SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on a 10 nm process. It belongs to the Core 13th Gen series, uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, and carries a 125 W TDP. The chip operates with a 3.00 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.80 GHz, with the multiplier unlocked for overclocking. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel bus, and the CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 places it among the top-tier desktop CPUs, while the single-core score of 6897 demonstrates strong per-thread performance. The 3DMark thread scaling is particularly telling: the score climbs from 1188 for single-thread to 2353 for 2 threads, 4643 for 4 threads, 8510 for 8 threads, 11177 for 16 threads, and peaks at 15405 for max threads. This near-linear scaling across thread counts indicates that the hybrid core arrangement — a mix of performance and efficiency cores — effectively distributes workload across all available resources.

The PassMark suite reinforces this picture. The multithread score of 57729, integer math score of 206859, and floating point math score of 150869 all point to exceptional compute throughput. The data compression score of 786218 suggests strong performance in archival and compression tasks, while the encryption score of 46186 indicates robust cryptographic processing capabilities. The extended instructions score of 46084 shows that the processor handles AVX and similar instruction sets efficiently. The physics score of 2956, while lower relative to the raw compute scores, still represents solid performance for simulation and physics-based workloads.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 93 against all CPUs positions it in the top 7% of processors tracked in the database. Its average benchmark score of 61841 places it in close competition with the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834, 0% delta), Intel Core i9-13900K (61766, 0.1% delta), Intel Core i9-13900T (61723, 0.2% delta), and Intel Xeon 636 (61360, 0.8% delta). The differences between these rivals are within noise margins, suggesting that the i9-13900KF delivers performance essentially equivalent to its closest competitors. The near-identical scores between the KF and K variants imply that the lack of integrated graphics does not hamper compute performance.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The combination of strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 6897, 3DMark single-thread 1188) and 32 threads provides the foundation for high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The 5.80 GHz boost clock ensures that games relying on a few fast cores will see responsive performance, though the GPU will ultimately limit frame rates in most titles.

Streaming: The 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. The data encryption score of 46186 and extended instructions score of 46084 indicate that the CPU can handle the computational overhead of encoding streams while maintaining game performance. The high multithread score of 57729 in PassMark suggests that background streaming tasks will not starve the main game threads.

Video editing: The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20519 and Geekbench multicore score of 22486 demonstrate strong multi-threaded processing for timeline rendering and export tasks. The floating point math score of 150869 supports heavy color grading and effects processing. The PassMark multithread score of 57729 indicates that the CPU can handle 4K video editing workflows with multiple effects layers.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 is a clear indicator of rendering capability. This score, combined with the 3DMark max threads score of 15405, suggests that the CPU can handle complex scenes in applications like Blender or Maya. The rendering performance is within 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-13900K, making it effectively indistinguishable from that flagship part.

Software development: The data compression score of 786218 and random string sorting score of 86510 indicate strong performance in code compilation and data manipulation tasks. The single-thread score of 4584 in PassMark supports fast IDE responsiveness and quick builds for smaller projects. The 32 threads allow for parallel compilation of large codebases, reducing build times significantly.

Student and office work: The CPU's capabilities far exceed the requirements of typical office applications. The single-thread scores (Geekbench 2668, PassMark 4584) ensure snappy spreadsheet and document handling. The dual-channel memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 provides flexibility for system builders, though the power requirements and cooling needs make this a less practical choice for basic office tasks.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing. The CPU ranks at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. This 36-percentile gap indicates that the processor is substantially more capable than the graphics card. In gaming workloads, the RTX 3050 OEM will be the limiting factor in almost every scenario, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load increases. The CPU's high thread counts and fast clocks will rarely be fully utilized in gaming, as most games cannot scale across 32 threads effectively.

The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce this bottleneck. The PassMark G3D score of 11857 and GeekBench OpenCL score of 60740 are modest compared to the CPU's compute capabilities. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will constrain texture loading and high-resolution rendering. The CPU can feed data faster than the GPU can process it, creating a situation where frame rates will be determined by GPU performance rather than CPU capability.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. In 3D rendering, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 will drive CPU-based renderers, while the GPU's compute score of 5779 in PassMark indicates limited GPU-accelerated rendering performance. For video editing, the CPU will handle encoding and effects processing, while the GPU provides acceleration for certain filters and preview rendering. The GPU's 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores offer some ray tracing and AI acceleration, but the overall compute throughput is modest.

The FPS scaling data is absent for this exact combination, as no measured frame rates exist. However, the benchmark scores suggest that in CPU-bound scenarios at low resolutions, the GPU will cap performance. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes the sole limiting factor, and the CPU's advantages become less relevant. This imbalance means that users will see excellent performance in CPU-intensive tasks like compilation or rendering, but gaming performance will be firmly entry-level.

# Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Content creators working with CPU-based renderers will benefit from the i9-13900KF's 48855 Cinebench R23 multicore score. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 32 threads and 786218 data compression score, which accelerates build processes. Students in computer science or engineering programs that run simulations or compile frequently will find the CPU's physics score of 2956 and floating point math score of 150869 valuable.

The GPU's 57th percentile ranking suggests it is best suited for entry-level gaming at 1080p with medium settings, or for basic GPU-accelerated tasks. Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications like database management or financial modeling will benefit from the processor's throughput. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking makes this a compelling choice for professionals who need maximum compute power without the cost of workstation-class platforms. However, gamers seeking high-refresh-rate experiences at 1440p or 4K will find the GPU severely limiting, and should consider this build only if CPU-bound tasks are the primary use case.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, providing flexibility for system builders. The dual-channel memory bus means that users can choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering ample bandwidth for modern storage devices and expansion cards. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that future GPUs and NVMe drives can operate at full speed.

The GPU's suggested PSU of 300 W and the CPU's 125 W TDP combine for a modest total system power requirement. The GPU uses a single 8-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor. The GPU's 130 W TDP is low by modern standards, meaning that most quality power supplies will have sufficient headroom. The CPU's 125 W TDP is also moderate for a flagship processor, though boost clocks may push power draw higher under load.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU to balance the system. The CPU's performance headroom is substantial, and pairing it with a higher-tier graphics card would unlock the full gaming potential of the processor. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure that a future GPU upgrade will not be bandwidth-limited. The memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means that users can upgrade memory without changing the motherboard, though moving to DDR5 would require a new board and memory kit.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is based on the GA106 chip using the Ampere architecture, fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung. The GPU features 2304 shading units, 72 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units. It includes 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1515 MHz and a boost clock of 1755 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This figure is modest by modern standards and will limit performance in high-resolution textures and memory-intensive applications. The pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s indicate moderate fill rates. The FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1) place it in the entry-level segment of desktop GPUs.

The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its positioning. The PassMark G3D score of 11857 and GeekBench OpenCL score of 60740 are within 0.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15171 avg score), 0.5% of the AMD Radeon 680M (15270 avg score), 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (15283 avg score), and 0.6% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (15290 avg score). The GPU's percentile ranking of 57 places it in the middle of the performance distribution. The DirectX scores — 61 for DX10, 86 for DX11, 58 for DX12, and 137 for DX9 — show that the GPU handles older APIs well but struggles with modern DirectX 12 workloads. The G2D score of 973 indicates adequate 2D performance for desktop use.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 61841 places it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. Its closest rivals — the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834, 0% delta), Intel Core i9-13900K (61766, 0.1% delta), Intel Core i9-13900T (61723, 0.2% delta), and Intel Xeon 636 (61360, 0.8% delta) — are all within 0.8% of its score. This indicates that the i9-13900KF is effectively tied with these processors in overall performance.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 15199 places it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals — the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (15171, 0.2% delta), AMD Radeon 680M (15270, -0.5% delta), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (15283, -0.5% delta), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (15290, -0.6% delta) — are all within 0.6% of its score. The GPU is thus performance-equivalent to these mid-range parts, despite being an OEM variant.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 75, reflecting the substantial gap between the two components. The CPU contributes the vast majority of the system's overall performance capability. The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data clearly shows a system optimized for CPU-intensive workloads, with GPU performance being a secondary consideration.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900KF has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 61841 is 0% different from the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834), and 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900K (61766).

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The GPU ranks at the 57th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the CPU's socket type?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the GPU's suggested power supply rating?

A: The GPU has a suggested PSU rating of 300 W.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11857 and percentile ranking of 57 suggest entry-level gaming performance. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will likely deliver playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but will struggle with modern AAA games. The CPU's high single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 6897) ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming scenarios. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may be limiting for high-resolution textures.

The DirectX 12 score of 58 in PassMark indicates that the GPU's performance under modern graphics APIs is weak relative to its DirectX 9 score of 137. This suggests that games using DirectX 12 will see lower performance than older titles. The GPU's FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS places it in the range where 1080p gaming at medium to high settings is achievable, but 1440p gaming will require reduced settings. The CPU's 32 threads will go largely unused in most games, which typically scale to 8 or 16 threads at most.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900KF with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU is a flagship 13th Gen Core processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, ranking at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU is an entry-level Ampere-based graphics card ranking at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 75, indicating that the system overall performs better than three-quarters of tracked configurations.

The pairing represents a significant CPU-first design philosophy. The processor's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 and PassMark multithread score of 57729 demonstrate top-tier compute capability, while the GPU's modest benchmark scores position it as a secondary component. This build is best suited for users whose workloads are CPU-bound — rendering, compilation, scientific computing — with gaming as an occasional secondary use case. The GPU's end-of-life production status and the CPU's active status further reinforce this imbalance, suggesting that the system was designed with a future GPU upgrade in mind.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KF

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds