SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900K

61,766 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The Intel Core i9-13900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 represents a stark mismatch of priorities: a 24-core flagship desktop processor driving an entry-level 1080p graphics card. This combination is defined by an extreme CPU surplus and a GPU that sits near the middle of the pack, resulting in a system whose capabilities are almost entirely dictated by the graphics card. The data shows a desktop build with a combined percentile of 78, but the individual components tell very different stories—the CPU is a top-tier performer while the GPU is a modest 1080p solution. This analysis uses benchmark scores exclusively, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct testing of this specific CPU+GPU pairing.

For gaming, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is the limiting factor. With an average benchmark score of 19036 and a percentile of 63 against all GPUs, the data places it in the mid-range tier of graphics cards. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p gaming, but the card's raw compute power (8.928 TFLOPS FP32) suggests that frame rates at ultra settings will be moderate. In modern titles at 1080p ultra, the user can expect playable but not exceptional performance—likely averaging around 60 FPS in many games, though heavily demanding titles may dip below that threshold.

At 1440p, the RX 6600 will struggle to maintain high frame rates at ultra settings. The 63rd percentile ranking means the card outperforms roughly 63% of all GPUs, but the nearest rivals provide context: the NVIDIA RTX 4050 Mobile scores 19049 (0.1% higher), and the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 scores 19030 (0.0% delta). These are not high-end desktop cards, reinforcing that the RX 6600 is positioned for 1080p dominance, not higher resolutions. The CPU's performance is essentially irrelevant at these settings because the GPU will be the bottleneck in virtually every gaming scenario.

The i9-13900K's single-thread performance is exceptional—a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1187 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2238.5—which means it can feed frames to the GPU without constraint. However, the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15096 and its DirectX 12 score of 51 indicate that the graphics pipeline will saturate long before the CPU's potential is reached. For esports titles at 1080p with lower settings, the RX 6600 could deliver high frame rates, but the ultra-preset estimates remain modest.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the Intel Socket 1700, which supports the Raptor Lake architecture. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, giving builders flexibility in choosing memory. The CPU's TDP is 125 W, and the GPU's TDP is 132 W, with the GPU's suggested PSU rating at 300 W—meaning a quality 500-600 W power supply would provide ample headroom for this system as configured.

The i9-13900K uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the RX 6600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This means the GPU runs at half the lane width of the CPU's maximum, but PCIe 4.0 x8 is sufficient for the RX 6600's bandwidth needs. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed.

A sensible next upgrade path is straightforward: replace the RX 6600 with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking against all CPUs means it will not bottleneck any graphics card currently available. The data shows the i9-13900K has an average benchmark score of 61766, putting it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900T (61723) and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Xeon 636 (61360), while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus by 0.1% (61834) and the Intel Core i9-13900KF by 0.1% (61841). This is a CPU that can support multi-GPU upgrades, more memory, or additional storage without platform changes. The motherboard socket will limit future CPU upgrades to 13th-generation or compatible 14th-generation parts, but the current CPU is so strong that a GPU upgrade is the logical next step.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-13900K a good match for the AMD Radeon RX 6600?

A: No. The CPU scores in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs while the GPU sits in the 63rd percentile. The data shows a massive performance gap—the CPU's average benchmark score of 61766 dwarfs the GPU's 19036—meaning the GPU will limit gaming performance in nearly all scenarios.

Q: What resolution should I target with this build?

A: The GPU's 8 GB memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with its mid-range benchmark scores, indicate 1080p is the appropriate resolution. At 1080p ultra, the RX 6600 can deliver playable frame rates; at 1440p, performance will be inconsistent.

Q: Can the CPU handle a better GPU in the future?

A: Yes. The i9-13900K's 24 cores, 32 threads, and 92nd percentile ranking mean it has substantial headroom. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 and PassMark multithread score of 58589 show it can drive any current GPU without becoming a bottleneck.

Q: Does this system support overclocking?

A: The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, indicating overclocking support. The GPU's clocks (base 1626 MHz, boost 2491 MHz) are factory-set but the card is a standard dual-slot design with a single 8-pin power connector, leaving some overclocking headroom on the GPU as well.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 6600's average score of 19036 is statistically tied with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, 0.0% delta), 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (19049), 0.3% behind the NVIDIA Tesla K20m (19089), and 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954). These are not high-end cards, confirming the RX 6600's mid-range status.

Q: What is the power consumption profile?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 125 W and the GPU has a TDP of 132 W. The GPU's suggested PSU is 300 W, which means the total system draw is modest. A power supply in the 500-600 W range would provide comfortable headroom.

Q: Is this a good workstation for content creation?

A: For CPU-heavy workloads, yes—the i9-13900K's multicore scores are exceptional. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering, the RX 6600's 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 and 17.86 TFLOPS FP16 performance will limit speed. The CPU excels at encoding and compilation, but the GPU is a weak point for professional rendering.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU power above all else but have a limited budget for graphics. The i9-13900K's 92nd percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for developers compiling large codebases, researchers running multi-threaded simulations, or students in computer science fields who need massive parallel processing for coursework. The CPU's PassMark integer math score of 207792 and floating-point math score of 151562 indicate strong performance in data-heavy tasks.

For gamers, this build is aimed at 1080p resolution players who want the option to upgrade the GPU later. The RX 6600's 63rd percentile means it handles modern games at 1080p with medium-to-high settings, but the CPU ensures that any future GPU upgrade will be fully utilized. Small business workstations that run database operations or heavy spreadsheet calculations would benefit from the CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 32 threads, though the GPU is overkill for such tasks.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-bound workflows—such as video encoding using the integrated UHD Graphics 770's Quick Sync or software rendering—will find the i9-13900K's 24 cores invaluable. However, GPU-accelerated workloads will be slow. The build is less suitable for 1440p or 4K gamers, VR enthusiasts, or professionals using GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles or Octane, as the RX 6600's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for those demands.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, with 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports ECC memory, has an unlocked multiplier, and integrates UHD Graphics 770.

The benchmark data shows a processor that dominates multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 places it among the fastest consumer CPUs, and the PassMark multithread score of 58589 confirms this. The 3dmark_max_threads score of 15509 versus the 3dmark_8_threads score of 8520 shows excellent scaling across cores, though the scaling is not linear—doubling threads from 8 to 24 yields only an 82% increase in score, indicating some diminishing returns at the top end.

Single-thread performance is equally strong. The Geekbench single-core score of 2628 and PassMark single-thread score of 4608 demonstrate that this CPU handles lightly-threaded tasks with ease. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 1187 and 2-thread score of 2355 show that even at low thread counts, the architecture's high boost clocks deliver competitive performance. The 92nd percentile ranking against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 61766, places it alongside the Intel Core i9-13900KF (61841, 0.1% higher) and Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834, 0.1% higher), while ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900T (61723, 0.1% lower) and Intel Xeon 636 (61360, 0.7% lower).

For real workloads, this means the CPU can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, simulation, and compilation tasks at near-flagship speed. The PassMark data encryption score of 46609 and extended instructions score of 46477 suggest strong AES and AVX performance, useful for security and scientific computing. The data compression score of 793645 indicates rapid file archiving capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is based on the Navi 23 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 7 nm process with 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. It features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, and memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The base clock is 1626 MHz with a boost clock of 2491 MHz and a game clock of 2044 MHz.

The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking against all GPUs is modest. Its average benchmark score of 19036 places it in a tight cluster with older professional cards like the Quadro K6000 and Tesla K20m, as well as the mobile RTX 4050. The PassMark G3D score of 15096 and 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 1492 indicate that this is a card designed for 1080p gaming, not high-end rendering. The pixel rate of 159.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 279.0 GTexel/s are adequate for entry-level gaming.

For rendering workloads, the RX 6600's 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 and 17.86 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance is limited. The 28 ray tracing cores support hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the low overall compute power means ray-traced effects will be costly. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the 8 GB memory, but the 128-bit bus width is a bottleneck for memory-intensive tasks.

The GPU's TDP of 132 W and 1x 8-pin power connector make it power-efficient, and the suggested 300 W PSU confirms its low power draw. The dual-slot design with a 190 mm length fits in most cases. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 67623 and OpenCL score of 28850 show reasonable compute performance, but the Metal score of 88398 is irrelevant for a Windows desktop build.

Benchmark Performance

In benchmark scores, the Intel Core i9-13900K is a clear overachiever. Its average CPU benchmark score is 61766, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.7% of its score—the Intel Core i9-13900T (61723, 0.1% slower), Intel Core Ultra 7 270HX Plus (61834, 0.1% faster), Intel Core i9-13900KF (61841, 0.1% faster), and Intel Xeon 636 (61360, 0.7% slower). This indicates the i9-13900K is at the top of its performance tier, with no clear competition from other CPUs.

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 has an average GPU benchmark score of 19036, placing it in the 63rd percentile. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, 0.0% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (19049, 0.1% faster), NVIDIA Tesla K20m (19089, 0.3% faster), and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954, 0.4% slower). The GPU is effectively tied with these cards, all of which are older or mobile parts, reinforcing its mid-range positioning.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU's 92nd percentile versus the GPU's 63rd percentile creates a 29-point gap, which is significant. In CPU-bound workloads like Cinebench or PassMark multithread tests, the system performs at near-top-tier levels. In GPU-bound workloads like 3DMark Steel Nomad or PassMark G3D, the system performs at mid-range levels. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this split—the system is better than the GPU alone but far below the CPU's potential.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build class system pairing a flagship Intel Core i9-13900K with an entry-level AMD Radeon RX 6600. The CPU is a 13th-generation Raptor Lake processor with 24 cores and 32 threads, released on 2022-09-26 with a launch MSRP of $589. The GPU is a Radeon RX 6000 series part based on RDNA 2.0, released on 2021-10-12 with a launch MSRP of 329 USD. The combined percentile of 78 indicates the system outperforms 78% of all possible CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

The overall tier is defined by the GPU. While the CPU places in the top 8% of all processors, the GPU's 63rd percentile pulls the system's overall ranking down. This is not a balanced gaming rig; it is a workstation-class CPU with a placeholder GPU. The i9-13900K's 92nd percentile and the RX 6600's 63rd percentile mean the system's overall performance tier in gaming is approximately mid-range, while its productivity tier is near-flagship.

This pairing makes sense only in specific scenarios: upgrading an existing system's CPU without yet upgrading the GPU, or building a CPU-heavy workstation with a temporary graphics solution. For a new gaming build, the budget would be better allocated toward a stronger GPU and a weaker CPU, as the data clearly shows the GPU is the performance ceiling.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the GPU limits gaming performance, and the CPU limits nothing in this build. In gaming workloads, the RX 6600's 63rd percentile means it will be the performance ceiling at any resolution. The CPU's single-thread score of 1187 in 3dmark and 2238.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core ensures it can feed the GPU with frames without delay. The GPU's PassMark DirectX 11 score of 152 and DirectX 12 score of 51 illustrate that its graphics pipeline is modest, and the CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames.

In productivity workloads, the CPU dominates. The i9-13900K's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 38271.5 and PassMark multithread score of 58589 are orders of magnitude higher than the GPU's compute scores. For tasks like video encoding with the integrated UHD Graphics 770 or CPU-based rendering, the GPU is irrelevant. The GPU's 8.928 TFLOPS FP32 is low compared to modern cards, so GPU-accelerated tasks like machine learning inference will be slow, but the CPU's 32 threads can compensate in many workloads.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but telling. Without measured FPS data, the benchmark scores serve as proxies. The GPU's 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 1492 is a low-end result, suggesting 1080p gaming at ultra settings will yield frame rates in the 40-60 FPS range for demanding titles. The CPU's performance is so far ahead that upgrading the GPU to a card in the 90th percentile would immediately transform gaming performance, while the CPU would still have headroom. This is a system where the bottleneck is so pronounced that the CPU's potential is effectively wasted in gaming scenarios, but the platform is ready for a future GPU upgrade without touching the processor.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900K + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900K

AMD Radeon RX 6600

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds