SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration built around a flagship 13th-generation processor and a previous-generation enthusiast-class graphics card. The CPU, a 24-core Raptor Lake-S part with 32 threads, is designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads, while the GPU, based on the Ampere architecture, offers a substantial 24 GB of GDDR6X memory. The data indicates a strong overall system, with a combined percentile rank of 83 across all benchmarked configurations, though the specific strengths and potential bottlenecks of this pairing require careful analysis of the individual component scores.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 24-core processor built on the Raptol Lake architecture, utilizing a 10 nm process node from Intel. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, supported by a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2 per core, with a shared 36 MB L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus and includes ECC memory support, a feature typically associated with workstation-class reliability. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark data shows this processor scores exceptionally well in multi-threaded tests. In Cinebench R23, it achieves a multi-core score of 48855, which is a dominant result that positions it for heavy rendering and compilation tasks. The single-core score of 6897 in the same test is equally impressive, indicating strong performance in lightly-threaded applications like games and legacy software. The Geekbench multi-core score of 22486 and single-core score of 2668 corroborate this balanced high-end performance profile. The 3DMark thread scaling is linear and strong: from 2353 with 2 threads to 8510 with 8 threads, and up to 15405 with max threads, demonstrating excellent utilization of its core count.

The processor sits at the 93rd percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61841. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus with an average score of 61834 (a 0% delta), the Intel Core i9-13900K at 61766 (0.1% faster for the 13900KF), and the Intel Core i9-13900T at 61723 (0.2% faster). This indicates the 13900KF is statistically tied with the best available desktop and mobile processors, with performance deltas of less than one percent. The Passmark multi-thread score of 57729 and the floating-point math score of 150869 further emphasize its compute-heavy capabilities, making it suitable for scientific simulations and financial modeling.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system performance is strong, reflected by an overall percentile rank of 83. The CPU's average benchmark score of 61841 is the primary driver of this result, placing it in the top 7% of all processors. The GPU, with an average benchmark score of 27565, sits at the 73rd percentile against all GPUs. While the CPU is firmly in the enthusiast tier, the GPU’s percentile is lower, suggesting a slight imbalance where the CPU has more compute headroom than the GPU in certain workloads.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the RTX 3090 scores 5118 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which tests modern gaming workloads. The Passmark G3D score is 26645, and the GPU compute score is 15356. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 172758 is particularly high, indicating strong general-purpose compute performance. When comparing to its nearest rivals, the RTX 3090’s average score of 27565 is essentially identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile (27435, 0.5% slower) and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (27425, 0.5% slower). It is slightly behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 (27839, -1% for the 3090) and the AMD Radeon RX 7800M (27883, -1.1% for the 3090). These deltas are minimal, showing the card remains competitive despite being a previous-generation product.

The picture is one of a top-tier CPU paired with a mid-to-high-tier GPU. The CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking suggests it will not be the limiting factor in most applications. The GPU’s 73rd percentile indicates it is a capable performer but is outclassed by newer and more powerful cards. The combined 83rd percentile reflects the CPU’s dominance pulling the overall score upward.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung’s 8 nm process, with a massive 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. It features 10496 shading units, 328 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. The card includes 82 dedicated RT cores and 328 tensor cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. Memory consists of 24 GB of GDDR6X on a 384-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s. The memory clock is listed at 1219 MHz, with an effective data rate of 19.5 Gbps. The base clock is 1395 MHz with a boost clock of 1695 MHz. The card’s FP32 performance is rated at 35.58 TFLOPS, with a matching FP16 throughput.

In rendering-specific tasks, the high memory bandwidth is critical for 4K textures and large 3D scenes. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 220 and DirectX 12 score of 110 are lower than the DirectX 9 score of 268, which is an unusual pattern but suggests the card’s performance is more dependent on driver optimizations and API overhead in newer titles. The pixel rate of 189.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 556.0 GTexel/s are substantial, allowing for high-resolution rendering with high levels of anisotropic filtering. The 24 GB VRAM is a standout feature, ensuring that even the most demanding asset-heavy workloads, such as 8K video editing or complex 3D scenes, will not run out of memory. The GPU’s percentile of 73 places it in a competitive position, performing nearly identically to the RTX 4070 Mobile and RX 6700 XT in average scores, though its large memory pool gives it an edge in capacity-sensitive applications that those rivals cannot match.

Who Should Build It

This build is suitable for users who prioritize CPU-bound productivity tasks and require a GPU with a large memory buffer for professional workloads. The 24-core, 32-thread CPU excels in video encoding, software compilation, and 3D rendering, where the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 ensures quick turnaround times. Content creators working with 4K or higher resolution footage will benefit from the 24 GB VRAM, which can hold large frame buffers and multiple layers in editing software without spilling into system memory.

For game developers, the high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6897) is crucial for physics calculations and game logic, while the multi-core prowess allows for parallel asset baking and lighting computation. Students in engineering or data science fields will find the Passmark integer math score of 206859 and data encryption score of 46186 useful for simulations and cryptography projects. Small business workstations running virtual machines will appreciate the 32 threads, and the ECC memory support provides data integrity for financial or database applications. While gamers will see strong performance, the CPU’s 93rd percentile is overkill for most gaming scenarios, making this a better fit for a prosumer who games occasionally but works heavily.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance is skewed towards the CPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 61841, while the GPU’s is 27565. This indicates that in multi-threaded CPU workloads, the system will be limited by the GPU only if the task involves graphics output. For pure compute tasks on the CPU, the GPU is irrelevant. In gaming, the bottleneck will be the GPU. The RTX 3090’s 73rd percentile is significantly lower than the CPU’s 93rd, meaning at lower resolutions (1080p), the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU, but the GPU will cap the frame rate. At higher resolutions (4K), the GPU becomes the definitive limiting factor, as its pixel rate and texture rate are taxed more heavily.

The 3DMark 16-thread score of 11177 shows the CPU can handle game logic and physics without breaking a sweat. However, the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 110 for the GPU suggests that in modern DX12 titles, the GPU is the primary constraint on frame rates. The delta in percentiles (93 vs 73) acts as evidence that the system is CPU-overprovisioned for gaming. For productivity suites that use GPU acceleration, like video editing with CUDA, the CPU will often wait for the GPU to finish processing frames, making the GPU a more significant bottleneck than its average score suggests.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the Intel Socket 1700, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 lanes, though the RTX 3090 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU’s TDP is 125 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 350 W, with a suggested PSU of 750 W. This leaves headroom for additional drives or expansion cards, but power capacity is a consideration for future upgrades.

The upgrade path is limited by the socket. The Intel Core i9-13900KF is already at the top of the Raptor Lake stack, so a CPU upgrade on the same platform would yield negligible gains. The logical next step is a GPU upgrade. The RTX 3090’s successor, the GeForce 40 series, is listed as its successor, and a future upgrade to a newer card would provide a significant boost in ray tracing and raw rasterization performance. However, the current GPU’s 24 GB VRAM is a substantial asset, so an upgrade would only be sensible for users needing more than 73rd percentile performance or newer features. Memory can be upgraded to DDR5 if the motherboard supports it, but the dual-channel bus limits the benefit of adding more capacity. The PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU ensures that future storage devices will be fully utilized, even if the current GPU is limited to Gen 4.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 6897 in Cinebench R23 ensures high frame rates at 1080p in CPU-bound titles, but the GPU’s 73rd percentile will limit performance in graphically intense games. Expect smooth gameplay at 1440p, but 4K high-refresh is not guaranteed.

Streaming: The 32 threads of the CPU can handle x264 encoding at a fast preset while gaming, and the GPU’s NVENC (implied by the tensor cores and Ampere architecture) can offload the encoding task, leaving the CPU free for game logic. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20519 supports simultaneous gaming and streaming without stutter.

Video editing: The 24 GB VRAM is ideal for holding large timelines and 4K previews. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 172758 indicates strong compute for effects and color grading, while the CPU’s multi-core score accelerates export times.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 makes this a rendering beast. The GPU’s 35.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 82 RT cores provide real-time viewport rendering and fast final-frame ray tracing.

Software development: The Passmark data compression score of 786218 and integer math score of 206859 speed up code compilation and data processing. The 32 threads allow for parallel builds, significantly reducing iteration times.

Student and office work: This is overkill for standard productivity. The Passmark single-thread score of 4584 ensures snappy responsiveness in word processors and spreadsheets, but the power draw and size make it impractical for a standard office environment.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining a flagship Intel Core i9-13900KF processor with a high-end NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 graphics card. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake-S part that ranks at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61841. The GPU is an Ampere-based card with 24 GB of VRAM, ranking at the 73rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27565. The combined system percentile is 83. This pairing is best described as a professional workstation with gaming capabilities, where the CPU’s immense multi-threading power is the defining feature, and the GPU provides a large memory buffer for complex visual workloads. It is not a balanced gaming setup but a productivity-first machine that can handle modern games at high settings.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900KF faster than the Intel Core i9-13900K?

A: Yes, marginally. The 13900KF has an average benchmark score of 61841, which is 0.1% higher than the 13900K’s score of 61766.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3090 have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined system percentile is 83, indicating it outperforms 83% of all benchmarked desktop configurations.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900KF has ECC memory support, which is a feature not commonly found on consumer desktop processors.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is 750 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 350 W and the CPU’s TDP is 125 W.

Q: How does the RTX 3090 compare to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in average benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 3090 has an average benchmark score of 27565, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 6700 XT’s score of 27425.

Q: What is the boost clock of the CPU?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data is available for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the components, not direct measurements. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 score of 6897) indicates it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games. The GPU’s 73rd percentile and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5118 suggest it is capable of high settings at 1440p, but the exact frame rates will vary by title.

The RTX 3090’s Passmark G3D score of 26645 is comparable to the RTX 4070 Mobile, which is a mobile part. In practice, expect playable frame rates at 4K with settings adjusted, and high refresh rates at 1080p and 1440p in less demanding games. The 24 GB VRAM ensures that texture-heavy games will not suffer from memory capacity issues, but the raw compute power is a generation behind the latest cards. These figures are estimates based on benchmark scores and should be validated with real-world game benchmarks for specific titles.