SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti: A Desktop Powerhouse Analysis

This pairing combines Intel's 24-core Raptor Lake flagship with NVIDIA's Ampere-based RTX 3070 Ti, creating a desktop system that sits at the 84th percentile across all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU alone ranks in the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 75th percentile among all graphics cards. This is a configuration where a top-tier compute engine meets a high-midrange graphics solution, producing a distinct performance profile that excels in CPU-bound workflows but shows measurable GPU limitations in certain gaming scenarios. The data indicates a system built for productivity first, with gaming performance that remains strong but is ultimately capped by the graphics card's 8 GB memory buffer and 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 3070 Ti's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 and PassMark G3D score of 23356 place it firmly in the upper quartile of GPUs, yet the 75th percentile ranking means it is not a top-tier 4K card. At 1080p and 1440p, the combination of the CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 8520 and the GPU's 608.3 GB/s memory bandwidth should sustain high frame rates in most titles, but the 8 GB VRAM buffer becomes a constraint for texture-heavy modern games at higher resolutions. The system is well-suited for competitive esports titles where the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5) drives high minimum frame rates.

Streaming: The GPU's 192 tensor cores and 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated encoding and decoding capabilities, while the CPU's 32 threads handle simultaneous gaming, encoding, and broadcast workloads without contention. The PassMark multithread score of 58589 indicates substantial headroom for software encoding if preferred, though the GPU's dedicated hardware paths are more efficient for this task. The 125W TDP CPU and 290W TDP GPU do require a robust cooling solution, but the 600W suggested PSU provides adequate headroom for a streaming-focused build with capture cards and multiple displays.

Video Editing: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 22820 and Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20740 demonstrate excellent rendering and export performance for 4K timelines. The GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 339.8 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate effects, color grading, and GPU-accelerated exports in modern NLEs. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache reduce latency when scrubbing through high-bitrate footage, while the 10 nm process node and 5.80 GHz boost clock ensure responsive timeline interaction. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K editing but may require proxy workflows for 8K material.

3D Rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 places it within 0.1% of the Core i9-13900T and Core i9-13900KF, meaning this processor is essentially at the top of the desktop CPU hierarchy for CPU-based rendering. The GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 11601 supports GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender, Octane, and similar applications, though the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity for viewport previews. For production rendering, the CPU will be the primary workhorse, with the GPU serving as an accelerator for interactive previews and final-frame GPU rendering of moderate-complexity scenes.

Software Development: The 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with a PassMark integer math score of 207792, provide exceptional throughput for large-scale compilation, unit testing, and parallel build systems. The PassMark data compression score of 793645 indicates strong performance for repository operations, packaging, and artifact management. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs means developer workstations built around this pairing will handle monorepos, container builds, and CI-style workloads with minimal wait times, while the 5.80 GHz boost clock keeps interactive tooling and IDE responsiveness snappy.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is dramatically over-provisioned for typical productivity tasks, with the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4608 and the GPU's PassMark G2D score of 1055 ensuring instant response in office suites, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is unavailable. However, the 125W CPU TDP and 290W GPU TDP make this an impractical choice for energy-conscious academic environments, and the dual-slot GPU with a 1x 12-pin power connector requires a power supply and chassis that can accommodate high thermal output.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry is immediately apparent in the percentile gap: the CPU sits at the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 75th percentile. This 17-point delta means the processor is capable of feeding significantly more graphics work than this GPU can process. In CPU-bound workloads such as compilation, 3D rendering, and data processing, the GPU will remain largely idle, and the system's performance is entirely dictated by the CPU's capabilities. Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like 4K gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the CPU will frequently wait on the GPU, particularly in scenes that exceed the 8 GB VRAM buffer.

The 3DMark multi-threaded scores reveal the CPU's scaling characteristics: the 16-thread score of 11201 is 72% of the max-thread score of 15509, showing that the 8 performance cores deliver the bulk of the throughput while the 16 efficiency cores contribute meaningful additional performance. This hybrid architecture means lightly-threaded tasks (3DMark 2-thread score of 2355) benefit from the high boost clock, while heavily-threaded workloads leverage the full 32-thread count. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 91 versus DirectX 11 score of 192 suggests the Ampere architecture performs relatively better under older APIs, which can influence gaming performance in DX11 titles versus DX12 titles.

The FPS scaling between CPU and GPU is not measurable from the data package, as no measured frame rates exist for this exact combination. However, the benchmark scores indicate that at 1080p, where the CPU's single-thread performance can fully feed the GPU, the RTX 3070 Ti should approach its performance ceiling. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 608.3 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM become the limiting factors, and the CPU's performance advantage becomes increasingly irrelevant. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11601 versus the CPU's PassMark multithread score of 58589 suggests that for compute-heavy workloads, the CPU actually outperforms the GPU, which is atypical and reinforces the system's CPU-centric character.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 61766 places it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with its nearest rival being the Intel Core i9-13900T at 61723 (a 0.1% difference) and the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 61834 (a -0.1% difference). This effectively means the 13900K is statistically tied with its closest competitors, with all three processors falling within a 0.2% performance band. The Core i9-13900KF at 61841 (also -0.1% delta) confirms that the integrated GPU does not meaningfully impact CPU benchmark scores. The Xeon 636 trails at 61360, a 0.7% deficit that shows this consumer chip outperforms a server-class Xeon in the aggregate benchmark.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 29945 places it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile at 29928 (0.1% delta), meaning this desktop GPU performs virtually identically to a newer mobile part. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 leads by 0.5% at 30095, while the RTX 2080 Ti trails by 0.5% at 29783. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is 1.6% behind at 30433, which is notable as it shows the RTX 3070 Ti outperforms a lower-tier AMD card by a wider margin than it trails the RX 6800.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 and Geekbench multicore score of 22820 demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded performance, while the 3DMark max-thread score of 15509 and 16-thread score of 11201 show strong scaling up to 16 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 58589 and floating-point math score of 151562 round out a picture of a processor that dominates in compute-heavy tasks. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output but is not a gaming solution, with the discrete GPU handling all graphics workloads.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer within 0.1% of the fastest desktop processors available, while the GPU is a solid mid-to-high-range part that outperforms older flagship cards like the RTX 2080 Ti by 0.5% but lags newer and higher-tier options. The combined 84th percentile ranking reflects this asymmetry, positioning the system as a whole in the upper tier of desktop configurations.

Who Should Build It

The primary audience for this configuration is professionals who require extreme multi-threaded CPU performance but have moderate GPU requirements. Software developers working on large codebases will benefit from the 24 cores and 32 threads, with the PassMark integer math score of 207792 and data compression score of 793645 delivering fast builds and efficient package management. 3D artists and animators who use CPU-based renderers will find the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 particularly compelling, as this places the processor within 0.1% of the fastest desktop chips for rendering workloads.

Video editors working with 4K timelines will appreciate the CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 22820 for smooth playback and fast exports, while the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color work. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 4K editing but may require proxy workflows for 8K material. Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p high-refresh displays will find the combination well-suited, with the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5) preventing bottlenecks and the GPU's 608.3 GB/s bandwidth delivering smooth frame rates.

Students and small business users should avoid this configuration unless they have specific compute-intensive workloads, as the 125W CPU TDP and 290W GPU TDP make it power-hungry and the performance is massively over-provisioned for typical productivity tasks. The system is better suited as a workstation for technical professionals, a high-end content creation machine, or an enthusiast gaming build for competitive titles at 1080p and 1440p.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU's 125W TDP and the GPU's 290W TDP result in a suggested PSU rating of 600W, providing a baseline for system power delivery. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes (CPU only) offers substantial bandwidth headroom for future storage and GPU upgrades, while the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible.

The first logical upgrade would be the GPU, as the RTX 3070 Ti is the system's primary bottleneck in gaming workloads. A higher-tier GPU would better complement the CPU's 92nd percentile performance, though the 600W suggested PSU may need to be upgraded to accommodate a more power-hungry graphics card. The CPU's 5.80 GHz boost clock and 24 cores provide significant headroom for future GPU upgrades without creating a CPU bottleneck.

Memory is another consideration, as the platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Upgrading from DDR4 to DDR5 (or increasing DDR5 capacity) could improve memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads, though the 36 MB shared L3 cache helps mitigate memory latency. The CPU's ECC memory support is unusual for a consumer platform and could appeal to workstation users who require error correction. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a useful fallback if the discrete GPU is removed or fails, making troubleshooting easier.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, with a die size of 392 mm² containing 17,400 million transistors. The GPU features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units, delivering a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s. The 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads, with FP32 performance rated at 21.75 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

The 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a mid-to-high-range GPU but becomes a limiting factor in 4K gaming and large compute workloads. The memory clock runs at 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective), and the GPU's base clock of 1575 MHz boosts to 1770 MHz. The 75th percentile ranking among all GPUs means this card outperforms the majority of graphics cards but trails top-tier models by a noticeable margin.

The benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 119718, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 139541. The PassMark G3D score of 23356 and GPU compute score of 11601 indicate strong rasterization performance with moderate compute capabilities. The DirectX 12 score of 91 versus DirectX 11 score of 192 suggests the architecture performs relatively better under DX11, which is a consideration for older game titles. For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity, and the 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 rate, while respectable, is lower than higher-tier Ampere cards.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations below are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 and PassMark G3D score of 23356 indicate strong 1440p gaming performance, while the CPU's high single-thread scores prevent frame rate drops in CPU-bound scenarios.

At 1080p, the CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2355 suggest the processor can feed the GPU effectively, and the RTX 3070 Ti should deliver high frame rates in most titles. The 608.3 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are sufficient for 1080p ultra settings in most games, though some memory-hungry titles may require texture quality reductions.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and frame rates will depend more on the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 169.9 GPixel/s pixel rate. The 75th percentile GPU ranking suggests this card performs similarly to an RTX 2080 Ti (0.5% faster) but slower than an RX 6800 (0.5% slower), providing a reference point for expected performance. At 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth become significant constraints, and high-refresh 4K gaming is not realistic in demanding titles.

Ray tracing performance is supported through the 48 RT cores, but the moderate RT core count and 8 GB VRAM limit the quality settings that can be used with ray tracing enabled. DLSS would be available through the 192 tensor cores, potentially recovering frame rates in supported titles, though this is not measured in the data package.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900K a good match for the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 75th percentile creates an imbalance where the processor is capable of feeding significantly more graphics work than the GPU can handle. This is a good pairing for CPU-bound workloads, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this system?

A: The combined percentile is 84, placing this desktop system in the upper tier of CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU's average benchmark score of 61766 and GPU's average score of 29945 contribute to this ranking.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU's average score of 29945 is 0.1% higher than the RTX 5070 Mobile (29928), 0.5% lower than the RX 6800 (30095), 0.5% higher than the RTX 2080 Ti (29783), and 1.6% higher than the RX 6700 (30433).

Q: What memory does this platform support?

A: The Intel Socket 1700 platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer platform.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for this system?

A: The suggested PSU rating is 600W, based on the CPU's 125W TDP and the GPU's 290W TDP. This provides adequate headroom for the base configuration, though a higher-wattage PSU may be needed for future upgrades.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 and Geekbench multicore score of 22820 place it within 0.1% of the fastest desktop processors. The PassMark multithread score of 58589 confirms exceptional performance in heavily-threaded tasks.

Q: Is this system suitable for 4K gaming?

A: The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth are significant constraints at 4K resolution. The 75th percentile GPU ranking suggests the card is better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K requiring reduced settings or DLSS.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock of 3.00 GHz boosts to 5.80 GHz, and the 125W TDP is the thermal design point for this flagship desktop chip. The CPU features a hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores, reflected in the 80 KB L1 cache per core, 2 MB L2 cache per core, and 36 MB shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores demonstrate exceptional performance across the board. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 and single-core score of 2238.5 place this chip at the top of the desktop CPU hierarchy, within 0.1% of the Core i9-13900T and Core i9-13900KF. The Geekbench multicore score of 22820 and single-core score of 2628 reinforce this position. The 3DMark scores show strong scaling: 2-thread at 2355, 4-thread at 4648, 8-thread at 8520, 16-thread at 11201, and max-thread at 15509, demonstrating that the chip efficiently utilizes all available threads.

The PassMark suite provides insight into specific workload performance. The integer math score of 207792 and floating-point math score of 151562 indicate exceptional number-crunching capability. The data compression score of 793645 and data encryption score of 46609 show strong performance in data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 46477 reflects robust SIMD and vector processing. The single-thread score of 4608 and find prime numbers score of 236 round out a profile of a processor that excels in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads.

The 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61766, places this processor statistically tied with the fastest desktop chips available, making it an excellent choice for any CPU-bound workload. The launch MSRP of $589 reflects its flagship positioning, and the unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the 5.80 GHz boost clock already provides substantial performance.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's top-tier Core i9-13900K processor with NVIDIA's high-midrange GeForce RTX 3070 Ti graphics card. The system ranks at the 84th percentile across all CPU+GPU combinations, reflecting a configuration where the CPU is a top-tier performer (92nd percentile) and the GPU is a solid upper-midrange part (75th percentile). The CPU was released on 2022-09-26 with a launch MSRP of $589, while the GPU was released on 2021-05-30 with a launch MSRP of 599 USD.

The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with the GPU's 6144 shading units and 8 GB GDDR6X memory, make this a capable system for a wide range of workloads. The 125W CPU TDP and 290W GPU TDP require adequate cooling, and the 600W suggested PSU provides a baseline for power delivery. The system supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU and PCIe 4.0 x16 for the GPU, and includes the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU as a fallback.

The overall tier of this build is high-end desktop, positioned for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. The GPU, while not top-tier, is still a strong performer that handles 1080p and 1440p gaming well, as well as GPU-accelerated content creation. The system is best suited for software developers, 3D artists, video editors, and power users who need extreme multi-threaded performance and are willing to accept a GPU that is good but not class-leading. The production status is Active for the CPU and End-of-life for the GPU, indicating that the graphics card is at the end of its lifecycle while the processor remains current.