SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KS + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

98 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 2% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
99%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KS

64,051 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

184,664 Benchmark Score
Top 1% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KS sits at the apex of Intel's 13th Gen Raptor Lake desktop lineup. This is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on Intel's 10 nm process node, with a die size of 257 mm². The core configuration combines performance and efficiency cores, though the FACT PACK does not specify the exact split. The base clock is 3.20 GHz, with a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, which is the highest boost frequency in the FACT PACK's data. This is an unlocked multiplier part, allowing end-user overclocking beyond factory settings.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool benefits workloads with shared data sets, such as database operations and certain rendering tasks. The memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory support is present, which is notable for a desktop-class processor and relevant for workstation reliability. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, though the pairing with a discrete GPU makes this secondary.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database. The average benchmark score is 64,051, which places it in a tight cluster of high-end processors. The nearest rivals are all within a narrow band: the AMD EPYC 7343 scores 64,202 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 scores 63,765 (0.4% lower), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64,438 (0.6% lower), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 scores 64,640 (0.9% lower). This indicates that the i9-13900KS is essentially performance-equivalent to these competitors in aggregate benchmark terms, despite being from an earlier generation.

Thread scaling is strong. The 3DMark results show a progression from 1,226 single-thread, 2,412 for 2 threads, 4,754 for 4 threads, 8,812 for 8 threads, 11,616 for 16 threads, and 16,243 for max threads. This is a near-linear scaling pattern that indicates the processor can effectively utilize its full thread count across multi-threaded workloads. The single-thread score of 1,226 is competitive for high-frequency tasks. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore at 5,177, R20 multicore at 21,574, and R23 multicore at 51,368. The R23 single-core score of 7,252 is strong for lightly-threaded tasks.

Geekbench scores of 23,607 multi-core and 2,771 single-core are consistent with a high-end desktop part from this generation. PassMark results show specialized strengths: data compression at 814,838, data encryption at 47,772, extended instructions at 48,217, floating point math at 154,805, integer math at 211,027, and random string sorting at 90,257. The multithread score of 60,644 and single-thread score of 4,712 are both well above typical desktop processors. The physics score of 3,441 and prime number finding at 257 are more moderate, suggesting that some latency-sensitive workloads do not scale as dramatically.

# Benchmark Performance

The Core i9-13900KS achieves an average benchmark score of 64,051, with a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs. The nearest rival comparisons show a razor-thin margin: the AMD EPYC 7343 is only 0.2% faster, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is 0.9% slower. This positions the i9-13900KS in the upper echelon of desktop processors, though not at the absolute top—there are CPUs that outperform it, but the delta is small.

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation GPU delivers an average benchmark score of 184,664, placing it in the 98th percentile among all GPUs. This is a workstation-class card based on the AD102 chip, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 175,286, and the Vulkan score is 194,041. The nearest rivals are all data-center or pro-grade parts: the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB scores 183,725 (0.5% lower), the A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187,147 (1.3% higher), the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182,109 (1.4% lower), and the GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178,050 (3.7% lower). This indicates the RTX 5000 Ada is slightly below the A100 40 GB but ahead of the RTX 4090 D.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 96, which reflects a system that is in the top 4% of all tracked configurations. The CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 98th percentile create a balanced high-end pairing, where neither component is a severe bottleneck in aggregate terms. However, the CPU is the lower-performing component relative to its own class, which has implications for specific workloads.

The pair rank by FPS is null, and there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. Therefore, all gaming performance discussion must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not measured results.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this specific CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, so all frame rate figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and percentile positions.

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation's 98th percentile GPU score of 184,664 is exceptionally high. In gaming contexts, this GPU should deliver extremely high frame rates at popular resolutions, though the exact figures cannot be stated. The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate are indicative of strong rasterization throughput. The 448.8 GPixel/s pixel rate supports high-resolution rendering.

The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core of 7,252, 3DMark single-thread of 1,226) suggest it can keep up with the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The 36 MB of L3 cache and high boost clock of 6.00 GHz are favorable for gaming workloads that are latency-sensitive.

For esports and competitive titles at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread strength should allow very high frame rates, limited primarily by the GPU's ability to render frames quickly. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's massive compute resources (12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, 176 ROPs) become the primary driver of performance, and the CPU should not be a limiting factor in most titles.

The lack of measured FPS data means these are qualitative estimates. The benchmark scores suggest the system is well-equipped for high-refresh gaming, but exact FPS figures cannot be provided.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The GPU sits at the 98th percentile, while the CPU is at the 93rd. This 5-percentile gap indicates that in most workloads, the CPU is the component more likely to become the limiting factor.

However, the CPU's absolute performance is still very high. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 51,368 and 3DMark max threads score of 16,243 indicate that heavily multi-threaded workloads will not be CPU-bound in most practical scenarios. The CPU's thread scaling from 2 threads (2,412) to max threads (16,243) shows a 6.7x improvement, which is respectable for a hybrid architecture.

In gaming, the bottleneck analysis depends on resolution and title. At lower resolutions with high frame rates, the CPU's single-thread performance and memory latency become more critical. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,712 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 7,252 are strong, suggesting the CPU can handle high-refresh gaming. At higher resolutions, the GPU's rendering pipeline (65.28 TFLOPS FP32) becomes the dominant factor, and the CPU is unlikely to bottleneck.

In compute workloads, the GPU's 175,286 OpenCL score indicates massive parallel throughput. For tasks that can utilize the GPU (rendering, AI inference, scientific computing), the GPU is the clear performance driver. For CPU-bound tasks like software compilation or spreadsheet calculations, the CPU's 64,051 average score is the relevant metric.

The combined 96th percentile indicates that this pairing is well-balanced for a high-end desktop system. Neither component is severely mismatched to the other, though the GPU has more headroom relative to its class.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i9-13900KS uses Intel Socket 1700, which is the platform for 12th and 13th Gen Core processors. The memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5, dual-channel, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. This flexibility allows builders to choose between established DDR4 memory or newer DDR5 modules, though the actual bandwidth advantage of DDR5 is not quantified in the FACT PACK.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). This supports the latest PCIe 5.0 SSDs and graphics cards, though the RTX 5000 Ada uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 interface is backward compatible and does not require the full Gen 5 bandwidth for most workloads.

The CPU's TDP is 150 W, while the GPU's TDP is 250 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 600 W, which provides sufficient headroom for the combined system load. The GPU requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, which should be available on modern power supplies. The total system power draw is not listed, but the 600 W suggested PSU is the guideline.

A sensible next upgrade path from this platform would be to move to a newer socket, as the Intel Socket 1700 is tied to the 12th/13th Gen generation. The FACT PACK does not list a successor CPU socket, so no specific recommendation can be made. Within the current platform, the CPU is already at the top of the stack (the "KS" suffix indicates a special edition), so CPU upgrades are not meaningful. GPU upgrades would be possible, but the RTX 5000 Ada is already at the 98th percentile.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 6.00 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single-core 7,252, PassMark single-thread 4,712) are ideal for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 98th percentile performance provides the rendering power needed for high frame rates. This system is well-suited for 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitors, particularly at 1440p where both CPU and GPU contribute significantly.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 60,644 indicates strong multi-tasking capability. The GPU's NVENC hardware (not specified in the FACT PACK but implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture) would offload encoding tasks. This system can handle simultaneous gaming, streaming, and chat applications without significant performance degradation.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 51,368 and the GPU's 175,286 OpenCL score make this a capable editing workstation. Timeline scrubbing, effects rendering, and export tasks benefit from both the CPU's multi-threaded performance and the GPU's compute throughput. The 32 GB of video memory on the GPU is substantial for large projects.

3D rendering: The GPU's 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 and 1,020.0 GTexel/s texture rate provide strong rasterization and compute performance. The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores (as listed in the FACT PACK) support ray tracing and AI-accelerated rendering. The CPU's 24 cores handle scene preparation and physics simulation. This system is well-suited for both GPU-accelerated and CPU-based render engines.

Software development: The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded performance (PassMark integer math 211,027, data compression 814,838) make this a fast compilation machine. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is less relevant for typical development tasks but useful for GPU compute development.

Student and office work: This system is massively over-provisioned for typical office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches, but the 98th percentile GPU is unnecessary for spreadsheets or document editing. For students in engineering or data science programs, the compute power is beneficial, but for general office work, this is excessive.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need both top-tier CPU and GPU performance in a desktop form factor. The combined 96th percentile places it in the top 4% of all configurations.

Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions who want maximum detail settings and high refresh rates will benefit from the GPU's 98th percentile performance. The CPU's 93rd percentile ensures minimal bottleneck at these resolutions. Gamers at 1080p with very high refresh rate monitors (240Hz+) will also benefit from the CPU's single-thread strength.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or AI workloads are a primary audience. The GPU's 32 GB of VRAM and 400 tensor cores support large models and high-resolution textures. The CPU's 24 cores handle multi-task workflows.

Software developers working on large codebases or GPU-accelerated applications will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance and the GPU's compute capabilities valuable. The ECC memory support is a plus for data integrity.

Students in engineering, data science, or computer graphics programs will benefit from the performance, though the cost is high. Small business workstations running CAD, simulation, or data analysis software are also a fit, given the workstation-class GPU.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900KS has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 64,051, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD EPYC 7343 (64,202) and 0.9% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 (64,640).

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 98th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 184,664.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU is 600 W.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class GPU based on the AD102 chip, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die contains 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² area, with a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². This is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height, requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector.

The memory subsystem consists of 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This yields a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The 32 GB capacity is substantial for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and AI model loading.

The compute configuration includes 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. The 100 RT cores and 400 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI inference. The GPU clocks at 1155 MHz base and 2550 MHz boost. Peak pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 65.28 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1).

Benchmark results show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and a Vulkan score of 194,041. The average benchmark score is 184,664, placing the GPU in the 98th percentile. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB at 183,725 (0.5% lower), while the A100 SXM4 40 GB is 1.3% higher. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is 1.4% lower, and the GeForce RTX 4090 D is 3.7% lower.

For rendering workloads, the high FP32 throughput and large VRAM capacity are critical for complex scenes and high-resolution output. The RT cores accelerate ray-traced rendering, and the tensor cores accelerate denoising and AI-based upscaling. The GPU's 98th percentile ranking indicates it outperforms the vast majority of GPUs in the database.

The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support, but the bandwidth is sufficient for most workloads. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a, supporting multiple high-resolution monitors.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900KS with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S part with a 6.00 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is a workstation-class Ada Lovelace card with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory.

The combined percentile is 96, meaning this configuration outperforms 96% of all tracked systems. The CPU's 93rd percentile and GPU's 98th percentile create a high-end pairing where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its class.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 64,051 is within 1% of its nearest rivals, indicating it is at parity with the best available alternatives. The GPU's average score of 184,664 is 3.7% higher than the GeForce RTX 4090 D and 0.5% lower than the A100 SXM4 80 GB, placing it in elite company.

This is a system built for maximum performance in both CPU-intensive and GPU-intensive workloads. The CPU provides exceptional multi-threaded compute and single-thread responsiveness, while the GPU offers workstation-grade rendering and compute capabilities. The 150 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP, with a 600 W suggested PSU, indicate a high-power but manageable build.

The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated, but the benchmark scores suggest this system is capable of extremely high frame rates in most titles. This is a top-tier desktop configuration suitable for demanding professional and enthusiast use cases.