchmark scores suggests that frame rates will scale with resolution and settings, but the GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap performance in bandwidth-sensitive titles.

In CPU-bound workloads, the balance shifts. The GPU becomes irrelevant for tasks like data compression (CPU score 538254), encryption (34415), and integer math (157324), where the CPU's thread count and cache size dominate. For 3D rendering that uses the GPU, the RX 6600's 8 GB VRAM and 6554 PassMark GPU compute score will limit scene complexity and render times. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache helps with gaming performance by reducing memory latency, but the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface could theoretically bottleneck a faster card—though for the RX 6600, the bandwidth is sufficient. Overall, the CPU is the star, and the GPU is the constraint for graphics-heavy tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs a top-tier 24-core Intel processor with a mid-range AMD graphics card, resulting in a combined percentile of 78. The CPU, the Intel Core i9-13900T, is a Raptor Lake-S part with a 35 W TDP, designed for systems where power efficiency is paramount, yet it matches the average benchmark score of the 13900K within 0.1%. The GPU, the AMD Radeon RX 6600, is an RDNA 2.0 part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, 1792 shading units, and a boost clock of 2491 MHz, placing it at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs.

The overall tier is that of a productivity-first workstation with adequate gaming capability. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking puts it in the top 8% of all processors, while the GPU's 63rd percentile is solidly mid-pack. This is not a balanced gaming rig—the CPU is overkill for the GPU in most game titles—but it is a coherent build for users who prioritize multi-threaded compute and are willing to accept lower graphical settings or resolutions. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $549, and the GPU's launch MSRP is 329 USD, but current market pricing is not part of this analysis.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the RX 6600 can drive 100+ FPS in esports titles, given its 63rd percentile standing and 159.4 GPixel/s pixel rate, but the CPU's single-core strength (R23 single-core 5155) ensures no frame-time stutter from the processor side. At 1440p, frame rates will drop below 60 FPS in demanding titles, making this a 1080p-focused gaming setup.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, as the PassMark multi-thread score of 43036 indicates that even with a game running, there are plenty of threads for OBS or similar encoders. The GPU's lack of dedicated encoding hardware is not an issue because the CPU can handle x264 encoding without impacting game performance significantly.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 and PassMark floating-point math score of 108779 make this build excellent for 4K video editing in Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve, with the CPU handling timeline scrubbing and export encoding. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p effects and basic color grading, but 4K timelines with heavy effects may exceed its capacity.

3D rendering: In CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles (CPU mode), the 24-core processor will deliver outstanding performance, with the 92nd percentile ranking suggesting render times in the top tier of consumer hardware. GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or Octane will be limited by the RX 6600's 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 performance, which is workable for simple scenes but slow for complex ones.

Software development: The CPU's data compression score of 538254 and integer math score of 157324 indicate fast compilation and test execution, making this ideal for developers building large C++ or Rust projects. The GPU is irrelevant for most dev workflows, so the 63rd percentile is not a concern.

Student and office work: For general productivity, this build is massively overprovisioned—the CPU's 35 W TDP means it runs cool and quiet, and the GPU handles spreadsheet rendering, web browsing, and 4K video playback without effort. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running data analysis tasks, though the 8 GB VRAM is more than needed for office applications.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 7 nm process, with a die size of 237 mm² and 11,060 million transistors. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, with 28 ray accelerators for hardware-accelerated ray tracing. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth from a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The boost clock is 2491 MHz, with a game clock of 2044 MHz and a base clock of 1626 MHz.

The GPU's benchmark scores paint a picture of a capable 1080p card that is showing its age. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1492 and PassMark G3D score of 15096 place it at the 63rd percentile, with the nearest rivals being the Quadro K6000 (19030, delta 0%), RTX 4050 Mobile (19049, -0.1%), Tesla K20m (19089, -0.3%), and RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954, +0.4%). The Geekbench Vulkan score of 67623 and Metal score of 88398 indicate solid API support, while the OpenCL score of 28850 shows moderate compute throughput. The PassMark GPU compute score of 6554 is low in absolute terms, reflecting the card's focus on rasterization over compute-heavy workloads.

For rendering, the RX 6600 can handle 1080p gaming at high settings and light 1440p in older titles, but its 128-bit memory bus limits bandwidth-intensive effects like high-resolution textures or heavy post-processing. The 28 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the performance is not comparable to higher-end RDNA 2 cards or NVIDIA's RTX series, so ray tracing should be used sparingly. The GPU's dual-slot design, 190 mm length, single 8-pin connector, and 300 W suggested PSU make it easy to install in most systems, and its display outputs (1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a) support multi-monitor setups up to 4K. The card is end-of-life, so availability is decreasing, but its performance profile remains relevant for budget 1080p gaming and light creative work.