SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900KF + AMD Radeon RX 7400 — Desktop Build Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's flagship 13th-generation desktop processor with AMD's entry-level Radeon RX 7000-series graphics card, creating a system with an extreme CPU-to-GPU performance imbalance. The CPU sits at the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 17th percentile among all graphics cards, resulting in a combined system percentile of 55. Benchmark data indicates the processor is a high-end compute powerhouse, whereas the graphics card is positioned for basic display output and light gaming rather than high-end rendering tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-S codename) using Intel's 10 nm process node. The die measures 257 mm², and the chip features a base clock of 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The thermal design power is rated at 125 W, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself.

Benchmark scores illustrate the processor's multi-threaded dominance. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 48855, while the single-core score is 6897. Cinebench R20 results show 20519 multicore and 2896 single-core, and Cinebench R15 shows 4924 multicore and 695 single-core. Geekbench reports 22486 multicore and 2668 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a clear progression: 1188 for single-thread, 2353 for 2-threads, 4643 for 4-threads, 8510 for 8-threads, 11177 for 16-threads, and 15405 for max-threads. This scaling pattern indicates strong thread utilization across the board, with near-linear gains from 8 to 16 threads and additional headroom at the maximum thread count.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's strengths in compute-heavy workloads. The multithread score is 57729, while single-thread is 4584. Integer math scores 206859, floating-point math scores 150869, and extended instructions score 46084. Data compression reaches 786218, data encryption reaches 46186, and random string sorting reaches 86510. Physics simulation scores 2956, while find prime numbers scores 225. The average benchmark score across all tests is 61841.

The 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs places this processor firmly in the high-end desktop segment. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus with an average score of 61834 (0% delta), the Intel Core i9-13900K at 61766 (0.1% slower), the Intel Core i9-13900T at 61723 (0.2% slower), and the Intel Xeon 636 at 61360 (0.8% slower). These tight deltas mean the i9-13900KF trades blows with the very best available processors, with differences under 1% in aggregate performance.

For real workloads, the data indicates exceptional multi-core rendering, compilation, and simulation capability. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 suggests 3D rendering tasks will complete rapidly, while the single-core score of 6897 ensures responsive everyday use and strong performance in lightly threaded applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite paints a picture of a top-tier processor. The average benchmark score of 61841 places it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 48855 is roughly 7 times the single-core score of 6897, showing strong scaling across the 24 cores. The 3DMark max-threads score of 15405 versus the single-thread score of 1188 represents a 13-fold increase, further confirming the processor's ability to leverage its full thread count.

The GPU, in stark contrast, delivers entry-level performance. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 achieves an average benchmark score of 2467, placing it at the 17th percentile of all GPUs. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1103. PassMark results show a G3D score of 11897, G2D score of 1209, and GPU compute score of 5152. DirectX tests vary significantly: DirectX 9 scores 176, DirectX 10 scores 59, DirectX 11 scores 97, and DirectX 12 scores 44. These figures indicate the GPU handles older APIs better than modern ones, a hallmark of a low-end graphics solution.

The GPU's nearest rivals are similarly low-performing parts: the AMD Radeon 8040S at 2440 (1.1% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce 710M at 2433 (1.4% slower), the Intel HD Graphics 610 at 2425 (1.8% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M at 2422 (1.9% slower). The GPU sits at the bottom of the performance spectrum, with its closest competitors being integrated and legacy mobile graphics solutions.

The combined system percentile is 55, reflecting the massive gap between CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU contributes the overwhelming majority of the system's overall performance, while the GPU holds the system back in graphics-intensive tasks. Benchmark results indicate the CPU can handle any compute workload thrown at it, but the GPU will limit gaming and GPU-accelerated applications to modest settings and resolutions.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the CPU and GPU creates a severe bottleneck situation. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 17th percentile ranking means the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost every graphics workload. The CPU is capable of feeding frames far faster than the GPU can render them, making the GPU the primary constraint in gaming scenarios.

In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression, encryption, and multi-threaded rendering, the CPU's high scores dominate. The PassMark data compression score of 786218 and integer math score of 206859 demonstrate compute throughput that far exceeds what the GPU can match. However, in GPU-bound workloads like 3D gaming, the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 44 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 indicate severe limitations.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data — no measured frame rates exist for this combination. However, the benchmark scores imply that any game running at ultra settings will be constrained by the GPU's 17th percentile standing. The CPU's 93rd percentile suggests it could sustain high frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios, but the GPU will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could theoretically support.

For balance, the data suggests this pairing is appropriate only for workloads that are primarily CPU-centric. Tasks like software compilation, data processing, and multi-threaded rendering that do not heavily rely on GPU acceleration will benefit from the CPU's strength. Conversely, gaming and GPU compute tasks will be severely under-served by the GPU.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900KF compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i9-13900KF averages 61841 across all benchmarks, putting it within 0.8% of the Intel Xeon 636, 0.2% of the Intel Core i9-13900T, 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-13900K, and exactly level with the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 sits at the 17th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2467. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon 8040S, scores 2440, a 1.1% difference.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked. The base clock is 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, and the 125 W TDP provides thermal headroom for overclocking on a capable motherboard.

Q: What memory types are supported?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. ECC memory is also supported.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined system percentile is 55, reflecting the CPU's high performance (93rd percentile) and the GPU's low performance (17th percentile), resulting in a mid-tier overall system.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this build?

A: No. The data contains no measured frame rates for this CPU+GPU combination. All FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the processor itself. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and require minimal GPU acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 24-core, 32-thread configuration, with Cinebench R23 multicore scores of 48855 indicating rapid build times. Data analysts and scientists running computation-heavy simulations will leverage the PassMark integer math score of 206859 and floating-point math score of 150869.

Content creators focused on CPU-based rendering, such as video encoding or 3D scene processing, will find the processor's multi-threaded performance exemplary, though GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited. Students in computer science or engineering fields will benefit from the CPU's compute power for compilation and simulation, while the GPU handles basic display output.

Small business workstations running database operations, virtualization, or heavy spreadsheet calculations will see strong CPU performance. The PassMark data compression score of 786218 and encryption score of 46186 indicate robust handling of data-intensive tasks. However, any user requiring modern gaming performance, 3D modeling with GPU acceleration, or machine learning workloads will find the GPU severely inadequate.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel configuration and ECC capability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The platform supports a wide range of motherboards from the 13th generation era.

The GPU's suggested power supply is 200 W, which is modest given the CPU's 125 W TDP. The GPU draws power from a single 6-pin connector and uses a dual-slot design. This low power requirement means the PSU headroom is ample for the current GPU, but upgrading to a more powerful GPU would require additional power delivery.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Radeon RX 7400 with a higher-performing graphics card. The CPU's 93rd percentile performance can support significantly more powerful GPUs without becoming a bottleneck. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is adequate for the current card but may limit future high-end GPUs that benefit from x16 bandwidth. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes would support next-generation GPUs, ensuring the platform remains relevant.

The production status is active for the CPU, and the architecture is Raptor Lake. The GPU was released on 2025-08-07, while the CPU launched on 2022-09-26. The CPU's launch MSRP is $564, though this is a historical figure.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 17th percentile ranking makes high-refresh gaming at modern settings unrealistic. The CPU could support high frame rates, but the GPU's DirectX 12 score of 44 suggests it will cap performance well below competitive levels. Estimated frame rates at ultra settings would be low, and even medium settings would strain the GPU.

Streaming: CPU-based encoding would perform excellently given the 24-core configuration and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855. The GPU lacks dedicated encoder performance data, but its low overall standing suggests hardware encoding would be weak. Software encoding using the CPU's threads would be the preferred approach.

Video editing: CPU-based effects and timeline processing will be swift, with Geekbench multicore score of 22486 supporting smooth editing workflows. GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be limited by the GPU's 5152 compute score, making GPU-heavy operations slow.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will be exceptional, with Cinebench R23 multicore score of 48855 indicating fast render times. GPU rendering will be severely constrained by the GPU's 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 8 GB VRAM, making it unsuitable for complex scenes.

Software development: Compilation and code analysis will benefit from the CPU's 32 threads and PassMark integer math score of 206859. The GPU's basic display output is sufficient for IDEs and documentation. Automated testing and CI workloads will run efficiently.

Student and office work: The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4584 ensures responsive application usage, while the 93rd percentile ranking handles any academic software. The GPU's 17th percentile is adequate for document processing, web browsing, and spreadsheets. Power consumption is reasonable with the GPU's 43 W TDP.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900KF, a 24-core, 32-thread processor at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400, a GPU at the 17th percentile of all GPUs. The combined system percentile is 55, indicating a mid-tier overall system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but falters in GPU-intensive workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 61841 stands in stark contrast to the GPU's 2467, showing a performance gap of approximately 25-fold between components.

The build class is desktop, targeting users who prioritize processor performance over graphics capability. The CPU is a top-tier part within 0.8% of its nearest rivals, while the GPU competes with integrated and legacy mobile graphics solutions. This pairing is suited for compute-focused users who do not require modern gaming or GPU acceleration, but it would be mismatched for gamers or creators relying on GPU rendering.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is based on the Navi 33 chip using the RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. Ray tracing cores number 28, though no tensor cores are specified. The base clock is 1452 MHz, with a boost clock of 2300 MHz and a game clock of 2200 MHz. Memory operates at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed across an 8 GB GDDR6 interface on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU's pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance reaches 16.49 TFLOPS for FP32 and 32.97 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). The thermal design power is just 43 W, requiring only a single 6-pin power connector and a 200 W suggested power supply. The card occupies a dual-slot form factor and connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 connectors. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark scores reveal the GPU's entry-level positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1103. PassMark results show DirectX 9 at 176, DirectX 10 at 59, DirectX 11 at 97, and DirectX 12 at 44. The G2D score is 1209, G3D score is 11897, and compute score is 5152. The average benchmark score is 2467, placing the GPU at the 17th percentile. The nearest rivals are all low-end or integrated parts, with deltas under 2%.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's low compute scores and modest VRAM capacity indicate it handles basic 2D work and light 3D rendering. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for modern desktop applications but will limit texture sizes and scene complexity in 3D applications. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the GPU's compute capability but will not support high-resolution textures or complex shaders effectively.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured frame rate rows, so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and low DirectX 12 score of 44 strongly suggest that modern game titles at ultra settings will run poorly.

Estimated frame rates at ultra settings would be very low across all game genres. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1103 places it in the entry-level segment, competing with integrated graphics. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus provide 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in less demanding titles. Esports games with light graphics requirements may achieve playable frame rates, but AAA titles with modern rendering features will strain the GPU.

The CPU's high performance does not compensate for the GPU's limitations in gaming. While the i9-13900KF can process game logic and physics rapidly, the GPU determines the final rendered frame rate. The 24-core processor's 3DMark max-threads score of 15405 ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU's 17th percentile standing creates a hard cap on gaming performance. Users seeking playable frame rates in modern games would need to significantly lower settings or resolutions, and even then, the GPU's DirectX 12 performance suggests limited success with current-generation titles.