SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

21,629 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of an Intel Core i9-13900K with an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a study in contrasts, uniting a top-tier, modern desktop processor with a workstation GPU built on older Turing architecture. The data shows a system that is exceptionally strong for CPU-bound tasks but whose graphics capabilities, while competent, are positioned firmly in the mid-range of the current GPU landscape. This analysis is based on the benchmark scores and specifications provided, which reveal a machine tailored for a specific, professional-centric workload.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is a professional workstation card built on the Turing architecture, fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. This is a substantial amount of VRAM, well-suited for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and complex 3D scenes in professional applications. The GPU's clock speeds are listed with a base of 1620 MHz and a boost of 1815 MHz, which are competitive for its generation.

In terms of compute resources, the card houses 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. For specialized tasks, it includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores. The presence of these cores is significant; the RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing, while the tensor cores are designed for AI-accelerated workflows like denoising and deep learning inference. The API support is comprehensive, including DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad software compatibility.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of its performance tier. The GPU achieves a Passmark G3D score of 15616 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 78999. In Vulkan, it scores 92309, suggesting better performance in that API. However, its overall standing is defined by its 67th percentile versus all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB with a deltaPct of -1%, and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile with a deltaPct of 1.2%. This indicates that the Quadro RTX 5000's raw performance is closely matched to these cards, positioning it as a mid-range performer rather than a high-end one by modern standards. The 16 GB VRAM is its key differentiator, offering capacity that rivals in its performance class often lack.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined system percentile is 80, indicating it outperforms the majority of configurations in the database. This is a high overall standing, driven overwhelmingly by the CPU's exceptional performance. The Intel Core i9-13900K sits in the 92nd percentile versus all CPUs, a dominant position. Its average benchmark score is 61766, placing it in the same tier as the Intel Core i9-13900T (deltaPct 0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (deltaPct -0.1%), and the Intel Core i9-13900KF (deltaPct -0.1%). This shows the processor is performing at the very top of the consumer desktop market.

In contrast, the GPU’s 67th percentile is a significant drag on the combined score. While the CPU is a top-8% performer, the GPU is only in the top 33%. This creates a lopsided system where the processor is capable of much more than the graphics card can feed it in gaming or real-time rendering scenarios. For instance, in CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding or software compilation, the system will excel. However, in GPU-bound tasks like 4K gaming or final frame rendering, the Quadro RTX 5000 will be the limiting factor. The combined picture is of a high-performance workstation CPU paired with a professional GPU that offers ample memory but lacks the raw compute power to match the CPU's elite status.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Raptor Lake architecture. The i9-13900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering flexibility in platform cost and performance. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, ensuring high bandwidth for the fastest NVMe SSDs and future expansion cards. However, the Quadro RTX 5000 is a PCIe 3.0 x16 card. This means the GPU is interfacing with the system over an older, slower bus. While PCIe 3.0 is not a bottleneck for most professional workloads, it is a consideration for future upgrades.

The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 230 W. The suggested PSU for the system is 550 W. This leaves modest headroom for the rest of the system components. A sensible next upgrade path would be the graphics card. The CPU is a top-tier performer and is unlikely to be a bottleneck for years. The data shows the GPU is the system's weakest link. Swapping the Quadro RTX 5000 for a more modern GPU with a higher percentile score would immediately improve the system's combined percentile and gaming capability. The platform's support for PCIe Gen 5 ensures that a future, faster GPU would have the bandwidth it needs to perform optimally.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This system is not a balanced gaming machine, but it is a potent tool for specific professional use cases. The data suggests it is best suited for users who prioritize CPU compute power and require large amounts of GPU memory.

Professional Workstation Users: The 16 GB VRAM of the Quadro RTX 5000 is a key feature for professionals working with large 3D models, high-resolution video editing timelines, or complex CAD designs. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking ensures that tasks like code compilation, physics simulations, and multi-tasking will be exceptionally fast.
Content Creators (Video Editors): The high multi-threaded performance of the i9-13900K, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5, will drastically reduce export and render times. The 16 GB VRAM allows for smooth scrubbing and playback of high-resolution footage.
Software Developers: The CPU excels in compilation and data processing. Passmark scores of 207792 for integer math and 151562 for floating point math indicate strong performance in data manipulation tasks.
Students and Small Business Workstations: The system can serve as an over-powered but effective workstation for engineering, architecture, or data science students. The combination of an elite CPU and a GPU with substantial memory can handle demanding academic software.
Gamers: This is not an ideal choice for pure gamers. While the CPU is excellent, the GPU's 67th percentile shows it is not a high-refresh-rate gaming card. It would be suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming, but its performance is on par with a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which is a decidedly mid-range card.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system is inherently unbalanced. The CPU's 92nd percentile versus the GPU's 67th percentile is a clear indicator that the graphics card is the bottleneck in any graphics-intensive workload. The data shows the GPU is closely matched to the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB (deltaPct -1%). Therefore, in gaming, frame rates will be dictated by the GPU's performance level, not the CPU's.

In CPU-bound workloads, the story is different. Tasks like data compression (Passmark score of 793645), 3D physics calculations (Passmark physics score of 3140), and multi-threaded rendering will be limited by the processor. The GPU will have a secondary role, and its lower percentile will not matter as much. For example, in a 3D rendering application using a CPU-based renderer, the system will perform exceptionally well. However, in a GPU-accelerated renderer, the Quadro RTX 5000 will be the limiting factor. The system is well-balanced only if the user's primary workloads are CPU-bound. In any scenario where the GPU is the primary processor, the system will not perform at a level commensurate with the CPU's capabilities.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores, not measured results. The data shows the GPU has a Passmark G3D score of 15616, placing it at the 67th percentile. Its performance is comparable to a GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, suggesting it is a 1080p-class gaming card.

At 1080p with ultra settings, this system should be capable of delivering playable frame rates in most titles, though high-refresh-rate monitors (165Hz+) will be difficult to fully utilize in demanding games. At 1440p, performance will be more strained, and settings may need to be lowered to maintain smooth gameplay. At 4K, the GPU would be a significant bottleneck, and the system would likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates in modern games. The CPU is more than capable of handling the game logic and physics at any resolution. The primary constraint will always be the Quadro RTX 5000's raw shader performance, which is in the mid-range tier.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. This is a hybrid architecture, with a combination of performance and efficiency cores, though the exact core distribution is not specified in the data. It has a large 36 MB shared L3 cache, which is beneficial for gaming and productivity.

The benchmark scores confirm its elite status. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 and the Geekbench multi-core score of 22820 are exceptional. The single-core performance is also top-tier, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2628. This indicates excellent responsiveness in single-threaded applications and strong overall performance in multi-threaded tasks. The Passmark multi-thread score of 58589 further validates its leadership position. This CPU is a powerhouse for heavy workloads like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, where its multi-core performance is fully utilized. Its 92nd percentile ranking is well-deserved, as it sits among the fastest desktop processors available.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined system percentile is 80, driven by the CPU's excellent 92nd percentile and the GPU's more modest 67th percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900K compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900T?

A: The i9-13900K has an average benchmark score of 61766, which is only 0.1% higher than the i9-13900T's average score of 61723, indicating they perform nearly identically in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the performance class of the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 based on benchmark data?

A: The GPU is at the 67th percentile and its average score is 21629. It is closely matched to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB, which has a deltaPct of -1%, placing it in the mid-range performance tier.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for games?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussions are estimates based on the component benchmark scores.

Q: What kind of memory does the CPU support?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing flexibility for the builder.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for a system with this CPU and GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for a system with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 is 550 W, which is based on the GPU's 230 W TDP and the CPU's 125 W TDP.

Q: Is the GPU's memory size a significant feature?

A: Yes, the GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is a substantial amount of VRAM. This is its key differentiator and is well-suited for professional workloads with large datasets.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a recommended scenario. The GPU's 67th percentile and parity with the GTX 1060 6 GB (deltaPct -1%) indicate it will struggle to push high frame rates at 1080p in demanding titles, making high-refresh-rate monitors difficult to utilize effectively.

Streaming: The CPU is the star here. Its 92nd percentile and excellent multi-core scores, like 58589 in Passmark, provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The system could handle streaming, but the game's frame rate will still be limited by the mid-range GPU.

Video Editing: This is a strong use case. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 will enable fast export times. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is excellent for scrubbing high-resolution timelines and applying effects, making it a capable editing workstation.

3D Rendering: For CPU-based rendering, this system is exceptional, with the i9-13900K providing top-tier performance. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the Quadro RTX 5000's 11.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 GB VRAM can handle complex scenes, but its mid-range percentile means it will not be a top-tier performer.

Software Development: This is an ideal scenario. The CPU's high integer math score of 207792 in Passmark indicates rapid code compilation. The 24 cores and 32 threads are perfect for running multiple virtual machines or parallel builds, making it a highly productive developer machine.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for standard office tasks, but it excels in demanding academic fields. Engineering or data science students will benefit from the CPU's raw compute power for simulations and the GPU's 16 GB memory for large datasets, though the cost is a significant factor.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the `buildClass` field. The combination of the Intel Core i9-13900K and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 creates a system with a split personality. The CPU is an elite, top-tier component, sitting at the 92nd percentile. It is a flagship desktop processor designed for maximum multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The GPU, however, is a professional workstation card that, while equipped with a generous 16 GB of VRAM, performs at the 67th percentile, putting it in the mid-range tier of graphics cards.

The system's overall tier is defined by its combined percentile of 80. This indicates a high-performing system overall, but one that is clearly unbalanced. It is a professional-grade workstation, not a high-end gaming PC. The i9-13900K provides the muscle for heavy compute tasks, while the Quadro RTX 5000 provides a stable, feature-rich, and high-capacity visual output for professional applications. This pairing is best suited for a user who needs the absolute best CPU performance on a desktop platform but whose graphics needs are satisfied by a capable, high-VRAM professional card. It is a niche but potent combination for specific professional workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

FAQ

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds