SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900KF

61,841 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

58,392 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900KF and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration built around a 24-core Raptor Lake processor and a 16 GB RDNA 2 flagship GPU. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and hardware characteristics, not empirical results.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the synthetic benchmark scores and the hardware specifications of both components, not on direct in-game testing.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 28070 places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs, indicating strong rasterization performance that should comfortably handle modern titles at high settings. The 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for 1440p and 4K textures, while the 5120 shading units and 320 TMUs deliver substantial fill rate capabilities. The pixel rate of 295.7 GPixel/s and texture rate of 739.2 GTexel/s suggest the card can sustain high resolution rendering without becoming texture-bound in most scenarios.

For the CPU side, the i9-13900KF's single-thread score of 1188 in 3dmark and 4584 in PassMark single-thread tests indicate excellent per-core performance, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates in games that rely on a few heavily loaded threads. The boost clock of 5.80 GHz is among the highest available, and the 3dmark_8_threads score of 8510 suggests strong performance in games that utilize up to eight threads, which covers the vast majority of current titles.

At 1080p, the CPU is likely to be the limiting factor in many scenarios, as the GPU's raw throughput exceeds what most games demand at that resolution. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 15405 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 indicate the CPU can feed the GPU effectively even in CPU-intensive scenes. At higher resolutions like 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the RX 6950 XT's 88th percentile standing suggests it should deliver playable frame rates at ultra settings in most titles, though exact numbers cannot be stated without measured data.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 91, placing it in the top 9% of all CPU+GPU combinations tracked in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900KF compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900K?

A: The i9-13900KF has an average benchmark score of 61841, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i9-13900K's average score of 61766. The delta is essentially negligible, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory bandwidth and how does it affect performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This high bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and memory-intensive workloads without significant bottlenecks.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900KF has an unlocked multiplier, as indicated by the "KF" suffix, allowing users to adjust clock speeds beyond the factory settings.

Q: What is the recommended power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is 700 W, based on its 335 W TDP and the need for sufficient headroom for the rest of the system.

Q: What is the CPU's process node and die size?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900KF is built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². This is larger and older than the GPU's 7 nm TSMC process, which uses a 520 mm² die.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA P102-100 in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT has an average benchmark score of 58392, which is 0.2% lower than the NVIDIA P102-100's average score of 58528. The performance difference is minimal.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 21 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process by TSMC. The die contains 26,800 million transistors across a 520 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 51.5M per mm². This substantial hardware configuration includes 5120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operations pipelines, providing a balanced mix of compute and output capabilities.

The memory subsystem is a highlight: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for 4K textures and high-resolution rendering workloads. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate, while the GPU core has a base clock of 1860 MHz, a game clock of 2100 MHz, and a boost clock of 2310 MHz. These clock speeds are moderate for a flagship card but are complemented by the high shader count.

For ray tracing, the GPU includes 80 RT cores, though the RDNA 2.0 implementation is generally less performant than competing architectures in this specific workload. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support and Vulkan 1.4 API compatibility ensure modern game features are accessible. The FP32 performance of 23.65 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 47.31 TFLOPS (2:1) indicate strong compute throughput for non-gaming tasks.

Benchmark scores reinforce the GPU's capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 28070 places it in the 88th percentile, while the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 4235 suggests solid DirectX 12 performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 205998 and Vulkan score of 165212 indicate strong general-purpose compute, though the Metal score of 222653 is less relevant for Windows-based gaming. For rendering workloads, the GPU compute score of 14199 in PassMark shows the card can handle compute-intensive tasks, but it is not a professional-grade renderer.

The GPU's physical design is a triple-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 120 mm in height, and 50 mm in width, requiring substantial case space. It draws 335 W TDP and requires two 8-pin power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 700 W. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and two DisplayPort 1.4a connectors, supporting modern monitors.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Intel Core i9-13900KF and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT is asymmetric in favor of the CPU, which has a 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 88th percentile. This suggests that in most gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor, especially at higher resolutions where the graphics card's fill rate and bandwidth become the primary constraints.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3dmark single-thread score of 1188) and 8-thread performance (8510) are strong enough to drive high frame rates, but the GPU's raw throughput may not be fully utilized if the CPU can produce frames faster than the GPU can render them. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 11177 and max_threads score of 15405 indicate the CPU has substantial headroom for multi-threaded workloads, but most games do not scale beyond 8-16 threads effectively.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The RX 6950 XT's 88th percentile standing means it is a high-end card, but not top-tier, and its 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit performance in the most demanding titles at ultra settings. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking means it can easily feed the GPU at these resolutions, so frame rates will scale primarily with GPU clock speeds and memory bandwidth.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22486 indicate it is exceptionally strong for rendering and encoding tasks, far exceeding what the GPU can contribute in compute-heavy applications unless they are optimized for GPU acceleration. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 14199 is respectable but not dominant, so CPU-bound workloads will be limited by the processor's thermal and power constraints rather than the GPU.

The deltaPct values from nearest rivals provide context: the CPU is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900K and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Xeon 636, while the GPU is 0.2% behind the NVIDIA P102-100 and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon PRO V710. These small deltas indicate that neither component has a significant advantage over its closest competitors, so the bottleneck is determined more by workload type than by component choice.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The Intel Core i9-13900KF uses the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between more affordable DDR4 or higher-performance DDR5 modules, though the platform is limited to the 12th and 13th generation Core processors, meaning future CPU upgrades would require a new motherboard.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, enabling high-speed connectivity for the latest GPUs and NVMe SSDs. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible and provides sufficient bandwidth for the RX 6950 XT's 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for consumer desktop processors and may appeal to workstation users.

The GPU's TDP of 335 W and the CPU's TDP of 125 W combine for a total of 460 W, leaving headroom within the suggested 700 W PSU for other components. However, the CPU's boost clock of 5.80 GHz can draw significantly more power under load, and the GPU's boost clock of 2310 MHz also increases power draw, so a high-quality 700 W PSU is recommended for stability, especially if overclocking is considered.

A sensible next upgrade path would be to replace the GPU with a newer generation card, as the RX 6950 XT is end-of-life and its 88th percentile ranking leaves room for improvement. The CPU's 93rd percentile and support for PCIe Gen 5 mean it will not be a bottleneck for several years, so focusing on the GPU or adding more memory (if using DDR4) would provide the most immediate performance gains. Alternatively, upgrading to a higher-capacity PSU (e.g., 850 W or higher) would provide headroom for future components, though the current 700 W suggestion is adequate for this configuration.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets enthusiasts who demand high performance across both gaming and productivity workloads. The 93rd percentile CPU and 88th percentile GPU position it as a top-tier desktop configuration for users who want to play games at 1440p or 4K with high settings, as the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern textures and effects, while the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads ensure no bottleneck in CPU-intensive titles.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22486, which indicate strong rendering and encoding performance. The GPU's compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute score of 14199) can accelerate certain tasks, though the CPU is the primary workhorse for most production workflows.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's multi-threaded performance for compilation and testing, as well as the ECC memory support for data integrity. The GPU's OpenCL and Vulkan scores (205998 and 165212 respectively) suggest it can handle compute tasks for machine learning or scientific computing, though it is not a professional-grade compute card.

Students and small business users building a workstation will find this configuration overkill for typical office tasks, but the high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4584) ensures snappy responsiveness in productivity applications. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample memory hierarchy for multitasking.

The build is less suitable for users who prioritize energy efficiency or compact form factors, as the GPU is a triple-slot card with a 335 W TDP and the CPU requires robust cooling for its 125 W TDP (which can exceed 200 W under boost). Users with limited desk space or smaller cases will need to verify clearance for the 267 mm GPU length.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The Intel Core i9-13900KF achieves an average benchmark score of 61841, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, scores 61834 with a deltaPct of 0, while the Intel Core i9-13900K scores 61766 with a deltaPct of 0.1, and the Intel Xeon 636 scores 61360 with a deltaPct of 0.8. These results indicate the CPU is at the top of its class, with no meaningful performance gap to its closest competitors.

Key CPU benchmarks include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 and single-core score of 6897, a Geekbench multi-core score of 22486 and single-core score of 2668, and a PassMark multi-thread score of 57729. The 3dmark scores show scaling from 2353 (2 threads) to 15405 (max threads), with single-thread at 1188. PassMark sub-tests reveal strengths in integer math (206859) and floating-point math (150869), with a data compression score of 786218 and encryption score of 46186.

The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT achieves an average benchmark score of 58392, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA P102-100, scores 58528 with a deltaPct of -0.2, while the Intel Arc A570M scores 58239 with a deltaPct of 0.3, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657 with a deltaPct of -0.5. The GPU's performance is solid but not exceptional, with a PassMark G3D score of 28070 and a 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4235.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU relative to their respective markets. The CPU's 93rd percentile versus the GPU's 88th percentile means the system is CPU-heavy, which is beneficial for productivity tasks but may leave some gaming performance on the table if the GPU cannot keep up with the CPU's frame generation capability. The combined percentile of 91 reflects this balance, placing the build in the top 9% of all tracked configurations.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build featuring the Intel Core i9-13900KF and AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, representing a high-end configuration from the 13th generation Core and Radeon RX 6000 series respectively. The build's combined percentile of 91 places it in the top 9% of all CPU+GPU pairings tracked in the database, indicating a premium tier system that can handle demanding workloads.

The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on a 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The 125 W TDP is modest for a flagship processor, but the boost clock can push power draw higher under load.

The GPU is a triple-slot card based on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, using the Navi 21 chip on a 7 nm TSMC process with a 520 mm² die and 26,800 million transistors. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, 5120 shading units, and 80 RT cores. The 335 W TDP requires a 700 W PSU and two 8-pin power connectors.

The overall tier is high-end desktop, suitable for gaming at high resolutions, content creation, and professional workloads. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking places it among the best available processors, while the GPU's 88th percentile is strong but below the very top tier of graphics cards. This asymmetry means the build excels in CPU-bound tasks such as video rendering and software compilation, while gaming performance is limited by the GPU's slightly lower standing.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13900KF is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a 10 nm process node and a die size of 257 mm². It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, which is among the highest in the market. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, providing substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data.

The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support as a notable feature for workstation use. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for GPUs and storage. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and the 125 W TDP is a baseline figure that can be exceeded under boost conditions.

Benchmark scores reveal the CPU's strengths clearly. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 indicates exceptional performance in rendering workloads such as 3D animation and video encoding, while the single-core score of 6897 shows strong performance in lightly threaded applications like web browsing and office productivity. The Geekbench multi-core score of 22486 and single-core score of 2668 corroborate these results.

The 3dmark scores demonstrate scaling across thread counts: 2353 for 2 threads, 4643 for 4 threads, 8510 for 8 threads, 11177 for 16 threads, and 15405 for max threads. This scaling is nearly linear up to 8 threads, indicating good multi-threading efficiency, though the gains diminish beyond 16 threads. The PassMark sub-tests show particular strengths in integer math (206859) and floating-point math (150869), with data compression (786218) and encryption (46186) scores indicating strong performance in data-intensive tasks.

The single-thread performance is critical for gaming, as most games rely on a few heavily loaded threads. The 3dmark single-thread score of 1188 and PassMark single-thread score of 4584 are both strong, ensuring the CPU can maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The 2 MB per-core L2 cache and 36 MB L3 cache help reduce memory latency, further improving responsiveness.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-thread performance (3dmark single-thread score of 1188, PassMark single-thread of 4584) supports high frame rates at 1080p, while the GPU's 88th percentile and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth enable smooth gameplay at 1440p. The 3dmark_8_threads score of 8510 ensures modern games that use up to eight threads run well, though the GPU's 88th percentile may limit the absolute maximum frame rates in the most demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 and PassMark multi-thread score of 57729, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The GPU's hardware encode capabilities, though not directly benchmarked, are supported by the DirectX 12 Ultimate API and 16 GB VRAM, allowing simultaneous game rendering and streaming without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The CPU's multi-core performance is exceptional, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 48855 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22486, making timeline scrubbing and export rendering fast. The GPU's OpenCL score of 205998 can accelerate effects and color grading, while the 16 GB VRAM allows for high-resolution previews and multiple video streams.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20519 and R15 multi-core score of 4924 indicate strong performance in CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The GPU's FP32 performance of 23.65 TFLOPS and PassMark GPU compute score of 14199 support GPU-accelerated rendering, though the CPU is likely the primary renderer for most workflows.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 786218 and integer math score of 206859 indicate fast compilation and data processing. The 36 MB L3 cache and 32 threads allow for parallel builds, while the ECC memory support provides data integrity for long-running test suites. The GPU's compute capabilities can offload some tasks, but the CPU is the main workhorse.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread of 4584, Geekbench single-core of 2668) ensures responsive web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet calculations. The 16 GB GPU memory is more than needed for office tasks, but the system's overall performance ensures no lag in multitasking. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking means this build is overkill for basic tasks, but it will handle any future workload without upgrade pressure.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900KF + AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900KF

AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds