SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

16,504 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is a desktop configuration that combines a high-core-count 13th Gen processor with a current-generation Blackwell GPU. The CPU holds a strong position in the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 59th percentile among all graphics cards. This pairing produces a system that is heavily weighted toward processor-centric tasks, though the GPU still delivers competitive 3D Mark Steel Nomad results that align closely with several workstation-oriented rivals.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the data shows a mixed picture. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1187 in 3DMark and 4608 in PassMark single-thread tests indicates solid per-core performance, which is essential for driving high frame rates. However, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504 places it at the 59th percentile, suggesting that at extreme resolutions, the graphics card may not be the primary limiting factor but rather the software’s ability to utilize the Blackwell architecture. At 1080p and 1440p, the Core i9-13900K’s 32 threads and 5.80 GHz boost clock should provide enough headroom to feed the GPU, but the lack of measured FPS data means these expectations are qualitative estimates.

Streaming and content creation benefit significantly from the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 demonstrates substantial parallel processing power, which handles video encoding and simultaneous gameplay well. The PassMark multi-thread score of 58589 reinforces this, showing that the 24 cores and 32 threads can manage multiple demanding applications concurrently. For streamers who also game on the same system, the 3DMark 16-thread score of 11201 indicates that even a fraction of the CPU’s resources can sustain encoding tasks without crippling game performance.

Video editing workflows that rely on timeline scrubbing and effect rendering will see strong performance from the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 207792 and floating-point math score of 151562. These numbers suggest rapid processing of video frames and complex transitions. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency during multi-layer edits. The GPU’s 24 GB of GDDR7 memory with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for 4K preview buffers and GPU-accelerated effects, though its mid-pack percentile suggests it may not outpace all competitors in this specific metric.

3D rendering and ray-traced workloads lean more heavily on the GPU, but the CPU still plays a role in scene setup and physics calculations. The PassMark physics score of 3140 is modest, indicating that the CPU may not be the top performer for complex physics simulations. The GPU’s 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI denoising, which is critical for realistic renders. The 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance is substantial, but the GPU’s 59th percentile rank among all GPUs suggests that while capable, it is not in the top tier of rendering cards according to the Steel Nomad metric.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s high thread count and fast single-core speed. The Geekbench multi-core score of 22820 and single-core score of 2628 indicate responsive compilation times and quick IDE interactions. The PassMark data compression score of 793645 shows efficient handling of large codebases and binary assets. For developers working with virtual machines or containers, the 32 threads allow multiple isolated environments to run simultaneously without significant contention, a scenario where the 3DMark max-thread score of 15509 becomes relevant.

Student and office workloads are far below the system’s capabilities, but the headroom ensures no lag in spreadsheet calculations, document rendering, or web browsing. The PassMark single-thread score of 4608 provides snappy UI responsiveness, while the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU offers a fallback for basic display tasks if the discrete GPU is underutilized. The data suggests this is massive overkill for such tasks, but it does mean the system will never feel slow for these lighter applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Core i9-13900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This gives builders flexibility in choosing memory, though the platform is tied to the 13th Gen generation. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-bandwidth NVMe storage or expansion cards. The GPU, using a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, is fully compatible with this slot, ensuring the connection is not a bottleneck.

The system’s power requirements are substantial. The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 575 W, and the suggested PSU is 950 W. This indicates that a quality power supply is essential for stable operation. The GPU uses a single 16-pin power connector, which is a modern standard, and the CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though this would increase power draw beyond the base TDP. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be adding more DDR5 memory, as the dual-channel bus is currently the only memory path, and capacity beyond typical configurations could help with large datasets.

The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support from the CPU is forward-looking, but the GPU’s bus interface matches this standard, so no upgrade is needed there. The storage subsystem can benefit from Gen 5 NVMe drives, which would leverage the CPU’s lanes directly. However, the motherboard choice will dictate how many Gen 5 slots are available, as the CPU provides only 16 lanes. The ECC memory support is a professional feature, but it requires compatible motherboards and registered DIMMs, which may not be standard in consumer boards.

For a future upgrade path, the Socket 1700 platform likely represents the end of the line for this generation. The 14th Gen processors may share the socket, but the data in the FACT PACK does not confirm compatibility. Users looking to upgrade to newer architectures would need a new motherboard. The GPU, however, is a current-generation product with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, so it has more longevity in the system. The 950 W PSU recommendation leaves some headroom for additional drives or peripherals, but it is not excessive for the combined CPU and GPU power draw.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process from TSMC. It houses 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving it a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2017 MHz and a boost clock of 2407 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz effective 28 Gbps. The memory subsystem consists of 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.34 TB/s of bandwidth.

The compute resources are substantial. The GPU features 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs. For ray tracing, it has 170 RT cores, and for AI workloads, 680 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 423.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 1,636.8 GTexel/s. Raw compute performance is rated at 104.8 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio for these precisions.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16504 places the GPU in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. This benchmark result is the only GPU metric available, and it shows that the card’s performance is closely matched with several rivals. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA T400 with a score of 16508, a delta of 0%, meaning the RTX 5090 D V2 is essentially tied with this entry-level workstation card in this specific test. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415, a 0.5% difference, and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408, a 0.6% difference. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is 0.9% behind at 16361.

This data suggests that while the RTX 5090 D V2 has massive memory and compute resources, the Steel Nomad benchmark does not fully reflect those advantages. The score indicates that in this particular DX12 test, the GPU performs at a level comparable to much older or less powerful cards. This could be due to driver optimizations, the test’s workload characteristics, or the GPU’s design priorities. For rendering tasks that utilize the RT and tensor cores, the hardware specifications suggest strong capability, but the benchmark numbers do not confirm superiority in all scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need massive CPU throughput for professional workloads and can tolerate a GPU that, while capable, does not lead its class in the available benchmark. Content creators working with 4K video editing or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU’s 32 threads and the GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 ensures fast exports, while the GPU memory handles large textures and compositing layers. However, the GPU’s 59th percentile rank suggests that for pure rendering, other cards may offer better price-to-performance, though pricing is not discussed here.

Software developers building large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 207792 and multi-thread score of 58589, which speed up compilation and test execution. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code segments. For students in engineering or data science fields, the CPU’s Geekbench multi-core score of 22820 provides ample power for simulations and statistical analysis, while the GPU’s tensor cores can accelerate machine learning workloads, though the exact performance in such tasks is not measured.

Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database servers, or financial modeling will find the CPU’s 32 threads ideal for parallel tasks. The PassMark data encryption score of 46609 indicates secure transaction processing capabilities. The GPU is less critical for these workloads, but its 24 GB of VRAM can support large datasets for visualization or data analytics. The ECC memory support of the CPU is a plus for data integrity, though it requires specific motherboards.

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p who also use their system for productivity will see strong CPU performance, but the GPU’s benchmark score does not indicate top-tier gaming performance relative to other GPUs. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming expectations are based on the CPU’s strong single-thread score of 1187 in 3DMark and the GPU’s raw specs, which include 170 RT cores for ray-traced effects. This system is better suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy tasks over GPU-centric gaming or rendering.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-S codename. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The CPU is fabricated on Intel’s 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results paint a picture of a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1187 is strong, while the max-thread score of 15509 shows significant scaling. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 is particularly notable, as is the Geekbench multi-core score of 22820. The PassMark multi-thread score of 58589 confirms the CPU’s ability to handle many concurrent threads.

In the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, the Core i9-13900K is positioned near the top of the performance curve. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-13900T with an average score of 61723 (a 0.1% difference), the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 61834 (-0.1%), and the Intel Core i9-13900KF at 61841 (-0.1%). The Intel Xeon 636 is 0.7% behind at 61360. These tiny deltas indicate that the 13900K is essentially tied with its closest competitors, and the choice between them would come down to factors not measured here, such as power efficiency or specific feature support.

For real workloads, the CPU’s PassMark scores reveal specific strengths. The integer math score of 207792 is high, indicating fast general-purpose processing. The floating-point math score of 151562 supports scientific and engineering applications. The data compression score of 793645 is exceptional, suggesting the CPU can handle archive operations and database compression with ease. The physics score of 3140 is lower relative to other PassMark metrics, indicating that physics simulations may not be the CPU’s strongest suit, but it is still a positive score.

The CPU’s support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode provides flexibility, and the ECC memory support is a professional feature. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 offers a basic display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or office tasks without a discrete GPU. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, which could push the boost clock beyond 5.80 GHz, though this would increase power consumption beyond the 125 W TDP.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1187 and PassMark single-thread score of 4608, suggests it can handle the game logic and draw calls effectively.

For GPU-bound scenarios at 4K resolution, the RTX 5090 D V2’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504 is the only indicator. This score places the GPU at the 59th percentile, meaning that in this DX12 test, it performs better than 59% of GPUs but worse than 41%. For gaming, this translates to estimated playable frame rates at 4K for many titles, but not the highest possible frame rates compared to top-tier GPUs. The 24 GB of GDDR7 memory with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth provides ample capacity for high-resolution textures and modern game assets.

At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, but its 5.80 GHz boost clock and 32 threads should prevent significant bottlenecks. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2355 and 4-thread score of 4648 indicate that the CPU can handle lightly-threaded game workloads efficiently. For esports titles that rely on high frame rates, the CPU’s single-thread performance should support high refresh rates, but the GPU’s mid-pack percentile may cap maximum FPS in some cases.

Ray tracing performance is supported by the 170 RT cores, which is a dedicated hardware path for ray-traced effects. Games that use ray tracing for reflections or shadows will likely see better performance than non-RT implementations, but the specific FPS impact is not measured. The tensor cores (680) can be used for DLSS or other AI-based upscaling, which could improve frame rates by rendering at a lower resolution and upscaling, but this is not quantified in the available data.

The dataIsMeasured field is false, so these are qualitative expectations. The estimated frame rates would be playable at mainstream resolutions, but the GPU’s percentile rank suggests that for competitive gaming at the highest settings, other GPUs may offer higher scores. The CPU is not the bottleneck for gaming, but the GPU’s performance relative to its peers is the defining factor for game FPS.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this system, the CPU is clearly the stronger component relative to its peers. The Core i9-13900K sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 5090 D V2 is in the 59th percentile of all GPUs. This imbalance means that for CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data analysis, or video encoding, the processor will be the primary driver of performance, and the GPU will be underutilized.

For GPU-bound workloads like 3D rendering or gaming at high resolutions, the GPU’s lower percentile rank becomes the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 16504 is the only GPU benchmark, and it is closely matched with rival cards like the NVIDIA T400 (0% delta) and AMD Radeon PRO W7500 (0.5% delta). This suggests that in this specific test, the GPU is not delivering a significant advantage over much less expensive or older cards, which would bottleneck overall system performance in graphics-intensive tasks.

The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore is 61766, while the GPU’s avgBenchmarkScore is 16504. This disparity shows that the CPU has more performance headroom relative to its competition than the GPU does. In a balanced system, both components would have similar percentile ranks, but here the CPU outclasses the GPU by a wide margin. For gaming, this means the GPU will likely be the limiting factor at 4K, while the CPU may be the limit at 1080p if the game is poorly optimized for many threads.

The combined percentile is 76, which reflects the overall system tier. This is lower than the CPU’s individual percentile, pulling the system down due to the GPU’s mid-pack performance. The lack of measured FPS data prevents a direct bottleneck analysis, but the benchmark scores suggest that upgrading the GPU would yield a more balanced system, while the CPU has little room for improvement within its socket.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile rank among all processors?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K is in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, indicating it performs better than 92% of processors in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in 3DMark Steel Nomad?

A: The RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504 in 3DMark Steel Nomad, which is essentially tied with the NVIDIA T400 at 16508 (0% delta). It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 and 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 76, which is between the CPU’s 92nd percentile and the GPU’s 59th percentile, reflecting the system’s overall tier.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900K supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in professional workstation platforms.

Q: What are the GPU’s memory specifications?

A: The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 384-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 1.34 TB/s and a memory clock of 1750 MHz, effective 28 Gbps.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this system?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All gaming performance discussions are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows a processor at the top of its class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 is a strong indicator of rendering performance, while the single-core score of 2238.5 supports responsive everyday use. The Geekbench scores of 22820 multi-core and 2628 single-core align with these results. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 15509 at max threads, 11201 at 16 threads, and 1187 at single-thread, showing excellent scaling from 2 to 32 threads.

The GPU’s only benchmark is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16504. This places the GPU in the 59th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are extremely close, with the NVIDIA T400 at 16508 (0% delta), AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16415 (0.5%), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell at 16408 (0.6%), and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16361 (0.9%). These small deltas indicate that the GPU’s performance in this test is not differentiated from these competitors.

The combined picture is one of a CPU that dominates the GPU in relative performance. The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 61766 is nearly four times the GPU’s 16504, and the CPU’s percentile rank is 33 points higher. This suggests that for workloads that depend on both components, the GPU will be the bottleneck. The CPU’s PassMark scores further emphasize its strength, with a multi-thread score of 58589 and an over 1.5 million floating-point math score.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 5.80 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 card with 24 GB of GDDR7 memory and 170 RT cores. The system’s overall tier is reflected in the combined percentile of 76, which is driven down by the GPU’s 59th percentile rank.

The CPU is a top-tier processor, sitting in the 92nd percentile, and its benchmark scores confirm it is a high-end part. The GPU, while having impressive specifications on paper, does not perform as well in the 3DMark Steel Nomad benchmark relative to its peers. This creates an imbalance where the CPU is capable of far more than the GPU can keep up with in graphics-intensive tasks. The system is best suited for users who need massive CPU throughput for professional applications and can accept a GPU that performs at a mid-pack level according to the available data.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds