SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7600

15,171 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 represents a study in stark contrast. The CPU is a flagship 24-core processor with a 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range 8 GB card sitting at the 57th percentile. This creates a desktop build where the processor vastly outperforms the graphics card in raw compute potential, a dynamic visible across all benchmark categories. The following analysis examines the specifications, performance data, and workload implications of this pairing.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, specifically using the Navi 33 chip manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The GPU contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. Its memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. The GPU's base clock is 1720 MHz, with a game clock of 2250 MHz and a boost clock of 2655 MHz.

The compute configuration includes 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The card features 32 ray accelerators for RT workloads, though it lacks dedicated tensor cores. Pixel fill rate is rated at 169.9 GPixel/s, and texture rate at 339.8 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is 21.75 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The card has a TDP of 165 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested power supply of 450 W. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x8 interface and offers display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Benchmark scores for the RX 7600 show a mixed picture. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 2310. Geekbench results show 88051 in OpenCL and 34401 in Vulkan. Passmark scores include 16634 for G3D and 8790 for GPU compute, with legacy DirectX tests scoring 84 for DX10, 172 for DX11, 58 for DX12, and 226 for DX9. The GPU's average benchmark score is 15171, placing it at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM with a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Radeon Pro 560X at 0.6%, the AMD Radeon 680M at -0.7%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti at 0.7%. These deltas are all within 1%, showing the RX 7600 sits in a very tight competitive cluster. For rendering workloads, the 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides solid rasterization capability, while the 32 RT cores offer entry-level ray tracing support, though the absence of tensor cores means AI-accelerated tasks will rely on standard compute paths.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all gaming performance discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores, not from direct measurement. The analysis must treat these figures as projections based on the synthetic and compute benchmarks available.

The RX 7600's 57th percentile GPU ranking and its average benchmark score of 15171 suggest it is a capable 1080p gaming card, but not one designed for extreme resolutions. The 8 GB memory capacity, while adequate for current titles at 1080p, may become a limiting factor in future games with higher texture requirements. The 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is moderate, and the 128-bit bus width constrains memory throughput relative to higher-tier cards. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2310 reinforces the GPU's position as a mid-range performer.

For 1080p gaming at ultra settings, the RX 7600 would be expected to deliver playable frame rates in most titles, given its DirectX 12 Ultimate support and 12_2 feature level. At 1440p, performance would likely drop, with some games requiring settings reductions to maintain smooth gameplay. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 16634, compared to its nearest rivals all within 0.7%, indicates it performs nearly identically to cards like the RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon 680M. The 4 GB VRAM difference between the RX 7600 and the 680M, however, gives the former an advantage in texture-heavy scenes. The estimated frame rates would be moderate, not exceptional, reflecting the GPU's mid-tier status. The CPU's immense power does not change the GPU's inherent limits; the graphics card remains the primary determinant of raw FPS in GPU-bound scenarios.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-S. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The base clock is 3.00 GHz, boosting up to 5.80 GHz. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory support available. It offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The TDP is 125 W. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770. The processor uses the Intel Socket 1700 interface and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The benchmark scores for the 13900K are exceptional. In Cinebench R23, it scores 38271.5 in multicore and 2238.5 in single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 20740 multicore and 2927 single-core. Geekbench results are 22820 multicore and 2628 single-core. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 11201 for 16 threads, 2355 for 2 threads, 4648 for 4 threads, 8520 for 8 threads, 15509 for max threads, and 1187 for single thread. Passmark results include 58589 for multithread, 4608 for single thread, 207792 for integer math, 151562 for floating point math, 793645 for data compression, 46609 for data encryption, and 46477 for extended instructions.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 61766, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-13900T with a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at -0.1%, the Intel Core i9-13900KF at -0.1%, and the Intel Xeon 636 at 0.7%. These deltas are tiny, indicating the 13900K sits at the very top of the performance hierarchy. The single-thread score of 4608 in Passmark and 2238.5 in Cinebench R23 indicate outstanding per-core performance, crucial for lightly-threaded workloads. The multicore scores are equally impressive, with the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 38271.5 demonstrating massive parallel throughput. For real workloads, this CPU excels at video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and any multi-threaded task. The data compression score of 793645 and encryption score of 46609 further highlight its strength in data-intensive tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU is pronounced. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile, while the GPU is at the 57th percentile. This 35-point gap means the 13900K will be the limiting factor in almost no workload; the RX 7600 will throttle overall system performance in graphics-intensive scenarios. The CPU's average benchmark score of 61766 dwarfs the GPU's 15171, though these numbers measure different things and are not directly comparable.

In gaming at 1080p, the RX 7600 is likely the bottleneck, as the GPU's mid-range compute capabilities will cap frame rates before the CPU's 24 cores are fully utilized. The CPU's single-thread score of 4608 in Passmark is more than sufficient to feed the GPU's pixel and texture pipelines. At higher resolutions, the GPU bottleneck becomes even more pronounced. For productivity workloads like video editing or 3D rendering, the CPU dominates. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 ensures the 13900K will handle multi-threaded rendering tasks with ease, while the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 performance may be sufficient for GPU-accelerated effects but will not match the CPU's relative strength.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this: the GPU's nearest rivals include the Radeon 680M, an integrated solution, and older discrete cards like the GTX 660 Ti, all within 0.7% performance. This shows the RX 7600 is not a high-end part. The CPU, conversely, rivals the 13900KF and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, both top-tier processors. The system is CPU-overpowered relative to the GPU. For users prioritizing frame rates, the GPU is the first upgrade target. For users prioritizing compute-heavy tasks like compilation or rendering, the CPU provides headroom that the GPU cannot match.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's benchmark percentile and average score?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K has an average benchmark score of 61766, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest rival in benchmark performance?

A: The RX 7600's average benchmark score is 15171. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon 680M with a score of 15270, representing a delta of -0.7%, meaning the RX 7600 is slightly slower.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and memory clock of 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU scores 38271.5 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2238.5 in single-core.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900K has ECC memory support enabled.

Q: What is the GPU's TDP and suggested power supply?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 165 W and a suggested power supply of 450 W.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 75.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, the RX 7600's 57th percentile ranking and 16634 Passmark G3D score suggest it can drive moderate frame rates, but the CPU's 92nd percentile ensures it will not be the limiting factor. The 8 GB VRAM may require texture quality reductions in some titles. For streaming, the 13900K's 32 threads and 38271.5 Cinebench R23 multicore score provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, though the GPU's compute performance may limit in-game FPS during simultaneous loads. Video editing benefits from the CPU's 207792 Passmark integer math score and 793645 data compression score, enabling fast timeline scrubbing and export, while the GPU accelerates effects via its 21.75 TFLOPS FP32. 3D rendering workloads rely heavily on the CPU's multicore might, with the 15509 3DMark max threads score indicating strong performance in CPU-based renderers; GPU rendering would be slower due to the RX 7600's mid-range compute. Software development sees the CPU's 58589 Passmark multithread score speeding up compilation, and the 46609 encryption score aids secure builds. Student and office work is over-served by this pairing; the CPU's 4608 single-thread score handles spreadsheets and browsers effortlessly, and the GPU's 984 Passmark G2D score is more than adequate for desktop tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers playing at 1080p who want a smooth experience without extreme graphical demands. The RX 7600's performance, nearly identical to the RTX 3050 OEM and Radeon 680M, confirms it is a 1080p-focused card. Content creators working with video editing or 3D modeling will benefit from the 13900K's dominant CPU scores, particularly the 22820 Geekbench multicore result, allowing fast rendering and encoding. Developers compiling large codebases will see significant time savings from the 32 threads and 207740 Cinebench R20 multicore score. Students in engineering or computer science programs requiring heavy parallel computation will find the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking valuable. Small business workstations handling data analysis or financial modeling can leverage the 793645 data compression score for rapid processing. However, users seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere, as the GPU's 57th percentile and 8 GB VRAM will struggle at those resolutions.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900K and AMD Radeon RX 7600. The CPU is a flagship 13th Gen Core processor, released on 2022-09-26 with a launch MSRP of $589. The GPU is from the Radeon RX 7000 series, released on 2023-05-24 with a launch MSRP of 269 USD. The pairing's combined percentile is 75, indicating it outperforms the majority of systems, but the individual component percentiles reveal a significant imbalance: the CPU at 92 and the GPU at 57. This system is best described as a CPU-centric workstation with a modest graphics card. The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads at up to 5.80 GHz boost represent top-tier performance, while the GPU's 2048 shading units and 8 GB memory represent only mid-range capability. The overall tier, based on the 75th combined percentile, places this build in the upper-middle range of all systems, though its CPU is in the top 8% and its GPU is in the lower half of the top 57%.

Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900K achieves an average benchmark score of 61766, placing it at the 92nd percentile. Its standout results include a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5, a Geekbench multicore score of 22820, and a Passmark multithread score of 58589. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 achieves an average benchmark score of 15171, placing it at the 57th percentile. Its key results include a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2310, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 88051, and a Passmark G3D score of 16634. The combined picture is one of extreme CPU dominance. The CPU's performance is within 0.1% of the Intel Core i9-13900T and Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus, showing it is at the very top of its class. The GPU's performance is within 0.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti, a card from a much older generation. This contrast means the system's overall benchmark profile is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound tasks. In any workload that uses the GPU heavily, the system will perform at the GPU's level, not the CPU's. The combined percentile of 75 reflects this asymmetry, being closer to the GPU's 57 than the CPU's 92.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The system uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the GPU's TDP is 165 W, with a suggested power supply of 450 W for the GPU. The CPU's multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking with appropriate cooling. The platform supports ECC memory, which is useful for workstation stability. A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the RX 7600 with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU has significant headroom, as its 92nd percentile ranking means it will not bottleneck a faster graphics card. The 450 W suggested PSU may need to be increased if a more powerful GPU is installed, as the current GPU only requires 165 W. The 8 GB VRAM on the RX 7600 is a limiting factor for modern titles at higher resolutions, and an upgrade to a GPU with more memory and higher compute performance would balance the system. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and 5.80 GHz boost clock ensure it remains relevant for future workloads. Memory can be expanded or upgraded to faster DDR5 modules, as the platform supports both standards. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU allow for future high-bandwidth storage devices or other expansion cards. Overall, the platform has strong longevity, but the GPU is the clear weak point and the first component to consider replacing.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + AMD Radeon RX 7600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Radeon RX 7600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds