SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KS + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KS

64,051 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900KS and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 form a desktop pairing that sits at the 80th combined percentile, indicating a system with substantial compute muscle but a clear imbalance between its components. The CPU is a top-tier 24-core Raptor Lake-S part, while the GPU is a workstation card from the Turing era with a 67th percentile ranking. This analysis uses the benchmark data to explain what this pairing excels at, where it struggles, and who should consider building it.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KS is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and produced on Intel's 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a maximum boost clock of 6.00 GHz, with a TDP of 150 W. The die size is 257 mm², and the cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The chip is unlocked for overclocking and uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, offering PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 64051. The multi-threaded performance is exceptional, as shown by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 51368 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 23607. The 3DMark max-threads score of 16243 further confirms its capacity to handle heavily threaded workloads. Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7252 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2771. This combination of high core count and strong per-core performance makes the i9-13900KS a versatile processor for both parallel rendering tasks and latency-sensitive applications.

The data shows the i9-13900KS is nearly identical in average score to the AMD EPYC 7343, with a delta of -0.2%, meaning it is effectively tied with that server-class chip. It is also slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 by 0.4% and slightly behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F by -0.6% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 by -0.9%. These rival comparisons indicate that the i9-13900KS delivers performance on par with modern workstation CPUs, despite being from an earlier generation. For real workloads, this means a machine that can breeze through video encoding, software compilation, and 3D scene rendering, while also offering the high single-thread speed needed for responsive application usage and gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i9-13900KS?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads, which allows it to handle a high volume of parallel tasks effectively.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: Its average score of 64051 is essentially tied with the AMD EPYC 7343 (-0.2%), slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 (+0.4%), and slightly behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F (-0.6%) and Intel Core Ultra 7 265 (-0.9%).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The GPU sits at the 67th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 21629.

Q: Does the GPU support modern APIs for gaming?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which are necessary for modern game features.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the Quadro RTX 5000 is 550 W, and it requires a 1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin power connector setup.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this combination; all game performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a significant performance gap between the two components. The CPU's average benchmark score is 64051, placing it in the 93rd percentile, while the GPU's average score is 21629, placing it in the 67th percentile. The combined system percentile is 80, indicating that the CPU is dragging the overall ranking upward relative to the GPU. The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 21574 and Passmark multi-thread score of 60644 demonstrate its dominance in compute-heavy tasks. In contrast, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 15616 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999 show it is a capable card, but not in the same league as the CPU’s performance tier.

The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, from which it trails by -1%, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile, which it leads by 1.2%. It also outperforms the AMD Radeon HD 8970M by 1.8% and the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL by 2.3%. These deltas are all within a few percentage points, meaning the Quadro RTX 5000 performs in the same bracket as these mid-range consumer and mobile parts. This is a stark contrast to the CPU, which is competing with high-end server and workstation chips like the AMD EPYC 7343.

The combined picture is one of a system with extraordinary processing power for non-graphics tasks, but with graphics performance that is merely average by modern standards. The CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 47772 and data compression score of 814838 highlight its strength in data-intensive workloads, while the GPU’s Passmark compute score of 6525 suggests it is not a primary compute accelerator. For users, this means the system will excel in CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, scientific simulations, and file processing, but will be limited in GPU-accelerated rendering or gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 67th percentile means that in most workloads, the CPU will be waiting on the GPU. This is particularly true in gaming, where the GPU is responsible for rendering frames. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics calculations or AI inference on the CPU, the i9-13900KS will perform without bottleneck, but any task that relies on the GPU for rendering or compute will be constrained by the Quadro RTX 5000’s performance level.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this. The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 3441 and 3DMark 16-thread score of 11616 show it can feed data to the GPU quickly. However, the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 59 and DirectX 11 score of 140 are relatively low, suggesting it struggles with modern graphics APIs. In a balanced system, you would expect the GPU to have a comparable percentile to the CPU; here, the 26-percentile-point gap means the GPU will be the bottleneck in most graphics-intensive applications. For FPS scaling, this means that even with the CPU’s high single-thread score of 4712 in Passmark, the actual frame rate in games will be dictated by the GPU’s fill rate and compute capabilities, which are modest by current standards.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture and TU104 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The card’s clocks are set at a base of 1620 MHz and a boost of 1815 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It houses 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. The GPU’s compute capabilities include an FP32 performance of 11.15 TFLOPS and an FP16 performance of 22.30 TFLOPS (2:1). The board has a TDP of 230 W and requires a 550 W power supply, with a dual-slot cooler and 1x 6-pin plus 1x 8-pin power connectors.

For rendering workloads, the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM is a significant asset, allowing large textures and complex scenes to fit in memory. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution texture streaming. However, the benchmark scores show it is not a high-performance card in raw terms. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 92309 is its best result, but the Passmark G3D score of 15616 places it in the mid-range. The presence of 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores means it supports hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI features, but the overall performance is limited by the older architecture and lower clock speeds compared to newer cards. The GPU’s 67th percentile and its proximity in score to the GTX 1060 6 GB indicate that while it has more VRAM and workstation features, its raw gaming and compute throughput is similar to that of a consumer card from several generations ago.

Who Should Build It

This system is best suited for users who need massive CPU compute power but have modest GPU requirements. The target audience includes content creators who work with CPU-intensive tasks like video transcoding, 3D scene simulation, and data processing, where the i9-13900KS’s 24 cores and 36 MB L3 cache provide a significant advantage. Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the high multi-threaded scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 51368. Students and researchers running scientific computing applications that are CPU-bound will find the processor’s performance compelling, especially given its ECC memory support for data integrity.

For small business workstations, the Quadro RTX 5000 offers 16 GB of VRAM and certified drivers for professional applications, which is useful for CAD or light 3D modeling, but the GPU’s 67th percentile means it is not ideal for heavy GPU rendering. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with lower graphical settings might find the system acceptable, but the GPU will limit high-refresh-rate gaming. The system is not balanced for gaming; it is a CPU-centric workstation where the GPU provides adequate, but not exceptional, graphics acceleration. Users who primarily need CPU performance and only require display output or light GPU acceleration will find this pairing more appropriate than those seeking a high-end gaming rig.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the data. All game performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing. With that caveat, the gaming potential of this system is constrained by the GPU. The Quadro RTX 5000’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 59 is low, indicating poor performance in modern titles that rely heavily on DirectX 12 features. The DirectX 11 score of 140 is better, suggesting that older games or those using DirectX 11 may run more smoothly.

Based on the GPU’s average benchmark score of 21629 and its proximity to the GTX 1060 6 GB, gamers should expect 1080p performance comparable to that of a mid-range card from the Pascal era. At 1440p, the 16 GB VRAM will help with texture quality, but the raw throughput is insufficient for high frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7252, will ensure that it does not bottleneck the GPU in most games, but the GPU will be the limiting factor. For esports titles or older games, the system may deliver playable frame rates, but for modern AAA games at high settings, the estimates suggest performance will be below what a balanced gaming PC would offer.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines the Intel Core i9-13900KS, a flagship 13th Gen consumer processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000, a professional workstation GPU from the Turing generation. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread part with a 6.00 GHz boost clock, representing the top of the Raptor Lake desktop lineup. The GPU is a 16 GB GDDR6 card with ray tracing and tensor cores, but it is end-of-life and based on older 12 nm technology. The combined percentile of 80 indicates that the system performs better than 80% of all possible CPU-GPU combinations, but this is heavily weighted by the CPU’s 93rd percentile. The GPU’s 67th percentile drags the overall tier down from what would be an elite gaming or rendering workstation.

The pairing is unusual, as it mates a high-end 2023 processor with a 2018-era GPU. This suggests a build that was upgraded or configured with a specific focus on CPU-bound tasks. The system’s overall tier is "high-end CPU, mid-range GPU," which is reflected in the benchmark scores. Users should be aware that while the CPU can handle the most demanding computational workloads, the GPU will not provide a corresponding level of graphics performance, making this a specialized tool rather than a balanced multimedia machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900KS uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, offering high bandwidth for modern NVMe SSDs and GPUs. The motherboard platform is mature, but the socket is shared with other 13th Gen and 12th Gen processors, meaning the upgrade path is limited to that generation. The CPU’s TDP is 150 W, so a capable air cooler or liquid cooler is recommended, but no specific cooler size is indicated in the data.

The GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, so it will work without issue. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 550 W, and the system’s total power draw will be well within that range given the CPU’s 150 W TDP and GPU’s 230 W TDP. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the Quadro RTX 5000 with a more modern GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to support a much faster graphics card. The CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread scores mean it would not bottleneck a contemporary high-end GPU, making a GPU swap the most impactful change to improve gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering performance. The platform’s support for PCIe Gen 5 ensures that a new GPU will have sufficient bandwidth, and the 550 W PSU headroom suggests that a more power-efficient modern GPU could be installed without a PSU upgrade, though a higher-wattage unit might be needed for a top-tier card.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KS + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KS

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds