SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The pairing of the Intel Core i9-13900K with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 creates a stark contrast in performance tiers. The CPU is a top-tier desktop processor, while the GPU is a low-power entry-level card, resulting in a system where the graphics card is the dominant bottleneck for nearly all gaming and graphically intensive tasks. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the database, so all gaming frame rate discussions are estimated from the individual benchmark scores of the components.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals an extreme imbalance in this desktop configuration. The Intel Core i9-13900K sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 lands in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, a position that places it firmly in the entry-level segment. This massive gap in relative standing is the primary determinant of system behavior.

In this pairing, the RTX 4010 is the definitive limiting factor for any workload that relies on graphics processing. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 2893 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test is a modest figure, especially when compared to the CPU's capabilities. For gaming, the CPU can easily feed frames to the GPU, but the GPU’s processing power will cap the output. The i9-13900K’s high single-thread score of 2628 in Geekbench and 2238.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures that it will rarely be the cause of a frame rate stall; the bottleneck will consistently be the graphics card.

However, the bottleneck shifts entirely for non-graphics workloads. In tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering on the CPU, or software compilation, the RTX 4010 is largely irrelevant. Here, the i9-13900K’s immense multi-threaded power, demonstrated by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5, takes center stage. The system would exhibit excellent performance in these CPU-bound scenarios, showing that the bottleneck is workload-dependent. For a balanced system, one would expect components closer in percentile ranking; this pairing is heavily skewed, making the GPU the sole performance ceiling for graphics tasks while the CPU operates with significant headroom.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark results for this build are defined by the juxtaposition of a flagship CPU and an entry-level GPU. The Intel Core i9-13900K delivers exceptional numbers across all tests. Its 3DMark scores scale from 1187 for single-thread to 15509 for max-threads, showing strong scaling with core count. In Cinebench R23, it achieves 38271.5 points in multi-core and 2238.5 points in single-core, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 61766. The CPU's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-13900T (0.1% higher), the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i9-13900KF (0.1% lower), and the Intel Xeon 636 (0.7% lower). These tiny delta percentages show that the 13900K is at the very top of the performance pyramid, essentially tied with its closest competition.

The GPU’s performance is a stark contrast. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 scores 2893 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark. This score places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2893. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (-0.5%), NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (-0.6%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (-0.7%), and NVIDIA Quadro P600 (-1%). The data shows the RTX 4010 is not just slightly behind these cards; it is fundamentally in a different performance class. The combined percentile for this build is 55, dragged down significantly by the GPU's low standing. The overall picture is a system with extraordinary processing potential that is hamstrung by a graphics component that is not designed for high-end gaming or professional 3D work.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. Therefore, all frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the relative benchmark scores of the components. The RTX 4010's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2893 and its 18th percentile ranking suggest that it will deliver playable frame rates primarily at 1080p resolution with lower graphical settings. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU's limited 4 GB VRAM and modest processing power will be severely strained.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are not graphically demanding, the i9-13900K’s strong single-core performance could help push frame rates high enough to take advantage of a 144Hz monitor, but the RTX 4010 will still limit maximum output. For modern AAA games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield at "Ultra" settings, the system would likely struggle. The 4 GB VRAM is a critical limitation, as many modern titles exceed this capacity at high detail settings, causing texture pop-in or stuttering. The estimated performance would be in the low-to-mid 30s of FPS at 1080p for the most demanding titles, requiring significant settings reductions to achieve a smooth 60 FPS experience. In this configuration, the CPU is a powerful asset that ensures frame pacing is consistent, but the GPU is the definitive gatekeeper for gaming performance.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a suitable build for high-refresh-rate gaming. While the CPU is capable of processing frames at very high rates, the RTX 4010’s 18th percentile performance and 4 GB VRAM will cap frame rates well below what a 144Hz or 240Hz monitor can display in most titles. The system might achieve high FPS in very light e-sports titles at 1080p, but it is the GPU, not the CPU, that will be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The i9-13900K is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. Its 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom to encode video using the x264 encoder while simultaneously running a game. However, the RTX 4010’s lack of gaming performance means the playable game itself will be running at lower settings and frame rates. The CPU can handle the broadcast workload, but the overall stream quality will be limited by the game's visual output.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. Video editing software like Adobe Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve heavily utilizes the CPU for encoding, decoding, and applying effects. The i9-13900K’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22820 indicate exceptional performance in these tasks. The GPU can assist with some effects and rendering, but the CPU will do the heavy lifting, making this a very capable editing workstation.

3D Rendering: Similar to video editing, CPU-based rendering will see excellent performance. The i9-13900K’s high multi-threaded scores are ideal for render engines like V-Ray or Blender's Cycles. The RTX 4010, with its 6 RT cores and 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance, is capable of some GPU-accelerated rendering, but it is not a professional-grade card. For complex scenes, relying on the CPU is the better choice, making this a decent workstation for CPU-centric rendering tasks.

Software Development: This is an ideal use case. Compilation and code analysis are highly parallel tasks that benefit directly from the i9-13900K’s 32 threads. Its PassMark multi-thread score of 58589 and integer math score of 207792 demonstrate the raw computational power needed to significantly reduce build times. The GPU is of little importance in this scenario, making this pairing a powerhouse for developers.

Student and Office Work: This build is massively overpowered for standard student and office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The i9-13900K is overkill for such workloads, and the RTX 4010 provides no benefit for these applications. While it will handle everything with ease, it is an inefficient and costly choice for this scenario, which would be better served by a more balanced, lower-power system.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a flagship desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process. It is a 24-core, 32-thread behemoth featuring a hybrid architecture, though the specific P-core/E-core split is not listed in the data. Its base clock is 3.00 GHz, and it can boost up to 5.80 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, which is useful for troubleshooting or systems without a discrete GPU.

The benchmark data confirms its flagship status. Its 3DMark scores scale from 1187 (single-thread) to 15509 (max-threads), indicating excellent multi-threading capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 is a strong indicator of its ability to handle demanding productivity workloads. In Geekbench, it scores 2628 single-core and 22820 multi-core. The PassMark suite shows its versatility, with a high integer math score of 207792 and a floating-point math score of 151562. Its 92nd percentile ranking puts it among the best CPUs available, with its nearest rivals being within 0.7% of its average score of 61766. This CPU is built to crush multi-threaded workloads and offers top-tier single-thread performance, making it a versatile choice for high-end computing.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 55, reflecting a high-performing CPU and a low-performing GPU.

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core i9-13900K?

A: The i9-13900K has an average benchmark score of 61766, which places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the RTX 4010's performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4010 has an average benchmark score of 2893. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, which has a score that is 0.5% higher.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of the i9-13900K?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 have?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the process node for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010?

A: The RTX 4010 is built on an 8 nm process node by Samsung.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 4010?

A: The RTX 4010 has a memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s.

Who Should Build It

This build is for a niche user who demands extreme CPU processing power but has minimal requirements for graphics performance. This could be a software developer who needs the i9-13900K’s 32 threads to drastically cut compile times in large codebases. The PassMark integer math score of 207792 and multi-thread score of 58589 are the key indicators for this use case.

It could also suit a video editor or 3D artist who primarily relies on CPU-based rendering and encoding, as the i9-13900K's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 shows exceptional capability in these areas. However, they must be prepared for slow GPU-accelerated previews or effects, as the RTX 4010 is not a strong performer. It is not a build for gamers at any resolution, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 18th percentile ranking will significantly limit frame rates and visual fidelity in modern titles.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that pairs a flagship Intel Core i9-13900K processor with an entry-level NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 graphics card. The i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread Raptor Lake processor with a 92nd percentile ranking, making it one of the most powerful CPUs available. The RTX 4010, in contrast, is a low-power, single-slot card based on the Ampere architecture, with a 4 GB VRAM and an 18th percentile ranking. The overall tier of this build is defined by its combined 55th percentile, a score that is heavily weighted by the disparity between the two components. This is not a balanced system, but rather one that is optimized for specific CPU-intensive tasks while offering minimal 3D graphics capability.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is an entry-level graphics card that is a significant anomaly in this build. It is based on the Ampere architecture and built on Samsung's 8 nm process. The GPU has a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz. It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s. The card has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. It also includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though its low compute power (2.706 TFLOPS FP32) limits their effectiveness.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is underwhelming, scoring 2893 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This score places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, putting it in the same performance class as the NVIDIA Quadro P600, which scores 1% higher. This means that for rendering tasks, the card is only suitable for light workloads or as a display adapter. While the tensor and RT cores are present, the card's 4 GB VRAM and low memory bandwidth will be severe bottlenecks in any modern 3D application. The data clearly shows that this GPU is a major limiting factor in the overall system performance and is not suited for gaming or professional 3D rendering.