SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900KF paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a desktop combination that presents a stark contrast in performance tiers. The CPU is a top-tier 24-core processor that sits near the top of the charts, while the GPU is a professional workstation card that, while capable, is positioned much lower in the performance hierarchy. This pairing results in a system where the processor is the dominant component, and the graphics card is the primary limiting factor for gaming and real-time graphics workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a significant imbalance between the two components. The Intel Core i9-13900KF achieves an average benchmark score of 61841, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. This is a dominant score, edging out the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, which scores 61834, and the Intel Core i9-13900K, which scores 61766. The performance delta between the i9-13900KF and its closest rivals is minimal, at 0.0% and 0.1% respectively, indicating that it is at the very top of the desktop CPU performance tier.

In stark contrast, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has an average benchmark score of 17789, which places it in only the 61st percentile of all GPUs. This score is nearly identical to that of the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which scores 17666, a delta of just 0.7%. The Quadro RTX 4000 also sits close to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17639) and the AMD Radeon 780M (17588), with deltas of 0.9% and 1.1% respectively. This places the GPU in a decidedly mid-range performance bracket, far below the elite status of the CPU it is paired with.

The combined percentile for this build is 77, which reflects the moderating influence of the GPU on the overall system capability. The raw compute scores highlight the CPU’s strength: it scores 48855 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 20519 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Single-threaded performance is also exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6897. The GPU, meanwhile, shows its limitations in modern APIs, scoring only 1873 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 52 in Passmark DirectX 12. The combined picture is one of a workstation-class CPU paired with a mid-range GPU, creating a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but is constrained in graphics-intensive applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data suggests this is not a primary high-refresh gaming machine. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking and its low DirectX 12 score of 52 in Passmark indicate that it will struggle to maintain high frame rates in modern titles at high settings. While the CPU’s powerful single-thread score of 6897 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU, the graphics card will be the limiting factor, making high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming unlikely to be a smooth experience.

Streaming: The combination of a powerful CPU and a GPU with dedicated hardware for encoding makes this a viable streaming setup. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by a Passmark multi-thread score of 57729, provide ample headroom to handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously. The GPU's 288 tensor cores can also offload some processing, though the older architecture means it is less efficient than newer generations. The system is more than capable of handling the CPU-side encoding workload.

Video Editing: This is a mixed scenario. The CPU is a powerhouse for video editing, with its high multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 48855) accelerating timeline rendering and effects processing. However, the GPU's 8 GB of memory and its 61st percentile ranking will limit its ability to handle complex GPU-accelerated effects and high-resolution video scrubbing. The system will be very fast for CPU-bound editing tasks but will show its age in GPU-heavy workflows.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering, this build is exceptional. The processor's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and high multi-threaded throughput (Passmark integer math score of 206859) will drastically reduce render times in applications that rely on the CPU. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering, the Quadro RTX 4000's 7.119 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is modest, meaning it will be significantly slower than more modern workstation cards. The system is best suited for CPU-centric render engines.

Software Development: The CPU makes this an excellent development workstation. Its high single-threaded performance (Passmark single-thread score of 4584) ensures fast compilation times for single-threaded build steps, while its 24 cores and 32 threads handle parallel builds with ease. The GPU's 8 GB of memory is sufficient for driving multiple 4K displays for code and documentation, but it is not necessary for most development tasks. The Passmark data compression score of 786218 also indicates rapid handling of large code repositories.

Student and Office Work: This system is dramatically over-powered for standard student and office tasks. The CPU's performance is far beyond what is needed for web browsing, document processing, or spreadsheets. The GPU's professional features, such as its 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, are beneficial for driving multi-monitor setups, but the cost and power of this CPU are not justified by these workloads. A more modest system would provide a better balance for these tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is the primary bottleneck in this configuration. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 61st percentile ranking creates a massive disparity in capability. In any workload that is graphically intensive, the GPU will reach its limits long before the CPU is fully utilized. This is evident in the GPU's low scores in modern benchmarks; its Passmark DirectX 12 score of 52 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1873 are far below what the CPU could potentially feed.

The CPU, conversely, will rarely be the limiting factor. In gaming, for instance, the CPU’s high single-core performance ensures it can handle game logic and physics without issue, but the frame rate will be capped by the GPU's rendering capabilities. The FPS scaling, therefore, is entirely dependent on the GPU. The CPU is so powerful that it will likely not bottleneck any GPU in most scenarios, but the inverse is not true: the GPU will bottleneck the CPU in almost all graphics workloads. The system is CPU-bound in compute tasks and GPU-bound in graphics tasks, with the GPU representing the more significant constraint for a balanced system.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900KF is in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61841.

Q: How does the Quadro RTX 4000 compare to the GeForce RTX 4060 in benchmarks?

A: The Quadro RTX 4000 scores an average of 17789, while the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 17639, making the Quadro 0.9% faster in this metric.

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the i9-13900KF?

A: The processor has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Quadro RTX 4000?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 77.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900KF supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the difference in average score between the i9-13900KF and the i9-13900K?

A: The i9-13900KF has an average score of 61841, while the i9-13900K has an average score of 61766, a delta of 0.1%.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The CPU features a substantial cache hierarchy, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and offers PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 20 lanes. The processor is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation environments.

The benchmark results confirm its high-end status. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 and single-core score of 6897 put it at the top of the performance charts. The Geekbench multi-core score of 22486 and single-core score of 2668 further validate its strong all-around performance. In Passmark tests, it excels in integer math (206859) and floating-point math (150869), which are critical for scientific and financial calculations. The processor's data encryption score of 46186 and extended instructions score of 46084 highlight its capability in security and media applications. The 93rd percentile ranking shows it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs, with its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, scoring nearly identically. This CPU is built for maximum throughput in heavily threaded workloads and top-tier responsiveness in single-threaded tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a professional workstation GPU based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The GPU is equipped with 36 RT cores and 288 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 416.0 GB/s. The card has a base clock of 1005 MHz and a boost clock of 1545 MHz, with a TDP of 160 W. It uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface and is a single-slot card, requiring a single 8-pin power connector.

The GPU's performance profile is that of a mid-range card from a previous generation. Its Passmark G3D score of 15117 places it in the 61st percentile, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 indicates limited capability in modern DirectX 12 titles. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 show moderate compute performance. Its FP32 performance is rated at 7.119 TFLOPS, which is modest for rendering tasks. The GPU's nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, has nearly identical average scores, which underscores its age and performance tier. While the Quadro RTX 4000 offers features like 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and USB Type-C, its processing power is the limiting factor in this build. Its 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for many professional workflows but is not ample for large, complex scenes or high-resolution textures.

Who Should Build It

This system is tailored for professionals and enthusiasts who prioritize CPU performance above all else. It is an excellent choice for software developers who need rapid compilation times and efficient handling of parallel workloads, evidenced by the CPU's high multi-threaded score of 57729 in Passmark. Content creators working with CPU-based renderers will also benefit greatly from the 24 cores and 32 threads, which can dramatically reduce render times. The CPU's support for ECC memory makes it suitable for small business workstations where data integrity is paramount.

For gamers, this configuration is less ideal. While the CPU will not bottleneck any game, the GPU's 61st percentile performance will limit the gaming experience. It is not recommended for high-refresh gaming at high resolutions, as the GPU will be the primary constraint. However, for gamers who play at 1080p with lower settings, the system will be more than adequate. Students and office workers will find this system to be overkill for their needs, as the processing power far exceeds the demands of typical academic or administrative software. This build is for those who need a ferocious CPU for demanding compute tasks and are willing to accept a mid-range GPU for secondary graphics needs.

Build Overview

This build pairs a top-tier enthusiast desktop CPU with a professional workstation GPU from a previous generation. The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a flagship 13th Gen processor designed for maximum performance in desktop applications, with a 93rd percentile ranking. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation card based on the Turing architecture, designed for professional applications like CAD and content creation, but its performance places it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The combination creates a desktop system with a significant performance disparity, where the CPU is the dominant component. The combined percentile for the build is 77, which reflects a system that is overall powerful but held back by its graphics component. This is a desktop-class pairing that sits in the upper-mid range of overall system performance, driven almost entirely by the CPU's strength.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates based on the component benchmark scores, not measured results. The data indicates that the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 will be the primary determinant of gaming performance. Given its 61st percentile ranking and its low 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873, the GPU is not suited for high-refresh, high-detail gaming at 1440p or 4K resolutions. In modern, demanding titles, players should expect to use medium or low settings to achieve playable frame rates at 1080p. The CPU’s high single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 6897) will ensure that the system can handle the game logic without issue, but it cannot compensate for the GPU’s rendering limits. For less demanding or older games, the system will perform well, but for AAA titles, the GPU will cap performance well below what the CPU is capable of supporting. These figures are estimates, as no empirical FPS data is available for this pairing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KF

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds