SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + AMD Radeon RX 7700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7700

15,852 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 is a desktop configuration that combines a flagship 24-core processor with a modern mid-to-upper-range graphics card. The benchmark data shows a significant disparity in class between the two components: the CPU sits at the 92nd percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits at the 58th percentile of all graphics cards. This pairing is defined by an extremely capable compute processor driving a competent, but not class-leading, graphics solution. The following analysis breaks down the specific performance characteristics, workload implications, and target use cases based strictly on the provided benchmark data.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture and the Navi 32 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s. The memory clocks are listed as 2438 MHz with 19.5 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has a base clock of 1900 MHz, a game clock of 2041 MHz, and a boost clock of 2459 MHz. The board power is rated at 200 W, requiring a 550 W suggested PSU and dual 8-pin power connectors.

The GPU features 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. For ray tracing, it includes 40 dedicated RT cores. The compute capabilities are rated at 25.18 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio for those operations. Pixel and texture fill rates are 236.1 GPixel/s and 393.4 GTexel/s, respectively. The card supports PCIe 4.0 x16 and offers display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The synthetic benchmark results show a mixed performance profile. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RX 7700 scores 2865. The PassMark G3D score is 20974, while the PassMark GPU Compute score is lower at 10963. The Geekbench OpenCL score is significantly higher at 106028. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15852, placing it at the 58th percentile. This percentile indicates that the RX 7700 is positioned in the middle of the performance pack. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, include the AMD Radeon R9 370X (score 15862, delta -0.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (score 16014, delta -1%), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (score 15679, delta 1.1%). The data shows it performs nearly identically to these cards, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (score 16129) being 1.7% ahead. This suggests that for gaming and rendering workloads that rely on raw rasterization, the RX 7700 is a solid performer but is not positioned in the top tier of graphics cards.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system’s average benchmark score is 61766, placing it in the 75th percentile for all configurations. This is a strong overall position, driven almost entirely by the CPU’s high score. The Intel Core i9-13900K has an enormous processing advantage, which inflates the system’s combined percentile. The GPU’s lower percentile is the limiting factor in the overall score.

The CPU benchmarks are exceptional. In Cinebench R23, the i9-13900K scores 38271.5 in multi-core and 2238.5 in single-core. Cinebench R20 scores are 20740 multi-core and 2927 single-core. The Geekbench scores are 22820 multi-core and 2628 single-core. The 3DMark CPU tests show scaling from 1187 in single-thread to 15509 in max-threads, with intermediate scores of 2355 for 2 threads, 4648 for 4 threads, 8520 for 8 threads, and 11201 for 16 threads. The PassMark multithread score is 58589, with a single-thread score of 4608. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 61766, placing it at the 92nd percentile. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-13900T (61723, delta 0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834, delta -0.1%), and the Intel Core i9-13900KF (61841, delta -0.1%), showing that the 13900K is essentially tied with these top-tier processors.

The GPU benchmarks, as noted, are more modest. The PassMark G3D score of 20974 and the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2865 are representative of its class. The combined picture is a system that can handle massively parallel CPU tasks with ease but is capped by the GPU in graphics-intensive scenarios. The data indicates that the CPU is the dominant component in this pairing by a wide margin, with a percentile difference of 34 points.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck in this system. The CPU’s 92nd percentile rank versus the GPU’s 58th percentile rank shows a substantial imbalance. The CPU is far more powerful relative to its peers than the GPU is relative to its peers. This means that in tasks that are heavily dependent on the GPU, the RX 7700 will be the limiting factor, preventing the i9-13900K from reaching its full potential.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data, as there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. However, the benchmark scores indicate that the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most gaming or rendering scenarios. The i9-13900K’s 3DMark max-threads score of 15509 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 are far higher than what most applications require. Conversely, the RX 7700’s average score of 15852 is only slightly above its nearest rival, the Radeon R9 370X, suggesting that the GPU will saturate its capabilities much earlier than the CPU.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, or 3D scene preparation, the i9-13900K will excel, and the GPU will have minimal impact. In GPU-bound workloads like high-resolution gaming or final frame rendering, the RX 7700 will be the constraining hardware. The data suggests that this configuration is well-suited for users who prioritize CPU-heavy productivity and are willing to accept mid-range GPU performance, or for those who plan to upgrade the GPU later without changing the platform.

Who Should Build It

This build is tailored for users who require extreme multi-threaded processing power. The i9-13900K’s performance is its primary asset, making this system ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D modeling, and software compilation, where the CPU’s high multi-core scores are directly beneficial. The 24-core, 32-thread configuration is a strong asset for developers compiling large codebases or running multiple virtual machines.

For gamers, this system is not optimized for high-refresh 4K gaming, as the GPU lacks the necessary horsepower. The GPU is more suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming, but the CPU is overkill for these tasks. This pairing makes more sense for a workstation that can also play games at moderate settings. Students and small business workstations that run CPU-intensive simulations, data analysis, or financial modeling would see direct benefits from the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 58589 and data compression score of 793645. However, these users should be aware that the GPU is the weaker link, and workloads that are graphically intensive will not see the same level of performance as CPU-based tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and includes ECC memory support. It is designed for the Intel Socket 1700 and features PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU. The chip has a 125 W TDP and includes integrated UHD Graphics 770. It has a 36 MB shared L3 cache, with 2 MB L2 cache per core and 80 KB L1 cache per core. The die size is 257 mm². The CPU was released in late September 2022.

The benchmark scores confirm the CPU’s dominance in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 is an indicator of its massive parallel processing capability. The single-core score of 2238.5 is also high, ensuring snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks. The Geekbench single-core score of 2628 and multi-core score of 22820 align with these results. The PassMark tests show strong performance in specific tasks: data encryption at 46609, extended instructions at 46477, floating point math at 151562, and integer math at 207792. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 61766 is at the 92nd percentile, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900T, has a nearly identical average score of 61723, showing that the 13900K is at the top of its performance tier.

Gaming Performance

The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all FPS figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The RX 7700’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2865 and PassMark G3D score of 20974 suggest it is a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming card. The GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and 624.1 GB/s bandwidth provide ample memory for modern game textures at these resolutions.

For esports titles and older games, the RX 7700 should easily deliver high frame rates at 1080p with ultra settings, likely exceeding 144 FPS in many cases. At 1440p, frame rates would be lower but still playable, potentially in the 60-100 FPS range for demanding titles. At 4K, the GPU is likely to struggle with ultra settings, and users would need to lower settings or use upscaling technologies to achieve playable frame rates. The i9-13900K is not a bottleneck in any gaming scenario; its single-thread score of 4608 in PassMark ensures it can feed the GPU effectively. The estimated gaming performance is solid for mainstream resolutions but falls short of high-refresh 4K gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 75, placing it above the majority of configurations but below the top tier.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900T?

A: The i9-13900K has an average benchmark score of 61766, which is 0.1% higher than the i9-13900T’s score of 61723, indicating they are effectively tied in performance.

Q: How much VRAM does the AMD Radeon RX 7700 have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 624.1 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile rank and its nearest competitor?

A: The GPU is at the 58th percentile. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon R9 370X with an average score of 15862, which is 0.1% lower than the RX 7700’s score of 15852.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Intel Core i9-13900K?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

Q: Does the RX 7700 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 40 dedicated ray tracing cores, but its overall benchmark scores suggest it is not a top-tier performer in this area.

Q: What is the TDP of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W, and the GPU has a board power of 200 W.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build that combines a flagship-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU. The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor from the Raptor Lake generation, featuring a maximum boost clock of 5.80 GHz. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 is a 16 GB graphics card based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with a boost clock of 2459 MHz. The system’s overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 75, is upper-mid-range. The CPU’s 92nd percentile indicates it is a top-tier processor, while the GPU’s 58th percentile shows it is a solid but not exceptional graphics solution. This pairing is best described as a workstation-class CPU with a mainstream gaming GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RX 7700 is estimated to handle 1080p and 1440p gaming well, based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2865. The i9-13900K will not limit frame rates, but the GPU is not positioned for 4K high-refresh gaming.

Streaming: The i9-13900K’s 24 cores and high PassMark multithread score of 58589 provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming while maintaining game performance on the RX 7700.

Video Editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38271.5 makes it excellent for video encoding and rendering tasks. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for effects and timeline previews, though it is not the primary strength of this system.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will be exceptionally fast. Tasks that rely on the GPU for final output will be limited by the RX 7700’s compute score of 10963, which is moderate.

Software Development: Compilation times will be very short thanks to the CPU’s high multi-threaded performance. The large L3 cache of 36 MB and high integer math score of 207792 are beneficial for code builds.

Student and Office Work: This system is overkill for basic tasks, but it will handle any student workload, including heavy data analysis in spreadsheets or running complex simulations, with ease. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4608 ensures snappy performance in standard applications.