SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
93%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

This laptop-class pairing combines a 24-core Raptor Lake-HX processor with a Turing-based professional mobile GPU, landing at the 70th percentile overall. The CPU is the dominant performer here — its 89th percentile ranking across all CPUs contrasts sharply with the GPU's 50th percentile standing. The data shows a system built for multi-threaded productivity first, with graphics capability that is competent but not class-leading by modern standards.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile's 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests it will handle esports titles at high frame rates, but demanding AAA games at maximum settings may struggle to maintain very high refresh rates. The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1102 and PassMark single-thread score of 4081 indicate strong per-core performance that won't bottleneck most gaming workloads.

Streaming: The combination of 24 cores and 32 threads provides ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and broadcasting. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 43062 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 indicate it can handle encoding workloads while maintaining gameplay performance. The GPU's 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for AI-enhanced streaming effects and ray-traced visuals, though the 50th percentile GPU ranking means encoding quality settings should be moderate.

Video editing: Multi-core performance shines here. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 14836 and PassMark integer math score of 156175 suggest smooth timeline scrubbing and fast export times in applications that leverage CPU encoding. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provides sufficient capacity for 4K video timelines, though the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest compared to newer workstation GPUs.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering workloads will benefit from the 36 MB shared L3 cache and 24 cores. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4494.5 and 3DMark max threads score of 11738 demonstrate strong sustained multi-threaded throughput. GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Octane will be limited by the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 531224 and data encryption score of 32130 indicate fast build times and efficient handling of large codebases. The 24-core configuration with 32 threads allows parallel compilation across many translation units, while the dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support provides adequate bandwidth for developer workloads.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking means it will breeze through spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing with minimal power draw at low utilization. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking is more than sufficient for office applications, though the 110 W TDP and laptop form factor mean battery life will be a consideration.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The build ranks at the 70th percentile overall, which places it above the median but below high-end desktop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Core i9-13900HX has an average benchmark score of 46098, placing it 0.1% ahead of both the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46062) and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030), while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G (46187) is 0.2% ahead.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The Core i9-13900HX boosts up to 5.40 GHz from a 2.20 GHz base clock, with a 55 W TDP.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core i9-13900HX supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile uses the Turing architecture (TU104 chip) fabricated on a 12 nm process by TSMC, with 13,600 million transistors.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is marked as end-of-life, with its predecessor being Quadro Pascal-M and its successor being Ampere-MW.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite reveals a clear picture of exceptional multi-threaded capability. The 3DMark max threads score of 11738 is 31.5% higher than the 8-thread score of 6857, demonstrating excellent scaling across cores. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 versus the single-core score of 2056 shows a 13.6x scaling factor across the 24-core configuration, which is strong for a mobile processor.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 46098 places it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030 (0.1% behind), and the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45970 (0.3% behind). The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G leads this group by 0.2% at 46187. This clustering indicates the i9-13900HX is well-matched against current mid-range and mobile flagship processors.

The GPU presents a stark contrast. With an empty benchmark array and an average benchmark score of 0, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile's 50th percentile ranking is based on its hardware specifications rather than measured results. The 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 293.8 GTexel/s texture rate suggest a mid-range GPU performance tier, consistent with its 50th percentile placement.

The combined percentile of 70 reflects the CPU's strength pulling the overall score upward, while the GPU sits at the median. The data indicates this is a CPU-limited system in terms of overall performance tier, with the GPU being the weaker component in the pairing.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a professional who needs exceptional multi-threaded CPU performance in a laptop form factor. Software developers compiling large projects will benefit from the 24-core, 32-thread configuration and the PassMark multithread score of 43062. The data compression score of 531224 and encryption score of 32130 indicate strong performance for database workloads and secure communications.

Content creators working with CPU-based rendering or video encoding will find the Cinebench R20 multicore score of 14836 and R23 score of 27900 compelling. The 36 MB L3 cache helps with large working sets common in creative applications. For those doing occasional GPU-accelerated work, the 16 GB VRAM provides sufficient capacity for large scenes, though the 50th percentile GPU ranking means it is not ideal for GPU-heavy workflows.

Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the CPU's performance for simulation and compilation tasks, while the GPU handles CAD and basic 3D modeling adequately. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support from the CPU, combined with professional-grade drivers of the Quadro series, make this a viable option for financial modeling or scientific computing.

Gamers should look elsewhere unless they prioritize CPU-bound titles at lower resolutions. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and the absence of measured FPS data suggest it is not optimized for high-refresh gaming.

CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die size. It features a hybrid configuration typical of Raptor Lake-HX, with performance and efficiency cores managed by the hardware scheduler. The base clock of 2.20 GHz boosts to 5.40 GHz under load conditions.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool is critical for multi-threaded workloads that share data between cores, helping explain the strong scaling seen in the 3DMark results. The dual-channel memory controller supports both DDR4 and DDR5, providing flexibility in system design.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1102 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2056 indicate strong per-core performance competitive with desktop processors. The PassMark single-thread score of 4081 confirms this. Multi-threaded scores scale impressively: the 3DMark max threads score of 11738 is 75.1% higher than the 8-thread score of 6857, showing the scheduler effectively utilizes all 24 cores.

The PassMark floating point math score of 110470 and integer math score of 156175 indicate balanced ALU and FPU performance. The extended instructions score of 30550 suggests strong SIMD throughput, beneficial for scientific computing and media processing. The physics score of 2645 and find prime numbers score of 190 are lower relatively, indicating some workloads may not scale perfectly to 24 cores.

At the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 46098, this processor sits firmly in high-end territory. Its nearest rivals show it is competitive with current-generation mobile and entry-level server chips, though the 0.1-0.3% deltas indicate the performance differences are negligible in real-world use.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is based on the Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is generous for a mobile workstation GPU and adequate for large datasets.

The GPU features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The 48 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration, while 384 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated workflows like denoising and DLSS. The base clock of 1035 MHz boosts to 1530 MHz, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). This configuration produces 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 18.80 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio).

The pixel rate of 97.92 GPixel/s and texture rate of 293.8 GTexel/s are modest by modern standards. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring broad API compatibility. The 110 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate this is a high-power mobile component designed for large laptops or mobile workstations.

At the 50th percentile of all GPUs, this is a median performer. The empty benchmark array means there is no measured data to compare against rivals. The lack of nearest rivals in the data further complicates direct comparison. Based on specifications alone, this GPU would be competitive with mid-range desktop GPUs from its generation but falls behind newer architectures.

The 384 tensor cores are notable for a mobile GPU, suggesting NVIDIA positioned this for AI inference workloads. The 48 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, though the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits the complexity of ray-traced scenes. The production status is end-of-life, with the successor being Ampere-MW, indicating this GPU has been superseded.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows. All gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores and hardware specifications.

The CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1102 and PassMark single-thread score of 4081 indicate it can feed frames to most GPUs without bottlenecking at 1080p. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggest it can handle esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant at high frame rates, likely exceeding 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings.

For AAA titles at 1080p ultra settings, the 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth provide enough memory capacity, but the 9.400 TFLOPS throughput will limit performance. Expect 60-80 FPS in moderately demanding titles, dropping to 40-60 FPS in the most demanding games. Ray tracing will be particularly taxing given the older Turing RT cores and the 50th percentile GPU ranking.

At 1440p, frame rates will drop further, with many titles falling below 60 FPS at ultra settings. The 256-bit memory bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth become limiting factors at higher resolutions. At 4K, this GPU is not suitable for high-refresh gaming, with most titles struggling to maintain 30-40 FPS at ultra settings.

The 110 W TDP and laptop form factor mean thermal throttling may further reduce gaming performance during extended sessions. The professional Quadro drivers are not optimized for gaming, potentially reducing performance compared to consumer GeForce drivers.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the Intel Core i9-13900HX processor with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile GPU. The CPU sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 50th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 70. This creates an asymmetric system where the CPU outperforms the GPU significantly.

The pairing is unusual: a high-end 24-core mobile CPU with a professional workstation GPU that is now end-of-life. The CPU's average benchmark score of 46098 places it among current mid-range and mobile flagship processors, while the GPU's 50th percentile ranking reflects its age and mid-range positioning.

This is not a balanced gaming system — the GPU is the clear bottleneck for graphics workloads. However, for CPU-intensive tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, the system is exceptionally capable. The 55 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP indicate substantial cooling requirements, typical of high-performance mobile workstations.

The 70th combined percentile suggests this system will outperform the majority of laptops on the market, but it does not compete with high-end desktop configurations. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking is the primary driver of the overall score, while the GPU holds the system back from higher placement.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates the GPU is the limiting factor in most workloads. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile creates a significant performance imbalance. In gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck at all but the lowest resolutions and settings, with the CPU's single-thread performance being more than sufficient.

For multi-threaded CPU workloads like rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the CPU is the star. The 3DMark max threads score of 11738 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 show exceptional throughput. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking will not limit these workloads, as they are CPU-bound.

In mixed workloads like video editing, the bottleneck shifts depending on the task. Timeline scrubbing and effects preview use the CPU heavily, while export can leverage both CPU and GPU. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for 4K timelines, but the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will slow GPU-accelerated effects compared to newer GPUs.

The FPS scaling from the CPU's 3DMark scores suggests it can maintain high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU's lack of measured data and 50th percentile ranking indicate it will cap frame rates in GPU-bound scenarios. The 0.1% delta between the CPU and its nearest rivals further confirms that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this system.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a soldered laptop platform, so CPU upgrades are not practical. The memory support for DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel configuration provides some flexibility, but the memory bus width is fixed at dual-channel. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, though the GPU in this system uses PCIe 3.0 x16, leaving bandwidth headroom unused.

The GPU is end-of-life with no successor in the current lineup (its successor is the Ampere-MW generation), making upgrades difficult in a laptop form factor. The 110 W TDP and IGP slot width mean any replacement GPU would need to match these power and thermal constraints. The lack of a suggested PSU rating makes power supply considerations unclear, but the combined 55 W CPU and 110 W GPU TDPs suggest a 200 W+ power delivery system.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests focusing on the GPU side of the system. A newer GPU with a higher percentile ranking would better balance the CPU's 89th percentile performance. However, the laptop form factor and BGA socket limit upgrade options. A more practical upgrade would be increasing memory to the maximum supported capacity, leveraging the DDR4/DDR5 support for improved performance in memory-intensive workloads.

The 36 MB L3 cache and 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide headroom for fast NVMe storage, which would improve load times and data-intensive workloads. For users needing more GPU performance, an external GPU enclosure via the PCIe connection could be considered, though the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface of the current GPU suggests the platform may not fully support PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 GPU bandwidth.