SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700

30,433 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture and manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The chip features a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with a thermal design power of 125 W. Its cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 pool. Memory support spans both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel memory bus, and the processor also carries ECC memory support, making it suitable for workstation-adjacent tasks. The CPU includes UHD Graphics 770 as integrated graphics, though this pairing with a discrete GPU means that iGPU is largely a fallback option.

Benchmark data places the i9-13900K at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61,766. Its nearest rivals highlight just how tightly packed the top tier is: the Core i9-13900T scores 61,723 (0.1% lower), the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus scores 61,834 (0.1% higher), and the Core i9-13900KF scores 61,841 (0.1% higher). The Intel Xeon 636 trails slightly at 61,360 (0.7% lower). These deltas are within noise, meaning the i9-13900K effectively sits at parity with the fastest alternatives in its class.

Looking at threaded scaling, the 3DMark results tell a clear story. The single-thread score is 1,187, while 2-thread and 4-thread scores jump to 2,355 and 4,648 respectively. Scaling continues to 8,520 for 8 threads and reaches 11,201 for 16 threads. The max-threads score of 15,509 represents a 13.1x improvement over single-thread performance, which is strong but not perfectly linear — a reminder that even a 24-core chip cannot fully saturate every core on every workload. Cinebench results reinforce this: R15 multicore is 5,805.5 versus 318 single-core (18.3x), R20 multicore is 20,740 versus 2,927 single-core (7.1x), and R23 multicore is 38,271.5 versus 2,238.5 single-core (17.1x). The R20 scaling anomaly suggests some workloads hit memory or scheduling bottlenecks earlier than others.

Geekbench scores are equally telling: a multicore result of 22,820 and single-core of 2,628. PassMark multi-thread performance hits 58,589, with single-thread at 4,608. Specialized workloads show the chip's versatility: data compression scores 793,645, data encryption 46,609, extended instructions 46,477, floating-point math 151,562, and integer math 207,792. The physics score of 3,140 and random string sorting at 87,705 round out a chip that is clearly built for maximum throughput across heterogeneous workloads.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The i9-13900K's single-thread score of 1,187 in 3DMark and 4,608 in PassMark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance that can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,355 and 4-thread score of 4,648 show that even modest thread counts scale well, which matters for games that use 4-8 threads. With the RX 6700, this CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU at 1080p or 1440p high-refresh settings, as the GPU is more likely to be the limiting factor in most modern titles.

Streaming: The 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial parallel capacity for simultaneous game encoding and gameplay. A 3DMark 16-thread score of 11,201 and max-threads score of 15,509 indicate that the CPU can handle the background encoding workload without stealing significant resources from the game itself. The PassMark multi-thread score of 58,589 supports this, as does the data compression score of 793,645, which is relevant to encoding efficiency.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore at 38,271.5 places this CPU in a strong position for export and rendering tasks. The Geekbench multicore score of 22,820 reinforces that timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and final render output will all benefit from the high thread count. The 36 MB L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed project data close to the cores, reducing latency in multi-track edits.

3D rendering: The R20 multicore score of 20,740 and R23 multicore of 38,271.5 are the headline numbers here. Rendering engines that scale across threads will see near-linear gains up to 16 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that. The 3DMark max-threads score of 15,509 suggests the chip can handle complex scenes, though the RX 6700's 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 will also contribute in GPU-accelerated renderers.

Software development: Compilation workloads benefit from both high single-thread and multi-thread performance. The PassMark integer math score of 207,792 and extended instructions score of 46,477 indicate strong ALU throughput for code generation. The 32 threads allow parallel builds to proceed quickly, while the single-thread score of 4,608 ensures interactive responsiveness during editing and debugging.

Student and office work: This pairing is massively overqualified for typical productivity tasks, but the data supports smooth multitasking. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,628 ensures snappy application launches, while the multi-thread capacity means dozens of browser tabs, office documents, and communication apps can run concurrently without slowdown. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, so it will not be the bottleneck in any office workload.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 84, which indicates a system that is strong overall but not perfectly matched. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. This 17-point gap suggests the CPU is the more capable component in this pairing.

In gaming workloads, the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread of 1,187, PassMark single-thread of 4,608) is sufficient to drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 75th percentile position will cap maximum FPS in graphically intensive scenarios. The RX 6700's PassMark G3D score of 18,931 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,014 indicate it is a mid-range performer, so at 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor far more often than the CPU.

The CPU's 3DMark 16-thread score of 11,201 versus its max-threads score of 15,509 shows that scaling from 16 to 24 threads yields a 38.5% improvement. This suggests that games or applications using more than 16 threads will benefit from the full CPU, but most games use fewer threads, making the GPU the bottleneck in those scenarios.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is clearly the dominant component. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 and Geekbench multicore of 22,820 place the CPU in a tier where it can handle heavy rendering, compilation, and data processing tasks without external bottlenecks. The GPU's compute score of 8,240 in PassMark and OpenCL score of 97,841 in Geekbench are respectable but secondary for CPU-centric workflows.

Memory bandwidth is a shared resource. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, and the GPU has 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth from its 10 GB GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus. For gaming, the GPU's memory bandwidth is sufficient for its performance class, but the CPU's dual-channel memory configuration could bottleneck in memory-intensive physics or simulation tasks, though the 36 MB L3 cache mitigates this.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else but still need a capable GPU for gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. The 92nd percentile CPU and 75th percentile GPU mean that gamers at 1080p or 1440p will experience GPU-limited frame rates in most titles, which is acceptable if the goal is consistent high settings rather than maximum FPS. At 4K, the GPU will be the clear bottleneck, and users should expect to lower settings or accept lower frame rates.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit most from this pairing. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38,271.5 and PassMark multi-thread score of 58,589 provide the parallel horsepower needed for export and render tasks, while the GPU's 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 can accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and rendering in supported applications.

Software developers will appreciate the 24 cores and 32 threads for parallel builds. The PassMark integer math score of 207,792 and data compression score of 793,645 indicate strong performance for code compilation and packaging tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Students and small business users building a workstation for general productivity will find this system far more capable than needed, but the headroom means it will remain relevant for years. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures responsive daily use, and the multi-thread capacity handles occasional batch tasks like spreadsheet recalculations, PDF processing, or database queries without slowdown.

The GPU's end-of-life production status means this is not a future-proof choice for gamers who want to keep upgrading the graphics side. However, the CPU's Active production status and Socket 1700 platform mean the processor is still current, and users can upgrade the GPU later without changing the motherboard.

# Benchmark Performance

The Intel Core i9-13900K achieves an average benchmark score of 61,766, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are extremely close: the Core i9-13900T at 61,723 (0.1% lower), the Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus at 61,834 (0.1% higher), and the Core i9-13900KF at 61,841 (0.1% higher). The Intel Xeon 636 trails at 61,360 (0.7% lower). These margins are effectively negligible, meaning the i9-13900K is at the top of the desktop CPU hierarchy.

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 achieves an average benchmark score of 30,433, placing it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 70HX at 30,476 (0.1% higher), the NVIDIA Tesla M60 at 30,490 (0.2% higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30,095 (1.1% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti at 29,945 (1.6% lower). The GPU sits in a competitive mid-range tier, notably close to the RTX 3070 Ti but slightly ahead.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 84, which reflects a system where the CPU is near the top of its class and the GPU is solidly above average. The CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 15,509 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 38,271.5 are the standout numbers, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,014 and PassMark G3D of 18,931 define its gaming and rendering capabilities.

The CPU's Geekbench scores of 22,820 (multicore) and 2,628 (single-core) provide a balanced view of its throughput and responsiveness. The PassMark multi-thread score of 58,589 and single-thread of 4,608 corroborate these findings. Together, the CPU and GPU cover a wide performance envelope, but the CPU is clearly the dominant partner.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture using the Navi 22 chip, manufactured by TSMC on a 7 nm process. The die contains 17,200 million transistors across a 335 mm² area, yielding a transistor density of 51.3M per mm². The GPU features 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units, along with 36 dedicated ray tracing cores. The GPU has no tensor cores, which means AI-accelerated workloads rely on standard compute paths.

Memory configuration consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2000 MHz, translating to 16 Gbps effective. This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming but may become a constraint at 4K with high-resolution textures. The base clock is 1941 MHz, with a game clock of 2174 MHz and a boost clock of 2450 MHz. Pixel rate is 156.8 GPixel/s and texture rate is 352.8 GTexel/s.

Compute performance is rated at 11.29 TFLOPS for FP32 and 22.58 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). These figures place the GPU in the mid-range tier for compute tasks. Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,014, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 97,841, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 83,974. The PassMark G3D score is 18,931, with a GPU compute score of 8,240. DirectX performance in PassMark shows scores of 115 for DX10, 166 for DX11, 71 for DX12, and 250 for DX9, indicating that legacy API performance is stronger than modern API performance in that specific test.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1 and three DisplayPort 1.4a connections. The card is dual-slot, 267 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, requiring a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU is 450 W, and the GPU's TDP is 175 W. The production status is end-of-life, with a release date of June 8, 2021, and its predecessor is Navi, with successor Navi III.

The GPU's 75th percentile position and average benchmark score of 30,433 indicate it performs slightly above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, which scores 29,945 (1.6% lower). The RX 6700's nearest rival, the RX 6800, scores 30,095 (1.1% lower), meaning the RX 6700 actually outperforms it in this benchmark aggregate. For rendering, the 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 and 22.58 TFLOPS FP16 provide solid GPU-accelerated rendering performance in applications that support RDNA 2.0.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data, so all frame rate expectations below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,187 and PassMark single-thread of 4,608 indicate strong per-core performance for gaming. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 18,931 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,014 suggest it can handle modern titles at 1080p and 1440p with high settings. At 1080p, the GPU is likely the bottleneck in most games, with the CPU providing ample headroom. At 1440p, the GPU will be more stressed, and frame rates will drop accordingly. At 4K, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth will be limiting factors, particularly in texture-heavy titles.

The GPU's 36 ray tracing cores enable ray-traced effects, but the 11.29 TFLOPS FP32 compute means ray tracing performance will be modest compared to higher-tier GPUs. The PassMark DX12 score of 71 is notably low relative to DX11 (166), which suggests that the GPU's modern API performance may not fully reflect its DX11-era capabilities. This could translate to variable performance in DX12 titles.

For esports titles that are CPU-bound, the i9-13900K's high single-thread performance will drive very high frame rates, likely exceeding the GPU's output capability. For AAA titles, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and users should expect playable but not exceptional frame rates at high settings. The combined 84th percentile of the pairing suggests a system that can handle most games at 1080p high settings and many at 1440p medium-to-high settings.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900K, a 24-core, 32-thread desktop processor from the Core 13th Gen series, with the AMD Radeon RX 6700, a 10 GB GDDR6 GPU from the Radeon RX 6000 series. The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 84, indicating an above-average system overall.

The CPU is a top-tier desktop part, sitting at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61,766. It is unlocked (multiplier unlocked is true) and supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus. The GPU is a mid-range part at the 75th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30,433. The CPU is in Active production status, while the GPU is end-of-life.

This pairing is asymmetric: the CPU is near the top of the desktop hierarchy, while the GPU is solidly mid-range. This makes the system well-suited for CPU-intensive workloads like rendering, compilation, and video editing, where the GPU plays a supporting role. For gaming, the system is balanced toward 1080p and 1440p high-settings play, with the CPU ensuring that frame rates are not CPU-limited.

The CPU's release date is September 26, 2022, with a launch MSRP of $589. The GPU was released June 8, 2021, with no launch MSRP available. The CPU's 125 W TDP and the GPU's 175 W TDP combine for a total power draw of 300 W, which is manageable with a 450 W suggested PSU.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 84, placing this system above the majority of all CPU+GPU combinations.

Q: How does the Intel Core i9-13900K compare to its nearest rival, the Core i9-13900KF?

A: The i9-13900K has an average benchmark score of 61,766, while the i9-13900KF scores 61,841, a 0.1% difference in favor of the KF.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i9-13900K supports ECC memory, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and platform class?

A: The CPU uses Intel Socket 1700 and is a desktop-class processor from the Core 13th Gen series.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RX 6700 has an average benchmark score of 30,433, which is 1.6% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti's score of 29,945.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900K has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz and a base clock of 3.00 GHz.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel Core i9-13900K uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which is the LGA 1700 socket. This platform supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and the CPU includes ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), which is sufficient for a modern GPU and NVMe storage.

The CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the GPU's TDP is 175 W, for a combined 300 W. The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, which leaves headroom for the CPU and other components. The GPU requires a single 8-pin power connector, and the CPU uses the standard Socket 1700 power delivery.

For memory, the dual-channel bus supports both DDR4 and DDR5, so users can choose based on motherboard support and budget. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache and per-core L2 cache of 2 MB reduce memory bandwidth pressure, but dual-channel memory is still the platform standard.

The GPU is end-of-life, so the most sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU that fits the PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The CPU is still in Active production, so it remains a current part. A GPU upgrade would be the primary path to improve gaming performance, as the CPU has headroom to support a faster GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile position means it is not the bottleneck in this system, so upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant performance gains for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 for the CPU, but the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, so there is no immediate need to upgrade the bus interface. The power supply headroom of 450 W suggested for the GPU leaves room for a more power-hungry GPU in the future, though the exact wattage of a new GPU is not specified here. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which could extend the platform's useful life without a motherboard change.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Radeon RX 6700

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds