SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

13,745 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF sits at the top of the Raptor Lake desktop stack, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². This is a 24-core, 32-thread processor that combines performance and efficiency cores, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The architecture is Raptor Lake-S, and the multiplier is unlocked, meaning the chip is designed for enthusiast overclocking. Cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and it includes ECC memory support. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is relevant for high-bandwidth storage and future GPU connectivity.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 48855, while the single-core score is 6897. The ratio between these two numbers—roughly 7:1—highlights how the core count scales with parallel tasks. The 3DMark suite shows a similar pattern: 16-thread score of 11177, max-thread score of 15405, and a single-thread score of 1188. The scaling from 2 threads (2353) to 8 threads (8510) is nearly linear, indicating strong thread scheduling and cache coherence. Geekbench multicore reaches 22486, with a single-core score of 2668. PassMark multithread is 57729, and the single-thread score is 4584. The PassMark integer math score of 206859 and floating-point math score of 150869 show balanced ALU and FPU performance, which matters for mixed workloads like scientific computing or financial modeling.

The percentile ranking versus all CPUs is 93, meaning this processor outperforms 93% of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 61841. The nearest rivals are telling: the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61834 (0% delta), the Intel Core i9-13900K scores 61766 (0.1% faster), the Intel Core i9-13900T scores 61723 (0.2% faster), and the Intel Xeon 636 scores 61360 (0.8% slower). The 13900KF is essentially tied with its non-F counterpart, which makes sense given they share the same silicon. The fact that a mobile-oriented Ultra chip and a Xeon server chip are within 1% suggests this CPU is at the peak of what Intel offers for desktop. For real workloads, this means video rendering, compilation, and 3D simulation tasks will see near-best-in-class performance, while single-threaded tasks like office productivity or web browsing will still be extremely fast, just not disproportionately ahead of cheaper alternatives.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i9-13900KF have integrated graphics?

A: No. The "F" suffix in the model name indicates the integrated graphics are disabled. The FACT PACK lists integratedGraphics as null, so this CPU requires a discrete GPU for display output.

Q: What memory types does the i9-13900KF support?

A: It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, in a dual-channel configuration. The memory bus is dual-channel, and the processor also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mainstream desktop chip.

Q: How does the i9-13900KF compare to the i9-13900K in terms of benchmark scores?

A: The two are nearly identical. The 13900KF has an average benchmark score of 61841, while the 13900K scores 61766, a 0.1% difference. In practice, this is within run-to-run variance and not a meaningful performance gap.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the i9-13900KF?

A: The launch MSRP is $564. This is a single data point and does not reflect current street pricing or market fluctuations.

Q: What is the TDP of the i9-13900KF?

A: The TDP is 125 W. This is the base power draw, and actual power consumption can be higher under load, especially with the unlocked multiplier and boost clocks. The suggested PSU for the GPU in this build is 700 W, which accounts for the combined system draw.

Q: What socket does the i9-13900KF use?

A: It uses Intel Socket 1700. This is the LGA 1700 platform, which is specific to 12th, 13th, and 14th generation Intel desktop processors.

Q: What is the process node for the i9-13900KF?

A: It is built on a 10 nm process node, fabricated by Intel. The die size is 257 mm². This is a mature node, and the chip is currently in active production.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture for this CPU+GPU pairing is a desktop build at the 74th percentile overall. The CPU is the dominant performer, sitting at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 55th percentile among all GPUs. This is a significant mismatch in relative standing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 61841 places it in elite company, while the GPU's average score of 13745 places it in the middle of the pack. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 660M (13812, 0.5% faster), the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (13821, 0.5% faster), the AMD Radeon RX 570X (13871, 0.9% faster), and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (13543, 1.5% slower). The fact that a mobile workstation GPU and a much older RX 570X are within 1% of the RX 7900 XT's average score is surprising and suggests the database's average benchmark score is heavily weighted by certain tests that may not reflect gaming performance.

Looking at specific GPU benchmarks, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5623. Geekbench OpenCL scores 12756, while Vulkan scores 71068. PassMark G3D is 29009, and GPU compute is 16828. The DX12 and Vulkan scores show the GPU is capable in modern APIs, but the PassMark DX12 score of 110 is suspiciously low compared to DX11 at 340 and DX10 at 158. This might indicate driver overhead or a test that doesn't scale well with this architecture. The CPU, by contrast, has no such anomalies; all its benchmark scores are consistently strong. The data shows a system where the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck, but the GPU may struggle to keep pace in CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance here is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 55th percentile means that in most workloads, the RX 7900 XT will be the limiting factor. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 and PassMark multithread score of 57729 are far above what any game or consumer application can fully utilize, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 and PassMark G3D score of 29009 are solid but not exceptional. In gaming at 1080p or 1440p, the CPU could easily render frames faster than the GPU can process them, leading to GPU-bound scenarios where FPS is capped by the graphics card. At 4K, the GPU will be the clear bottleneck, as resolution scales the GPU workload much faster than the CPU workload.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent here because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The FACT PACK explicitly states that measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all FPS discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores. Given the CPU's single-thread performance (Geekbench single-core 2668, 3DMark single-thread 1188) and the GPU's mid-tier percentile, the likely scenario is that the CPU will outperform the GPU in every gaming workload. For productivity tasks, the CPU will dominate, while the GPU will only matter for GPU-accelerated rendering or compute. The PassMark GPU compute score of 16828 is decent, but it is not in the same league as the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 57729. This is a system built for CPU-heavy tasks, with the GPU serving as a capable but not top-tier companion.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is Intel Socket 1700, which is a mature socket that has been used across multiple generations. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, so the upgrade path depends on what the user already has or is willing to buy. DDR5 offers higher bandwidth, but the CPU's dual-channel memory bus means the gains are not enormous. PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes is available from the CPU, so a user could add a Gen 5 NVMe SSD or a future Gen 5 GPU. However, the GPU in this build uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is fully compatible and not a bottleneck for current GPUs. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the GPU's TDP is 300 W, with a suggested PSU of 700 W. This leaves headroom for overclocking the CPU (since the multiplier is unlocked) or adding additional drives.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be a stronger GPU. The CPU has plenty of headroom, as evidenced by its 93rd percentile ranking, so a higher-tier GPU would better balance the system. The RX 7900 XT is end-of-life, so users looking to upgrade could consider a newer GPU from the Navi IV generation, which is the successor listed in the FACT PACK. Alternatively, the CPU could be upgraded to a newer Intel generation if the motherboard supports it, but the Socket 1700 platform is likely at the end of its roadmap. Memory upgrades are also possible: going from DDR4 to DDR5, or increasing capacity, since the CPU supports both. The 36 MB of L3 cache is already large, so cache is not a limitation. The platform is solid, but the GPU is the weak link, and upgrading it would yield the most visible performance gains.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need extreme CPU performance but are content with mid-tier GPU performance. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates will benefit from the CPU's single-thread speed, though the GPU may cap FPS in demanding titles. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D renderers, will see massive gains from the 24 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 and Geekbench multicore score of 22486 indicate that rendering, encoding, and compilation tasks will finish quickly. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 206859 and the multithread score of 57729. Students and small business workstations that run virtualization, data analysis, or heavy spreadsheet workloads will also benefit from the CPU's strengths.

The GPU is suitable for general-purpose graphics work, but it is not a top-tier gaming card. Its 20 GB of VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth are useful for large textures or GPU compute, but the 55th percentile ranking means it lags behind dedicated high-end cards. This build is not ideal for 4K gaming at ultra settings, but it will handle 1440p gaming and 1080p high-refresh gaming well. For professionals, the combination of CPU and GPU is well-suited for CPU-bound tasks like simulation, data processing, and software development, with the GPU providing acceleration for OpenCL or Vulkan workloads. The ECC memory support on the CPU is a bonus for workstation reliability, though the consumer chipset may not fully support it.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance is exceptional, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1188 and Geekbench single-core of 2668. This means the CPU will not hold back frame rates in esports titles or less demanding games. However, the GPU's 55th percentile ranking suggests that at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, the GPU may be the limiting factor in graphically intense games. Expect high but not maximum FPS in most titles, with the CPU rarely being the bottleneck.

Streaming: The 24-core, 32-thread configuration is overkill for streaming workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 57729 means the CPU can handle game encoding (via software x264) without sacrificing game performance, since there are plenty of spare cores. The GPU also supports hardware encoding, but the CPU is more than capable of handling the stream encoding load alongside gaming. This is a strong scenario for this build.

Video editing: Video editing software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve benefits from both CPU and GPU acceleration. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 will speed up timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's 20 GB VRAM and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle large 4K or 8K timelines. The PassMark GPU compute score of 16828 is adequate for effects and color grading. This is a productive scenario.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in Blender or Cinema 4D will be excellent, given the 24 cores and the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20519. GPU rendering with the RX 7900 XT will be moderate, as the GPU is not top-tier. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 suggests the GPU can handle some rendering, but it will not compete with dedicated high-end cards. For hybrid CPU+GPU rendering, this build is strong.

Software development: Compilation is heavily multithreaded, and the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 206859 and multithread score of 57729 will reduce build times significantly. The 36 MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, but it can accelerate OpenCL workloads for scientific or data-heavy applications. This is an excellent scenario for this build.

Student and office work: This is massive overkill for typical student or office tasks. The CPU's single-thread score of 4584 in PassMark is more than enough for word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU is also unnecessary for office work. The advantage here is future-proofing, but the cost is high. For students in engineering or data science, the CPU's power is useful, but for general office use, this is excessive.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass is "desktop") pairing the Intel Core i9-13900KF with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT. The combined percentile is 74, meaning this system outperforms 74% of all builds in the database. The CPU is the star, at the 93rd percentile, while the GPU is at the 55th percentile. The overall tier is therefore high-end on the CPU side, but mid-range on the GPU side. This is an unbalanced build, but not in a way that hurts CPU-bound workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score is 61841, while the GPU's is 13745. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake chip with a 5.80 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is a Navi 31 chip with 5376 shading units, 84 RT cores, and 20 GB of GDDR6 memory. The system is designed for users who prioritize CPU performance, whether for gaming at high refresh rates or for productivity tasks like rendering and compilation.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the Navi 31 chip fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, with a transistor density of 109.1M per mm². The GPU has 5376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 render output units. It features 84 RT cores for ray tracing, though there are no tensor cores listed. Clock speeds are a base of 1387 MHz, a boost of 2394 MHz, and a game clock of 2025 MHz. Memory is 20 GB of GDDR6 on a 320-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 800.0 GB/s. Memory speed is 2500 MHz, or 20 Gbps effective. The pixel rate is 459.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 804.4 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 51.48 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 103.0 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU has a TDP of 300 W, requires a 700 W PSU, and uses 2x 8-pin power connectors. It is a dual-slot card, 276 mm long, and supports PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results for the GPU are mixed. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5623, which is a modern test and indicates reasonable DX12 performance. Geekbench Vulkan is 71068, which is strong, while OpenCL is 12756. PassMark G3D is 29009, and GPU compute is 16828. The PassMark DX9 score of 322, DX10 of 158, DX11 of 340, and DX12 of 110 are inconsistent, with DX12 being the lowest. This could be due to driver overhead or the test's nature. The overall percentile is 55, and the average benchmark score is 13745. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon 660M (13812, 0.5% faster), NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile (13821, 0.5% faster), AMD Radeon RX 570X (13871, 0.9% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT (13543, 1.5% slower). These rivals are a mix of integrated graphics and older cards, which suggests the average score is skewed by tests that do not favor this architecture. For rendering, the GPU's FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS is high, but the 84 RT cores are modest for ray tracing. The 20 GB VRAM is ample for large textures and 4K assets. The GPU is capable, but it does not sit at the top of the GPU hierarchy.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so all FPS figures discussed below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results. The CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1188, PassMark single-thread 4584) is strong enough to drive high frame rates in most games. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5623 and PassMark G3D score of 29009 place it in the mid-range for gaming. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck in demanding titles, capping FPS around what a mid-tier card delivers. At 1440p, the GPU will be more stressed, and FPS will drop further. At 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain high FPS in the most demanding games, and the CPU will be underutilized. In esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant, the CPU's single-thread speed will allow very high FPS, but the GPU's raw power may still limit the maximum frame rate. Overall, the gaming performance is expected to be solid at 1080p and 1440p, with the CPU providing a strong foundation and the GPU capping performance in GPU-bound scenes. For 4K gaming, this is not the ideal build, as the GPU is not in the top tier.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KF

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds