SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

This desktop pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake flagship with NVIDIA's Ampere-based RTX 3080 Ti, landing in the 88th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU configurations. The CPU carries a 92nd percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards, creating a system that is compute-heavy on the processor side and still strong but not class-leading on the graphics side. Benchmark data confirms the CPU's average score of 61,766 places it within 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-13900T and Core i9-13900KF, making these effectively interchangeable in performance terms. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3080 Ti's PassMark G3D score of 26,896 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 5,077 indicate strong rasterization throughput, while the i9-13900K's single-thread 3DMark score of 1,187 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,608 ensure the CPU can feed frames quickly. For 1080p and 1440p high-refresh gaming, the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking suggests it will not bottleneck the GPU at typical settings, though the GPU's 83rd percentile means it is the more likely constraint at higher resolutions.

Streaming: The i9-13900K's 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous game encoding and broadcast workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,271.5 and PassMark multi-thread score of 58,589 indicate the CPU can handle x264 encoding alongside gaming without compromising frame delivery. The GPU's NVENC capability is not directly benchmarked, but the 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores suggest hardware-accelerated encoding is available as an alternative.

Video editing: Multi-core performance drives export and render times, and this CPU delivers elite results here. The Geekbench multi-core score of 22,820 and 3DMark max-threads score of 15,509 place the processor well above typical workstation CPUs. The GPU's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory with 912.4 GB/s bandwidth supports GPU-accelerated effects and color grading, though the 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 compute is more modest than current-generation cards.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20,740 and R15 multi-core score of 5,805.5 put it in contention with workstation-class chips for CPU-based rendering. For GPU rendering, the RTX 3080 Ti's 10,240 shading units and 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide solid but not exceptional performance, with the PassMark GPU compute score of 15,282 indicating mid-pack compute capability relative to its gaming strength.

Software development: Compilation and testing benefit from both high single-thread and multi-thread performance. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,628 and PassMark integer math score of 207,792 support fast code compilation, while the 36 MB shared L3 cache helps with large codebases. The CPU's support for ECC memory is notable for development servers or validation workstations.

Student and office work: This configuration is massively overprovisioned for typical productivity tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,608 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,355 mean everyday applications run with near-zero latency, but the power draw and cooling requirements are far beyond what such workloads demand. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is unavailable.

FAQ

Q: How does the i9-13900K compare to its closest rival, the i9-13900T?

A: The two processors are statistically tied, with the i9-13900K averaging 61,766 in benchmark scores versus 61,723 for the i9-13900T, a delta of just 0.1%. Real-world differences would be imperceptible in most workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to the RTX 5070?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti averages 41,187 in benchmark scores, which is 2% ahead of the RTX 5070's 40,377 average. This puts the older card slightly ahead despite being from a prior generation.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, meaning the i9-13900K can be overclocked beyond its 5.80 GHz boost clock. The 125W TDP provides a baseline for power delivery, though actual overclocking headroom depends on cooling and motherboard VRM quality.

Q: What memory types are compatible with this CPU?

A: The i9-13900K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with a dual-channel memory bus. This flexibility allows builders to choose between cost-effective DDR4 or higher-bandwidth DDR5, though the FACT PACK does not specify maximum supported speeds.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 Ti still in production?

A: No, the production status is listed as "End-of-life." Its successor is the GeForce 40 series, and the predecessor was the GeForce 20 series. This means availability is limited to existing stock or the used market.

Q: What is the physical size of the GPU?

A: The card measures 285 mm in length (11.2 inches), 112 mm in height (4.4 inches), and 40 mm in width (1.6 inches), occupying a dual-slot form factor. It requires a single 12-pin power connector and a suggested 750 W power supply.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-thread performance scale from 8 to 16 threads?

A: The 3DMark 8-thread score is 8,520, while the 16-thread score is 11,201, representing a 31.5% improvement. Scaling continues to the max-threads score of 15,509, showing good but not perfect scaling across the 24 cores and 32 threads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The i9-13900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus. This gives builders flexibility in choosing memory, though the FACT PACK does not quantify maximum bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself, while the RTX 3080 Ti uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, meaning the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds even though the slot supports Gen 5. Future upgrades to a PCIe 5.0 GPU would benefit from the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, though no such cards are detailed in the FACT PACK.

The GPU's suggested PSU is 750 W, while the CPU has a 125W TDP, indicating that a quality 750 W power supply should cover the combined load with some headroom for transient spikes, though the exact combined draw is not specified. The GPU requires a single 12-pin power connector, which may necessitate an adapter for older power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade path would be replacing the RTX 3080 Ti with a newer-generation GPU, as the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it will remain relevant for several more years. The platform itself is at the end of its socket generation, so a CPU upgrade would likely require a new motherboard. The 12 GB GDDR6X memory on the GPU is adequate for current games, but future titles with higher VRAM demands could benefit from a GPU with more memory. The CPU's support for ECC memory is a niche feature that may appeal to workstation users, but mainstream builders will not need it.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 88 masks an imbalance: the CPU sits at the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 83rd percentile. This means the GPU is the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, especially at higher resolutions where pixel throughput matters more than frame generation. The CPU's single-thread dominance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,187 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,608, ensures that CPU-bound scenarios like 1080p esports titles will not starve the GPU. However, the reverse is not true: the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 26,896 is strong but not top-tier, so heavily GPU-bound workloads will cap overall performance.

In productivity workloads, the CPU is clearly the dominant component. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,271.5 and PassMark multi-thread score of 58,589 indicate the CPU can saturate the GPU in compute tasks, but the GPU's 15,282 PassMark GPU compute score suggests it can only partially offload certain workloads. For gaming at 1440p and above, the GPU's 83rd percentile will be the bottleneck; for rendering and compilation, the CPU's 92nd percentile means it is unlikely to be the constraint unless the software is poorly threaded. The lack of measured FPS data prevents a precise bottleneck analysis, but the percentile gap strongly suggests GPU-limited gaming at high resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It features a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a 125W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache, which is substantial for gaming and productivity workloads. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770, making it a versatile platform even without a discrete GPU.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,271.5 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22,820 place it in the top 8% of all CPUs. Single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,238.5 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,628. The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: integer math at 207,792, floating-point math at 151,562, and data compression at 793,645 all indicate excellent compute throughput. The extended instructions score of 46,477 suggests strong SIMD performance for scientific and engineering workloads.

The nearest rival comparison shows the i9-13900K is essentially identical to the i9-13900T and i9-13900KF, with deltas of 0.1% or less. It is also 0.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon 636, indicating that this consumer chip competes with entry-level workstation processors. The 92nd percentile ranking confirms this is a top-tier consumer CPU, though not the absolute fastest available.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p or 4K with high refresh rates will find this pairing capable, though the GPU's 83rd percentile means it will limit frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU's 92nd percentile ensures no processor-induced stutters, making this ideal for gamers who want maximum CPU headroom for future GPU upgrades. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or large data sets will benefit from the CPU's multi-thread dominance, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 38,271.5 and PassMark multi-thread of 58,589 supporting long render jobs.

Software developers will appreciate the fast compilation times indicated by the PassMark integer math score of 207,792 and the 36 MB L3 cache for code hot spots. Students and small business workstations are over-served by this configuration; the performance is far beyond what office applications require, and the power and cooling demands are unnecessary for such workloads. However, for users who also game or do occasional video work, this system handles those tasks with ease. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is sufficient for most current creative applications, and the CPU's ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive work.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so the following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 3080 Ti's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077 and PassMark G3D score of 26,896 indicate strong 1440p performance, likely achieving high frame rates in most titles at high settings. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 1,187 in 3DMark suggests it can drive very high frame rates in esports and lighter titles, potentially exceeding 144 Hz in many games.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, with the 83rd percentile ranking suggesting playable but not extreme performance in AAA titles. The GPU's 912.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and 12 GB GDDR6X memory are well-suited for high-resolution textures, but the 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 compute is moderate by current standards. The CPU's performance in gaming is unlikely to be a limiting factor at any resolution, given its 92nd percentile ranking and strong single-thread results. Users seeking maximum frame rates should target 1440p, where this pairing strikes the best balance between CPU and GPU capability.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class configuration combining Intel's Core i9-13900K, a 24-core Raptor Lake processor, with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, an Ampere-architecture GPU with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory. The combined percentile of 88 places this build in the upper tier of all systems, with the CPU at the 92nd percentile and the GPU at the 83rd percentile. This is a high-end pairing from the previous hardware generation, offering strong 1440p gaming and excellent multi-threaded productivity performance. The CPU was released in late September 2022 with a launch MSRP of $589, while the GPU launched in mid-2021 with a launch MSRP of $1,199 USD.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use with a dedicated monitor and peripherals. The GPU is dual-slot, measuring 285 mm in length, and requires a 750 W power supply. The CPU's 125W TDP and the GPU's 350W TDP combine to require robust cooling, though the exact thermal solution is not specified in the FACT PACK. This system is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance for productivity while still wanting solid gaming capability, though the GPU is also a generation old and may struggle with newer titles at maximum settings.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 61,766, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900T, scores 61,723 (0.1% behind), while the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61,834 (0.1% ahead), making all three statistically equivalent. The CPU's strongest results include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38,271.5, a Geekbench multi-core score of 22,820, and a 3DMark max-threads score of 15,509. Single-thread performance is also excellent, with a Cinebench R23 single-core of 2,238.5 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,608.

The GPU averages 41,187 in benchmark scores, ranking in the 83rd percentile of all graphics cards. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, scores 40,870 (0.8% behind), while the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB scores 41,707 (1.2% ahead) and the RTX 5070 scores 40,377 (2.0% behind). Key GPU results include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,077, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 192,697, and a PassMark G3D score of 26,896. The combined picture shows a CPU that outperforms its GPU counterpart by a significant margin, with the CPU in the top 8% and the GPU in the top 17% of their respective categories. This suggests the system is better balanced for CPU-heavy workloads than GPU-bound gaming, and users should expect the GPU to be the first component needing an upgrade.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds