SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900T + AMD Radeon RX 6400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
83%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900T

61,723 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6400

6,001 Benchmark Score
Top 17% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i9-13900T and the AMD Radeon RX 6400 presents a striking asymmetry in performance potential. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a 4 GB entry-level RDNA 2 part. This is a desktop configuration where the processor operates in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, yet the graphics card sits in the 35th percentile. The data indicates a system built around extreme multi-threaded compute capability that is paired with a modest graphics solution, creating a unique profile that excels in productivity but is constrained in graphics-intensive tasks. The benchmark results reveal a machine that is a powerhouse for processing but a lightweight for rendering, a dichotomy that defines its character.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. Its base clock is a lowly 1100.00 MHz, but it can boost up to 5.30 GHz, a significant range that suggests a design focused on power efficiency and thermal management. The CPU has a 36 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB L2 cache per core. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics. The chip is built for the Intel Socket 1700 platform and has a TDP of 35 W.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of its capabilities. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 36517 points in multi-core and 5155 points in single-core tests. The multi-core score is exceptional, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The single-core score is also strong, indicating excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. The PassMark multi-thread score of 43036 further reinforces its high-end positioning, while the single-thread score of 4177 confirms it is not just a multi-core monster but also a quick single-core performer. Its average benchmark score is 61723, which is nearly identical to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900K, which has an average score of 61766, a delta of -0.1%. This suggests that the T-series chip, despite its lower TDP, delivers performance on par with the flagship K-series in aggregated benchmarks.

The real-world implications of these scores are substantial. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 indicates that the CPU can handle demanding workloads like 3D rendering and video encoding with relative ease. The data compression score of 538254 in PassMark points to strong performance in archiving and file management tasks. The floating-point math score of 108779 and integer math score of 157324 show robust computational throughput for scientific and financial applications. The low 35 W TDP is notable, as it suggests that this high core count and performance come without the extreme power draw of its higher-clocked siblings, making it an interesting option for small form factor or power-conscious builds. The locked multiplier means overclocking is not an option, but the stock performance data suggests it does not need it to compete effectively.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 64, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems. The CPU’s individual percentile is 92, while the GPU’s is 35, creating a significant gap. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 61723, while the GPU averages 6001. This disparity is the defining feature of the build. The CPU offers flagship-level performance, while the GPU offers entry-level graphics. In the PassMark G3D test, the GPU scores 7673, which is a modest figure. The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 43036 is over five times higher than the GPU’s G3D score, illustrating the imbalance.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-13900K, with an average score of 61766, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, with a score of 61834. The 13900T is within 0.2% of these chips, meaning its performance is statistically indistinguishable in aggregate. The GPU’s nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and the AMD FirePro W4100, with average scores of 6000 and 5987, respectively. The RX 6400 is just 0.3% ahead of the Quadro K4000M, showing that it is competitive with older mobile and workstation parts. The data suggests that for CPU-bound tasks, this system will perform like a top-tier desktop, but for GPU-bound tasks, it will perform like a budget laptop from several years ago. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 is very low, and the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30 is also minimal, indicating weak modern API support in real-world gaming scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This scenario is not viable with the current GPU. The RX 6400's PassMark G3D score of 7673 and its 35th percentile ranking indicate that it will struggle to produce high frame rates at high resolutions. The CPU’s strong single-core score of 5155 in Cinebench R23 is irrelevant if the GPU cannot render frames fast enough. This system is not suitable for high-refresh gaming without a GPU upgrade.

Streaming: The CPU is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 suggests that even with a game running, the CPU can handle x264 encoding without a significant performance hit. However, the GPU's low performance will limit the gaming side of the stream, making this a good setup for streaming simple or older titles.

Video Editing: For video editing, the CPU is a powerhouse. The multi-core performance is critical for rendering timelines and exporting final projects. The PassMark data encryption score of 34415 and the integer math score of 157324 suggest fast processing of codecs and effects. The GPU can assist with some effects, but its 4 GB VRAM and low compute scores will be a bottleneck for high-resolution or complex projects. The CPU will handle the heavy lifting, but the GPU will limit the overall speed of the editing process.

3D Rendering: This is a mixed scenario. In CPU-based renderers, the 13900T will excel, with its Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3680 and R23 score of 36517 indicating top-tier performance. However, in GPU-based renderers, the RX 6400 will fail to deliver usable performance. Its FP32 performance of 3.565 TFLOPS is low, and its 4 GB VRAM will be insufficient for complex scenes. This system is only suitable for CPU rendering workflows.

Software Development: The CPU is ideal for software development. Compilation tasks are highly parallel, and the 32 threads will significantly reduce build times. The PassMark find prime numbers score of 175 and the random string sorting score of 63358 show strong performance in algorithmic tasks. The GPU is not a factor in most development workflows, so this pairing is excellent for developers who do not game.

Student and Office Work: For general office work, this system is massively overpowered on the CPU side and adequate on the GPU side. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could handle basic display output, but the RX 6400 is present. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4177 in PassMark ensures snappy application loading and multitasking. The data suggests that for spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing, this system will be exceptionally fast, though the GPU is largely unnecessary for these tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a severe bottleneck on the GPU side. The CPU's percentile of 92 versus the GPU's percentile of 35 indicates that the graphics card will limit the system in any workload that requires GPU acceleration. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor 100% of the time, as its 35th percentile ranking means it cannot keep up with the CPU's ability to prepare frames. The CPU will spend most of its time idle, waiting for the GPU to finish rendering. The low FPS scaling expected from such a low GPU score means that lowering resolution will help, but the GPU is still the primary constraint.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering with a CPU-based engine, the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU’s 92nd percentile performance shines. The CPU will not be a bottleneck in any scenario except the most extreme multi-threaded tasks, where its performance is still in the top 8% of all CPUs. The imbalance is stark: the system is either a top-tier workstation or a low-end gaming machine, depending on the application. The PassMark GPU compute score of 2812 is particularly low, indicating that even non-gaming GPU tasks like OpenCL acceleration will be slow.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 and PassMark DirectX 11 score of 70 are very low, suggesting that modern AAA games at 1080p with ultra settings will likely run at sub-30 FPS. The RX 6400's 4 GB VRAM is also a concern for modern titles, which often require more memory for high-quality textures. The GPU’s 35th percentile ranking places it in the bottom tier of current graphics hardware.

Based on the benchmark scores, the system will likely handle esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant at 1080p with medium to low settings to achieve playable frame rates above 60 FPS. However, for graphically demanding titles, the expectations are poor. The PassMark DirectX 9 score of 93 and DirectX 10 score of 54 suggest that older games run better, but the lack of modern API performance (DirectX 12 score of 30) means that newer games will suffer. The CPU’s high single-core score does not translate to high FPS if the GPU cannot render frames quickly enough. This is a system where the CPU is ready for a high-refresh gaming experience, but the GPU holds it back to entry-level 1080p or 720p gaming.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive productivity over graphics performance. It is an ideal workstation for software developers who compile large codebases, thanks to the 24 cores and 32 threads that will drastically reduce build times. It is also suitable for data analysts and financial modelers who run complex simulations, given the high PassMark integer math score of 157324 and floating-point score of 108779. For video editors working with 4K footage, the CPU will handle the heavy lifting of rendering and encoding, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517.

This is not a build for gamers or 3D artists who rely on GPU rendering. The RX 6400 is a clear bottleneck, and its 4 GB VRAM will cause issues in modern creative applications. However, for a small business server or a headless compute node, this pairing is excellent. The CPU’s 35 W TDP is a major advantage, allowing for dense server configurations with low cooling requirements. Students in computer science or engineering fields would benefit from the CPU’s power, but the GPU is unnecessary for their coursework. The system is a specialist tool for compute-heavy tasks, not a general-purpose gaming or content creation machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900T uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for future devices. The 35 W TDP is exceptionally low, meaning the motherboard’s power delivery system is not taxed heavily. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 250 W, which is modest, and the GPU itself has no power connectors, drawing power directly from the PCIe slot.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU has significant headroom, and its 92nd percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a much faster graphics card. Swapping the RX 6400 for a higher-tier GPU would transform this system into a top-tier gaming or rendering machine. The CPU’s 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that a new GPU will have ample bandwidth. Memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives flexibility, though users should choose a higher-speed kit to match the CPU’s performance. The platform is not forward-compatible with newer sockets, so a future CPU upgrade would require a new motherboard, but the 13900T is so powerful that this is unlikely to be a near-term necessity.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines a flagship-tier CPU with an entry-level GPU. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 64, is mid-range, but the individual components are at opposite ends of the spectrum. The Intel Core i9-13900T is a 24-core processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock, a 35 W TDP, and a 92nd percentile ranking. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is a 4 GB GDDR6 card with a 64-bit memory bus, a boost clock of 2321 MHz, and a 35th percentile ranking.

The build is a study in contrasts. It offers the raw compute power of a high-end workstation in a power-efficient package, but it pairs that with a graphics card that is at the bottom of the performance charts. The data suggests that this is a system for users who need extreme CPU performance for specific tasks, such as compilation, data processing, or CPU-based rendering, and who only need basic graphical output. It is not a balanced gaming machine, but it is a highly specialized productivity tool. The launch MSRP for the CPU is $549, and the GPU has a launch MSRP of 159 USD.

FAQ

Q: What is the biggest performance bottleneck in this system?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is the primary bottleneck. Its 35th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 7673 are significantly lower than the CPU's 92nd percentile, meaning the GPU will limit any graphics-intensive workload.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900T compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i9-13900T has an average benchmark score of 61723, which is only 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900K's score of 61766. This indicates nearly identical aggregate performance.

Q: Can this system handle 3D rendering tasks?

A: Yes, but only with CPU-based renderers. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36517 is excellent for CPU rendering. The GPU's 4 GB VRAM and FP32 performance of 3.565 TFLOPS make it unsuitable for GPU rendering.

Q: What type of memory does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The specific type depends on the motherboard chosen.

Q: Is this a good system for gaming?

A: No, the data suggests it is poor for modern gaming. The GPU's low scores, such as a PassMark DirectX 12 score of 30, indicate that it will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles.

Q: What is the power draw characteristic of this CPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, which is exceptionally low for a 24-core processor. This makes it suitable for power-efficient or small form factor builds.

Q: What is the first upgrade that should be made to this system?

A: The GPU should be replaced. The CPU has a 92nd percentile ranking and will not bottleneck a much faster graphics card, making a GPU swap the most impactful change.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6400 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and features the Navi 24 chip, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 12 ray accelerators. The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1923 MHz, with a boost clock of 2321 MHz. The card is single-slot, requires no power connectors, and has a TDP of 53 W, with a suggested PSU of 250 W.

The benchmark results show that the RX 6400 is a low-performance part. Its PassMark G3D score of 7673 places it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 176 is minimal, indicating very weak performance in modern DirectX 12 workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 32011 is moderate, but the Vulkan score of 16372 is lower, suggesting inconsistent performance across APIs. The PassMark DirectX 11 score of 70 and DirectX 12 score of 30 are particularly low, showing that the card is not optimized for modern gaming APIs. Its average benchmark score is 6001, which is on par with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, a mobile GPU from several generations ago.

The 4 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for modern applications, as many games and creative tools require more memory for high-resolution textures. The 64-bit memory bus and 128.0 GB/s bandwidth further limit its performance in memory-intensive tasks. The FP32 performance of 3.565 TFLOPS is low, which caps its compute capabilities. While it has 12 ray accelerators, the overall GPU is too weak to provide a good ray-tracing experience, as indicated by its low Steel Nomad score. This GPU is suitable for basic display output and light, older games, but it is a mismatch for the high-end CPU it is paired with. The data indicates that the GPU is the clear limiting factor in this system, and its end-of-life production status suggests it is not a forward-looking component.