SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on Intel's Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process node. It carries a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that places it firmly in the high-performance laptop segment. The chip uses Intel's BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered, non-upgradeable platform, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that scales strongly with thread count. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1,102 in single-thread, 2,143 in 2-thread, 4,012 in 4-thread, 6,857 in 8-thread, 8,929 in 16-thread, and 11,738 in max-thread workloads. This scaling pattern shows nearly linear gains from 1 to 8 threads, with diminishing returns as the thread count increases beyond 16 — a typical signature for a hybrid architecture that combines performance and efficiency cores. The 24-core design with 32 threads means the chip has 8 cores with hyper-threading and 16 cores without, which explains the non-linear scaling at higher thread counts.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture. The R23 multicore score of 27,900 is roughly 13.6 times the single-core score of 2,056, indicating excellent parallel scaling for a mobile part. The R20 multicore score of 14,836 and R15 multicore score of 4,494.5 follow the same trend, showing consistent performance across benchmark generations. The single-core R20 score of 2,094 and R15 score of 296 are competitive for a laptop CPU, suggesting strong per-thread performance for lightly-threaded workloads.

PassMark results add another dimension. The multithread score of 43,062 is substantial, but the real story is in the specialized workloads. Data compression scores 531,224, data encryption hits 32,130, and extended instructions reach 30,550. Floating point math posts 110,470, while integer math achieves 156,175. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,081 shows the chip's capability in everyday tasks that rely on one or two cores. Interestingly, the find prime numbers score of 190 is modest, which suggests that the CPU's performance in certain integer-heavy, branch-predictor-dependent tasks may not be as strong as its raw throughput numbers imply.

The CPU sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46,098. Its nearest rivals are strikingly close: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46,062 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46,030 (0.1% behind), and the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45,970 (0.3% behind). The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G scores 46,187, which is 0.2% ahead. These sub-1% deltas mean that in real-world usage, the i9-13900HX is statistically indistinguishable from its closest competitors. The performance tier is crowded, and the differences between these processors would be imperceptible outside of synthetic benchmarks.

The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The large L3 cache is critical for gaming and content creation workloads where data reuse patterns benefit from a spacious last-level cache. The UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU provides a fallback display output, though it is not intended for serious gaming or compute workloads. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a consumer mobile chip and suggests some workstation-oriented design considerations.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Intel BGA 1964 socket means the i9-13900HX is soldered to the motherboard. There is no CPU upgrade path in the traditional sense — the processor is permanently attached, and any future upgrade requires replacing the entire laptop. This is a critical consideration for buyers who value longevity and the ability to swap components over time. The platform supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving system integrators flexibility in memory choices, though the actual memory type is determined at the factory and cannot be changed by the end user.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 20 lanes available from the CPU. This provides ample bandwidth for the fastest available NVMe SSDs and discrete GPUs, though the GPU in this build uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which means the CPU's Gen 5 lanes are not fully utilized by the graphics card. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display output and light acceleration tasks, but it is not a substitute for the discrete GPU in this system.

The GPU carries a 110 W TDP and uses no power connectors — it is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) soldered to the board. The suggested PSU field is null, which means no specific power supply recommendation is provided. This is typical for laptop components where the power delivery is handled by the chassis and charging brick rather than a user-replaceable PSU. The CPU's 55 W TDP combined with the GPU's 110 W TDP suggests a total system draw that requires a substantial power adapter, but the exact wattage is not specified in the data.

For users considering this platform, the upgrade path is essentially closed. The laptop class means memory and storage are the only user-accessible upgrades, and even those may be soldered depending on the specific laptop design. The sensible next upgrade for this system is not a component swap but rather a full platform migration when the laptop reaches the end of its useful life. The production status of the GPU is listed as end-of-life, and the CPU is active, but the BGA socket ensures both are permanently paired.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 70, which places the system above the median but not at the top tier. The CPU's individual percentile of 89 is significantly higher than the GPU's percentile of 50, indicating a substantial imbalance in raw performance capability. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, while the GPU sits at the median of all GPUs. This creates a scenario where the CPU is capable of feeding far more data than the GPU can process in many workloads.

In CPU-bound tasks like data compression, encryption, and many productivity applications, the i9-13900HX will operate at its full potential. The PassMark multithread score of 43,062 and the R23 multicore score of 27,900 demonstrate that this chip can handle demanding parallel workloads without breaking a sweat. However, in GPU-bound scenarios such as gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh becomes the limiting factor.

The GPU's benchmark scores are all zero in the data, and it has no nearest rivals listed, which means the performance picture for this GPU must be inferred from its specifications rather than measured results. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is substantial, but the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and the 50th percentile ranking suggest it is a mid-range performer by modern standards. The CPU, by contrast, is at the 89th percentile. This mismatch means that in mixed workloads, the CPU will frequently be waiting on the GPU to catch up.

The FPS scaling data is absent — there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, and the data is not measured but estimated. This absence is notable because it prevents direct quantification of the bottleneck in gaming scenarios. However, the specification disparity suggests that CPU-heavy games at lower resolutions and settings will be constrained by the GPU, while GPU-light tasks like compilation or spreadsheet work will be constrained by the CPU's single-thread performance, which is strong at 1,102 in 3DMark single-thread and 4,081 in PassMark single-thread.

# Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need substantial CPU horsepower for parallel workloads but do not require top-tier GPU performance. The 89th percentile CPU places the i9-13900HX among the fastest mobile processors available, making it suitable for software developers who compile large codebases, researchers running simulations, and data analysts processing large datasets. The 24 cores and 32 threads, combined with the R23 multicore score of 27,900, provide the parallel throughput these workloads demand.

Content creators who work primarily with CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D modeling, and audio production will find the i9-13900HX well-suited to their needs. The PassMark data compression score of 531,224 and encryption score of 32,130 indicate strong performance in file archiving and security-related workloads. The 16 GB GPU memory is useful for holding large textures and datasets in memory, even if the GPU's raw compute throughput is modest.

Students in engineering, computer science, and scientific fields will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities for coursework involving simulations, data analysis, and programming. The laptop class form factor makes it portable enough for classroom and library use, while the CPU performance handles demanding academic software. Small business workstations that run virtual machines, database servers, or heavy spreadsheet models will also appreciate the core count and memory support.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means users who prioritize gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering should look elsewhere. The 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for moderate gaming and light GPU compute, but they do not compete with high-end gaming GPUs. This is a workstation-oriented configuration where the CPU is the star and the GPU provides competent but not exceptional graphics support.

# Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system will deliver playable frame rates at 1080p and possibly 1440p in less demanding titles, but the GPU's median percentile ranking limits performance in graphically intensive games. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,102 in 3DMark and 4,081 in PassMark ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads. The R23 multicore score of 27,900 leaves ample headroom for encoding while gaming, even with x264 encoding at medium or slower presets. The PassMark extended instructions score of 30,550 suggests good AVX2 and related instruction set performance, which is relevant for encoding workloads.

Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see strong CPU performance in tasks like timeline scrubbing, effect processing, and export. The R20 multicore score of 14,836 and the high PassMark integer and floating point scores indicate solid performance in these workloads. The 16 GB GPU memory is beneficial for holding video preview data and applying GPU-accelerated effects, even if the GPU's compute throughput is not exceptional.

3D rendering with CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles (CPU mode) or V-Ray will leverage the full 24-core, 32-thread configuration. The R23 multicore score of 27,900 and the max-thread 3DMark score of 11,738 demonstrate strong scaling in multi-threaded rendering workloads. The GPU can assist in viewport rendering and final-frame acceleration, but the CPU will carry the bulk of the rendering load.

Software development benefits from the CPU's parallel compilation capabilities. Large C++ or Rust projects will compile faster with 24 cores, and the PassMark multithread score of 43,062 reflects this capability. The single-thread performance is also adequate for IDE responsiveness and build tooling that is not fully parallelized.

Student and office work is served well by the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the integrated UHD Graphics 770 for basic display output. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,081 ensures snappy application launches and responsive spreadsheets, while the 24 cores handle any bursty parallel workloads without issue.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is a Turing-architecture GPU built on a 12 nm TSMC process. It uses the TU104B chip with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1035 MHz with a boost clock of 1530 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate.

Memory configuration consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a substantial memory pool that can accommodate large datasets, high-resolution textures, and multi-tasking between GPU-accelerated applications. The 256-bit bus width is typical for a mid-range GPU, and the bandwidth is sufficient for the target workloads but not exceptional.

The compute configuration includes 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU also features 48 ray tracing cores and 384 tensor cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering and AI inference workloads. The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 9.400 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 18.80 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio.

The GPU's TDP is 110 W with no power connectors needed — it is an IGP designed for soldered laptop integration. It uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface, which is one generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability, but the bandwidth is sufficient for this GPU's performance class. Display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning the specific ports vary by laptop model.

The GPU is end-of-life, with a release date of June 2020. Its predecessor is the Quadro Pascal-M, and its successor is the Ampere-MW. The percentile ranking of 50 places it exactly at the median of all GPUs, and the average benchmark score is zero because no benchmark data is available for this GPU. The absence of benchmark scores and nearest rivals makes it challenging to position this GPU precisely against competitors, but the specification sheet suggests a capable mid-range workstation GPU.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are extensive and paint a clear picture of its capabilities. The average benchmark score is 46,098, placing it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1,102 in single-thread, 2,143 in 2-thread, 4,012 in 4-thread, 6,857 in 8-thread, 8,929 in 16-thread, and 11,738 in max-thread. Cinebench scores include R15 multicore at 4,494.5 and single-core at 296, R20 multicore at 14,836 and single-core at 2,094, and R23 multicore at 27,900 and single-core at 2,056.

PassMark results show a multithread score of 43,062, single-thread score of 4,081, data compression at 531,224, data encryption at 32,130, extended instructions at 30,550, find prime numbers at 190, floating point math at 110,470, integer math at 156,175, physics at 2,645, and random string sorting at 59,199. These scores indicate a well-rounded processor that excels in both integer and floating point workloads.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data — all benchmark entries are empty, and the average benchmark score is zero. The percentile ranking of 50 is the only performance metric available, placing it at the median of all GPUs. This means the GPU's actual performance must be estimated from its specifications rather than measured results.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 70, which reflects the imbalance between the 89th percentile CPU and the 50th percentile GPU. The overall system tier is mid-to-upper range, with the CPU providing the bulk of the performance capability. The data is not measured — there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussions must be framed as estimates based on the benchmark scores and specifications.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 46,098, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46,062) and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46,030), 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G (46,187), and 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4364P (45,970).

Q: What memory types does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: How much memory does the GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the GPU is end-of-life, with a release date of June 2020. Its predecessor is the Quadro Pascal-M and its successor is the Ampere-MW.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 70, with the CPU at the 89th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this combination?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. The data is not measured, so all FPS figures must be treated as estimates.

# Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The data contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. All gaming performance figures must therefore be treated as estimates based on the benchmark scores and specifications of the components.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,102 and a PassMark single-thread score of 4,081, indicates that the processor will not be a bottleneck in most games. The 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks, streaming, and game logic. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest that the graphics card will be the limiting factor in gaming workloads.

Based on the GPU's specifications, including 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, this system can be expected to handle 1080p gaming at high to ultra settings in most titles, with 1440p gaming possible in less demanding games or at reduced settings. The 48 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, but the GPU's overall compute throughput limits the quality settings that can be used with ray tracing enabled. At 4K resolution, the GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will likely struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles, especially at ultra settings.

For competitive esports titles like CS:GO, Valorant, or League of Legends, the system should deliver high frame rates at 1080p, as these games are more CPU-bound and the i9-13900HX excel in single-thread performance. For AAA single-player games, the GPU will constrain performance, and players should expect to adjust settings to achieve smooth frame rates. These estimates are based solely on the benchmark scores and specifications in the data, not on any measured FPS results.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the Intel Core i9-13900HX, a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor from the Core 13th Gen series, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, a Turing-architecture workstation GPU with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The build class is laptop, meaning both components are soldered into a mobile chassis with no user-upgrade path.

The CPU is the dominant component in this pairing, ranking at the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 46,098. It is a high-end mobile processor that competes closely with the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G, and AMD EPYC 4364P, all within 0.3% of each other. The GPU, by contrast, ranks at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, placing it at the median of the performance distribution.

The combined percentile for this system is 70, reflecting a configuration where the CPU significantly outclasses the GPU. This is a workstation-oriented laptop designed for CPU-intensive tasks like software development, data processing, and content creation, where the GPU provides competent graphics support but does not lead the system's performance profile. The overall tier is upper-mid-range, with the CPU providing top-tier performance and the GPU delivering adequate but not exceptional graphics capability. The production status of the GPU is end-of-life, while the CPU remains active, but the soldered nature of both components means they are permanently paired for the life of the laptop.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds