SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. It is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node with a die size of 257 mm². The chip operates with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while its thermal design power is rated at 55 W. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, and it includes ECC memory support, a feature typically reserved for workstation-class platforms. The processor is socketed in Intel BGA 1964, indicating a soldered mobile design rather than a socketed desktop part. Integrated graphics are provided by UHD Graphics 770, which allows for basic display output without a discrete GPU.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 36 MB L3 cache. This large shared cache is critical for workloads that benefit from fast access to frequently used data across multiple cores. The processor also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes from the CPU alone, which provides high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest storage and discrete GPUs in a laptop chassis. The CPU was released on January 3, 2023, and remains in active production. Its launch MSRP is $668.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales impressively with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1,102 in single-thread, 2,143 in 2-threads, 4,012 in 4-threads, 6,857 in 8-threads, 8,929 in 16-threads, and 11,738 in max-threads. This scaling from single-thread to max-threads reflects a strong multi-core design that is well-suited for heavily threaded workloads. Cinebench results corroborate this: Cinebench R23 multicore score is 27,900, while single-core is 2,056; Cinebench R20 multicore is 14,836 and single-core is 2,094; Cinebench R15 multicore is 4,494.5 and single-core is 296.

PassMark results provide further insight into specific workload characteristics. The multithread score is 43,062, while single-thread is 4,081. Data compression scores 531,224, data encryption scores 32,130, extended instructions score 30,550, floating-point math scores 110,470, integer math scores 156,175, and physics scores 2,645. Random string sorting scores 59,199, and find prime numbers scores 190. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in integer-heavy tasks and floating-point operations, making it suitable for scientific computing, financial modeling, and content creation.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 46,098, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 with an average score of 46,062 and a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 with a score of 46,030 and a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G with a score of 46,187 and a delta of -0.2%, and the AMD EPYC 4364P with a score of 45,970 and a delta of 0.3%. These deltas are extremely tight, all within 0.3% of each other. This means the i9-13900HX is effectively performance-equivalent to these rivals in aggregate benchmark terms, despite having a different core configuration and architecture. The data suggests that for most real-world applications, users would be hard-pressed to notice a difference between this chip and its closest competitors.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is a laptop-class GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture, specifically using the AD106 chip. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process node with 22,900 million transistors on a die size of 188 mm², yielding a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The GPU has a base clock of 1,395 MHz and a boost clock of 1,695 MHz. Memory clocks run at 2,000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. This bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 1440p workloads, but it is not class-leading for high-resolution texture-heavy scenes.

The GPU features 4,608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It also includes 36 RT cores for ray tracing and 144 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads such as DLSS. The pixel rate is 81.36 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 244.1 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 15.62 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 15.62 TFLOPS on a 1:1 ratio. The thermal design power is 115 W, which is typical for a mobile workstation GPU. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop implementation. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern gaming and rendering APIs.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data pack, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, indicating it sits exactly at the median of the GPU performance distribution. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, which means no aggregate score is available for comparison. The nearest rivals list is empty, so there is no direct comparison data against other GPUs. This makes it challenging to position the GPU precisely relative to the broader market, but the 50th percentile suggests it is a mid-range mobile GPU. The absence of benchmark data also means that claims about its performance must be framed as estimates based on its architecture and specifications.

The RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is a successor to the Ampere-MW architecture and has a successor in Blackwell-MW, indicating it is part of a defined mobile workstation lineage. The GPU is in active production, released on March 20, 2023. Given its 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, it is suited for 1080p gaming with high settings and for entry-level 3D rendering and machine learning tasks. The 36 RT cores allow for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while the 144 tensor cores enable DLSS upscaling, which can boost frame rates in supported titles. However, the 128-bit memory bus and modest bandwidth may limit performance in memory-intensive scenarios such as 4K texture packs or large scene rendering.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture of this CPU and GPU pairing places it at the 70th percentile of all builds in the database. The CPU is the standout component, sitting at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. This discrepancy is significant: the processor is a high-end part, while the GPU is a mid-range part. The CPU's average benchmark score of 46,098 is well above the GPU's lack of a score, but the GPU's median position indicates it delivers average performance relative to the rest of the GPU market.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 27,900 in multicore and 2,056 in single-core. These numbers mean the CPU is approximately 13.6 times faster in multicore than in single-core, which is a strong scaling ratio and indicates excellent multi-threaded efficiency. The single-core score of 2,056 is competitive with modern desktop processors, meaning the CPU handles lightly threaded tasks like web browsing and office applications with ease. The multicore score of 27,900 is sufficient for demanding productivity workloads such as video editing and 3D rendering, though it does not reach the heights of the most extreme desktop parts.

The 3DMark results show a similar story. The max-threads score of 11,738 versus the single-thread score of 1,102 reveals a 10.6 times scaling factor, which is robust. The 16-thread score of 8,929 indicates that the CPU maintains high performance even when half the threads are active, which is relevant for gaming workloads that use up to 16 threads. The 8-thread score of 6,857 and 4-thread score of 4,012 show that the CPU remains strong at lower thread counts, ensuring good performance in less parallelized applications.

PassMark multithread score of 43,062 and single-thread score of 4,081 reinforce the CPU's balanced nature. The data compression score of 531,224 is particularly high, suggesting strong performance in file archiving and data transfer tasks. The integer math score of 156,175 and floating-point math score of 110,470 indicate that the CPU handles both integer and floating-point operations effectively, which is important for mixed workloads like software compilation and scientific simulation.

The GPU, with no benchmark scores, cannot be directly quantified in the same manner. However, its specifications suggest it delivers around 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. This is a moderate figure, roughly equivalent to a mid-range desktop GPU. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming, but it may become a bottleneck at 1440p in memory-heavy titles. The 50th percentile ranking confirms that the GPU is an average performer in the current GPU landscape.

The combined 70th percentile for the build indicates that the CPU's high performance lifts the overall system tier, even with a mid-range GPU. This pairing is likely to excel in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software development, and multi-tasking, while GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions will be limited by the GPU's capabilities.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between the CPU and GPU in this build. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This means the CPU is the stronger component by a wide margin, and it will likely be the bottleneck in GPU-intensive workloads, or rather, the GPU will be the limiting factor. In gaming, the GPU is typically the primary determinant of frame rates, especially at higher resolutions. With the GPU at the median performance level, games at 1080p should run well, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth will become constraints.

The CPU's high multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27,900, means it can feed the GPU with data faster than the GPU can process it in many scenarios. This is not necessarily a problem for gaming, where frame rates are often GPU-limited, but it does mean that the CPU's potential is underutilized in such workloads. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, the GPU is largely idle, and the CPU's 89th percentile ranking ensures strong performance.

The FPS scaling picture is estimated, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. Based on the GPU's 50th percentile position, users should expect frame rates around the median for a mobile GPU with 8 GB VRAM. This suggests playable frame rates at 1080p with high settings in most modern titles, but with the need to lower settings or use upscaling for more demanding games. The CPU's high single-thread score of 2,056 in Cinebench R23 ensures that CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation and AI in games will not be a limiting factor.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. For CPU-intensive tasks like 3D rendering, video editing, and software development, the CPU's 89th percentile ranking means the system will perform admirably. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking is less relevant for these tasks, though it can still accelerate GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that support it. For tasks that use both CPU and GPU, such as AI training or video encoding with GPU acceleration, the system will be limited by the GPU's mid-range performance.

The combined 70th percentile suggests that the build is well above average overall, but the CPU-GPU imbalance means that the system is better suited for CPU-heavy workflows than for high-end gaming. Users who prioritize gaming should consider a more powerful GPU, while those who prioritize productivity will find the CPU to be a strong asset.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a high-end processor.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average score of 46,098 is within 0.3% of its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G, and AMD EPYC 4364P, making them effectively performance-equivalent.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 36 RT cores, which provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 70, placing the build above average in the database.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM make 1080p gaming at high settings a viable option, with estimated frame rates around the median for mobile GPUs. The CPU's strong single-thread performance ensures smooth frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU is the limiting factor for high-refresh 1440p gaming.

Streaming: The CPU's 89th percentile ranking and high multi-threaded performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27,900, make it well-suited for streaming while gaming. The CPU can handle encoding and game logic simultaneously, though the GPU's tensor cores could also accelerate encoding in supported software.

Video editing: The CPU's strong multi-core performance and the GPU's 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 power make this system capable of handling 1080p and moderate 1440p video editing. The 36 MB L3 cache and high memory bandwidth support smooth timeline scrubbing and rendering, while the GPU accelerates effects and exports.

3D rendering: In CPU-based rendering, the i9-13900HX delivers excellent performance, with Cinebench R23 multicore scores of 27,900 indicating fast render times. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the GPU's 50th percentile position, but it is still capable for entry-level scenarios.

Software development: The CPU's high integer math score of 156,175 and data compression score of 531,224 make it excellent for code compilation and data processing. The 24 cores and 32 threads allow for parallel builds, reducing compile times significantly.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,081 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, web browsing, and document editing. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides basic display output, though the discrete GPU is available for more demanding tasks.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores and specifications of the components.

The CPU's high single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,102 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,056, indicates that it will not bottleneck games that rely heavily on CPU performance. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM suggest that 1080p gaming is the target resolution. At 1080p with ultra settings, users can expect frame rates around the median for mobile GPUs with similar specifications. This means playable frame rates in most titles, with some demanding games requiring settings adjustments.

At 1440p, the GPU's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will become limiting factors. Frame rates will likely drop below the 60 FPS threshold in many games, and users may need to lower settings to high or medium to achieve smooth gameplay. The GPU's 36 RT cores enable ray tracing, but enabling it will further reduce frame rates, making DLSS upscaling a necessary tool to maintain playable performance. The tensor cores can be used for DLSS, which can boost frame rates in supported titles.

For esports titles, the CPU's high single-thread performance will allow for high frame rates, potentially exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. However, the GPU's mid-range position means that the maximum frame rate will be limited by the GPU in most cases. Overall, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming with high settings, with the flexibility to handle 1440p at reduced settings.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900HX with the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation, both of which are mobile components designed for laptops. The CPU is a high-end processor, ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range part, ranking in the 50th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile is 70, indicating that the build is above average overall.

The CPU is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on Raptor Lake architecture, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz and a 36 MB L3 cache. It is designed for demanding workloads like content creation, software development, and scientific computing. The GPU is based on Ada Lovelace architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 4,608 shading units, making it suitable for 1080p gaming and entry-level professional graphics work.

The build class is laptop, meaning both components are designed for mobile use. The CPU's TDP of 55 W and the GPU's TDP of 115 W indicate that this is a high-performance laptop that will require adequate cooling. The overall tier is above average, with the CPU providing the majority of the performance headroom. This is a balanced-to-CPU-heavy build that excels in productivity tasks but is only average in gaming performance relative to the broader laptop market.

# Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for power users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p will find the system capable of running most titles at high settings, with the CPU ensuring smooth frame pacing and the GPU providing adequate graphics power. Gamers at 1440p should look elsewhere, as the GPU's mid-range position will require significant settings compromises.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the CPU's high multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27,900 indicates fast render times, and the PassMark integer math score of 156,175 supports efficient processing of large datasets. The GPU's tensor cores can accelerate AI-based workflows like denoising and upscaling.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads, which enable parallel compilation and testing. The high data compression score of 531,224 indicates efficient handling of large codebases and file operations. Students and office workers will find the system more than sufficient for everyday tasks, with the CPU's single-thread performance ensuring responsiveness in common applications.

Small business workstations that require CPU-intensive tasks, such as financial modeling or data analysis, will benefit from this build. The CPU's high integer and floating-point scores support these workloads, while the GPU provides adequate graphics acceleration for presentations and visualization. However, businesses that rely heavily on GPU-accelerated applications, such as CAD or machine learning, should consider a more powerful GPU.

In summary, this build is best suited for users who need a high-performance CPU in a laptop form factor and are willing to accept mid-range GPU performance. It is a strong choice for productivity-focused users, while gamers should target 1080p resolution.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds