SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

93%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

Intel Core i9-13900HX

46,098 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The Intel Core i9-13900HX is a 24-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-HX variant. This is Intel's 13th generation Core i9 line, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The processor operates with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and boosts up to 5.40 GHz, which is a substantial single-core frequency for a mobile part. The cache hierarchy is generous: 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 allocation benefits workloads that repeatedly access a working set larger than typical desktop parts.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's positioning. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score reaches 27900, while the single-core score is 2056. The R20 results show 14836 multicore and 2094 single-core, and R15 shows 4494.5 multicore versus 296 single-core. These scores place the processor in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly nine out of ten processors in the database. The average benchmark score across all tests is 46098. The nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030 (0.1% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G scores 46187 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45970 (0.3% behind). This indicates that the i9-13900HX sits in a performance band where small percentage differences separate it from several modern competitors.

The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal how the CPU behaves under varying thread counts. With 2 threads, the score is 2143; with 4 threads, 4012; with 8 threads, 6857; with 16 threads, 8929; and with max threads, 11738. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads shows an 30.4% increase, while from 16 to max threads the gain is 31.5%. This suggests that the processor benefits from its full thread count but with diminishing returns beyond 16 threads, likely due to memory bandwidth and power constraints typical of mobile HX parts. The single-thread score of 1102 in 3DMark is modest relative to the multi-thread results, but the Cinebench single-core scores (2056 in R23) indicate strong per-core performance for everyday responsiveness.

PassMark tests add further context. The multithread score is 43062, single-thread is 4081, integer math is 156175, floating point math is 110470, data compression is 531224, data encryption is 32130, extended instructions score 30550, and random string sorting is 59199. The physics score is 2645 and find prime numbers is 190. These figures suggest that the CPU excels at integer-heavy and compression tasks, which are common in software compilation, database operations, and archive management. The floating-point performance is also strong, supporting scientific computing and certain rendering workloads. The extended instructions score indicates solid SIMD throughput for vectorized code.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the individual components, not from direct game testing.

Based on the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2056) and the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20355, this pairing should deliver high frame rates in most titles at 1080p. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile, which means it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU's percentile is 75th, so it is the more likely limiting factor for gaming performance. For an estimate, the GPU's average benchmark score of 29928 places it near the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (29945, 0.1% behind) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30095, 0.6% behind). These are desktop-class GPUs from a previous generation, suggesting the RTX 5070 Mobile can handle modern AAA games at high settings in 1080p and 1440p.

At 1080p with ultra settings, expect playable frame rates above 60 FPS in most titles, with lighter esports games reaching well above 100 FPS. At 1440p, the GPU's 8 GB GDDR7 memory and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth will be sufficient for many games, but some newer titles with heavy texture requirements may approach the memory limit. At 4K, the performance will drop significantly, and the GPU may struggle to maintain 60 FPS in demanding games. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache helps with frame pacing in CPU-bound scenes, but the GPU's 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is the primary driver. The pixel rate of 68.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 205.2 GTexel/s provide additional context for fill-rate-heavy effects.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's single-core score of 2056 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 20355 suggest this pairing can drive 144Hz displays at 1080p in competitive titles, though the GPU may become the limiting factor in more demanding games. The CPU's 2-thread score of 2143 in 3DMark indicates strong responsiveness for input processing.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The multithread score of 43062 in PassMark and Cinebench R23 multicore of 27900 suggest that x264 encoding at medium preset is feasible without significant frame drops. The GPU also supports NVENC, which offloads encoding work entirely, but the CPU alone can handle streaming duties.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 and PassMark data compression score of 531224 indicate strong performance for timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export tasks. The CPU's 36 MB L3 cache helps with large media files. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p and 1440p video editing, though 4K multi-layer timelines may push memory limits.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar tools will be strong, given the Cinebench multicore scores. The PassMark floating point math score of 110470 supports this. GPU-accelerated rendering will be limited by the 8 GB VRAM, which is sufficient for many scenes but may fail on complex ones. The GPU's 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI denoising, but the 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest for a modern GPU.

Software development: The CPU's high integer math score (156175 in PassMark) and multithread capability (43062) make compilation tasks efficient. The 32 threads allow parallel builds across many translation units. The 89th percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms most desktop processors in the database, which is beneficial for code indexing and test execution.

Student and office work: For everyday tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the CPU's single-thread performance (4081 PassMark single-thread) is more than sufficient. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 can handle basic display output, though the discrete GPU will be active in most scenarios. The 55 W TDP is relatively high for a laptop, but this is a desktop-class processor in a mobile form factor.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need a laptop that can handle both demanding multi-threaded workloads and modern gaming. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking makes it suitable for content creators who render video or 3D scenes on the go, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 27900 rivals many desktop processors. Software developers who compile large codebases will benefit from the 32 threads and high integer math performance (156175 in PassMark). The 36 MB L3 cache aids in reducing latency for repeated memory access patterns common in databases and scientific computing.

For gamers, the GPU's 75th percentile ranking means it is capable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but not for 4K at high settings. The 8 GB VRAM is a limitation for future titles with high-resolution textures. Users who prioritize maximum frame rates in esports titles will find this pairing sufficient, while those seeking ultra-quality AAA experiences at 4K should look elsewhere. Students and office workers will find the performance excessive for their needs, but the laptop's capability ensures longevity for demanding applications later in its life. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or data analysis tools will benefit from the CPU's thread count, though the GPU's compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute 8279) are secondary in such scenarios.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The Intel Core i9-13900HX has 24 cores and 32 threads.

Q: How does the CPU perform in Cinebench R23?

A: The multicore score is 27900 and the single-core score is 2056.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 29928, which is 0.1% behind the RTX 3070 Ti's score of 29945.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The i9-13900HX is in the 89th percentile, meaning it outperforms 89% of CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the memory support includes ECC capability.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82nd, indicating the pairing outperforms 82% of all builds in the database.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, using the GB206 chip manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The die contains 21,900 million transistors across 181 mm², giving a transistor density of 121.0 million per mm². The GPU has 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. It includes 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, which provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The base clock is 907 MHz with a boost clock of 1425 MHz, and the memory runs at 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a relatively narrow bus for a modern GPU, and the 8 GB capacity may become a bottleneck in memory-intensive workloads. The pixel rate is 68.40 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 205.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 throughput is 13.13 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), which is unusual for NVIDIA GPUs that typically have higher FP16 rates. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 20355, which places the GPU in the 75th percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 122238 and Vulkan score is 116960. PassMark sub-scores include DirectX 10 at 129, DirectX 11 at 192, DirectX 12 at 93, and DirectX 9 at 214. The G2D score is 896 and GPU compute is 8279. The average benchmark score is 29928. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (29945, 0.1% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (29783, 0.5% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30095, 0.6% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (30433, 1.7% ahead). This places the RTX 5070 Mobile in the same performance tier as older desktop flagship GPUs.

For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM is the primary constraint. Large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures may exceed this limit, causing performance degradation. The 36 RT cores support ray-traced rendering in applications like Blender and D5 Render, but the modest FP32 throughput (13.13 TFLOPS) means compute-heavy tasks will not be exceptionally fast. The tensor cores enable AI denoising and upscaling, which can improve interactive rendering performance. The 384.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p rendering but may bottleneck 4K workloads.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 75th percentile indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor in most workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 46098 is significantly higher than the GPU's 29928, and the combined percentile is 82, which is between the two individual percentiles. This suggests that the CPU has more headroom than the GPU, and applications that are GPU-bound will see the GPU as the bottleneck.

In gaming, the CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2056) is more than sufficient to feed the GPU's frame output. The GPU's 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 20355 PassMark G3D score will be the limiting factor in most titles. At 1080p, the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU may cap them below the CPU's maximum potential. At 1440p, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the bottleneck, while the CPU's utilization decreases. The 8 GB VRAM may cause stuttering in games that exceed this capacity, which is a GPU-side limitation.

In CPU-heavy workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU's 32 threads and high multithread score (27900 in Cinebench R23) will be the primary driver. The GPU's compute capabilities (8279 in PassMark GPU compute) are secondary, and the GPU will not bottleneck the CPU in these tasks. For hybrid workloads like real-time ray tracing in games, the CPU must handle game logic while the GPU handles rendering, and the balance is more even, but the GPU's RT cores and tensor cores are still the limiting factor for visual quality.

The FPS scaling between resolutions will follow the GPU's performance curve. Based on the GPU's percentile and rival scores, expect a significant drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a further drop to 4K. The CPU's performance is sufficient for even the highest frame rates the GPU can produce, so there is no CPU-induced bottleneck in gaming.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build featuring the Intel Core i9-13900HX processor paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile GPU. The build class is explicitly "laptop", meaning this is a mobile platform with integrated components. The CPU is a 13th generation Raptor Lake-HX part with 24 cores and 32 threads, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture part with 4608 shading units. The combined percentile of this pairing is 82, meaning it outperforms 82% of all builds in the database.

The CPU's 89th percentile ranking is higher than the GPU's 75th percentile, indicating that the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. The average benchmark scores reflect this: the CPU averages 46098 across all tests, while the GPU averages 29928. This pairing is best described as a high-end mobile workstation with gaming capabilities, rather than a pure gaming machine. The CPU is powerful enough for professional workloads, and the GPU is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but not for 4K ultra settings.

The release dates differ significantly: the CPU was released on January 3, 2023, while the GPU was released on April 14, 2025. This means the CPU is from an older generation, but its performance remains competitive due to its high core count. The GPU is from the newer GeForce 50-series, which introduces Blackwell architecture features. The build represents a pairing of a mature high-end CPU with a current-generation midrange-to-high-end GPU.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the Intel BGA 1964 socket, which is a ball-grid array package soldered to the motherboard. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in a traditional sense; users cannot swap the processor without replacing the entire motherboard. The socket is specific to Raptor Lake-HX mobile parts, so any upgrade would require a new laptop or motherboard. The CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, which provides flexibility for users who want to upgrade memory capacity or speed.

The GPU is also an integrated part of the laptop, with a slot width of "IGP" and no power connectors, indicating it is soldered to the motherboard. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, which provides ample bandwidth for the GPU's 8 GB GDDR7 memory. The display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop model. The GPU's TDP is 50 W, which is low for a discrete GPU, and the CPU's TDP is 55 W. There is no suggested PSU listed, but the combined TDP of 105 W plus other components suggests a laptop power adapter in the range of 150-200 W would be typical.

The memory support includes ECC, which is rare for mobile platforms and beneficial for workstations that require data integrity. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which can be used for high-speed storage or other peripherals. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 provides a fallback for display output if the discrete GPU is disabled. For a sensible upgrade path, users could increase memory capacity (since the CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5), upgrade storage via PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives, or use an external GPU enclosure if the laptop supports it. However, the CPU and GPU are both soldered and not replaceable, so the primary upgrade path is peripheral and storage.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are extensive. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 4494.5 and single-core is 296. In R20, multicore is 14836 and single-core is 2094. In R23, multicore is 27900 and single-core is 2056. The 3DMark scores scale from 1102 (single-thread) to 11738 (max threads). PassMark tests show multithread at 43062, single-thread at 4081, integer math at 156175, floating point math at 110470, data compression at 531224, data encryption at 32130, extended instructions at 30550, random string sorting at 59199, physics at 2645, and find prime numbers at 190. The CPU's average benchmark score is 46098, with a percentile of 89.

The GPU's benchmark scores include Geekbench OpenCL at 122238 and Vulkan at 116960. PassMark sub-scores are DirectX 10 at 129, DirectX 11 at 192, DirectX 12 at 93, DirectX 9 at 214, G2D at 896, G3D at 20355, and GPU compute at 8279. The GPU's average benchmark score is 29928, with a percentile of 75.

The combined picture shows a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU relative to their respective databases. The CPU's 89th percentile means it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs, while the GPU's 75th percentile means it outperforms three-quarters of GPUs. The combined percentile of 82 is a weighted average, indicating that the CPU's strength partially compensates for the GPU's more modest position. In practical terms, this means the build will excel in CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, while GPU-bound tasks like gaming will be limited by the GPU's performance tier. The CPU's nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of its average score, showing that it is at the top of its performance band. The GPU's nearest rivals are slightly more spread, with the RX 6700 being 1.7% ahead, but the RTX 5070 Mobile holds its own against desktop parts from previous generations.

Rate My PC: Intel Core i9-13900HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

Intel Core i9-13900HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds