SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

40,377 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is a desktop combination that represents a high-end CPU from the Raptor Lake generation matched with a current-generation Blackwell GPU. The CPU holds a 92nd percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all graphics cards, placing the overall pairing at the 87th combined percentile. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all frame rate discussions in this analysis are estimated from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture using a 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, and its 125 W TDP reflects a high-power design aimed at sustained multi-threaded workloads. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which together support high data throughput for demanding applications.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU’s multi-threaded strength. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 38271.5 points in multi-core and 2238.5 points in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly telling: it is roughly 17 times higher than the single-core score, highlighting that the 24-core configuration scales exceptionally well under full load. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 15509 with max threads, 11201 with 16 threads, 8520 with 8 threads, 4648 with 4 threads, and 2355 with 2 threads. The scaling from 2 to 4 threads is nearly linear (2355 to 4648, roughly a 97% increase), but from 4 to 8 threads the increase is about 83%, and from 8 to 16 threads it drops to about 31%. This indicates diminishing returns beyond 8 threads for lightly threaded workloads, which is typical for high-core-count desktop CPUs.

Geekbench results show 22820 in multi-core and 2628 in single-core. The single-core score of 2628 is competitive for tasks like web browsing and office applications, but the multi-core score is where this CPU separates itself from mainstream parts. PassMark tests reinforce this: the multithread score is 58589, while the single-thread score is 4608. The data compression score of 793645 and data encryption score of 46609 indicate strong performance in archival and security workloads, while floating point math at 151562 and integer math at 207792 suggest robust number-crunching ability for scientific and financial computations.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the i9-13900K is essentially tied at the top. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900T (avgScore 61723) and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon 636 (avgScore 61360). It is 0.1% behind both the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (avgScore 61834) and the Intel Core i9-13900KF (avgScore 61841). These sub-1% deltas mean that in real-world use, the differences between these chips are within measurement noise; the i9-13900K is effectively a top-tier performer among its direct competitors.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-13900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the platform’s memory bandwidth is not explicitly quantified in the data. ECC memory support is present, which adds reliability for workstation tasks where data integrity is critical.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for modern graphics cards and NVMe storage. The RTX 5070 also uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, so the CPU and GPU are fully compatible in terms of bus generation. The motherboard must support Intel Socket 1700, and given the 125 W TDP of the CPU and the 250 W TDP of the GPU, a quality power supply is required.

The suggested PSU for the GPU is 600 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 125 W, so a combined power draw of roughly 375 W for these two components alone suggests that a 600 W supply is the minimum recommendation, with headroom for other system components. The GPU requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, so the PSU must provide this connector natively or via an adapter. The CPU’s 125 W TDP is modest for a 24-core part, but the boost clock of 5.80 GHz likely pushes actual power draw higher under all-core loads, so a capable cooling solution is necessary.

A sensible next upgrade from this platform would be a newer-generation Intel CPU, though the data does not specify which processors share the LGA 1700 socket. Alternatively, the 24-core count and 32 threads mean that most users will not need a CPU upgrade for several years; the bottleneck in most workloads will be the GPU, which can be upgraded independently. The RTX 5070’s dual-slot design and 245 mm length (9.6 inches) mean it fits in most mid-tower cases, but the 40 mm width (1.6 inches) should be checked against case clearance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 2238.5 in Cinebench R23 and 1187 in 3DMark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for gaming. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 and PassMark G3D score of 29137 suggest capable rasterization performance.

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the combination of a top-92nd-percentile CPU and an 82nd-percentile GPU should deliver very high frame rates in most titles, with the CPU capable of feeding the GPU efficiently. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor, but the 12 GB of GDDR7 memory and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth should handle modern game assets well. At 4K, the GPU is likely the primary constraint, as resolution scaling typically shifts the bottleneck entirely to the graphics card.

The GPU’s 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores suggest that ray tracing and DLSS workloads are well supported, though no specific FPS figures are available. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 108 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 277, which could indicate driver optimization quirks or benchmark-specific behavior, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5077 is a more modern indicator of DX12 gaming performance. Overall, the estimated frame rates for this pairing should be high enough for competitive esports at 1080p and smooth single-player experiences at 1440p, with 4K gaming possible at reduced settings or with upscaling technologies.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 2238.5 in Cinebench R23 and 4608 in PassMark single-thread indicate excellent per-core performance, which is essential for pushing frame rates above 144 Hz. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5077 suggests it can keep up at 1080p and 1440p, making this pairing well-suited for competitive shooters and fast-paced action titles.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 58589 means that even with a game running, the CPU can handle x264 encoding or other streaming tasks without significant frame drops. The GPU’s NVENC (implied by the 192 tensor cores) could offload encoding entirely, but no specific encoding benchmarks are provided.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 and Geekbench multi-core of 22820 indicate strong performance for timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 672.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects processing, and the 80 ROPs deliver 201.0 GPixel/s for compositing operations. This pairing should handle 4K video editing with multiple layers and effects smoothly.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 15509 3DMark max-thread score and 151562 PassMark floating point math suggest robust performance in CPU-based renderers. The GPU’s 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 482.3 GTexel/s texture rate indicate strong GPU-accelerated rendering capabilities. For Blender or similar software, the combination of 32 threads and 6144 shading units provides a balanced rendering pipeline.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 793645 and integer math score of 207792 indicate fast compilation and code analysis. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache helps with large codebases that exceed cache capacity, and the high single-thread score of 2628 in Geekbench ensures responsive IDE interaction. Multi-threaded builds will benefit from the 32 threads, though the diminishing scaling beyond 8 threads in 3DMark suggests that compilation tasks with limited parallelism may not fully utilize the CPU.

Student and office work: The single-thread performance is more than adequate for document processing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The 125 W TDP means the CPU idles efficiently, and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a backup display output if the discrete GPU is not needed. However, this pairing is overkill for typical student workloads, and the power draw of the GPU (250 W TDP) is unnecessary for office tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die. It features 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 2325 MHz with a boost clock of 2512 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores.

Compute performance is substantial: FP32 throughput is 30.87 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 30.87 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). Pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 482.3 GTexel/s. These figures indicate strong rasterization and compute capabilities. The 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 192 tensor cores support AI workloads like DLSS and neural rendering.

Benchmark results place the GPU at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. The PassMark G3D score is 29137, and the GPU compute score is 15787. In Geekbench, OpenCL scores 172660 and Vulkan scores 178923. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 5077. Notably, the PassMark DirectX scores are inconsistent: DirectX 9 scores 320, DirectX 11 scores 277, DirectX 10 scores 180, and DirectX 12 scores 108. This pattern is unusual, as newer APIs typically score higher, but it may reflect the benchmark’s implementation rather than the GPU’s actual capability.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5070 is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (avgScore 40318) and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (avgScore 40063). It is 1.2% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (avgScore 40870) and 2% behind the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (avgScore 39568). These sub-2% deltas indicate that the RTX 5070’s average benchmark score is closely clustered with these professional-grade cards, though the RTX 5070 offers modern features like GDDR7 memory and Blackwell architecture that these rivals may lack.

For rendering workloads, the 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 48 RT cores make this GPU suitable for real-time ray tracing and GPU-accelerated rendering. The 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1080p and 1440p gaming textures, but may be limiting for 4K textures or large 3D scenes. The 192 tensor cores provide significant AI acceleration, which can be leveraged for denoising and upscaling in creative applications.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets desktop users who need both high single-thread performance and substantial multi-core throughput, combined with strong GPU compute. Gamers at 1440p will find the combination well-balanced, as the CPU’s single-thread score of 2628 in Geekbench and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5077 suggest high frame rates without either component being a clear bottleneck. Content creators working with 4K video will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 and the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM for effects and compositing.

Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 32 threads and high PassMark integer math score of 207792, while the 36 MB L3 cache helps with working sets that exceed 16 MB. Students and small business users will find this system overprovisioned, but the ECC memory support and 80 ROPs make it suitable for workstation-class tasks like CAD or scientific computing, where data accuracy is paramount. The 125 W CPU TDP and 250 W GPU TDP mean that a 600 W PSU is the minimum for this build, so users with power-hungry peripherals or multiple storage drives should consider higher-wattage supplies.

The GPU’s dual-slot design and 245 mm length fit in most mid-tower cases, but the 40 mm width may require checking CPU cooler clearance. The 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs support multi-monitor setups, which is beneficial for productivity users who need multiple displays for code, documentation, and communication tools.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are well-matched in overall performance, with the CPU at the 92nd percentile and the GPU at the 82nd percentile. This 10-percentile gap suggests that the CPU has more headroom than the GPU, meaning that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. For gaming at 1080p, the CPU’s high single-thread performance (2238.5 Cinebench R23 single-core) can likely push frame rates high enough to saturate the GPU’s capabilities. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s rendering load increases, and the 82nd-percentile rank indicates it will become the bottleneck more frequently.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial headroom. The 3DMark scaling data shows that performance increases from 2355 (2 threads) to 15509 (max threads), a 6.6x improvement, which indicates good multi-threading efficiency. However, the diminishing returns between 8 and 16 threads (31% increase from 8520 to 11201) suggest that some workloads may not fully utilize all 32 threads, leaving CPU performance on the table.

The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is a potential bottleneck for 4K gaming or large texture packs, as 12 GB is becoming a minimum for high-end 4K textures. The 672.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but may be limiting for 4K with high-resolution textures. The CPU’s dual-channel memory support could also be a bottleneck for memory-intensive workloads, though the data does not specify whether DDR4 or DDR5 is used, which affects bandwidth significantly.

The overall combined percentile of 87 indicates that this pairing is balanced, but the GPU is the more likely constraint in gaming and GPU-compute tasks, while the CPU is the constraint in highly threaded workloads that exceed 16 threads. The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 108 is anomalously low, which could indicate driver issues or benchmark limitations, but if real, it would suggest a bottleneck in DX12 titles specifically.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K has 24 cores and 32 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5070 have and what type?

A: The RTX 5070 has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, with the CPU at the 92nd percentile and the GPU at the 82nd percentile.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900K supports ECC memory, according to the specifications.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 5070 is 600 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 250 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The CPU’s boost clock is 5.80 GHz, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the i9-13900KF?

A: The i9-13900K is 0.1% behind the i9-13900KF in average benchmark score, with scores of 61766 and 61841 respectively, a negligible difference.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 61766, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900T, scores 61723 (0.1% behind), while the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61834 (0.1% ahead). The i9-13900KF scores 61841 (0.1% ahead), and the Intel Xeon 636 scores 61360 (0.7% behind). These sub-1% deltas mean the i9-13900K is statistically tied with its closest competitors.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 40377, placing it at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs. The AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 40318 (0.1% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 scores 40063 (0.8% behind), the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870 (1.2% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568 (2% behind). The GPU’s performance is tightly clustered with these professional cards, though the RTX 5070’s modern architecture and features differentiate it.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is top-tier (92nd percentile) paired with a GPU that is strong but not elite (82nd percentile). This 10-percentile gap suggests that the CPU is the stronger component, and the overall build is slightly CPU-heavy in terms of relative performance. The 87th combined percentile confirms that this is a high-end desktop pairing, suitable for demanding workloads, but the GPU is the component most likely to be upgraded first for higher resolutions or more demanding graphics settings.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the Intel Core i9-13900K (Raptor Lake, 24 cores, 32 threads) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (Blackwell 2.0, 12 GB GDDR7). The CPU is a 13th-generation Intel part with a 125 W TDP, while the GPU is a 50-series NVIDIA card with a 250 W TDP and a 600 W suggested PSU. Both components are active in production status, with the CPU released in September 2022 and the GPU in March 2025.

The overall tier of this pairing is high-end desktop, as indicated by the 87th combined percentile. The CPU’s 92nd percentile rank places it among the top processors, while the GPU’s 82nd percentile rank is solidly above average but not at the very top. This makes the build suitable for enthusiasts who prioritize CPU performance for productivity and multitasking, while still maintaining strong gaming and GPU-compute capabilities. The platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5, and ECC memory, providing flexibility for different use cases. The 24-core CPU and 12 GB GPU together offer a balanced high-performance desktop solution for gaming, content creation, and professional workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds