SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 9070

23,877 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture using TSMC's 4 nm process, with a 53,900 million transistor count spread across a 357 mm² die. The GPU packs 3,584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units, paired with 56 ray tracing cores. There are no dedicated tensor cores listed, which means AI acceleration relies on the general-purpose compute units rather than specialized hardware. The chip runs at a 1330 MHz base clock, boosts to 2520 MHz, and has a game clock of 2070 MHz — the game clock is the more relevant figure for sustained real-world workloads.

Memory configuration is substantial: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus delivers 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is listed at 2518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective data rate. This bandwidth figure is critical for high-resolution texture streaming and compute tasks that move large datasets. For rendering workloads, the combination of 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio) means the card handles both single-precision and half-precision math at identical rates, which is beneficial for shader-heavy scenes and certain compute-accelerated rendering pipelines. Pixel rate sits at 322.6 GPixel/s and texture rate at 564.5 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for high-resolution rasterization.

Benchmark results place this GPU at the 69th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23,877. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 reflects modern API performance, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 131,539 and 58,705 respectively show compute and graphics API efficiency. Passmark G3D score of 25,381 and G2D score of 1,280 round out the picture. The nearest rivals are telling: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 23,736 (0.6% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24,063 (0.8% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile scores 23,628 (1.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24,170 (1.2% ahead). This places the RX 9070 in a competitive band with those cards, though the deltaPct values are small — all within roughly a point or two of each other. For rendering, the data suggests the card is a capable mid-to-high-tier performer, not a flagship, but with enough VRAM and bandwidth to handle substantial scenes without hitting memory ceilings.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the LGA 1700 socket. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility depending on motherboard selection and budget. ECC memory support is enabled, which matters for workstation builds that require error-correcting memory for long compute jobs. The CPU has PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU itself, so the platform is ready for the latest high-bandwidth GPUs and NVMe storage. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output, which is useful for troubleshooting or basic tasks without a discrete GPU.

The CPU's TDP is 125 W, while the GPU's TDP is 220 W, and the suggested power supply is 550 W. That PSU recommendation accounts for the combined load of both components plus the rest of the system. The GPU uses 2x 8-pin power connectors and occupies a dual-slot form factor. From a power headroom perspective, a 550 W PSU is the minimum suggested — builders who want overclocking headroom on the unlocked multiplier (the CPU is multiplier-unlocked) would reasonably look for a higher-wattage unit, but the data only specifies 550 W as the suggestion. The platform supports PCIe 5.0 x16 for the GPU, which is fully compatible with the RX 9070's PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data shows the CPU and GPU are both on active production status with recent release dates (CPU: 2022-09-26, GPU: 2025-03-05). The CPU's socket 1700 and memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 mean that a motherboard upgrade could go either way depending on what the builder already owns. The GPU's PCIe 5.0 interface is forward-compatible with any modern motherboard. The integrated graphics on the CPU also means that a GPU failure or removal doesn't brick the system entirely. For future upgrades, the platform is current enough that neither component is a bottleneck in terms of interface standards — PCIe Gen 5 on the CPU side matches the GPU's bus interface.

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The die size is 257 mm². Clock speeds are 3.00 GHz base and 5.80 GHz boost, which is a large single-core boost window for lightly threaded workloads. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This cache structure benefits workloads that reuse data across cores, such as physics simulations or database processing. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, dual-channel, with ECC capability.

Benchmark data shows the 13900K performs exceptionally well in multi-threaded tests. Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 and single-core score of 2,238.5 demonstrate strong scaling from the 24 cores. Cinebench R20 scores are 20,740 multicore and 2,927 single-core. Geekbench multicore reaches 22,820 and single-core 2,628. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show the core count working: 2 threads score 2,355, 4 threads score 4,648, 8 threads score 8,520, 16 threads score 11,201, and max threads score 15,509. The single-thread score of 1,187 confirms that the boost clock of 5.80 GHz translates to strong per-core performance. Passmark tests reinforce this: multithread score of 58,589, single-thread score of 4,608, integer math at 207,792, floating point math at 151,562, and extended instructions at 46,477. Data compression scores 793,645, encryption 46,609, and physics 3,140.

The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 61,766. Its nearest rivals are extremely close: the Intel Core i9-13900T scores 61,723 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61,834 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i9-13900KF scores 61,841 (0.1% ahead), and the Intel Xeon 636 scores 61,360 (0.7% behind). These deltaPct values are negligible, meaning the 13900K is effectively performance-par with its nearest competitors. For real workloads, the data indicates this is a top-tier desktop CPU for both single-threaded responsiveness and heavily parallel tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing. The 32 threads handle multi-threaded workloads with ease, while the 5.80 GHz boost ensures snappy single-thread performance for older or less parallel software.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this build is 81, which indicates the pair sits above the majority of all CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU's 92nd percentile versus the GPU's 69th percentile reveals a significant mismatch in relative performance tiers. The CPU is near the top of the desktop stack, while the GPU is a solid mid-to-high-tier card but not a flagship. In CPU-bound workloads — such as lightly threaded games, physics calculations, or compilation tasks — the GPU will not be the limiting factor; the CPU can feed it easily. In GPU-bound workloads, such as high-resolution gaming with maxed settings, the GPU's 69th percentile position means it will cap frame rates well before the CPU's headroom is exhausted.

The 3DMark thread scaling data on the CPU demonstrates that the 13900K scales nearly linearly from 2 to 16 threads, then continues scaling to max threads. This means even heavily threaded workloads that use all 32 threads will see benefit, but the GPU's compute capacity (36.13 TFLOPS FP32) will be the ceiling for graphics tasks. The CPU's Passmark physics score of 3,140 and the GPU's Passmark GPU compute score of 14,737 indicate that for compute-heavy rendering tasks, the GPU does the heavy lifting, while the CPU handles scene setup and physics. For gaming, the deltaPct between the GPU and its rivals (all within 1.2%) suggests that swapping the RX 9070 for any of those near-identical cards would produce imperceptible differences — the bottleneck is the GPU's absolute performance tier, not its specific model.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 69th percentile and the CPU's 92nd percentile mean that at 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rates, the CPU will not hold back frame generation, but the GPU will determine the ceiling. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6,290 indicates modern DX12 titles will run smoothly, though the GPU's nearest rivals are all within 1.2% performance, so expect frame rates in line with those cards.

Streaming: The CPU's 32 threads and strong multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 multicore 38,271.5, Passmark multithread 58,589) provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth handle the rendering side without memory pressure.

Video editing: The CPU's data compression score of 793,645 and encryption score of 46,609 suggest fast timeline operations and export encoding. The GPU's 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 GB VRAM accelerate effect rendering and color grading. The combination handles 4K projects with ease, and the CPU's 36 MB L3 cache helps with random access patterns in editing software.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 is excellent for CPU-based rendering, while the GPU's 56 ray tracing cores and 36.13 TFLOPS FP32 support GPU-accelerated renderers. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for complex scenes without out-of-core spills.

Software development: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads compile code quickly, with Passmark integer math at 207,792 and extended instructions at 46,477. The GPU's compute capability accelerates ML inference and data processing tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,608 in Passmark and 1,187 in 3DMark ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for basic tasks. This build is overkill for spreadsheets and documents, but the data shows it handles them without breaking a sweat.

# Who Should Build It

This combination targets enthusiasts and professionals who need top-tier CPU performance and solid GPU capability. Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit from the CPU's 92nd percentile ensuring no frame drops from CPU bottlenecks, though the GPU's 69th percentile means settings may need tuning for 4K ultra. Content creators working with video, 3D rendering, or large datasets will appreciate the CPU's 32 threads and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant time savings from the CPU's multi-threaded scores. Students and office workers in engineering, data science, or creative fields will find the CPU handles coursework and the GPU accelerates any compute assignments. Small business workstations that run financial modeling, CAD, or video production will be well served by the ECC memory support and the CPU's data encryption score of 46,609.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 61,766, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900T, scores 61,723 (0.1% behind), while the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61,834 (0.1% ahead). The Intel Core i9-13900KF scores 61,841 (0.1% ahead), and the Intel Xeon 636 scores 61,360 (0.7% behind). The CPU's multi-threaded performance is outstanding: Cinebench R23 multicore 38,271.5, Cinebench R20 multicore 20,740, Geekbench multicore 22,820, and 3DMark max threads 15,509. Single-thread scores are equally strong: Cinebench R23 single-core 2,238.5, Geekbench single-core 2,628, and 3DMark single-thread 1,187.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 23,877, placing it at the 69th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z, scores 23,736 (0.6% behind), while the AMD Radeon RX 6800S scores 24,063 (0.8% ahead). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile scores 23,628 (1.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER scores 24,170 (1.2% ahead). The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 131,539 highlight its compute and rendering capability. The combined percentile for this build is 81, meaning this pairing outperforms 81% of all tested CPU-GPU combinations. The CPU is the dominant component by a wide margin in relative performance, which is the defining characteristic of this build.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 81, meaning this build outperforms 81% of all tested CPU-GPU combinations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900T?

A: The 13900K scores 61,766 on average, while the 13900T scores 61,723, which is 0.1% behind. The difference is negligible.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 9070 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900K has ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 550 W, based on the CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 220 W TDP.

Q: What PCIe generation does the GPU use?

A: The RX 9070 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, which matches the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Q: How far apart are the CPU and GPU in percentile rankings?

A: The CPU is at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 69th percentile of all GPUs — a 23-point gap indicating the CPU is significantly stronger relative to its peers.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for the Intel Core i9-13900K with the AMD Radeon RX 9070. All frame rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6,290 and its Passmark G3D score of 25,381, combined with the CPU's 92nd percentile performance, indicate that at 1080p and 1440p, the GPU will be the primary limiter in most titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,608 in Passmark ensures no bottleneck in game logic or draw calls. At 4K resolution, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth support high texture quality, but the 69th percentile GPU performance means ultra settings at 4K will likely require compromises on frame rate. The nearest GPU rivals (RTX 2080 SUPER, RX 6800S) all score within 1.2% of the RX 9070, so expect performance in line with those cards — roughly mid-to-high-tier for 1440p gaming, with 4K playable at adjusted settings. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and 5.80 GHz boost clock minimize frame time spikes in CPU-bound scenes. For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU will push very high frame rates, but the GPU will cap them somewhere below what the CPU alone could support.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + AMD Radeon RX 9070

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Radeon RX 9070

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds