SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KS

64,051 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Intel Core i9-13900KS pairs with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 in a desktop configuration that sits at the 56th combined percentile. The CPU is a 24-core Raptor Lake-S part with a 6.00 GHz boost clock and a 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU is an Ampere-based entry-level card with 4 GB of memory and an 18th percentile ranking. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rates discussed in this analysis are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay data.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p is possible but constrained by the GPU's 18th percentile position. The RTX 4010 scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it 0.5% behind the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 1% behind the Quadro P600. The CPU's 1226 single-thread score and 4712 Passmark single-thread score provide ample headroom, but the GPU's 96.00 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will limit texture-heavy scenes. Expect 60+ FPS in esports titles at medium settings, but high-refresh 144Hz gaming will require significant settings reductions.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's massive thread count, with 32 threads delivering a 60644 Passmark multithread score. The 3DMark max-threads score of 16243 indicates strong encoding and multitasking capability. The CPU can handle x264 encoding at high presets while gaming, but the GPU's lack of a robust encoder (implied by its low tier) means NVENC-based streaming may not match the quality of higher-tier 40-series cards.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see mixed results. The CPU's 51368 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 23607 Geekbench multicore score provide excellent timeline scrubbing and export performance. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus will struggle with 4K timelines, effects, and GPU-accelerated rendering. The 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for basic color grading but not for complex fusion compositions.

3D rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D favors the CPU heavily. The 21574 Cinebench R20 multicore score and 5177 R15 multicore score indicate strong CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU's 768 shading units and 24 TMUs will handle simple viewport previews but will be a bottleneck for final frame renders, especially with RTX features enabled given only 6 RT cores.

Software development is a strength for this pairing. The CPU's 814838 Passmark data compression score and 47772 data encryption score indicate fast compilation and cryptographic operations. The 48217 extended instructions score supports SIMD-heavy workloads. The GPU is adequate for UI rendering and basic compute tasks, but developers working on machine learning or CUDA-accelerated projects will find the 4 GB VRAM severely limiting.

Student and office work is overkill on the CPU side but acceptable on the GPU. The 2771 Geekbench single-core score ensures snappy application launches, while the 90257 random string sorting score handles database and spreadsheet operations efficiently. The GPU's 50 W TDP and single-slot design make it easy to cool, but its 18th percentile ranking means it only barely outperforms integrated graphics in some scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 64051, placing it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 7343 at 64202 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 at 63765 (0.4% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F at 64438 (0.6% behind), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 at 64640 (0.9% behind). This places the i9-13900KS in a tight cluster at the top of the performance stack, with less than 1% separating it from its closest competitors.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 2893 from a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it at the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907 (0.5% ahead), the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2910 (0.6% ahead), the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB at 2913 (0.7% ahead), and the Quadro P600 at 2923 (1% ahead). The RTX 4010 is essentially at parity with these cards in this specific test, which is notable given the massive architectural differences.

The combined picture shows a severe imbalance. The CPU sits in the top 7% of all processors while the GPU sits in the bottom 18% of all graphics cards. This creates a system where the CPU is capable of driving far more graphics performance than the GPU can deliver. The combined percentile of 56 reflects this mismatch, pulling the overall system ranking down from what the CPU alone would suggest.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KS features 24 cores and 32 threads based on the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process. The base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 6.00 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The die size is 257 mm² and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a consumer desktop part.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 7252 and Geekbench single-core score of 2771 demonstrate exceptional per-core performance, likely from the high 6.00 GHz boost. The multi-core scores are equally impressive, with Cinebench R23 reaching 51368 and Geekbench multicore hitting 23607. The 3DMark tests show scaling from 2412 at 2 threads to 16243 at max threads, indicating efficient thread utilization.

For real workloads, this means the CPU will never be the limiting factor in any task. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample data locality for complex workloads. The Passmark integer math score of 211027 and floating point math score of 154805 indicate strong arithmetic capability. Data compression at 814838 and encryption at 47772 show excellent throughput for storage and security applications. The 3441 physics score suggests good performance in physics simulations.

Gaming Performance

Since no measured FPS data exists for this CPU-GPU combination, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 18th percentile ranking and 2893 Steel Nomad score suggest entry-level 1080p gaming capability. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking means it will never bottleneck the GPU in any scenario.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant at 1080p, the CPU's 4712 Passmark single-thread score and 1226 3DMark single-thread score should allow the GPU to reach 100-144 FPS at competitive settings. The GPU's 28.19 GPixel/s pixel rate and 42.29 GTexel/s texture rate are sufficient for these lighter workloads.

For AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU will likely deliver 30-50 FPS in demanding games. The 4 GB VRAM will cause texture pop-in and stuttering in modern titles that require 6-8 GB. The 96.00 GB/s bandwidth is a significant constraint, as higher-tier cards offer 2-3 times this bandwidth. At 1440p, expect 20-35 FPS, and 4K gaming is not viable with this GPU.

The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 8812 and 16-thread score of 11616 indicate that it can feed the GPU with draw calls and physics data without issue. However, the GPU's 768 shading units and 16 ROPs will limit fill-rate-bound scenarios. Ray tracing is possible with 6 RT cores but will severely impact frame rates, likely dropping below 20 FPS in RT-enabled titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving builders flexibility in memory selection. The 150 W TDP requires a capable air cooler or liquid cooler, though the CPU's performance headroom suggests overclocking potential given the unlocked multiplier.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and has a 50 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 250 W. It draws power from the PCIe slot only, with no power connectors required. This makes it a drop-in upgrade for any system with a spare x8 slot. The single-slot design and 163 mm length fit in most cases.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the GPU with a higher-tier 40-series card. The CPU has enough headroom to drive cards several tiers above the RTX 4010. The 250 W suggested PSU indicates the platform has significant power headroom, so a card with a higher TDP could be accommodated with a PSU upgrade. The CPU's DDR5 support means memory bandwidth can be improved by switching from DDR4 to DDR5, though the current 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is already substantial.

The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and 24 cores will remain relevant for several years. The socket 1700 platform is mature with widespread BIOS support. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the GPU is removed. The 257 mm² die size on 10 nm suggests good thermal characteristics, though the 150 W TDP at 6.00 GHz boost requires robust cooling.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p with modest expectations will find this system adequate for esports and older titles. The CPU ensures minimum frame rates stay high, but the GPU limits maximum frame rates. Players targeting 60 FPS in competitive shooters can achieve this with medium settings. Those seeking 144Hz gaming should look elsewhere or plan a GPU upgrade.

Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound workflows will benefit from this pairing. Video editors exporting long timelines will see excellent performance from the 32 threads. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 814838 data compression score. 3D artists using CPU-based renderers like Arnold or V-Ray will find the 51368 Cinebench R23 score extremely capable.

Students in engineering or computer science programs can run virtual machines, compile code, and handle office productivity simultaneously. The ECC memory support is a bonus for data integrity. Small business workstations handling databases, spreadsheets, and light photo editing will perform admirably. The GPU is sufficient for dual-monitor setups with basic graphical needs.

The system is not suitable for GPU-accelerated machine learning, high-end 3D rendering, or 4K video editing. The 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit memory bus are fundamental limitations. Users in these fields should consider a higher-tier GPU even if it means pairing it with a less powerful CPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 uses the GA107 chip on an 8 nm Samsung process with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores. The base clock is 1417 MHz with a boost clock of 1762 MHz. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

The FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s and texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs are 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. The card is single-slot, 163 mm long, 69 mm tall, with no power connectors.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 places it at 18th percentile, nearly matching the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907 despite the massive memory and bandwidth differences. This suggests the RTX 4010 has surprisingly strong compute efficiency for its class. However, the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will cause bottlenecks in real-world rendering that synthetic benchmarks may not capture.

The 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores provide ray tracing and DLSS capability, but the low shading unit count and memory bandwidth limit their effectiveness. For rendering workloads, the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 is adequate for simple scenes but will struggle with complex geometry and high-resolution textures. The 43.5M / mm² transistor density indicates a dense design for the 8 nm node.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 56, reflecting the CPU's 93rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 18th percentile ranking.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The i9-13900KS has an average benchmark score of 64051, which is 0.2% behind the AMD EPYC 7343 at 64202 and 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 at 64640 (the rival is ahead, so the CPU is 0.9% behind).

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The RTX 4010 has 96.00 GB/s bandwidth from 4 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus. This is a significant constraint for high-resolution textures and modern game assets.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the i9-13900KS supports ECC memory with dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 at 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and PSU requirement?

A: The GPU has a 50 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 250 W. It requires no power connectors and draws power from the PCIe slot.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB?

A: The RTX 4010 scores 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is 0.5% behind the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2907. Despite this close score, the 4060 Ti has 4x the VRAM.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock and core count?

A: The CPU has 24 cores and 32 threads with a 6.00 GHz boost clock and 3.20 GHz base clock, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data shows a clear bottleneck scenario where the GPU limits the system in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's 93rd percentile versus the GPU's 18th percentile creates a 75-point gap. In gaming, the CPU can render frames faster than the GPU can display them, meaning frame rates will be determined almost entirely by the GPU.

Evidence from the 3DMark scores supports this. The CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 16243 is in a completely different performance class than the GPU's Steel Nomad score of 2893. The GPU's 96.00 GB/s bandwidth and 4 GB VRAM will cause stuttering and texture streaming issues in modern games, regardless of CPU capability.

In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data compression, and encryption, the GPU is irrelevant and the CPU shines. The 814838 data compression score and 47772 encryption score are among the best available. For 3D rendering that uses both CPU and GPU, the CPU will handle scene setup and geometry processing while the GPU renders pixels, but the GPU's 768 shading units will limit final output resolution and complexity.

The balanced upgrade path is to replace the GPU with a card that better matches the CPU's performance tier. The CPU can support significantly more powerful GPUs without becoming a bottleneck. Alternatively, users could downgrade the CPU to save cost if GPU-intensive workloads are the primary use case, but the data shows the CPU provides excellent value for CPU-bound tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900KS, a 24-core Raptor Lake-S processor with a 6.00 GHz boost clock and 93rd percentile ranking, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010, an Ampere-based GPU with 4 GB GDDR6 memory and an 18th percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 56, placing this system in the mid-range overall despite having a top-tier CPU.

The CPU is a flagship desktop part with 32 threads, 36 MB L3 cache, and support for DDR4/DDR5 memory. It launched with a $699 MSRP and remains in active production. The GPU is an entry-level 40-series card with 768 shading units, 6 RT cores, and 24 tensor cores, drawing only 50 W with no power connectors required.

The overall tier is defined by the GPU's limitations. This system excels at CPU-intensive tasks like software development, video encoding, and 3D rendering in CPU-based engines. For gaming, it delivers playable frame rates at 1080p in less demanding titles but struggles with modern AAA games at high settings. The upgrade path is clear: replace the GPU to unlock the CPU's full potential.