SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900K + AMD Radeon RX 7400

This desktop pairing combines the top-tier Intel Core i9-13900K processor, which sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 61,766, with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 graphics card, a decidedly entry-level component that sits at only the 17th percentile among all GPUs with an average score of 2,467. The combined percentile for this build is 55, placing it near the middle of all tracked configurations, but the enormous gap between CPU and GPU capability defines every workload discussion that follows.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p or 1440p with high refresh rate monitors, the Radeon RX 7400 becomes the limiting factor. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 11,897 places it just 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 710M and 1.8% ahead of the Intel HD Graphics 610, which indicates it is primarily suited for esports and older titles at moderate settings rather than demanding AAA games at high frame rates. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,608 in PassMark and 3DMark single-thread score of 1,187 are more than sufficient to feed frames, but the GPU cannot translate that headroom into high FPS.

Streaming: The i9-13900K's 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcast workloads. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 58,589 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 indicate that software encoding while gaming would not strain the processor, though the RX 7400's modest compute capabilities mean the GPU itself contributes little to the streaming pipeline. The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for capture buffers but not for GPU-accelerated encoding workloads that demand higher throughput.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing, preview rendering, and export operations in editors like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve benefit from the i9-13900K's strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20,740 and Geekbench multicore score of 22,820 show that the CPU can handle 4K timeline operations and render exports efficiently. The RX 7400's FP32 throughput of 16.49 TFLOPS and 28 ray accelerators provide some GPU acceleration for effects and color grading, but the GPU's 17th percentile standing means complex GPU-accelerated effects will be slow.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender Cycles or V-Ray will perform exceptionally well given the i9-13900K's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5, which is among the highest recorded for consumer processors. However, GPU-accelerated rendering with the RX 7400 will lag considerably; its PassMark GPU compute score of 5,152 and FP32 performance of 16.49 TFLOPS place it far below what professional render workloads require. The 8 GB VRAM also limits scene complexity for GPU rendering.

Software development: Compilation workloads scale directly with core count and thread count, and the i9-13900K's 24 cores and 32 threads, coupled with its 36 MB of shared L3 cache, make it an excellent choice for large C++ or Rust projects. The PassMark data compression score of 793,645 and integer math score of 207,792 reflect strong throughput for build tools and static analysis. The RX 7400's graphics capabilities are irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a lopsided but functional developer machine.

Student and office work: For document editing, spreadsheet analysis, web browsing, and productivity suites, this build is massively overprovisioned on the CPU side. The i9-13900K's PassMark single-thread score of 4,608 ensures snappy responsiveness, while the RX 7400's PassMark G2D score of 1,209 is adequate for 2D desktop acceleration and video playback. Students or office workers would never utilize the CPU's full multi-threaded potential, making this a high-cost configuration for modest workloads.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Radeon RX 7400 capable of playing modern games at high settings?

A: No. The GPU sits at the 17th percentile among all GPUs, with its PassMark G3D score of 11,897 ranking just 1.4% above the NVIDIA GeForce 710M and 1.8% above the Intel HD Graphics 610. Its DirectX 12 PassMark score of 44 and DirectX 11 score of 97 indicate very low modern API performance.

Q: How does the Core i9-13900K compare to its closest rivals?

A: The i9-13900K has an average benchmark score of 61,766, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i9-13900T (61,723), 0.1% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61,834), and 0.1% lower than the Intel Core i9-13900KF (61,841). It also leads the Intel Xeon 636 (61,360) by 0.7%.

Q: What is the recommended power supply for this build?

A: The suggested PSU wattage is 200 W, based on the GPU's 43 W TDP and the CPU's 125 W TDP. This is a relatively modest power requirement for a desktop system with these components.

Q: Does the RX 7400 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 28 ray accelerators and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features. However, given the GPU's overall performance tier, ray-traced workloads will run at very low frame rates.

Q: What memory types does the i9-13900K support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. It also supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer desktop processor.

Q: Is the i9-13900K's integrated graphics sufficient for basic display output?

A: Yes, the CPU includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics. This provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails, and it handles 2D tasks adequately.

Q: What is the release timeline for these components?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K was released on 2022-09-26 with a launch MSRP of $589. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 was released on 2025-08-07.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the Intel Core i9-13900K demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded capability. In Cinebench R23, the processor scores 38,271.5 in multicore and 2,238.5 in single-core tests. The Cinebench R20 results show 20,740 multicore and 2,927 single-core. Geekbench scores reach 22,820 multicore and 2,628 single-core. The 3DMark suite shows scaling from 1,187 single-thread to 15,509 max threads, with intermediate results of 2,355 for 2 threads, 4,648 for 4 threads, 8,520 for 8 threads, and 11,201 for 16 threads. PassMark results include 58,589 multithread, 4,608 single-thread, 207,792 integer math, 151,562 floating point math, 793,645 data compression, 46,609 data encryption, 46,477 extended instructions, and 87,705 random string sorting. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its position near the top of consumer processors, with an average benchmark score of 61,766.

The GPU benchmarks for the AMD Radeon RX 7400 paint a very different picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,103. PassMark results show 11,897 for G3D, 5,152 for GPU compute, 1,209 for G2D, 176 for DirectX 9, 97 for DirectX 11, 59 for DirectX 10, and 44 for DirectX 12. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the entry-level segment, with an average benchmark score of 2,467. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 8040S (1.1% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce 710M (1.4% ahead), Intel HD Graphics 610 (1.8% ahead), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (1.9% ahead).

The combined picture is a system where the CPU contributes the vast majority of compute capability. The 92nd percentile CPU paired with a 17th percentile GPU creates an extreme imbalance, with the combined percentile of 55 reflecting the average of these two very different performance tiers.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform with the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process node from Intel. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, along with ECC memory support. PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The motherboard platform is mature, having been introduced with the 12th generation and carried through the 13th generation, meaning BIOS updates may be required for optimal compatibility.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots but will operate at PCIe 4.0 speeds. The GPU's 43 W TDP and suggested PSU of 200 W leave enormous headroom for a future GPU upgrade without changing the power supply. A sensible next step would be to replace the RX 7400 with a mid-range or high-end GPU that better matches the CPU's performance tier, as the CPU's 92nd percentile standing means it can support even the most demanding graphics cards without bottlenecking.

The platform's memory support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives builders flexibility, though DDR5 would better complement the CPU's high core count for memory-intensive workloads. The 36 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache provide substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data. The socket 1700 platform has been widely adopted, ensuring broad motherboard availability across price points.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the i9-13900K and RX 7400 is the defining characteristic of this build. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 17th percentile ranking means the GPU will bottleneck virtually every graphics-intensive workload. In gaming, the CPU can compute game logic, physics, and AI at rates far exceeding what the GPU can render, but frame rates will be constrained by the GPU's output capability. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 3,140 and single-thread score of 4,608 indicate no meaningful CPU-side limitation in games, while the GPU's PassMark DirectX 12 score of 44 suggests severe limitations in modern game rendering.

For productivity workloads, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, and 3D scene processing will perform at the CPU's high level, with the GPU contributing little. GPU-bound workloads like real-time effects rendering, GPU-accelerated encoding, and graphics design will be severely constrained by the RX 7400's modest compute capabilities. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 16.49 TFLOPS and texture rate of 257.6 GTexel/s are far below what professional graphics workstations require.

The FPS scaling evidence, based on the benchmark scores rather than measured game data, indicates that upgrading the GPU would provide dramatic frame rate improvements across all games and GPU-accelerated applications, while upgrading the CPU would yield negligible gains since it already operates in the top 8% of all processors.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p with esports preferences: Players focused on competitive titles like Counter-Strike, Valorant, or League of Legends at 1080p with low-to-medium settings may find the RX 7400 sufficient, as these games are less demanding. The CPU's high single-thread performance ensures consistent frame pacing, though the GPU's 17th percentile standing means high refresh rates above 144 Hz are unlikely in most titles.

Content creators prioritizing CPU-render workflows: Editors and motion graphics artists who use CPU-based rendering in After Effects, Premiere Pro, or Cinema 4D will benefit from the i9-13900K's 38,271.5 Cinebench R23 multicore score. The RX 7400 provides basic GPU acceleration for effects and previews, but this build is not suited for GPU-render pipelines.

Software developers: The 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with 36 MB of L3 cache, make this an excellent compilation workstation. Developers working on large codebases will see fast build times, and the GPU is adequate for multiple monitor setups and IDE rendering.

Students and office workers: This configuration is vastly overprovisioned for document processing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work. The CPU's capabilities go largely unused, and the GPU's 2D performance (PassMark G2D score of 1,209) is adequate but not exceptional for productivity displays.

Small business workstations: For businesses running CPU-intensive applications like financial modeling, data analysis, or engineering simulation, the i9-13900K provides strong single-threaded and multi-threaded performance. The GPU's modest capabilities are sufficient for standard office graphics, though GPU-accelerated visualization tools would struggle.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². It operates with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a TDP of 125 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with ECC memory support included. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the launch MSRP was $589.

Benchmark results confirm the i9-13900K's position at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 demonstrates exceptional sustained multi-threaded performance, while the single-core score of 2,238.5 shows strong per-thread capability. The 3DMark thread scaling from 1,187 single-thread to 15,509 max threads reveals near-linear scaling up to 16 threads, with diminishing returns at higher thread counts. PassMark results show particularly strong integer math (207,792) and floating point math (151,562), reflecting the CPU's capability in compute-heavy workloads.

The nearest rival comparisons show the i9-13900K is effectively tied with the i9-13900KF (0.1% lower), Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (0.1% lower), and i9-13900T (0.1% higher), with a 0.7% lead over the Intel Xeon 636. This indicates that the 13th generation architecture is already at its performance ceiling, and the unlocked multiplier provides limited additional headroom beyond the stock boost clock of 5.80 GHz.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining Intel's flagship 13th generation consumer processor with AMD's entry-level Radeon RX 7000 series graphics card. The combined percentile of 55 places this configuration exactly in the middle of all tracked builds, but this average masks the extreme skew between components. The i9-13900K at the 92nd CPU percentile is a top-tier processor suitable for the most demanding workloads, while the RX 7400 at the 17th GPU percentile is suitable only for basic graphics tasks and undemanding games.

The pairing is unusual in that the CPU costs more than the GPU by a significant margin (the CPU's launch MSRP of $589 versus the GPU's unlisted price), and the performance characteristics are wildly mismatched. This is not a balanced gaming build, nor is it a balanced workstation build. It is best understood as a CPU-centric system where graphics performance is secondary, suitable for users who prioritize processor throughput above all else.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's 17th percentile standing among all GPUs, with a PassMark G3D score of 11,897, indicates that this card performs at roughly the level of integrated graphics solutions from the same era.

Based on the GPU's DirectX benchmark scores — 176 for DirectX 9, 97 for DirectX 11, and 44 for DirectX 12 — estimated gaming performance is as follows. For older or esports titles running at 1080p with low settings, the RX 7400 may achieve playable frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for games that are several years old. For modern AAA titles at 1080p with medium settings, frame rates are likely to fall below 60 FPS, and at 1440p, the GPU would struggle to maintain playable frame rates even at low settings. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but may be exceeded by high-resolution texture packs in newer games.

The CPU's contribution to gaming is effectively negligible as a bottleneck; the i9-13900K's single-thread score of 4,608 in PassMark and 1,187 in 3DMark single-thread ensure that even the fastest GPUs would not be CPU-limited in most scenarios. However, the RX 7400's performance ceiling means the CPU's gaming advantage is entirely unrealized.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is based on the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1452 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a boost clock of 2300 MHz. Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU includes 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 28 ray accelerators. Pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s, texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput is 16.49 TFLOPS with FP16 at 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1). The TDP is 43 W, requiring a 200 W suggested PSU and a single 6-pin power connector. The card is dual-slot with display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1.

Benchmark results confirm the GPU's entry-level positioning. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 is very low, and PassMark scores of 11,897 for G3D, 5,152 for GPU compute, and 44 for DirectX 12 show that this card is not designed for modern gaming or compute workloads. The DirectX 9 score of 176 is the highest of the DirectX benchmarks, indicating the architecture is better suited to older APIs and workloads.

The nearest rival comparisons show the RX 7400 sits just 1.1% above the AMD Radeon 8040S, 1.4% above the NVIDIA GeForce 710M, 1.8% above the Intel HD Graphics 610, and 1.9% above the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M. These are all integrated or entry-level discrete graphics solutions, confirming the RX 7400's position at the bottom of the discrete GPU market. For rendering workloads, the 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 28 ray accelerators provide basic acceleration, but the 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit scene complexity and texture throughput. The GPU's 17th percentile standing makes it suitable for 2D desktop use, video playback, and very light 3D workloads, but it is not a gaming or rendering GPU by modern standards.