SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

99%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

117,088 Benchmark Score

Top 1% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using Intel's 10 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, paired with a 125 W TDP. The chip features a hybrid layout with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, with ECC memory capability and integrated UHD Graphics 770. The processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark data reveals a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark results show a progression from 1,187 points in single-threaded testing to 2,355 in 2-thread, 4,648 in 4-thread, 8,520 in 8-thread, 11,201 in 16-thread, and 15,509 at maximum threads. This near-linear scaling from 8 to 16 threads indicates strong core utilization efficiency, while the jump from single to dual-thread performance (roughly doubling) confirms that both P-cores and E-cores are effectively engaged. Cinebench R23 scores of 38,271.5 multi-core and 2,238.5 single-core place this chip in a high-performance tier for both lightly-threaded and heavily-parallel workloads. Geekbench results of 22,820 multi-core and 2,628 single-core corroborate the Cinebench findings.

PassMark tests provide granular insight into workload-specific strengths. The multi-thread score of 58,589 is supported by integer math at 207,792, floating-point math at 151,562, and extended instructions at 46,477. Data compression reaches 793,645, while data encryption hits 46,609. Random string sorting scores 87,705, and the physics test reaches 3,140. Single-thread PassMark is 4,608. The find prime numbers score of 236 is notably lower relative to other integer operations, suggesting that this workload pattern, which often depends on specific instruction sequences, is not where the architecture excels. The average benchmark score across all tests is 61,766, placing the processor at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-13900T (0.1% ahead), Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (0.1% behind), Intel Core i9-13900KF (0.1% behind), and Intel Xeon 636 (0.7% ahead) — all within a very tight margin, indicating that the 13900K sits at a performance plateau shared with several top-tier parts.

For real-world workloads, the 3DMark 16-thread score of 11,201 versus max-thread 15,509 demonstrates that the processor extracts meaningful additional performance beyond 16 threads, which matters for rendering and compilation tasks that can saturate all 32 threads. The single-thread score of 1,187 in 3DMark and 2,238.5 in Cinebench R23 show competitive per-core performance that keeps everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications fast.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this CPU+GPU pairing places it at the 94th percentile overall, which is a strong indicator of high-end capability. The CPU alone sits at the 92nd percentile among all processors, and the GPU at the 95th percentile among all graphics cards. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 61,766, while the GPU's average benchmark score is 117,088. These figures establish both components as top-tier parts individually, and their combination produces a system that ranks in the top 6% of all builds tracked in the database.

Comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals shows a tightly clustered group. The Core i9-13900T achieves an average score of 61,723, just 0.1% behind the 13900K. The Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61,834, 0.1% ahead. The Core i9-13900KF scores 61,841, also 0.1% ahead, and the Intel Xeon 636 scores 61,360, 0.7% behind. These negligible deltas mean that in practical terms, the 13900K delivers effectively identical aggregate performance to its closest competitors — the differences would be invisible in real-world use.

The GPU's nearest rivals show a slightly wider spread. The NVIDIA GB10 scores 117,393, 0.3% ahead of the RTX 4000 SFF Ada. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 scores 118,976, 1.6% ahead. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB scores 114,395, 2.4% behind, and the NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile scores 113,944, 2.8% behind. The benchmark scores for the GPU include Geekbench OpenCL at 124,812 and Geekbench Vulkan at 109,364. The OpenCL result being higher than Vulkan suggests strong compute throughput, while the Vulkan score still represents solid graphics processing capability. The combined 94th percentile ranking means that this pairing is positioned among high-performance desktop systems, with the GPU being the slightly stronger component relative to its own peer group. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation-class graphics card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process. The AD104 chip contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The card features 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 280.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Memory operates at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It includes 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for RT and AI workloads.

Clock speeds are set at a 720 MHz base and 1,560 MHz boost. This conservative clock range, combined with the 70 W TDP and absence of power connectors, indicates a power-efficient design intended for small form factor workstations. The card is dual-slot, measures 168 mm (6.6 inches) in length and 69 mm (2.7 inches) in height, and draws power solely from its PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W. Output is handled via 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a connectors, and the interface is PCIe 4.0 x16.

Compute capabilities are substantial for the power envelope. FP32 performance reaches 19.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 99.84 GPixel/s and texture rate is 299.5 GTexel/s. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The 20 GB VRAM capacity is particularly notable for a card with this power draw, providing generous memory headroom for large datasets and complex scenes. The 280.0 GB/s bandwidth, while not extreme, is adequate for the compute throughput and suits workloads that fit within the memory capacity.

In benchmark terms, the GPU scores 124,812 in Geekbench OpenCL and 109,364 in Geekbench Vulkan. The OpenCL advantage suggests compute-heavy tasks will see strong performance relative to graphics-focused rendering paths. At the 95th percentile among all GPUs, this card outperforms the vast majority of installed graphics hardware. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GB10, is only 0.3% ahead in average score, making the RTX 4000 SFF Ada effectively equivalent in aggregate performance. The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 leads by 1.6%, while the older NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB trails by 2.4% and the RTX A5500 Mobile by 2.8%. For rendering workloads, the 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced scenes and AI-accelerated denoising or upscaling. The workstation pedigree (successor to Workstation Ampere, predecessor to Blackwell PRO W) positions this card for professional applications rather than consumer gaming, though its benchmark scores indicate it would handle graphics tasks competently.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's single-thread score of 2,238.5 in Cinebench R23 and 4,608 in PassMark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance that supports high frame rates. The GPU's Vulkan score of 109,364 suggests capable graphics processing, though the workstation-class design with 70 W TDP may limit sustained gaming loads. At 1080p or 1440p with high refresh monitors, the CPU should keep frame rates high, but the GPU's modest power budget means 4K high-refresh gaming would likely be constrained by graphics throughput.

Streaming: The 24-core, 32-thread CPU provides substantial headroom for simultaneous encoding and gameplay. The 3DMark max-thread score of 15,509 indicates that even with a game consuming 8-16 threads, ample resources remain for streaming software. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 could theoretically offload some display tasks, though the dedicated GPU handles rendering. The 192 tensor cores on the GPU also enable AI-based encoding enhancements if the software supports them.

Video Editing: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 793,645 and integer math of 207,792 support fast codec operations and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 20 GB VRAM allows large preview buffers and complex effect stacks. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 124,812 indicates strong compute acceleration for effects and color grading. Multi-core rendering in Cinebench R23 at 38,271.5 suggests export times will be competitive with top-tier consumer processors.

3D Rendering: The CPU's max-thread 3DMark score of 15,509 and Cinebench R20 multi-core of 20,740 demonstrate strong CPU-based rendering throughput. The GPU's FP32 performance of 19.17 TFLOPS and 48 RT cores accelerate GPU-based renderers and ray-traced viewports. The 20 GB VRAM accommodates large scenes that would exceed the memory of consumer cards. The 95th percentile GPU ranking positions this system well for professional 3D work.

Software Development: The 32 threads handle parallel compilation effectively, as reflected in the 58,589 PassMark multi-thread score. The single-thread performance of 4,608 in PassMark keeps interactive tooling responsive. Data encryption at 46,609 and extended instructions at 46,477 support secure development workflows. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data structures.

Student and Office Work: This system massively exceeds the requirements for typical productivity. The single-thread scores alone would handle document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing with ease. The 2-thread 3DMark score of 2,355 shows that even lightly loaded scenarios benefit from the high-boost architecture. The integrated graphics provide a fallback display output, and the 125 W TDP means the CPU can be cooled in standard desktop cases. The 92nd CPU percentile makes this overkill for basic tasks, but the headroom ensures no workload will challenge the system.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a system where the GPU is the stronger component relative to its peer group, sitting at the 95th percentile versus the CPU's 92nd. This 3-percentage-point gap suggests the GPU has slightly more headroom above its competition than the CPU does. In aggregate, the combined 94th percentile indicates the system is well-balanced, with both components contributing to a top-tier overall position.

For CPU-bound workloads — such as physics simulation, data compression, or heavily multithreaded rendering — the processor's 15,509 max-thread 3DMark score and 58,589 PassMark multi-thread score will drive performance. The PassMark physics score of 3,140 indicates strong computational physics capability. In these scenarios, the GPU's role is secondary, and the CPU will be the limiting factor for overall frame pacing or task completion time.

For GPU-bound workloads — such as ray-traced rendering or large VRAM dataset processing — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada's 19.17 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 280.0 GB/s bandwidth will dominate. The GPU's 70 W TDP creates a unique constraint: it delivers 95th-percentile performance within a power envelope that is a fraction of typical high-end cards. This means the GPU may reach its compute limits before the CPU is fully stressed in graphics-heavy applications.

The CPU's boost clock of 5.80 GHz versus the GPU's 1,560 MHz boost clock illustrates the different design philosophies. The CPU is optimized for bursty, latency-sensitive tasks, while the GPU is optimized for sustained parallel throughput at low power. In gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance of 1,187 in 3DMark single-thread will typically keep pace with or exceed the GPU's frame rendering capacity at lower resolutions, making the GPU the bottleneck at 1080p. At higher resolutions, the GPU's memory bandwidth of 280.0 GB/s becomes more critical, and the balance shifts toward the GPU being the primary constraint.

The lack of measured FPS data for this combination means bottleneck analysis relies on benchmark scores. The tight clustering of the CPU's nearest rivals (all within 0.7%) suggests that CPU performance is at a plateau, so any bottleneck would likely emerge from the GPU's power-limited design rather than the CPU.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than verified results. The dataIsMeasured field is false, meaning these are qualitative expectations based on the performance characteristics of each component.

The CPU's single-thread performance is strong enough to drive high frame rates in most games. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,187 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,238.5 indicate that the processor will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, especially at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is more pronounced. The 8-thread 3DMark score of 8,520 suggests that even games optimized for 8 or fewer threads will run efficiently.

The GPU's gaming capability is harder to estimate. The Vulkan score of 109,364 and OpenCL score of 124,812 show it is a capable graphics processor, but the 70 W TDP and workstation-oriented design (with its focus on compute and professional rendering) mean gaming performance may not match what a gaming-focused GPU with similar benchmark scores would deliver. The 20 GB VRAM is generous and would prevent memory-related stuttering in high-texture games, but the 280.0 GB/s bandwidth could limit performance in games that are bandwidth-sensitive.

At 1080p, the CPU's high single-thread performance would likely keep frame rates high, with the GPU becoming the constraint in more demanding titles. At 1440p, the balance shifts further toward the GPU, and the 70 W power budget may result in frame rates below what the 95th percentile GPU ranking might suggest for gaming. At 4K, the GPU's modest bandwidth and power envelope would likely be the primary limiter, and users should expect moderate frame rates rather than high-refresh 4K gaming. The lack of measured data means these are estimates only — actual gaming performance could vary based on driver optimization and game-specific engine characteristics.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need professional-grade compute in a compact desktop form factor. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is explicitly a workstation card, and its 20 GB VRAM, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores make it suited for 3D rendering, AI inference, and scientific computing. The 95th percentile GPU ranking places it above nearly all other graphics cards, making it appropriate for professionals who require top-tier compute without the power and space requirements of larger cards.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p would benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance, though the GPU's workstation focus means they may not see gaming frame rates commensurate with its overall benchmark percentile. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering would find the combination of 32 CPU threads and 20 GB GPU memory well-matched to their workloads. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and the GPU's 95th percentile mean that both components handle their respective tasks at a high level.

Software developers working on large codebases would appreciate the 32 threads for parallel builds and the 36 MB L3 cache for frequently accessed data. The 125 W TDP and 70 W GPU power draw mean the system can be built in a compact desktop without exotic cooling, making it viable for small workstations. Students and office workers would find this system vastly overprovisioned, but the headroom ensures longevity. Small business workstations running CAD, simulation, or data analysis software would benefit from the ECC memory support and the GPU's professional driver ecosystem.

Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900K, a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, with the NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, a 20 GB workstation graphics card. The build class is desktop, indicating a stationary system rather than a laptop. The CPU was released on 2022-09-26 with a launch MSRP of $589, while the GPU was released on 2023-03-20 with no launch MSRP listed.

The combined percentile ranking of 94 places this system in the top 6% of all tracked builds, establishing it as a high-end configuration. The CPU's 92nd percentile and GPU's 95th percentile individually confirm that neither component drags the system down. The GPU's 95th percentile is particularly notable for a card with a 70 W TDP and no external power connectors, indicating exceptional performance-per-watt. The CPU's 92nd percentile, while high, is slightly lower than the GPU, making the processor the relatively weaker link in aggregate performance, though the 0.1-0.7% gaps to its nearest rivals show it is at the top of its class.

The architecture pairing — Raptor Lake for the CPU and Ada Lovelace for the GPU — represents two mature, high-performance designs from Intel and NVIDIA respectively. The CPU's 10 nm process and the GPU's 5 nm process (TSMC) reflect different manufacturing approaches, with the GPU's smaller node enabling higher transistor density (121.8M per mm²) and lower power consumption relative to its compute output. This desktop build is positioned as a professional workstation capable of handling demanding compute workloads while occupying a relatively compact physical footprint.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance ranking of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The system sits at the 94th percentile overall, meaning it outperforms 94% of all tracked builds in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900T?

A: The Core i9-13900T has an average benchmark score of 61,723, which is 0.1% ahead of the 13900K's 61,766. This difference is negligible in real-world performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing 280.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900K supports ECC memory, which is important for workstation reliability in compute-intensive tasks.

Q: What is the GPU's power requirement?

A: The GPU has a 70 W TDP and requires no external power connectors, drawing power solely from the PCIe slot. The suggested PSU is 250 W.

Q: How many ray tracing and tensor cores does the GPU have?

A: The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation includes 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores for accelerated RT and AI workloads.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The motherboard platform is built around Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Core 13th Gen series. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the processor, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. Memory support covers both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders flexibility in choosing between established DDR4 platforms or newer DDR5 boards. The 125 W TDP for the CPU is moderate for a high-end processor, meaning most quality air coolers or standard liquid coolers would suffice without exotic cooling solutions.

The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots, running at PCIe 4.0 speeds without issue. The 70 W TDP and absence of power connectors mean the GPU can be installed in virtually any system with a free PCIe slot, and the suggested 250 W PSU is well within the range of standard desktop power supplies. This low power draw leaves ample headroom for additional drives, fans, or peripherals.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU could be replaced with a newer generation processor on a different socket, but within Socket 1700, the 13900K is already at the top of its class. The GPU, with its 95th percentile ranking, would be the component to upgrade if workloads demand more graphics compute. A larger workstation GPU with higher power draw and more memory bandwidth would be the logical step, though the compact SFF design of the current card means any replacement would need to fit the same physical constraints. The 20 GB VRAM is generous, so memory capacity would not be the primary upgrade driver — compute throughput and bandwidth would be.

The platform's DDR5 support allows for future memory speed upgrades, and the PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide headroom for next-generation storage devices. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 on the CPU serves as a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails. The system's overall balance — with the GPU slightly ahead of the CPU in percentile ranking — suggests that a future CPU upgrade would be more impactful for rebalancing performance than a GPU upgrade, though both components would benefit from generational improvements in their respective architectures.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds