SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

44,795 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti form a high-end desktop pairing that sits at the 88th percentile among all builds in the database. The CPU, a 24-core Raptor Lake part with a 5.80 GHz boost clock, posts an average benchmark score of 61766, placing it in the 92nd percentile for processors, while the GPU, an Ada Lovelace design with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, achieves an average score of 44795 and sits in the 84th percentile for graphics cards. This combination is positioned for demanding workloads, though the data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing, meaning all gaming frame rate figures in this analysis are derived from the individual component benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture and fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, drawing a 125 W TDP and fitting into the Intel Socket 1700. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The chip also includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics, which is a fallback option rather than a primary display solution given the discrete GPU in this build. Its 257 mm² die size and unlocked multiplier indicate a part designed for enthusiast overclocking and sustained high-performance operation.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1187 in single-thread, 2355 in 2-thread, 4648 in 4-thread, 8520 in 8-thread, 11201 in 16-thread, and 15509 in max-thread runs. This scaling pattern, from roughly 2x performance at 2 threads to over 13x at max threads, demonstrates strong multi-core efficiency that benefits heavily threaded applications like video rendering and scientific computing. Cinebench R23 results reinforce this: a multi-core score of 38271.5 versus a single-core score of 2238.5 indicates that the chip’s 24 cores are not just present but are effectively utilized, delivering roughly 17x the single-core performance when all cores are engaged.

For real-world workloads, the Geekbench scores of 2628 single-core and 22820 multi-core suggest rapid responsiveness in everyday tasks and substantial throughput in content creation. PassMark results provide deeper insight into specialized tasks: a multi-thread score of 58589, integer math at 207792, floating-point math at 151562, and extended instructions at 46477. The data compression score of 793645 is particularly notable, indicating strong performance in file archiving and database operations. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61766, places it just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900T and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon 636, while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus and Intel Core i9-13900KF by 0.1% each—a margin so small it is effectively a tie in real-world terms.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the Intel Core i9-13900K?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K features 24 cores and 32 threads, which is a hybrid configuration designed for both high single-thread and multi-thread performance.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900T?

A: The i9-13900K has an average benchmark score of 61766, which is 0.1% higher than the i9-13900T’s score of 61723. This difference is practically negligible in real-world applications.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4070 Ti?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s, achieved through a 192-bit bus interface connected to 12 GB of GDDR6X memory running at 21 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti sits in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44795. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile by 0.8% and the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT by 1.3%, but leads the NVIDIA RTX A6000 by 1.6%.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900K supports ECC memory, which is a feature more commonly found in workstation-focused platforms, though it is paired here with consumer DDR4 or DDR5 modules.

Q: What is the process node for the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a die size of 294 mm² and a transistor count of 35,800 million.

Q: What DirectX version does the GPU support?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compatible with the latest gaming and rendering APIs.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a build where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The i9-13900K’s 92nd percentile ranking among CPUs outpaces the RTX 4070 Ti’s 84th percentile among GPUs, and the overall build sits at the 88th combined percentile. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system will outclass many other configurations, while in GPU-bound scenarios, it remains competitive but less dominant.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 61766 is nearly tied with its nearest rivals: the i9-13900T scores 61723 (0.1% slower), the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61834 (0.1% faster), the i9-13900KF scores 61841 (0.1% faster), and the Xeon 636 scores 61360 (0.7% slower). These margins are within noise, meaning the i9-13900K is effectively at parity with the best competing processors in this tier. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score of 20740 and single-core score of 2927 highlight a processor that excels in both parallel and serial workloads, a rare combination.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 44795 places it just 0.8% behind the RTX 5090 Mobile (45152) and 1.3% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45384), while leading the RTX A6000 by 1.6% (44075) and the Intel Arc A730M by 1.7% (45592). In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the GPU scores 5024, indicating solid DirectX 12 performance. PassMark results show a G3D score of 31624 and a GPU compute score of 18396, with DirectX 11 scoring 288 and DirectX 12 scoring 116, suggesting that legacy APIs perform differently than modern ones—DirectX 11 remains strong, while DirectX 12 shows the GPU’s newer architecture is better optimized for it. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 176953 and Vulkan score of 213808 provide further evidence of compute capability, with Vulkan notably ahead.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of the i9-13900K and RTX 4070 Ti, not from direct testing. With that caveat, the data suggests this build is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and solid performance at 4K, though the exact frame rates will vary by title and settings.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, as measured by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1187 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5, indicates strong per-core speed that minimizes bottlenecks in games that rely on a few fast threads. The GPU’s 84th percentile ranking, combined with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5024 and a PassMark G3D score of 31624, suggests it can handle modern titles at high settings. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth provide ample headroom for texture-heavy games at 1440p, while the 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power supports ray-traced effects, though at 4K, the GPU may require DLSS or reduced settings to maintain high frame rates. These estimates should be treated as directional rather than precise, as the absence of measured FPS means the real-world gaming experience could differ based on drivers, game optimizations, and cooling.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who need a balance of extreme CPU throughput and strong GPU acceleration. Gamers playing at 1440p with high refresh rates will find the combination capable, as the CPU’s 92nd percentile score ensures minimal frame pacing issues while the GPU’s 84th percentile score drives high settings. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threaded performance—Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 and PassMark multi-thread score of 58589—to accelerate exports and renders, while the GPU’s compute capabilities, evidenced by a Geekbench OpenCL score of 176953, handle GPU-accelerated effects and encoding.

Software developers compiling large codebases will see reduced build times thanks to the 24-core, 32-thread configuration, and the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 793645 aids in source control and packaging tasks. Students in engineering or data science fields can run simulations and machine learning workloads, leveraging the CPU’s extended instructions score of 46477 and the GPU’s tensor cores, though the latter is not explicitly benchmarked here. Small business workstations handling databases, virtualization, or financial modeling will appreciate the ECC memory support and the CPU’s integer math score of 207792, which indicates strong transactional throughput. This is not a budget-oriented system; it is a performance-first build for users who prioritize productivity and gaming fidelity over cost.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a chip designated AD104. It contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, with memory running at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). It has 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation units, along with 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The memory subsystem consists of 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The card is dual-slot, requires a 600 W power supply, uses a 1x 16-pin connector, and measures 285 mm in length.

Benchmark results indicate a GPU that excels in modern, compute-heavy workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5024 shows strong DirectX 12 performance, while the PassMark G3D score of 31624 and GPU compute score of 18396 reflect solid general rendering and compute capability. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 213808 outpaces the OpenCL score of 176953, suggesting that the GPU’s architecture is well-optimized for Vulkan-based applications, which is relevant for both gaming and professional rendering. The pixel rate of 208.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s indicate that the card can handle high-resolution textures and complex scenes without becoming fill-rate limited. The FP32 performance of 40.09 TFLOPS, matched by FP16 at 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1), provides a solid foundation for AI inference and scientific computing, though the tensor cores are not directly benchmarked in this data. For rendering workloads, the RT cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most 1440p and many 4K scenes, though very large textures or multi-GPU setups would require more.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread 3DMark score of 1187 ensures high minimum frame rates in CPU-bound scenes, while the GPU’s 84th percentile ranking and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5024 support high settings at 1440p with refresh rates exceeding 144 Hz in many titles. The 12 GB VRAM prevents texture streaming stutters in modern games.

Streaming: The 24-core, 32-thread CPU can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously without significant performance degradation, as indicated by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5. The GPU’s 240 tensor cores can also accelerate encoder workloads, though this is not explicitly measured.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark multi-thread score of 58589 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22820 provide fast timeline scrubbing and export rendering, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 176953 accelerates effects and color grading. The combination handles 4K footage with multiple layers efficiently.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20740 and the GPU’s 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 compute power make this build suitable for both CPU-based and GPU-accelerated rendering. The 60 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing in DCC applications, reducing render times for photorealistic scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 207792 and data compression score of 793645 speed up compilation and package management, while the 32 threads handle parallel builds. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 213808 is useful for developers targeting that API.

Student and office work: The CPU’s PassMark single-thread score of 4608 ensures snappy application launches, and the 92nd percentile CPU ranking means even the most demanding spreadsheets or virtual machines run smoothly. The GPU’s G2D score of 1200 handles multiple 4K displays for productivity workflows.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the Intel Core i9-13900K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 5.80 GHz boost clock, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace card with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. The build’s combined percentile of 88 indicates it outperforms the vast majority of systems in the database, though it is not at the absolute top tier. The CPU’s 92nd percentile is notably higher than the GPU’s 84th percentile, meaning the processor is the more exceptional component in this pairing. This is a high-end enthusiast desktop configuration, suited for users who demand top-tier CPU performance and are willing to pair it with a very capable, though not flagship, GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals an asymmetry between the CPU and GPU performance tiers. The i9-13900K’s 92nd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 61766 are significantly stronger relative to its peers than the RTX 4070 Ti’s 84th percentile and score of 44795. This suggests that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, particularly in scenarios that are graphics-heavy such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering. The CPU has more headroom than the GPU can fully utilize, meaning the i9-13900K could support a more powerful GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

In gaming, this imbalance manifests as a system that is CPU-bound at lower resolutions and settings, but GPU-bound at higher resolutions. At 1080p with lower settings, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1187 in 3DMark may be the limiting factor, but at 1440p or 4K with ultra settings, the GPU’s 84th percentile performance will likely be the constraint. The lack of measured FPS data prevents precise quantification, but the percentile gap—8 points—indicates the CPU has more performance headroom than the GPU. In productivity workloads, the balance depends on the task: multi-threaded CPU tasks like compilation or video encoding will leverage the CPU’s 24 cores, while tasks like 3D rendering with ray tracing will be limited by the GPU’s 60 RT cores and 12 GB VRAM. For users seeking to upgrade, the CPU can handle a faster GPU without bottlenecking, but the GPU cannot be upgraded to match the CPU’s relative performance without also considering a new GPU. This build is well-balanced for its tier, but it leans toward CPU-heavy workloads.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds